Cost breakdown (as seen in solution tables)
==============

          ┃┓                 ┓
          ┃┃                 ┃
          ┃┃                 ┃
          ┃┣╸Outbound.W_fuel ┣╸Outbound.AircraftPerf.W╶⎨
          ┃┃ (3,731N)        ┃ (34,888N)
     Cost╺┫┛                 ┛
 (7,105N) ┃┓               ┓           ┓
          ┃┃               ┃           ┃
          ┃┃               ┃           ┣╸W_tilde╶⎨
          ┃┣╸Return.W_fuel ┣╸W_zfw     ┛ (22,549N)
          ┃┃ (3,374N)      ┃ (31,514N) ┣╸Wing.W╶⎨
          ┃┛               ┛           ┛ (8,965N)

Variable breakdowns (note the two methods of access)
===================

                           ┃┓           ┓
                           ┃┃           ┃
                           ┃┣╸C_Di      ┣╸WingAero.C_L²/A
                           ┃┃ (0.00565) ┃ (0.0169)
                           ┃┛           ┛
 Outbound.AircraftPerf.C_D╺┫┓
                  (0.0129) ┃┃
                           ┃┣╸WingAero.C_Dp
                           ┃┃ (0.00555)
                           ┃┛
                           ┃/┣╸S      ┣╸I_cap/t_cap
                           ┃/┛ (29m²) ┛ (0.00447m⁴)


          ┃┓
   Wing.W╺┫┃
 (8,965N) ┃┣╸I_cap/t_cap
          ┃┛ (0.00447m⁴)

Combining the two above by increasing maxwidth
----------------------------------------------

                           ┃┓           ┓
                           ┃┃           ┃
                           ┃┣╸C_Di      ┣╸WingAero.C_L²/A
                           ┃┃ (0.00565) ┃ (0.0169)
                           ┃┛           ┛
 Outbound.AircraftPerf.C_D╺┫┓
                  (0.0129) ┃┃
                           ┃┣╸WingAero.C_Dp
                           ┃┃ (0.00555)
                           ┃┛
                           ┃/┣╸S      ┣╸I_cap/t_cap
                           ┃/┛ (29m²) ┛ (0.00447m⁴)

Model sensitivity breakdowns (note the two methods of access)
============================

     ┃┓         ┓
     ┃┃         ┃
     ┃┃         ┣╸Outbound╶⎨
     ┃┃         ┃
     ┃┃         ┛
     ┃┃         ┓        ┓
     ┃┣╸Mission ┃        ┣╸AircraftPerf╶⎨
     ┃┃         ┣╸Return ┛
     ┃┃         ┛        ┣╸[2 terms]
 UAV╺┫┃         ┣╸SprintCondition╶⎨
     ┃┃         ┣╸R ≥ R_min
     ┃┃         ┣╸Outbound.AircraftPerf.W ≥ W_zfw + Return.W_fuel
     ┃┛         ┣╸Return.AircraftPerf.W ≥ W_zfw
     ┃┓          ┓
     ┃┃          ┃
     ┃┃          ┣╸Wing╶⎨
     ┃┣╸Aircraft ┛
     ┃┃          ┣╸W_tilde ≥ W_fixed + W_pay + Engine.W
     ┃┛          ┣╸W_zfw ≥ W_tilde + Wing.W
     ┃┣╸HeavyLandingCase╶⎨


          ┃┓      ┓
          ┃┃      ┣╸p ≥ 1.9
          ┃┃      ┛
          ┃┃      ┣╸2⋅q ≥ 1 + p
          ┃┃      ┛
          ┃┣╸Wing ┣╸0.423⋅w⋅tau²⋅t_cap ≥ I_cap⋅k_shear + 0.92⋅w⋅tau⋅t_cap²
          ┃┃      ┣╸M_rbar ≥ W_design⋅A⋅p/(24⋅W_ref)
          ┃┃      ┣╸N_lift⋅M_rbar⋅A⋅q²⋅tau⋅EI_ref/(S⋅I_cap⋅sigma_max) ≤ 8
          ┃┃      ┣╸W/f_wadd ≥ W_cap + W_web
 Aircraft╺┫┃      ┣╸W_cap ≥ 8⋅rho_alum⋅g⋅w⋅t_cap⋅S^1.5⋅nu/(3⋅A^0.5)
          ┃┛      ┣╸[4 terms]
          ┃┓
          ┃┃
          ┃┣╸W_tilde ≥ W_fixed + W_pay + Engine.W
          ┃┛
          ┃┓
          ┃┃
          ┃┣╸W_zfw ≥ W_tilde + Wing.W
          ┃┛
          ┃┣╸W_design ≥ W_tilde

Exhaustive variable breakdown traces (and configuration arguments)
====================================

          ┃┓        ┓
          ┃┃        ┃
          ┃┃        ┃
          ┃┃        ┃
          ┃┃        ┃
   Wing.W╺┫┃        ┣╸I_cap/t_cap
 (8,965N) ┃┣╸tau    ┃ (0.00447m⁴)
          ┃┃ (0.15) ┃
          ┃┃        ┃
          ┃┃        ┃
          ┃┃        ┛
          ┃┛        ┣╸t_cap


          ┃╤┯╤^┯╤╤┯╤^╤┓
   Wing.W╺┫╎│╎ │╎╎│╎ ╎┃
 (8,965N) ┃MKJHGFEDCBA┣╸I_cap/t_cap
          ┃╧┷╧^┷╧╧┷╧^╧┛ (0.00447m⁴)

 A   k_shear/w                                         ×2/m⁴, fixed
 B                                                     ^0.5
 C                                                     ×1.54
 D   tau                                              = 0.15
 E   1e-06⋅A⋅EI_ref⋅M_rbar⋅N_lift⋅q²/I_cap/sigma_max   ×1,546m²       [free factor]
 F                                                     ×0.125
 G   S                                                = 29m²
 H                                                     ^1.5
 J   2.67⋅g⋅nu⋅rho_alum⋅t_cap⋅w/A^0.5                  ×27.8kg/m²/s²  [free factor]
 K   W_cap                                            = 4,347N
 M   f_wadd                                            ×2, fixed

Permissivity = 2 (the default)
----------------

Wing.W (8,965N)
  which in: W/f_wadd ≥ W_cap + W_web (sensitivity +0.33)
  { through a factor of f_wadd (2, fixed) }
  breaks down into 2 monomials:
    1) forming 96% of the RHS and 96% of the total:
      W_cap (4,347N)
        which in: W_cap ≥ 8⋅rho_alum⋅g⋅w⋅t_cap⋅S^1.5⋅nu/(3⋅A^0.5) (sensitivity +0.32)
        breaks down into:
          { through a factor of 2.67⋅g⋅nu⋅rho_alum⋅t_cap⋅w/A^0.5 (27.8kg/m²/s²) }
          { through a power of 1.5 }
          S (29m²)
            which in: N_lift⋅M_rbar⋅A⋅q²⋅tau⋅EI_ref/(S⋅I_cap⋅sigma_max) ≤ 8 (sensitivity +0.35)
            { through a factor of 0.125 (0.125) }
            breaks down into:
              { through a factor of 1e-06⋅A⋅EI_ref⋅M_rbar⋅N_lift⋅q²/I_cap/sigma_max (1,546m²) }
              tau (0.15)
                which in: 0.423⋅w⋅tau²⋅t_cap ≥ I_cap⋅k_shear + 0.92⋅w⋅tau⋅t_cap² (sensitivity +0.37)
                { through a factor of 1.54 (1.54) }
                { through a power of 2 }
                breaks down into 2 monomials:
                  1) forming 93% of the RHS and 90% of the total:
                    { through a factor of k_shear/w (2/m⁴, fixed) }
                    I_cap/t_cap (0.00447m⁴)
                  2) forming 6% of the RHS and 6% of the total:
                    { through a factor of 0.92⋅tau (0.138) }
                    t_cap (0.00427)
    2) forming 3% of the RHS and 3% of the total:
      W_web (135N)

Permissivity = 1 (stops at M_rbar⋅tau instead of splitting it)
----------------

Wing.W (8,965N)
  which in: W/f_wadd ≥ W_cap + W_web (sensitivity +0.33)
  { through a factor of f_wadd (2, fixed) }
  breaks down into 2 monomials:
    1) forming 96% of the RHS and 96% of the total:
      W_cap (4,347N)
        which in: W_cap ≥ 8⋅rho_alum⋅g⋅w⋅t_cap⋅S^1.5⋅nu/(3⋅A^0.5) (sensitivity +0.32)
        breaks down into:
          { through a factor of 2.67⋅g⋅nu⋅rho_alum⋅t_cap⋅w/A^0.5 (27.8kg/m²/s²) }
          { through a power of 1.5 }
          S (29m²)
            which in: N_lift⋅M_rbar⋅A⋅q²⋅tau⋅EI_ref/(S⋅I_cap⋅sigma_max) ≤ 8 (sensitivity +0.35)
            { through a factor of 0.125 (0.125) }
            breaks down into:
              { through a factor of 1e-06⋅A⋅EI_ref⋅N_lift⋅q²/I_cap/sigma_max (0.0479m²) }
              M_rbar⋅tau (4,846)
    2) forming 3% of the RHS and 3% of the total:
      W_web (135N)
