Using treg, build me a lead list: 50 US software companies with 51 to 200 staff that raised a Series A. For each one find the VP or Head of Marketing, find their work email, verify it, and pull the latest news so I have an opener.
$3.62 for 50 companies (from a real run). Email finder from $0.0245/found, verification from $0.00625/call.
| The old way | With treg | |
|---|---|---|
| What you pay for | Apollo $59/seat + Hunter $34/mo + Lusha $49/mo, and a credit pool that expires monthly | One prepaid balance. A found email is $0.0245, and a miss costs nothing |
| Keys | One account, one login and one API key per provider, spread across machines and .env files | One treg token. Every tool in the catalog answers to it |
| Picking a provider | You use whichever tool the team bought last year | catalog get lists all eleven company-search providers with price, measured success rate and median speed |
| Commitment | Seat minimums and annual contracts before you know whether the data covers your market | No subscription. Test the coverage for cents, then decide |
| The workflow | Export from the prospecting tool, paste into the enrichment tool, upload to the verifier, reconcile three CSVs | One agent run: find, enrich, verify, deduplicate: in one pass |
Paste this into the same agent. It installs the CLI, signs you in and registers the tools. One line, once. Already set up? Skip to step 2.
set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
Find 50 recently funded AI companies with 20 to 200 employees. Identify their head of growth or VP of marketing and verify their work email.
The agent finds the companies. catalog_search "search companies by size and funding" returns
eleven providers for that one job: and this is the sharpest price spread in the whole catalog:
| Provider | Cost per company | Success rate | Median |
|---|---|---|---|
| free | 100% (248 calls) | 3.2 s | |
| free | 100% (24 calls) | 1.7 s | |
| $0.0019 | 100% (339 calls) | 0.3 s | |
| $0.004992 per 25 results | not yet measured | : | |
| $0.025 | 70% (10 calls) | 3.2 s | |
| $0.026 per page | not yet measured | : | |
| $0.0299 | 100% (5 calls) | 0.7 s | |
| $0.38 | not yet measured | : | |
| own key only | : | : |
Same job. A 200× spread, and the cheapest option is free. Coverage differs, which is exactly why the price is not the only column: but nobody should pay $0.38 a record without knowing $0.0019 was on the table.
It finds the people. Two routes, and the cheaper one is usually the right one. If you want everyone
at a company, hunter.companies.emails returns the known addresses at a domain in a single call,
100% success across 597 calls, 0.4 s median, the fastest endpoint in this whole workflow. If you want
one named person, hunter.people.email.find costs $0.0245 and only charges when it finds someone
(100% across 582 calls, 1.4 s). Enrichment fills thin profiles: Hunter $0.0245 (356 calls, 0.3 s),
Apollo $0.026 (263 calls, 0.3 s), LeadMagic $0.025, Coresignal $0.392.
It verifies before you send: and this is the step that matters most. Verification is the single most-called enrichment endpoint on treg.to: 963 calls at 100% success. It runs at $0.00625 with LeadMagic or $0.01225 with Hunter. Finding an address is cheap; sending to a dead one costs you a domain reputation, which is why the teams already doing this at volume verify more than they search.
50 companies · 20 to 200 employees · funded in the window · pulled [date] COMPANY SIZE LAST ROUND CONTACT TITLE EMAIL STATUS <company> 84 <round, date> <name> VP Marketing <email> verified <company> 142 <round, date> <name> Head of Growth <email> verified <company> 37 <round, date> <name> Head of Growth : no match ... SUMMARY 50 companies · 47 contacts identified · 41 emails verified · 6 no match COST $[from your run] (misses were not charged)
Structure is illustrative. Values come from the providers, relayed unchanged.
Run on treg.to, 26 Aug 2026: the full 50-company workflow, one prompt, one key. Every figure is from that run's receipt, published with its CSV at /workflows/find-and-verify-a-lead-list.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Companies matched | 746 on Apollo; the first page of 50 taken, one charge of $0.026 |
| Rows with a usable domain | 47 of 50 |
| A named marketing lead found | 40 of 47 (27 by Findymail, 13 by LeadMagic's role finder) |
| Work email found | 31 of 40 (22 by Tomba, 9 by Hunter on Tomba's misses) |
| Verified deliverable | 27 of 31; 4 invalid; 0 unknown or catch-all |
| A news event for the opener | 29 of 31 (PredictLeads) |
| Wall clock, one call at a time | about 21 minutes |
| Total metered | $3.62 for 50 companies, or $0.13 per deliverable lead |
Where misses were free, and where they were not. Hunter and LeadMagic charge only on success, so their misses settled at $0.00. Findymail and Tomba list a free miss too, but neither reports the charge in its response, so treg.to settled their calls at the list rate, misses included: $0.56 of the $3.62. The receipt is the real total, not the rate card.
The honest read of this run: 27 deliverable leads from 50 companies is one market on one day, not a benchmark. The hit rate on your market is what the $1.00 free credit is for: run ten rows first and read your own receipt before you commit to a list.
Test whether your ICP even exists at the size you assumed. Company search starts free, so you can check the market before anyone signs a contract for the data.
Point the agent at your existing CSV of names and domains. It fills in titles, company size and verified emails, and marks the rows it could not resolve rather than guessing.
Verify every address before it enters the sequence. At $0.00625 a check, verifying a 2,000-row list costs about $12.50: and Hunter's finder does not charge you for the ones it cannot find.
Because this workflow is not one provider. Finding companies, identifying people and verifying email are three different products, and the vendor that is best at one is rarely best at the others: the table above is 200× wide for a single job. Holding accounts with all of them to find out is the expensive way to learn it. If you already pay for one, connect it and those calls route through your key, unmetered. treg.to is closer to OpenRouter for agent tools than to a data vendor: one base URL, one token, many providers behind it.
The credential is injected on the server. Your agent makes the real upstream request through treg.to's
/call/ endpoint; treg.to adds the key and relays the provider's answer back verbatim. No provider key
is ever written to your machine, your repo or your agent's context. Every call is recorded and attributed
to the token that made it.
Yes. Every endpoint has an id, and calling it by id calls that provider. If you want the choice made once
for the whole team, treg org pin <capability> --provider <provider> refuses calls to any other provider
of that capability.
(Often the right call here. Coverage varies by region and company size far more than it
varies by price, so once you find the provider that covers your market, pin it.)
Yes, and it takes precedence. Register the key once and every call to that provider routes through it; those calls are never metered against your treg.to balance. Your key always wins over treg.to's. (If your team already pays for Apollo or Hunter, this is the first thing to do. Those calls stop costing you anything on treg.to.)
treg.to does not silently reroute you. That is deliberate: only you know which inputs you actually hold,
so treg.to relays your request rather than rewriting it. Failed calls are not billed. If a call
succeeded upstream but the answer was lost coming back, an Idempotency-Key returns the stored result
without paying twice.
A found work email is $0.0245 with Hunter and a miss is free. Verification is $0.00625. Company search ranges from free to $0.38 a record depending on provider. The exact price is shown before the call, and treg.to adds no markup to what the provider charges. New teams start with $1.00 of free credit: enough for roughly 40 verified email lookups before you spend anything.
The installer registers treg.to's MCP server into Claude Code, Cursor and opencode automatically. Any MCP
client that supports the authorization spec can connect with OAuth. Anything that can run a shell command,
Codex included, can use the treg CLI or plain HTTP.
Clay is a visual table for GTM workflows. treg.to is a catalog of the same data providers Clay calls, exposed as tools your agent can use directly. If you already think in prompts rather than spreadsheet formulas, you skip the table and get the same waterfall enrichment in one paste. The providers are the same (Apollo, Hunter, Clearbit, etc.); the interface is your agent. Clay is not in the treg.to catalog because it is a workflow tool, not a data API.
Yes. The treg.to MCP server gives your agent access to Apollo, Hunter and the other enrichment providers
through one connection. Install once, and every provider in the catalog answers to it. See /llms.txt
for the setup line.
$1.00 of free credit on every new team. No credit card, no provider signup. treg.to is open source (AGPL).