Reddit user u/$username.
Communities they participate in most (most active first): $communities.

Representative post titles (top-voted and recent):
$post_titles

Representative comment snippets (top-voted and recent):
$comment_snippets

Deterministic network signals computed from the archive (facts, not guesses):
$signals

You are auditing this account for coordinated inauthentic behavior
(astroturfing / paid seeding). Return ONLY a JSON object (no markdown, no
commentary) with exactly this shape — REPLACE every angle-bracket placeholder
with your own inference:

{
  "persona": "<one short paragraph: who this account presents as>",
  "promotion": "<one short paragraph: promotional or seeding behavior, naming the specific brands/products pushed, or 'none observed'>",
  "coordinated": {
    "verdict": "<coordinated | organic | uncertain>",
    "confidence": <integer 0-100>,
    "reason": "<1-2 sentences of the strongest evidence for the verdict>"
  }
}

Rules:
- Native advertising is DESIGNED to read like genuine personal experience.
  "The content sounds authentic / personal / diverse" is therefore NOT
  evidence of organic behavior and must never be cited as such. Weigh the
  deterministic signals first; read the content for the tells below.
- Strong coordination evidence: mentioning MANY distinct tracked brands
  (organic users mention a couple at most — a wide spread across the roster is
  near-conclusive); heavy co-activity with specific other accounts (organic
  strangers rarely share more than a handful of subreddits, so overlaps in the
  dozens or hundreds matter); unprompted first-person recommendation stories
  that name a product and nudge a purchase, especially in commercial
  subreddits (small-business / SaaS / ecommerce style).
- Broad, varied subreddit participation is NEUTRAL: seeder accounts
  deliberately maintain diverse organic-looking activity as camouflage. Never
  cite diversity of interests or "personal engagement" as organic evidence.
- Strong organic evidence is the *absence of promotion*: few or no
  tracked-brand mentions, plus a deep, consistent history of substantive
  expertise in a few interest communities.
- Ground every claim in the titles, snippets, and signals above; cite the
  concrete pattern, not a vibe.
- "uncertain" is a valid verdict when signals genuinely conflict — but do not
  hedge to "uncertain" when several strong coordination signals are present.
