Skip to content

Commit 2902c3e

Browse files
kuba-moogregkh
authored andcommitted
tls: fix handling of zero-length records on the rx_list
commit 62708b9 upstream. Each recvmsg() call must process either - only contiguous DATA records (any number of them) - one non-DATA record If the next record has different type than what has already been processed we break out of the main processing loop. If the record has already been decrypted (which may be the case for TLS 1.3 where we don't know type until decryption) we queue the pending record to the rx_list. Next recvmsg() will pick it up from there. Queuing the skb to rx_list after zero-copy decrypt is not possible, since in that case we decrypted directly to the user space buffer, and we don't have an skb to queue (darg.skb points to the ciphertext skb for access to metadata like length). Only data records are allowed zero-copy, and we break the processing loop after each non-data record. So we should never zero-copy and then find out that the record type has changed. The corner case we missed is when the initial record comes from rx_list, and it's zero length. Reported-by: Muhammad Alifa Ramdhan <ramdhan@starlabs.sg> Reported-by: Billy Jheng Bing-Jhong <billy@starlabs.sg> Fixes: 84c61fe ("tls: rx: do not use the standard strparser") Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250820021952.143068-1-kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
1 parent 3bcb702 commit 2902c3e

1 file changed

Lines changed: 6 additions & 1 deletion

File tree

net/tls/tls_sw.c

Lines changed: 6 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1864,6 +1864,9 @@ int decrypt_skb(struct sock *sk, struct scatterlist *sgout)
18641864
return tls_decrypt_sg(sk, NULL, sgout, &darg);
18651865
}
18661866

1867+
/* All records returned from a recvmsg() call must have the same type.
1868+
* 0 is not a valid content type. Use it as "no type reported, yet".
1869+
*/
18671870
static int tls_record_content_type(struct msghdr *msg, struct tls_msg *tlm,
18681871
u8 *control)
18691872
{
@@ -2107,8 +2110,10 @@ int tls_sw_recvmsg(struct sock *sk,
21072110
if (err < 0)
21082111
goto end;
21092112

2113+
/* process_rx_list() will set @control if it processed any records */
21102114
copied = err;
2111-
if (len <= copied || (copied && control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA) || rx_more)
2115+
if (len <= copied || rx_more ||
2116+
(control && control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA))
21122117
goto end;
21132118

21142119
target = sock_rcvlowat(sk, flags & MSG_WAITALL, len);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)