### ftl_code_expert/prompts/research.py
VERDICT: PASS
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: Well-crafted prompt template that sets clear expectations, provides a concrete output format, and supplies the LLM with relevant context (belief metadata, repository tree, and already-explored files) to successfully infer target files.
---

### ftl_code_expert/prompts/__init__.py
VERDICT: PASS
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: Correctly imports and re-exports `RESEARCH_INFER_FILES_PROMPT` in `__init__.py` and maintains clean alphabetical exports in `__all__`.
---

### ftl_code_expert/cli.py:_get_explored_files
VERDICT: CONCERN
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: The function correctly extracts paths from files with `# File: ` headers in the first 5 lines. However, calling `read_text()` on the entire file before splitting lines is memory-inefficient if any entry files are large (e.g., from massive log dumps or automated system reports). Reading line-by-line using a `with open(...)` file handler and `f.readline()` in a 5-iteration loop is much more token-efficient and performance-friendly.
---

### ftl_code_expert/cli.py:_parse_review_candidates
VERDICT: CONCERN
CORRECTNESS: QUESTIONABLE
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: 1. No fallback or error handling is provided for `json.load(f)`. If a review file is malformed or corrupted, it will raise a raw `JSONDecodeError` rather than a user-friendly CLI warning.
2. The caller directly accesses `c["id"]` and `c["comment"]` without verifying that these keys exist in the parsed JSON objects. If a result object is missing either of these fields, the CLI will crash with a `KeyError`. Using `.get("id")` and `.get("comment", "")` is highly recommended at this system boundary.
---

### ftl_code_expert/cli.py:_parse_inferred_files
VERDICT: CONCERN
CORRECTNESS: QUESTIONABLE
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: The extraction logic via `re.finditer(r"\[.*?\]", response, re.DOTALL)` is elegant because it correctly validates elements as strings, but has a cross-platform path validation vulnerability in its usage.
Specifically, `f.split(os.sep)` is used in the caller to check for directory traversal (`".."`). If the tool runs on Windows (where `os.sep` is `\`) but the LLM returns standard POSIX paths (e.g. `["src/auth/../../etc/passwd"]`), `split(os.sep)` splits on `\`, resulting in `["src/auth/../../etc/passwd"]`. Since `".."` is not exactly in that list, the traversal check is bypassed. Using `Path(f).parts` is platform-agnostic and robust as it splits on both slashes correctly.
---

### ftl_code_expert/cli.py:research
VERDICT: CONCERN
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: UNTESTED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: 1. **No Tests**: There is no test coverage for the new `research` command or its pure utility functions (e.g., parsing, path validation).
2. **Robust Click Defaults**: Calling `ctx.invoke(propose_beliefs, auto_accept=True)` is fully correct. Click's `Context.invoke()` dynamically populates all missing options with their decorator-defined defaults when calling a `click.Command` object, so this will not raise a `TypeError`.
3. **Asymmetric/Questionable Error Handling**: `_run_file_topic` calls `sys.exit(1)` directly on error. This is a questionable practice for batch/loop helpers and forces `research` to wrap the call in a `try/except (SystemExit, Exception)` block to avoid process termination on a single file failure.
---

### SELF_REVIEW
LIMITATIONS:
- There is no unit/integration testing framework in the current workspace (test files list is empty and test count is 0), so verification of test-suite integration was limited to structural analysis of signatures and callbacks.
---

### FEATURE_REQUESTS
- Provide sample output/schema files of upstream tool outputs (like `reasons export` or `review-beliefs`) to aid in reviewing external parser boundaries.
- Automatically flag cross-platform file path traversal concerns (`os.sep` splits) when analyzing raw string manipulation of file paths.
---
