Card guide
Historical review
agent.history_review runs a finite research task over the assigned laser’s recorded evidence.
Ask a bounded research question
Use normal and failed periods, provenance, counterexamples and explicit uncertainty to examine performance changes or propose a better method. The card uses the same pinned execution profiles and capability checks as agent.task, with the research instruction profile.
id: historical-review operation: agent.history_review uses: [] agent_execution: mode: required task_profile: analysis parameters: agent_card_id: gateway-agent execution_profile: analysis instruction_profile: research lookback_s: 86400 timeout_s: 1800 prompt: "Compare normal and degraded periods. Identify competing explanations and a validation plan."
gateway-agent is the example gateway card ID. Use the ID configured in your laser deck; the UI shows its role as Gateway agent. Display names do not change routing IDs.
The profile ID must already exist in Agent settings. A monitor can select this card through history_task_card_id, with both an interval and a minimum amount of new recorded evidence. Manual task admission uses the same registered-card and profile checks.
| Record | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Instruction and evidence bundle | Pins the task profile, objective, provenance and bounded input without silently copying an entire resident conversation. |
| History and knowledge tools | Read the assigned laser’s records and propose evidence-backed knowledge with limitations. A proposal does not change physical policy. |
| Task status and result | Record effective model/effort, capability evidence, completed analysis and unresolved questions. |
Interpret the result
Historical correlation is not proof of causation. Distinguish measurement validity, configuration changes, path dependence, selection effects and missing coverage. A useful proposal specifies the supporting records, counterevidence and a bounded validation experiment.
This card cannot select the adjustment instruction profile. Historical review does not start a lock, grant a new safety envelope or adopt an unverified threshold change. Proposed methods remain proposals until the appropriate reviewed operation validates them.
Read the recorded result and local report before applying its conclusions. Automatic notifications provide a short outcome and next action; complete evidence stays with the task. Unknown interrupted work is retained for inspection and is never automatically replayed.