Meridian provides automated compliance assessments and recommendations, not legal advice. Final compliance determinations should be reviewed by qualified legal, compliance, or security professionals where required.
This repository features a multi-language structure using Go, Java, JavaScript, JSX, Python, TypeScript, along with web frameworks including Express, FastAPI, Next.js, and React. It integrates AI via the OpenAI SDK, mainly destined for runtime in Dockerized environments, controlled via GitHub Actions and GitLab CI.
Architecture: Web application with AI integration
Compliance Scope
Applicable Regulations
EU AI ActAI Governance & Responsible AI
Your repository deploys AI models or AI-powered systems.
Required: matched on ai_usage.
Not Applicable Regulations
DPDPA 2023Privacy & Data Protection
Excluded: 'primary_jurisdiction' does not match the condition required for this framework.
DPDPA Rules, 2025Privacy & Data Protection
Excluded: 'primary_jurisdiction' does not match the condition required for this framework.
GDPRPrivacy & Data Protection
Excluded: 'primary_jurisdiction' does not match the condition required for this framework.
RBI FREE-AI FrameworkAI Governance & Responsible AI
Excluded: 'regulated_financial_entity' does not match the condition required for this framework.
SEBI AI/ML GuidelinesAI Governance & Responsible AI
Excluded: 'regulated_financial_entity' does not match the condition required for this framework.
RBI Digital Payment Security ControlsPayments & Financial Security
Excluded: 'processes_payments' does not match the condition required for this framework.
PCI DSSPayments & Financial Security
Excluded: 'processes_payments' does not match the condition required for this framework.
RBI IT Governance & Risk ControlsCybersecurity & Operational Security
Excluded: 'regulated_financial_entity' does not match the condition required for this framework.
RBI NBFC IT FrameworkFinancial Sector Regulations
Excluded: 'regulated_financial_entity' does not match the condition required for this framework.
Access Control (CRITICAL) — Can the organization (as a third-country provider) demonstrate that it has appointed an authorised representative in the Union and that the representative fulfils all required tasks?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Data Subject Request Handling (HIGH) — Can the organization demonstrate that it has implemented appropriate data governance and management practices for training, validation, and testing data sets of high-risk AI systems?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Consent Management (HIGH) — Can the organization demonstrate that it has implemented appropriate safeguards when processing special categories of personal data for bias detection and correction?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Audit Logging (HIGH) — Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems have logging capabilities for automatic event recording throughout their lifetime?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Privileged Access Management (HIGH) — Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems are designed for effective human oversight throughout their use?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Full breakdown by effort below.
Recommended Actions
Quick Wins
Access Control (CRITICAL)
Can the organization (as a third-country provider) demonstrate that it has appointed an authorised representative in the Union and that the representative fulfils all required tasks?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Medium Effort
Data Subject Request Handling (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that it has implemented appropriate data governance and management practices for training, validation, and testing data sets of high-risk AI systems?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Consent Management (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that it has implemented appropriate safeguards when processing special categories of personal data for bias detection and correction?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Audit Logging (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems have logging capabilities for automatic event recording throughout their lifetime?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Privileged Access Management (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems are designed for effective human oversight throughout their use?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Backup And Recovery (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems are resilient to errors and have measures to address feedback loops?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Data Retention (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that it retains automatically generated logs for at least six months (or as otherwise required) for high-risk AI systems?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Records Of Processing (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that it has drawn up and maintains up-to-date technical documentation for high-risk AI systems as required by Annex IV?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Maker Checker (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems are designed for effective human oversight throughout their use?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Model Testing (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Business Impact Analysis (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems are resilient to errors and have measures to address feedback loops?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Data Lifecycle Management (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that it retains all required documentation for 10 years after placing a high-risk AI system on the market?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Grievance Redressal (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that it has procedures to handle complaints regarding infringement of the AI Act?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Policy Management (LOW)
Can the organization demonstrate that it has implemented appropriate data governance and management practices for training, validation, and testing data sets of high-risk AI systems?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Security Awareness Training (LOW)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems are designed for effective human oversight throughout their use?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Data Quality Management (INFORMATIONAL)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Strategic Initiatives
AI Risk Assessment (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems are designed for effective human oversight throughout their use?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Bias Detection (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Data Loss Prevention (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Privacy Impact Assessment (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that it has established, implemented, documented, and maintained a risk management system for high-risk AI systems throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Data Protection Impact Assessment (HIGH)
Can the organization demonstrate that it has established, implemented, documented, and maintained a risk management system for high-risk AI systems throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Physical Access Control (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Model Monitoring (MEDIUM)
Can the organization demonstrate that high-risk AI systems achieve appropriate levels of accuracy, robustness, and cybersecurity throughout their lifecycle?
Improves compliance posture for: EU AI Act.
Compliance Roadmap
Now · Quick Wins
Access Control
Next · Medium Effort
Data Subject Request Handling
Consent Management
Audit Logging
Privileged Access Management
Backup And Recovery
Data Retention
Records Of Processing
Maker Checker
Model Testing
Business Impact Analysis
Data Lifecycle Management
Grievance Redressal
Policy Management
Security Awareness Training
Data Quality Management
Later · Strategic Initiatives
AI Risk Assessment
Bias Detection
Data Loss Prevention
Privacy Impact Assessment
Data Protection Impact Assessment
Physical Access Control
Model Monitoring
Next Steps
Start with Top Priorities above, then work through the full Quick Wins/Medium Effort/Strategic Initiatives breakdown.
Technical Findings below show exactly where each gap was detected in your repository; export to PDF/HTML for a
shareable version, or JSON/SARIF to feed a CI pipeline.
Technical Findings (23)
CriticalEU_AI_ART_20_001 — Corrective Actions and Duty of InformationCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Audit Logging
CriticalEU_AI_ART_27_001 — Fundamental Rights Impact AssessmentCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_5_001 — Prohibition of Subliminal Manipulative TechniquesCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_5_002 — Prohibition of Exploiting VulnerabilitiesCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_5_003 — Prohibition of Social ScoringCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_5_004 — Prohibition of Predictive Policing Risk Assessments Based Solely on ProfilingCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_5_006 — Prohibition of Emotion Recognition in Workplace and EducationCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_5_007 — Prohibition of Biometric Categorisation for Sensitive CharacteristicsCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_5_008 — Restrictions on Real-Time Remote Biometric Identification for Law EnforcementCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
CriticalEU_AI_ART_73_001 — Reporting of Serious IncidentsCode Improvement Recommended
HighEU_AI_ART_86_001 — Right to Explanation of Individual Decision-MakingCode Improvement Recommended
Missing: Consent Management
Control Mapping Appendix
Raw control-level mapping (control IDs, clause text) is intentionally not inlined here — export to JSON or SARIF for the complete, machine-readable control mapping.