pdf31776May 11,
2016 16:56:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse, Respondent. A14-1202, Supreme Court, May 11, 2016.MSC2016-05-03T09:53:28+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-11T11:53:44+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-05-03T14:49:54+00:00The totality of the circumstances supported the district court's conclusion that the police officer had a reasonable, articulable suspicion to justify the stop of the appellant's vehicle. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse, Respondent. A14-1202, Supreme Court, May 11, 2016.A14-12022016-05-11T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1202 Court of Appeals Lillehaug, J. Took no part, Chutich, J. State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Filed: May 11, ... pdf610761May 11,
2016 16:56:13 GMTenglishORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF EVIDENCE. ADM10-8047, Supreme Court Administrative Order, May ...2016-05-05T16:12:01+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-05-11T11:55:22+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe attached amendments to the Rules of Evidence are prescribed and promulgated to be effective as of July 1, 2016.ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF EVIDENCE. ADM10-8047, Supreme Court Administrative Order, May 11, 2016.ADM10-80472016-05-11T00:00:00-0500 May 5, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT ADM10-8047 ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF EVIDENCE ORDER fl Om:cEOF ArPB..lAlECcurrs ... pdf59130May 9,
2016 15:07:28 GMTenglishNita Posey, Relator, vs. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic ...2016-05-02T09:39:25+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-09T10:07:14+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-05-02T14:39:07+00:00When an employee of an employer informs the employer and the employers client that the employee is unable to complete a job assignment because of a family crisis and tells the employer that the employee will reengage with the employer upon resolution of the family crisis, the employee has not quit employment under Minn. Stat. § 268.095, subd. 2(a) (2014). Reversed.Nita Posey, Relator, vs. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1576, Court of Appeals Published, May 9, 2016.A15-15762016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1576 Nita Posey, Relator, vs. Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic ... pdf31705May 9,
2016 15:07:28 GMTenglishVaughn A. Veit, Appellant, vs. ProSource Technologies, Inc., et al., defendants and third party plaintiffs, Respondents,...2016-05-02T15:33:48+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-09T10:06:22+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-05-02T20:33:06+00:00A professional-negligence action based on an allegedly negligent property appraisal accrues, and the statute of limitations begins to run, at the time the appraisal is completed.Vaughn A. Veit, Appellant, vs. ProSource Technologies, Inc., et al., defendants and third party plaintiffs, Respondents, vs. Carlson Professional Services, Inc., et al., third party defendants, Respondents. A15-1430, Court of Appeals Published, May 9, 2016.A15-14302016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1430 Vaughn A. Veit, Appellant, vs. ProSource Technologies, Inc., et al., defendants and third party plaintiffs, ... pdf174206May 9,
2016 15:07:28 GMTenglishDavid John Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-1378, Court of Appeals ...2016-05-03T16:21:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T10:05:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A district court in an implied-consent proceeding lacks jurisdiction to hear an untimely petition to rescind the revocation of a drivers license, including where a driver is mentally incompetent at the time of the revocation. However, in a subsequent criminal proceeding, a driver may challenge the states use of such a revocation to enhance charges.David John Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-1378, Court of Appeals Published, May 9, 2016.A15-13782016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1378 David John Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. Filed May 9, 2016 ... pdf62472May 10,
2016 13:51:09 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson, Appellant. A15-506, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, ...2016-05-02T12:58:55+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-10T08:49:39+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges to conviction of third-degree assault. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson, Appellant. A15-506, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.A15-5062016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf31121May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Bobby Maurice McGary, Appellant. A15-734, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.2016-04-29T14:00:15+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-09T11:41:00+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-29T19:00:07+00:00Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Bobby Maurice McGary, Appellant. A15-734, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-7342016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf42390May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishIzell Wright Robinson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-692, Court of Appeals Unpublished,...2016-05-02T13:14:55+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T11:38:36+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Izell Wright Robinson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-692, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-6922016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf35470May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Paul Michael Baumchen, Appellant. A15-878, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, ...2016-05-03T09:09:47+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T11:44:10+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Paul Michael Baumchen, Appellant. A15-878, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-8782016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf116104May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Charles Adams, Appellant. A15-991, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.2016-05-03T14:14:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T11:58:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct and sentencing.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Charles Adams, Appellant. A15-991, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-9912016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf157686May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Hoshiar A. Sadiq, Appellant. A15-1059, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.2016-05-03T10:08:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T13:07:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Hoshiar A. Sadiq, Appellant. A15-1059, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-10592016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf26066May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Lamar Davis, Appellant. A15-1035, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.2016-04-29T10:35:20+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T12:05:46+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Lamar Davis, Appellant. A15-1035, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-10352016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf38570May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishTony Lee Love, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1180, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9,...2016-05-02T14:21:34+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T13:17:55+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges to convictions of aiding an offender to avoid arrest and aiding an offender accomplice after the fact, appellant argues that the postconviction court erred by ordering him to pay $55,000 in joint and several restitution because he was not the direct cause of the complainants loss and that it did not properly consider his ability to pay. Reversed and remanded for a restitution hearing.Tony Lee Love, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1180, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-11802016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf192323May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishPatrick Exner, Appellant, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1, Respondent. A15-1262, Court of ...2016-05-03T13:25:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T13:24:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the Minn. R. Civ. P. 50.01 dismissal of his Minnesota Government Data Practices Act and defamation claims against his former employer, respondent school district. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Patrick Exner, Appellant, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1, Respondent. A15-1262, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-12622016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf26119May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishThomas Ardell Gentry, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1314, Court of Appeals Unpublished,...2016-05-03T13:18:04+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-09T13:35:00+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-05-03T18:17:43+00:00Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Thomas Ardell Gentry, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1314, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.A15-13142016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf203070May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishValley Paving, Inc., Appellant, vs. Stanley Consultants, Inc., Respondent. A15-1321, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May ...2016-05-03T10:46:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T13:43:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.Valley Paving, Inc., Appellant, vs. Stanley Consultants, Inc., Respondent. A15-1321, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-13212016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 `This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf27500May 9,
2016 19:44:24 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rae-Ann Jacklyn Pollard, Defendant, Bail Bonds Doctor, Inc., Appellant. A15-1530, ...2016-04-28T11:08:09+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T14:43:08+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges the district courts denial of its motion for reinstatement and discharge of the bonds.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rae-Ann Jacklyn Pollard, Defendant, Bail Bonds Doctor, Inc., Appellant. A15-1530, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-15302016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf106025May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jayson Stanley Sam, Appellant. A15-674, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.2016-05-03T13:38:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T11:20:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jayson Stanley Sam, Appellant. A15-674, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-6742016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf179847May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Earl Eugene Ashmore, Appellant. A15-675, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.2016-05-03T15:54:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T11:32:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges drug-related convictions.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Earl Eugene Ashmore, Appellant. A15-675, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-6752016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf16095May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishFrederick Bradley Kellogg, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1124, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-28T10:42:49+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T13:11:53+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea.Frederick Bradley Kellogg, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1124, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-11242016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf35825May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Carmel Goblish, Appellant. A15-976, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, ...2016-04-29T10:09:21+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T11:52:55+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges to conviction of driving while imparied.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Carmel Goblish, Appellant. A15-976, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-9762016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf253515May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishMary Jo Delaney, Appellant, vs. Cragun Corporation, Respondent. A15-1333, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016.2016-05-03T16:48:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T13:46:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challeneges that employer discharged her because she reported sexual harassment, violating the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Reversed and remanded.Mary Jo Delaney, Appellant, vs. Cragun Corporation, Respondent. A15-1333, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-13332016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf94764May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishJerry Delaney, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1776, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-05-02T12:48:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T14:05:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Jerry Delaney, Jr., petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1776, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-17762016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107175May 9,
2016 19:16:50 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. N. L.-N. and A. L. P., Parents. A15-1906, Court of Appeals ...2016-05-02T14:04:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T14:13:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. N. L.-N. and A. L. P., Parents. A15-1906, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-19062016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf209186May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Thomas Michael Hallberg, Respondent. A15-1032, ...2016-05-03T08:56:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T12:01:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter. Reversed and remanded.In re the Marriage of: Marianne Ronate Reis, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Thomas Michael Hallberg, Respondent. A15-1032, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-10322016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf44266May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishLyndsey Rae Kidd, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1213, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-05-03T13:18:21+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-09T13:20:27+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-05-03T18:18:10+00:00Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Lyndsey Rae Kidd, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1213, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-12132016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf36577May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Tamara Lyn Renneke, n/k/a Tamara Lyn Fjoslien, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Dean Glenn Renneke, ...2016-05-03T15:01:29+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T13:05:10+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Dissolution of marriage matter and retirement accounts.In re the Marriage of: Tamara Lyn Renneke, n/k/a Tamara Lyn Fjoslien, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Dean Glenn Renneke, Respondent. A15-1037, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-10372016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf61507May 9,
2016 20:40:05 GMTenglishIn re the Custody of: S.K.S. Christian Schut, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Cynthia Schut, Respondent. A15-1489, Court of ...2016-05-02T14:51:44+00:00PScript5.dll Version 5.2.22016-05-09T15:38:32+00:00Acrobat Distiller 11.0 (Windows)Challenges denial of petition for relief under the Hague Convention, misapplied the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), and clearly erred by awarding respondent mother child support. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In re the Custody of: S.K.S. Christian Schut, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Cynthia Schut, Respondent. A15-1489, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-14892016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf197661May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishTerry L. Gates, et al., Respondents, vs. Michael L. Macken, et al., Appellants. A15-1289, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-05-03T13:24:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-09T13:31:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment in property dispute. Reversed and remanded.Terry L. Gates, et al., Respondents, vs. Michael L. Macken, et al., Appellants. A15-1289, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-12892016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf42403May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishGregory Lee Cobbins, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1643, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-05-03T12:44:31+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-09T14:03:09+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-05-03T17:44:20+00:00Challenges denial of petition for post conviction relief.Gregory Lee Cobbins, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1643, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-16432016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf51629May 9,
2016 19:16:49 GMTenglishDelmer V. Fladwood, et al., Appellants, vs. City of St. Paul, Respondent. A15-1791, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9,...2016-05-03T11:45:19+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-09T14:08:44+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-05-03T16:44:57+00:00Challenges grant of summary judgment based on vicarious official immunity. Reversed and remanded.Delmer V. Fladwood, et al., Appellants, vs. City of St. Paul, Respondent. A15-1791, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016. A15-17912016-05-09T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf325151May 5,
2016 14:13:00 GMTenglishORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. ADM08-8004, Supreme Court Administrative Order,...2016-05-02T16:26:31+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-05-05T09:09:52+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe attached amendments to the Minnesota Code of Judicial Conduct are prescribed and promulgated to be effective as of July 1, 2016.ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT. ADM08-8004, Supreme Court Administrative Order, May 4, 2016.ADM08-80042016-05-04T00:00:00-0500 May 2, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT ADM08-8004 ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Dm~EOF AJIPB.lAlECcuns ... pdf181645May 2,
2016 15:06:23 GMTenglishNJK Holding Corporation, Respondent, vs. The Araz Group, Inc., Appellant. A15-1628, Court of Appeals Published, May 2, ...2016-04-26T09:18:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T10:04:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A promise to forgive debt is a credit agreement within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 513.33 (2014) and requires a writing to be enforceable.NJK Holding Corporation, Respondent, vs. The Araz Group, Inc., Appellant. A15-1628, Court of Appeals Published, May 2, 2016.A15-16282016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1628 NJK Holding Corporation, Respondent, vs. The Araz Group, Inc., Appellant. Filed May 2, 2016 Affirmed Schellhas, ... pdf182026May 2,
2016 15:06:23 GMTenglishScott Peterson, Appellant, Roger Smith, Plaintiff, vs. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1711, Court of ...2016-04-26T16:34:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T10:05:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A human resources complaint process may qualify as a dispute resolution process under Minnesota Statutes section 363A.28, subdivision 3 (2014) and toll the running of the Minnesota Human Rights Acts one-year statute of limitations. Reversed and remanded.Scott Peterson, Appellant, Roger Smith, Plaintiff, vs. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1711, Court of Appeals Published, May 2, 2016.A15-17112016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1711 Scott Peterson, Appellant, Roger Smith, Plaintiff, vs. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota, Respondent. Filed May ... pdf190358May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jeremy Williams, Appellant. A15-640, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-26T13:41:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T10:34:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon causing substantial bodily harm, second-degree assault with a dangerous weapon, and possession of a firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jeremy Williams, Appellant. A15-640, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-6402016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf171670May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishViele Contracting, Inc., Appellant, vs. Performance Pipelining, Inc., Respondent. A15-875, Court of Appeals Unpublished,...2016-04-26T11:00:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T10:53:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges that the district court erred and abused its discretion by rejecting appellants voluntary-payment defense.Viele Contracting, Inc., Appellant, vs. Performance Pipelining, Inc., Respondent. A15-875, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-8752016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf42722May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishGordon Dodge, Appellant, vs. Charlotte Stack, Respondent. A15-968, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-20T09:45:38+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-02T11:11:34+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-20T14:45:27+00:00Shareholder dispute. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Gordon Dodge, Appellant, vs. Charlotte Stack, Respondent. A15-968, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.A15-9682016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf109549May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nammoun Khampanya, Appellant. A15-885, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-28T09:25:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T10:55:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of first-degree robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nammoun Khampanya, Appellant. A15-885, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-8852016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf115206May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishJulius Antwon Coleman, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1195, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-26T15:35:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:25:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Julius Antwon Coleman, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1195, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-11952016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf173524May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Hobart Alvin Huffman, Appellant. A15-917, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-21T14:27:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:02:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of second-degree driving while impaired (DWI) and child endangerment. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Hobart Alvin Huffman, Appellant. A15-917, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-9172016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf282367May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishAutumn Ridge Landscaping, Inc., Relator, vs. Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1305, ...2016-04-26T15:28:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:58:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Relator-employer challenges the decision by an unemployment-law judge (ULJ) that respondent Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) correctly calculated relators unemployment-insurance (UI) tax rates for 2013, 2014, and 2015.Autumn Ridge Landscaping, Inc., Relator, vs. Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1305, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-13052016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf165271May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Walter Wayne Urban, Appellant. A15-1236, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-20T13:49:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:39:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of domestic assault. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Walter Wayne Urban, Appellant. A15-1236, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-12362016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf246344May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishRandal V. Johnson, et al., Respondents, vs. Robert A. Fischer, Appellant, County of Sibley, Respondent. A15-1315, Court ...2016-04-26T10:22:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T13:23:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Boundary dispute between farmers.Randal V. Johnson, et al., Respondents, vs. Robert A. Fischer, Appellant, County of Sibley, Respondent. A15-1315, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-13152016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123283May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gregory Thomas Wandzel, Appellant. A15-1375, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, ...2016-04-26T11:21:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T13:30:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges drug-related convictions.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gregory Thomas Wandzel, Appellant. A15-1375, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-13752016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107168May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishMonda Thao, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1644, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, ...2016-04-27T11:59:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T13:51:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Monda Thao, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1644, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-16442016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf185642May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishKjellbergs, Inc., et al., petitioners, Appellants, vs. State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, ...2016-04-25T13:17:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T13:46:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts order dismissing petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the state to initiate condemnation proceedings.Kjellbergs, Inc., et al., petitioners, Appellants, vs. State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, Respondent. A15-1553, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-15532016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf118599May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Scott Leithe, Appellant. A15-853, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-26T10:40:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T10:42:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Scott Leithe, Appellant. A15-853, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-8532016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf97507May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishIn re the Civil Commitment of: Aron Michael VanWagner. A15-1620, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-26T13:54:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T13:48:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts denial of motions for relief from the judgment of civil commitment pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02.In re the Civil Commitment of: Aron Michael VanWagner. A15-1620, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-16202016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf176936May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jose Antonio Diaz-Arreguin, Appellant. A15-860, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2,...2016-04-21T13:32:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T10:48:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jose Antonio Diaz-Arreguin, Appellant. A15-860, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-8602016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf127407May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of: B. A. H., Child. A15-1670, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-25T14:28:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T13:59:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts restitution order. Reversed and remanded.In the Matter of the Welfare of: B. A. H., Child. A15-1670, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-16702016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf147547May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishRenee Rodgers, Relator, vs. Childrens Dental Services, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...2016-04-25T14:38:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T14:04:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Renee Rodgers, Relator, vs. Childrens Dental Services, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1839, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-18392016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf204000May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Brandon Cochran, Appellant. A15-930, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, ...2016-04-25T11:12:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:06:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of a controlled substance charge. Reversed. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Brandon Cochran, Appellant. A15-930, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.A15-9302016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf132006May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Erik Demetrius White, Sr., Appellant. A15-1040, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2,...2016-04-25T13:56:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:17:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of a controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Erik Demetrius White, Sr., Appellant. A15-1040, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-10402016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf102918May 2,
2016 19:06:12 GMTenglishMark Jeffrey Koelndorfer, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1193, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-26T16:25:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:21:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Mark Jeffrey Koelndorfer, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1193, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.A15-11932016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf128973May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of: N. P. S. A15-1403, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016.2016-04-25T16:31:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T13:39:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013We remand the denial of appellant N.P.S.s petition to expunge his juvenile records held by the Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Department of Human Services and his petition to reinstate his firearm rights. Remanded.In the Matter of the Welfare of: N. P. S. A15-1403, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-14032016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf192628May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishFreddie Lee Jenkins, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1256, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-26T11:32:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T11:55:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Freddie Lee Jenkins, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1256, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-12562016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf33446May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishNorth Star Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, vs. Julie Joy Kruger, as trustee for the heirs and next of kin of Todd ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-20T09:19:01+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-05-02T13:42:49+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-20T14:18:31+00:00Challenges grant of summary judgment. Reversed and remanded.North Star Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, vs. Julie Joy Kruger, as trustee for the heirs and next of kin of Todd Michael Kruger, Appellant, Michael Allen Dahl, et al., Defendants. A15-1420, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-14202016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf193614May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishMartin Bell, et al, Appellants, vs. Leonard Street and Deinard Professional Association, et al., Respondents. A15-1311, ...2016-04-25T14:37:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T12:00:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.Martin Bell, et al, Appellants, vs. Leonard Street and Deinard Professional Association, et al., Respondents. A15-1311, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-13112016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf146948May 2,
2016 19:06:13 GMTenglishLifespan of Minnesota, Inc., Respondent, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1. A15-1717, Court ...2016-04-20T13:33:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-05-02T14:01:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment in contract dispute. Reversed and remanded.Lifespan of Minnesota, Inc., Respondent, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Special School District No. 1. A15-1717, Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016. A15-17172016-05-02T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf302550Apr 27,
2016 15:35:24 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Debra Elise Altschuler, Registration No. 0389549. A16-193, Supreme Court ...2016-04-19T14:00:32+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-04-27T10:32:50+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Debra Elise Altschuler is publicly reprimanded.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Debra Elise Altschuler, Registration No. 0389549. A16-193, Supreme Court Order, April 27, 2016.A16-1932016-04-27T00:00:00-0500 April 19, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Debra Elise Altschuler, Registration No. 0389549 Al6-0193 ... pdf48448Apr 27,
2016 15:35:24 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of: C.J.H., Child. A14-1810, Supreme Court, April 27, 2016.MN Judicial Branch2016-04-26T10:26:00+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-27T10:34:10+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-26T15:21:51+00:00The juvenile court did not continue this case without adjudication under Minn. R. Juv. Delinq. P. 15.05 because that court never found that the allegations in the charging document were proven, and therefore the court of appeals erred when it concluded that the juvenile court's jurisdiction expired before respondent was adjudicated delinquent. Reversed.In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.J.H., Child. A14-1810, Supreme Court, April 27, 2016.A14-18102016-04-27T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1810 Court of Appeals Hudson, J. Took no part, Chutich, J. In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.J.H., Child, Filed: ... pdf183267Apr 25,
2016 15:15:28 GMTenglishSteven Duane Auers, personally, and as trustee for the next of kin of Karen Auers, deceased, Respondent, vs. ...2016-04-19T08:53:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T10:13:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20131. Pursuant to Swanson v. Brewster, 784 N.W.2d 264 (Minn. 2010), a negotiated discount of medical expenses is a collateral source subject to offset under Minn. Stat. § 548.251 (2014). 2. A subrogee that has negotiated a discount of medical expenses may not assert a subrogation right for the discount under Swanson, and the subrogation right is limited to the amount of the subrogees payment. 3. An injured plaintiff who purchases the subrogation interest of a health-insurance carrier is not entitled to recover the Swanson collateral-source offset under Minn. Stat. § 548.251 in his personal injury case. Reversed.Steven Duane Auers, personally, and as trustee for the next of kin of Karen Auers, deceased, Respondent, vs. Progressive Direct Insurance Company, Appellant. A15-1832, Court of Appeals Published, April 26, 2016.A15-18322016-04-26T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1832 Steven Duane Auers, personally, and as trustee for the next of kin of Karen Auers, deceased, Respondent, vs. ... pdf123585Apr 25,
2016 15:15:28 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.H., Parent. A15-1992, Court of Appeals Published, April 25, 2016.2016-04-20T09:41:43+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T10:14:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20131. The juvenile court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over visitation issues raised in post-permanency proceedings under Minn. Stat. §§ 260C.503-.521 (2014). 2. The juvenile court must use the best-interests standard of Minn. Stat. § 260C.511 when deciding whether to modify visitation in a post-permanency proceeding.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.H., Parent. A15-1992, Court of Appeals Published, April 25, 2016.A15-19922016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1992 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.H., Parent. Filed April 25, 2016 Affirmed Stauber, Judge Hennepin ... pdf225237Apr 25,
2016 15:15:28 GMTenglishStand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A., Respondent, vs. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin ...2016-04-19T15:04:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T10:10:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A patients assignment of a no-fault insurance claim to a medical provider is invalid and unenforceable if the applicable automobile insurance policy forbids such an assignment and if the patient makes the assignment before the medical provider bills the patient for medical services. Reversed.Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A., Respondent, vs. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Appellant, Michael Schultz, et al., Respondents, Ilya Knyazev, et al., Respondents, Thomas Bennerotte, et al., Respondents, Jed Benjamin Iverson, Respondent, Gabriel Johnson, Respondent, Michael Fay, et al., Respondents, Brad Ratgen, et al., Respondents, Landon Barakow, Respondent, Lebertha Porter, Respondent. A15-843, Court of Appeals Published, April 25, 2016. A15-8432016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0843 Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A., Respondent, vs. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin ... pdf116989Apr 25,
2016 15:15:28 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. D. R. F., Appellant. A15-1591, Court of Appeals Published, April 25, 2016.2016-04-13T12:54:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T10:12:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013An expungement petition based on the petitioners acquittal cannot be denied on the ground that the petitioner might at some future time commit an offense, be charged with a crime, and have a bail hearing at which the petitioners bench warrant history on the acquitted crime would not be available because it has been expunged: such a hypothesis does not constitute the clear and convincing evidence that the interests of the public and public safety outweigh the disadvantages to the petitioner of not sealing the record within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 609A.03, subd. 5(b) (2014). Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. D. R. F., Appellant. A15-1591, Court of Appeals Published, April 25, 2016.A15-15912016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1591 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. D. R. F., Appellant. Filed April 25, 2016 Reversed and remanded Connolly, ... pdf44027Apr 25,
2016 15:15:28 GMTenglishIn re the Matter of the Estate of: Brian K. Johnson, Decedent. A15-1383, Court of Appeals Published, April 25, 2016.Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-14T11:32:14+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-25T10:11:37+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-14T16:32:06+00:00When an estate is administered by a court-appointed personal representative, Minnesota Statutes section 524.3-813 (2014) authorizes the personal representative to compromise claims against the estate without the consent of all beneficiaries under the will.In re the Matter of the Estate of: Brian K. Johnson, Decedent. A15-1383, Court of Appeals Published, April 25, 2016.A15-13832016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1383 In re the Matter of the Estate of: Brian K. Johnson, Decedent. Filed April 25, 2016 Affirmed Randall, Judge ∗ ... pdf203033Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishIn re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent. A15-1033, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...2016-04-19T08:51:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:44:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Probate dispute. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, remanded.In re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent. A15-1033, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-10332016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf182953Apr 25,
2016 20:24:17 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Andrew John Wondrasek, Appellant. A15-337, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-19T13:14:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T10:42:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts denial of motion to suppress evidence and to dismiss.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Andrew John Wondrasek, Appellant. A15-337, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-3372016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123569Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rustin Kent Hartland, Appellant. A15-898, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-15T15:18:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T11:06:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of receiving stolen property, theft of a motor vehicle, driving after license cancellation, and two counts of first-degree driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rustin Kent Hartland, Appellant. A15-898, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-8982016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf156435Apr 25,
2016 20:24:17 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Estate of: Orville C. Jacobson, Deceased In the Matter of the Estate of: Hughie Eugene Keenan, ...2016-04-14T14:53:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T10:39:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Probate dispute.In the Matter of the Estate of: Orville C. Jacobson, Deceased In the Matter of the Estate of: Hughie Eugene Keenan, Deceased. A15-316, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-3162016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf184567Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Administrative Penalty Order of Fays Homestyle Catering. A15-967, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-18T10:49:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:33:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges a $10,000 administrative penalty imposed by the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Health (the MDH) based on relators failure to obtain a license to provide catering services.In the Matter of the Administrative Penalty Order of Fays Homestyle Catering. A15-967, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-9672016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf136992Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Arnold Lee Scott, Appellant. A15-661, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016.2016-04-14T15:33:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T10:52:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Arnold Lee Scott, Appellant. A15-661, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-6612016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf100399Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. William James Chestnut, Appellant. A15-1073, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25,...2016-04-20T09:37:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:53:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree unintentional murder and sentencing.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. William James Chestnut, Appellant. A15-1073, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-10732016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf142374Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishPreeti Kaur Rajpal, Appellant, vs. Regents of the University of Minnesota, et al., Respondents. A15-1207, Court of ...2016-04-14T15:18:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:08:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment in dismissal from medical school.Preeti Kaur Rajpal, Appellant, vs. Regents of the University of Minnesota, et al., Respondents. A15-1207, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-12072016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf183532Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishJamel Daniel Hoard, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1211, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-19T13:41:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:18:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Jamel Daniel Hoard, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1211, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-12112016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf129270Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Byron Dean Sayers, Appellant. A15-1345, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-20T09:21:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T15:05:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Byron Dean Sayers, Appellant. A15-1345, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-13452016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf166868Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishRojelio Castillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1176, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-18T13:28:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:06:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Rojelio Castillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1176, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-11762016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf29151Apr 25,
2016 20:24:17 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Deundrick Demon McIntosh, Appellant. A15-887, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-18T10:23:08+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-25T11:00:27+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-18T15:23:01+00:00Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Deundrick Demon McIntosh, Appellant. A15-887, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-8872016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf187286Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Morgan Lee Thompson, Appellant. A15-904, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-14T11:34:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:12:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aggravated-robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Morgan Lee Thompson, Appellant. A15-904, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-9042016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf120631Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lisa Lorraine Peltier, Appellant. A15-1324, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-15T12:02:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:49:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts calculation of jail credit toward sentence.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lisa Lorraine Peltier, Appellant. A15-1324, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-13242016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf45462Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishNicholas James Heinz, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-964, Court of Appeals ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-19T09:37:02+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-25T13:32:13+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-19T14:36:53+00:00Challenges an order sustaining the revocation of drivers license for refusing to submit to a chemical test.Nicholas James Heinz, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-964, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-9642016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf133575Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishRobert Anderson, Respondent, vs. State of Minnesota, Appellant. A15-1254, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016.2016-04-19T13:53:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:30:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013State challenges restoration of right to possess a firearm.Robert Anderson, Respondent, vs. State of Minnesota, Appellant. A15-1254, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-12542016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf122374Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishKaytee Hooser, et al., Respondents, vs. Keith Anderson, Appellant. A15-1738, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-15T10:27:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T15:20:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Landlord-tenant dispute.Kaytee Hooser, et al., Respondents, vs. Keith Anderson, Appellant. A15-1738, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-17382016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf116193Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph Ray Burrell, Appellant. A15-1005, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-20T09:32:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:36:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges drug related convictions.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph Ray Burrell, Appellant. A15-1005, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-10052016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf31133Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishClarinda Low, Appellant, vs. Travis Russell Yorek, Respondent. A15-1107, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016.Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-18T09:36:50+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-25T13:57:26+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-18T14:36:38+00:00Appellant argues that the district court erred by issuing an order adopting the parties agreement and later refusing to vacate that order.Clarinda Low, Appellant, vs. Travis Russell Yorek, Respondent. A15-1107, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-11072016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf117473Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Scott Anthony Hebert, Appellant. A15-1121, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-19T13:27:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:59:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion for a downward dispositional departure from the presumptive sentencing guidelines range.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Scott Anthony Hebert, Appellant. A15-1121, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-11212016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf103442Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brian Robert Winsor, Appellant. A15-1056, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-18T13:26:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:49:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of stalking and violation of an order for protection. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brian Robert Winsor, Appellant. A15-1056, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-10562016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf172425Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. John Charles Kotten, Appellant. A15-1160, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-19T14:33:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:02:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of fourth-degree assault against a police officer, obstructing legal process, disorderly conduct, and trespass.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. John Charles Kotten, Appellant. A15-1160, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-11602016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf173272Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishAngela M. Schroeder, Relator, vs. Angel Eyes, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...2016-04-18T12:53:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:12:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Angela M. Schroeder, Relator, vs. Angel Eyes, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1208, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-12082016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf240174Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishRoxanne J. Soderholm, Respondent, vs. Olivia Forar, et al., Appellants. A15-1233, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...2016-04-20T09:28:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:22:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges that the district court erred in denying motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL).Roxanne J. Soderholm, Respondent, vs. Olivia Forar, et al., Appellants. A15-1233, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-12332016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf173397Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishScott Andren, Appellant, vs. James Woodhull, et al., Respondents. A15-1465, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-19T14:46:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T15:07:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment. Reversed.Scott Andren, Appellant, vs. James Woodhull, et al., Respondents. A15-1465, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-14652016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf29749Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Luke Brandon Scott, Appellant. A15-1815, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-19T09:18:44+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-25T15:22:20+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-19T14:18:37+00:00Challenges the district courts denial of motion to correct sentence for false imprisonment and first-degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Luke Brandon Scott, Appellant. A15-1815, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-18152016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf114574Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Henry Davila, Appellant. A15-1496, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016.2016-04-19T09:17:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T15:17:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges drug-related convictions.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Henry Davila, Appellant. A15-1496, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-14962016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf181802Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishRoger William Kuehn, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-1278, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-20T09:47:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T14:38:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges revocation of driver's license.Roger William Kuehn, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-1278, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-12782016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123011Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brandon Harley Johansen, Appellant. A15-1673, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...2016-04-13T14:07:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T15:19:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brandon Harley Johansen, Appellant. A15-1673, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-16732016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf139877Apr 25,
2016 20:24:18 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James William Kralik, Appellant. A15-914, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, ...2016-04-18T13:12:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-25T13:22:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of first-degree aggravated robbery, first-degree burglary, and second-degree assault. Affirmed in part, reversed in part.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James William Kralik, Appellant. A15-914, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 25, 2016. A15-9142016-04-25T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf421834Apr 20,
2016 16:25:22 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kristian Lee Oyen, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 386383. ...2016-04-13T13:28:01+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-04-20T11:18:14+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Kristian Lee Oyen is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota,.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kristian Lee Oyen, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 386383. A14-1384, Supreme Court Order, April 20, 2016.A14-13842016-04-20T00:00:00-0500 April 13, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1384 In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Kristian Lee Oyen, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf380684Apr 20,
2016 16:25:22 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Mark Alan Greenman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0228990. ...2016-04-13T13:49:30+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-04-20T11:19:27+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Mark Alan Greenman is suspended from the practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Mark Alan Greenman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0228990. A16-491, Supreme Court Order, April 20, 2016.A16-4912016-04-20T00:00:00-0500 April 13, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A16-0491 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Mark Alan Greenman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf1007568Apr 20,
2016 16:25:22 GMTenglishORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. ADM09-8006, Supreme Court Administrative Order,...2016-04-14T16:26:02+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-04-20T11:23:38+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe attached amendments to the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure are prescribed and promulgated to be effective on July 1, 2016.ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. ADM09-8006, Supreme Court Administrative Order, April 20, 2016.ADM09-80062016-04-20T00:00:00-0500 April 14, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT ADM09-8006 ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE fl OliiU: EOF API'B.L\ ... pdf431736Apr 20,
2016 16:25:22 GMTenglishORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. ADM10-8049, Supreme Court Administrative ...2016-04-14T16:33:01+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-04-20T11:22:22+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe attached amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure are prescribed and promulgated to be effective on July 1, 2016.ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. ADM10-8049, Supreme Court Administrative Order, April 20, 2016.ADM10-80492016-04-20T00:00:00-0500 April 14, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT ADMl0- 8049 ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE -I Om~IEOF APPB.J. ... pdf259046Apr 20,
2016 16:25:22 GMTenglishJ.D. Donovan, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. Minnesota Department of Transportation, et al., Respondents. A14-863,...2016-04-18T11:15:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-20T11:15:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The transport of asphalt cement from a commercial oil refinery to a contractors facility is not subject to the Prevailing Wage Act because the scope of hauling activities considered to be "work under the contract" under Minn. R. 5200.1106 (2015) is limited to hauling activities to, from, or on the site of a public works project. Reversed.J.D. Donovan, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. Minnesota Department of Transportation, et al., Respondents. A14-863,A14-1021, Supreme Court, April 20, 2016.A14-8632016-04-20T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0863 A14-1021 Court of Appeals Gildea, C.J. Dissenting, Lillehaug and Stras, JJ. J.D. Donovan, Inc., et al., ... pdf113195Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Casey James Pederson, Appellant. A14-2123, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...2016-04-11T10:42:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:00:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appeal from his conviction of fifth-degree drug possession and an 18-month prison sentence.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Casey James Pederson, Appellant. A14-2123, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A14-21232016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf121361Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Trevon Fuller, Appellant. A15-635, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.2016-04-12T11:42:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:55:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges his convictions of felony first-degree driving while impaired and gross misdemeanor driving after cancellation. Reversed.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Trevon Fuller, Appellant. A15-635, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-6352016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf166185Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishRonald D. Van Riper, Respondent, vs. Bonnie L. Roy, Appellant. A15-844, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.2016-04-12T16:22:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:54:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appeals eviction order.Ronald D. Van Riper, Respondent, vs. Bonnie L. Roy, Appellant. A15-844, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-8442016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf268319Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishMark Lanterman, et al., Appellants, vs. Michael Roman Afremov, Respondent. A15-729, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...2016-04-07T09:00:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:53:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellants challenge verdict in breach-of-contract claim. Reversed and remanded.Mark Lanterman, et al., Appellants, vs. Michael Roman Afremov, Respondent. A15-729, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-7292016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf285812Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishRebecca Lee Treptow, Respondent, vs. Brittany Ann Layland Vacko, Appellant. A15-1084, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-13T09:01:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:38:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Pro se appellant challenges the district courts issuance of a harassment restraining order (HRO).Rebecca Lee Treptow, Respondent, vs. Brittany Ann Layland Vacko, Appellant. A15-1084, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-10842016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf181615Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sheldon James Armstrong, III, Appellant. A15-924, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-07T10:09:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:46:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appeals conviction for attempted first-degree murder.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sheldon James Armstrong, III, Appellant. A15-924, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-9242016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf290438Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishJessica Mattson, Appellant, vs. City of Rushford, Respondent, Minnowa Construction, Inc., Respondent, State of ...2016-04-08T14:21:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:41:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges the summary-judgment dismissal of her negligence claims against respondents City of Rushford (Rushford), Minnesota State Department of Transportation (MNDOT), and Minnowa Construction, Inc. (Minnowa).Jessica Mattson, Appellant, vs. City of Rushford, Respondent, Minnowa Construction, Inc., Respondent, State of Minnesota Department of Transportation, Respondent, Edwards and Kelcey, Inc., et al., Defendants, Minnowa Construction, Inc., Third Party Plaintiff, vs. Eric Kaiser d/b/a Kaiser Concrete, Third Party Defendant. A15-1018, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-10182016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf144296Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mark Anthony Sanders, Appellant. A15-963, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...2016-04-12T13:35:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:48:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges his conviction of first-degree sale of a controlled substance.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mark Anthony Sanders, Appellant. A15-963, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-9632016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107998Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Shane Michener, Appellant. A15-1374, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18,...2016-04-12T13:47:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:37:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges his second-degree burglary conviction.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Shane Michener, Appellant. A15-1374, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-13742016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf140795Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. T. N., Parents. A15-1752, A15-1783, Court ...2016-04-12T14:22:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:25:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. T. N., Parents. A15-1752, A15-1783, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-17522016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf162843Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson, Appellant. A15-507, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...2016-04-11T14:01:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:50:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges his test-refusal conviction. Reversed.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Derrick Jacqueay Roberson, Appellant. A15-507, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-5072016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf148460Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kevin Maurice Williams, Appellant. A15-644, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...2016-04-12T17:24:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:59:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges conviction of two counts of second-degree aggravated robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kevin Maurice Williams, Appellant. A15-644, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-6442016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS ... pdf243813Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jeffrey Allen Bachman, Appellant. A15-1122, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...2016-04-07T08:50:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:26:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges conviction for driving under the influence of a controlled substance.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jeffrey Allen Bachman, Appellant. A15-1122, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-11222016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf198068Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Patrick James Buswell, Appellant. A15-804, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...2016-04-12T11:55:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:49:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges his convictions of being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm and possession of drug paraphernalia.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Patrick James Buswell, Appellant. A15-804, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-8042016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf115239Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric James Rutherford, Appellant. A15-834, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...2016-04-12T13:13:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:58:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appeal from his conviction of fifth-degree criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric James Rutherford, Appellant. A15-834, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-8342016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf133671Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dana Jerome Duncombe, Appellant. A15-1013, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...2016-04-12T14:35:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T13:57:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges his conviction of possession of a firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dana Jerome Duncombe, Appellant. A15-1013, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-10132016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf41446Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Renee Anita Vasko, Appellant. A15-1172, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-11T09:32:39+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-18T14:32:55+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-11T14:32:30+00:00Challenges her misdemeanor conviction of violating a municipal blight ordinance. Reversed.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Renee Anita Vasko, Appellant. A15-1172, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-11722016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 1 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS ... pdf132104Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishContinental Property Group, LLC, Appellant, vs. City of Wayzata, Respondent. A15-1550, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-12T12:17:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:33:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appeal from the citys denial of (1) a planned unit development concept plan, and (2) a height variance.Continental Property Group, LLC, Appellant, vs. City of Wayzata, Respondent. A15-1550, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-15502016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf43681Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishExcel Manufacturing, Inc., Appellant, vs. Todd Wondrow, et al., Respondents. A15-1325, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-12T09:39:38+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-18T14:34:55+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-12T14:39:29+00:00Appellant challenges the district courts summary-judgment dismissal of its lawsuit.Excel Manufacturing, Inc., Appellant, vs. Todd Wondrow, et al., Respondents. A15-1325, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-13252016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf157533Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.M.M., D.M.P. and W.A.W., Parents. A15-1905, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-12T09:15:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:40:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.M.M., D.M.P. and W.A.W., Parents. A15-1905, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-19052016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf188663Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishFern Hill Place Retail Association, Inc., Appellant, vs. Fern Hill Place Homeowners Association, Inc., Respondent. ...2016-04-11T14:09:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:42:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant retail association challenges the district court's denial of its motion to vacate an arbitration award.Fern Hill Place Retail Association, Inc., Appellant, vs. Fern Hill Place Homeowners Association, Inc., Respondent. A15-1318, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-13182016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf104914Apr 18,
2016 19:43:23 GMTenglishAdrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Sandi Weigum, Appellant. A15-1440, Court of ...2016-04-12T09:04:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-18T14:36:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Pro se appellant challenges a harassment restraining order (HRO) granted to pro se respondent and her minor child.Adrianne Robbennolt and obo minor child, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Sandi Weigum, Appellant. A15-1440, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 18, 2016.A15-14402016-04-18T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf118693Apr 13,
2016 16:58:11 GMTenglishToby Earl Johnson, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-698, Supreme Court, April 13, 2016.2016-04-06T16:34:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-13T11:52:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Because the postconviction court properly construed appellant's motion brought pursuant to Minn. R. Crim. P. 27.03, subd. 9, as a petition for postconviction relief, and the petition was untimely under Minn. Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(a) (2014), the court did not err in denying the petition.Toby Earl Johnson, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-698, Supreme Court, April 13, 2016.A15-6982016-04-13T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0698 McLeod County Gildea, C.J. Took no part, Anderson, Chutich, JJ. Toby Earl Johnson, Appellant, vs. Filed: ... pdf262115Apr 13,
2016 16:58:11 GMTenglishDaniel L. Berglund, Relator, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent. A15-957, Supreme Court, April 13, 2016.2016-04-08T16:03:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-13T11:51:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Under the plain language of Minn. Stat. §§ 270C.33, 270C.62 (2014), the tax liability reported on a commissioner-filed return is assessed when it is "made by the commissioner," is "in writing," and is "entered into the records of the commissioner." To the extent that Minn. R. 8160.0620 (2015) requires a commissioner-filed return to include the Commissioner of Revenue's signature, the rule is inconsistent with the plain language of Minn. Stat. § 270C.62. The notices of commissioner-filed returns provided relator with notice of his tax liability, consistent with his due process rights under the United States and Minnesota Constitutions.Daniel L. Berglund, Relator, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Respondent. A15-957, Supreme Court, April 13, 2016.A15-9572016-04-13T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0957 Tax Court Gildea, C.J. Took no part, Chutich, J. Daniel L. Berglund, Relator, vs. Filed: April 13, 2016 ... pdf183633Apr 11,
2016 15:06:39 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Donald Hand. A15-1341, Court of Appeals Published, April 11, 2016.2016-04-06T09:37:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T10:05:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20131. If an individual committed as a sexually dangerous person (SDP) brings a motion pursuant to rule 60.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from an order for indeterminate commitment alleging that the Minnesota Commitment and Treatment Act (MCTA), Minn. Stat. §§ 253D.01 .36 (2014), is unconstitutional under Karsjens v. Jesson (Karsjens I), 109 F. Supp. 3d 1139, 1157 (D. Minn. 2015), motion to certify appeal denied, Civ. No. 11-3659, 2015 WL 4478972 (D. Minn. July 22, 2015), and therefore his commitment to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP) was unlawful ab initio, the motion is barred by the exclusive transfer-or-discharge remedies of the MCTA. 2. When an SDP seeks a temporary restraining order (TRO) or temporary injunction pursuant to rules 65.01 and 65.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure, respectively, and that person has failed to state a viable claim for relief from an order for indeterminate commitment, the district court does not abuse its discretion by denying such relief.In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Donald Hand. A15-1341, Court of Appeals Published, April 11, 2016.A15-13412016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1341 In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Kenneth Donald Hand. Filed April 11, 2016 Affirmed Reyes, Judge Crow ... pdf187268Apr 11,
2016 15:06:39 GMTenglishMerceil Burkhalter, Appellant, vs. Dedrick D. Mays, et al., Defendants, Building Trades Federal Credit Union, ...2016-04-05T10:53:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T10:03:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013I. The protection afforded to good-faith purchasers under Minnesota Statutes section 508.25 (2014) encompasses good-faith encumbrancers. II. A lender who secures a loan to purchase Torrens property is not disqualified from protection as a good-faith encumbrancer under Minnesota Statutes section 508.25 simply because the lender secured the loan after it became aware of circumstances on which the ostensible seller might eventually base an equitable-mortgage claim.Merceil Burkhalter, Appellant, vs. Dedrick D. Mays, et al., Defendants, Building Trades Federal Credit Union, Respondent. A15-1078, Court of Appeals Published, April 11, 2016.A15-10782016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1078 Merceil Burkhalter, Appellant, vs. Dedrick D. Mays, et al., Defendants, Building Trades Federal Credit Union, ... pdf199231Apr 11,
2016 15:06:39 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, ex rel., Branden Lee Pollard, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections, ...2016-04-04T13:18:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T10:06:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Under Minn. Stat. § 609.3455, subd. 6 (Supp. 2005), an offenders conditional-release term is not reduced by the time that the offender is incarcerated during the supervised-release term.State of Minnesota, ex rel., Branden Lee Pollard, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections, Respondent. A15-1580, Court of Appeals Published, April 11, 2016.A15-15802016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1580 State of Minnesota, ex rel., Branden Lee Pollard, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections, ... pdf110094Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Myles Ray Estes, Appellant. A15-660, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016.2016-03-31T15:49:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:19:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aggravated robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Myles Ray Estes, Appellant. A15-660, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-6602016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123820Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric Tyler Schwappach, Appellant. A15-624, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-05T12:51:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:16:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric Tyler Schwappach, Appellant. A15-624, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-6242016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf118919Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Carlos Maurice Harris, Appellant. A15-711, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-05T13:26:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:41:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of a firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Carlos Maurice Harris, Appellant. A15-711, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-7112016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf168611Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mark Anthony Givins, Appellant. A15-685, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-05T15:33:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:39:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of burglary.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mark Anthony Givins, Appellant. A15-685, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-6852016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf207337Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Patrick Charles Bonga, Appellant. A14-961, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-06T09:32:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T10:58:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Patrick Charles Bonga, Appellant. A14-961, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A14-9612016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf121648Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Dewayne Kelley, Appellant. A15-749, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-05T16:41:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:43:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of misdemeanor trespassing and disorderly conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Dewayne Kelley, Appellant. A15-749, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-7492016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf166783Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Benjamin Danton Newman, Appellant. A15-990, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-01T13:27:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T12:01:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Benjamin Danton Newman, Appellant. A15-990, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-9902016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf183473Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Marcus Anthony Mattox, Appellant. A15-825, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-01T09:47:43+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:54:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of convictions for felony domestic assault, terroristic threats, theft, and false imprisonment.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Marcus Anthony Mattox, Appellant. A15-825, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-8252016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf173765Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson, Appellant. A15-1001, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11,...2016-03-31T15:55:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T12:03:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aiding an offender, accomplice after the fact.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson, Appellant. A15-1001, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-10012016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf122196Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Charles ONeal Darby, Jr., Appellant. A15-1038, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...2016-04-05T14:10:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T12:08:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Charles ONeal Darby, Jr., Appellant. A15-1038, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-10382016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf122080Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Antonio Dupree Wright, Appellant. A15-955, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-05T14:02:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:58:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony domestic assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Antonio Dupree Wright, Appellant. A15-955, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-9552016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf97091Apr 11,
2016 19:49:57 GMTenglishBaron Montero Jones, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1090, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-05T10:10:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:21:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Baron Montero Jones, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1090, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-10902016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf153503Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishJacquet Deon Munn, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1222, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-01T12:45:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:32:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Jacquet Deon Munn, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1222, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-12222016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf136721Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishMelissa Dawn Paisley, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Clark Davis Kratzer, Appellant. A15-1115, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-04T16:02:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:24:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Child custody dispute.Melissa Dawn Paisley, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Clark Davis Kratzer, Appellant. A15-1115, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-11152016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf179017Apr 11,
2016 19:49:57 GMTenglishBoardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC, Relator, vs. East Grand Forks City Council, Respondent. A15-1071, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-04T10:56:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:20:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges conditional renewal of liquor license.Boardwalk Bar & Grill, LLC, Relator, vs. East Grand Forks City Council, Respondent. A15-1071, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-10712016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf181769Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishMikel Thorstenson, Respondent, vs. Waterford Oil Co., Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...2016-04-05T09:08:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:00:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Employer appeals an unemployment-law judges (ULJ) decision that respondent did not engage in employment misconduct rendering him ineligible for unemployment benefits.Mikel Thorstenson, Respondent, vs. Waterford Oil Co., Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1380, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-13802016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf39214Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. L. O. and J. J. S., Parents. A15-1194, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-05T14:12:17+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-11T13:29:26+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-05T19:09:29+00:00Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. L. O. and J. J. S., Parents. A15-1194, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-11942016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 1 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS ... pdf207923Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Barbara Ann Shaw, Appellant. A15-771, Court of ...2016-04-05T08:47:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:46:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter. Reversed and remanded.In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Barbara Ann Shaw, Appellant. A15-771, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-7712016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf119566Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishTheodore Lee Wicken, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-813, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-05T10:27:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:51:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the postconviction courts denial of petition to withdraw guilty plea.Theodore Lee Wicken, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-813, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-8132016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf96054Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Maxwell Robert Flynn, Appellant. A15-807, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-04T10:46:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:49:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Maxwell Robert Flynn, Appellant. A15-807, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-8072016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf169464Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Robert Stepke, Appellant. A15-1159, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-01T12:26:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:25:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree test refusal.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Robert Stepke, Appellant. A15-1159, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-11592016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS ... pdf106625Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Daniel Alvin Hennen, Respondent. A15-1376, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-03-31T10:08:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:47:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Daniel Alvin Hennen, Respondent. A15-1376, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-13762016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf191162Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ger Lee, Appellant. A15-920, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016.2016-04-01T08:46:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:56:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ger Lee, Appellant. A15-920, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-9202016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf156780Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishNathan J. Knoernschild, et al., Respondents, vs. Dennis Halverson, Appellant. A15-909, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-05T09:49:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:55:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to grant of summary judgment.Nathan J. Knoernschild, et al., Respondents, vs. Dennis Halverson, Appellant. A15-909, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-9092016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS ... pdf132499Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishDonna Jean Sjolander f/k/a Donna Jean Carlson, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Steven Gary Carlson, Appellant. A15-362, ...2016-03-30T14:23:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:06:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Parenting-time dispute. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Donna Jean Sjolander f/k/a Donna Jean Carlson, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Steven Gary Carlson, Appellant. A15-362, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016.A15-3622016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf108410Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric Jamison Brewer, Appellant. A15-622, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-04T15:22:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:13:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony domestic assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric Jamison Brewer, Appellant. A15-622, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-6222016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf186176Apr 11,
2016 19:50:25 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Steven Merrill Hogy. A15-1514, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016.2016-04-04T14:43:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:24:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion for relief from civil commitment.In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Steven Merrill Hogy. A15-1514, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-15142016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf109858Apr 11,
2016 19:50:26 GMTenglishJames Adam Roth, Appellant, vs. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, Respondent. A15-1956, Court of ...2016-04-05T08:29:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:48:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for full discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous person (SDP).James Adam Roth, Appellant, vs. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, Respondent. A15-1956, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-19562016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf223985Apr 11,
2016 19:49:57 GMTenglishMohammad Sonbol, Appellant, vs. Green and White Taxi Cab Company, Inc., Respondent. A15-1044, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-05T13:29:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:08:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts denial of jury-trial demand.Mohammad Sonbol, Appellant, vs. Green and White Taxi Cab Company, Inc., Respondent. A15-1044, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-10442016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf102930Apr 11,
2016 19:49:57 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Peter Beard, Appellant. A15-1045, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-01T09:19:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:17:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony test-refusal.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Peter Beard, Appellant. A15-1045, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-10452016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf174825Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishMichael A. Pemrick, Relator, vs. Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1028, Court of ...2016-04-04T10:36:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T12:06:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Employer challenges an unemployment-law judges (ULJ) determination that 43 workers were employees.Michael A. Pemrick, Relator, vs. Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1028, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-10282016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf126935Apr 11,
2016 19:50:25 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. O., Parent. A15-1868, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016.2016-04-01T09:35:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:33:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. O., Parent. A15-1868, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-18682016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf109001Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishRojelio Castillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1196, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-01T11:01:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:31:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Rojelio Castillo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1196, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-11962016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf158027Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishAaron Wayne Downing, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1171, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-04-04T15:28:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:27:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.Aaron Wayne Downing, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1171, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-11712016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf167944Apr 11,
2016 19:49:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Maurice Deon Jackson, Appellant. A15-671, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-05T13:02:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T11:24:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of convictions of first-degree aggravated robbery and domestic assault by strangulation. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Maurice Deon Jackson, Appellant. A15-671, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-6712016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf193433Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishBrett Thomas Green, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1386, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-31T11:44:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:04:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Brett Thomas Green, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1386, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-13862016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf28904Apr 11,
2016 19:50:25 GMTenglishMorris Gaye Kayee, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1938, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-04-05T11:53:47+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-11T14:36:40+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-04-05T16:51:04+00:00Challenges denial of motion to correct sentence.Morris Gaye Kayee, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1938, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-19382016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf171639Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Roy Becker, Appellant. A15-1379, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016.2016-04-05T13:22:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:58:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts restitution order.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Roy Becker, Appellant. A15-1379, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-13792016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf174215Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishDavid Richard Carlson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1388, Court of Appeals ...2016-04-06T14:03:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:06:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.David Richard Carlson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1388, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-13882016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf165271Apr 11,
2016 19:50:25 GMTenglishKasele Howard, Relator, vs. Family First Home Care, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development,...2016-04-05T12:27:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:21:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Kasele Howard, Relator, vs. Family First Home Care, Inc., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1487, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-14872016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf116534Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rico Patrick Howard, Appellant. A15-1391, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-01T09:05:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:11:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree murder.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rico Patrick Howard, Appellant. A15-1391, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-13912016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123047Apr 11,
2016 19:50:25 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. L. C. and M. C., Parents. A15-1723, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-31T16:08:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:31:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. L. C. and M. C., Parents. A15-1723, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-17232016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf197680Apr 11,
2016 19:50:25 GMTenglishBoundary Waters Bank, Respondent, vs. William H. McGaughey, Appellant, Lian Y. McGaughey, Defendant. A15-1950, Court of ...2016-04-05T12:52:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:39:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Real-property-foreclosure action.Boundary Waters Bank, Respondent, vs. William H. McGaughey, Appellant, Lian Y. McGaughey, Defendant. A15-1950, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-19502016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf127576Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Steven Kenneth Myhre, Appellant. A15-1464, ...2016-04-01T15:41:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T14:18:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Spousal maintenance dispute and child support dispute.In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Steven Kenneth Myhre, Appellant. A15-1464, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-14642016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf99358Apr 11,
2016 19:49:58 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Lee Bender, Appellant. A15-1234, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, ...2016-04-04T15:34:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-11T13:38:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of fifth-degree domestic assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Lee Bender, Appellant. A15-1234, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 11, 2016. A15-12342016-04-11T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf954902Apr 7,
2016 20:24:26 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Timothy John Huber, Appellant. A13-1928, Supreme Court Order, April 6, 2016.2016-04-06T15:49:00+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-04-07T15:20:18+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inPage 12 of the slip opinion filed on April 6, 2016, is hereby amended.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Timothy John Huber, Appellant. A13-1928, Supreme Court Order, April 6, 2016.A13-19282016-04-06T00:00:00-0500 April 6, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1928 fl Om~EOF AJ~~~BJAJECcurra State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Timothy John Huber, Appellant. ORDER ... pdf282544Apr 6,
2016 15:56:41 GMTenglishLaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil, deceased, Appellant, vs. St. Matthews Evangelical ...2016-04-05T13:25:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-06T10:51:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Under the ecclesiastical abstention doctrine, pastors and their church are not liable to former parishioners for defamation or related common-law torts for statements made by the pastors during the course of formal church discipline proceedings when the statements were communicated only to other members of the church and participants in the formal church discipline process.LaVonne Pfeil, Individually and as Trustee for Heirs of Henry Pfeil, deceased, Appellant, vs. St. Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Unaltered Augsburg Confession of Worthington, Nobles County, Minnesota, et al., Respondents. A14-605, Supreme Court, April 6, 2016.A14-6052016-04-06T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0605 Court of Appeals Anderson, J. Dissenting, Lillehaug, J., Gildea, C.J. Took no part, Hudson, Chutich, JJ. ... pdf203247Apr 12,
2016 13:45:04 GMTenglishMelinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II, Appellant, vs. Allina Health ...2016-04-11T12:04:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-12T08:43:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Minnesota Statutes § 253B.23, subd. 4 (2014), provides immunity to a medical-services provider that, in good faith, denies admission to a person seeking voluntary mental-health treatment under Minn. Stat. § 253B.04, subd. 1 (2014). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II, Appellant, vs. Allina Health System, et al., Respondents. A14-794, Supreme Court, April 6, 2016.A14-7942016-04-06T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0794 Court of Appeals Anderson, J. Concurring, Lillehaug, J. Took no part, Hudson, Chutich, JJ. Melinda M. Binkley, ... pdf194424Apr 4,
2016 16:45:02 GMTenglishPaek Saengkeo, Respondent, vs. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims, Appellant. A15-1267, Court of Appeals Published, ...2016-03-24T14:11:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T11:44:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Under Minn. Stat. § 65B.64, subd. 3 (2014), the assigned claims plan, an injured passenger of an uninsured vehicle is not entitled to economic loss benefits if the injured passenger is dwelling with a family member who is an uninsured owner of a vehicle that must be insured under Minn. Stat. § 65B.48 (2014), unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the owner did not contemplate the use or operation of his or her uninsured vehicle by anyone. Reversed.Paek Saengkeo, Respondent, vs. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims, Appellant. A15-1267, Court of Appeals Published, April 4, 2016.A15-12672016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1267 Paek Saengkeo, Respondent, vs. Minnesota Automobile Assigned Claims, Appellant. Filed April 4, 2016 Reversed ... pdf141432Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Peter Louis John, Appellant. A15-303, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-29T12:25:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T11:54:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aiding and abetting second-degree murder.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Peter Louis John, Appellant. A15-303, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-3032016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf232143Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rip Wayne Rust, Appellant. A15-480, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-29T13:51:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T12:05:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rip Wayne Rust, Appellant. A15-480, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-4802016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf112063Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Montalvo Knowles, Appellant. A15-452, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-24T14:22:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T12:02:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of domestic assault by strangulation and gross-misdemeanor domestic assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Montalvo Knowles, Appellant. A15-452, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-4522016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf100838Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Khong Meng Kong, Appellant. A15-859, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-24T14:34:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:40:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of a firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Khong Meng Kong, Appellant. A15-859, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-8592016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf110190Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ann Marie Hoyer, Appellant. A15-919, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-29T13:42:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:49:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ann Marie Hoyer, Appellant. A15-919, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-9192016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf190150Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Barenburg, Appellant. A15-607, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-28T11:16:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T12:14:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of making terroristic threats. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Barenburg, Appellant. A15-607, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-6072016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf103879Apr 4,
2016 19:10:22 GMTenglishShauna Marie Krupicka, Respondent, vs. Paul John Hassinger, Appellant. A15-1231, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, ...2016-03-24T14:29:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T14:00:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges the district courts order denying his motion to modify or vacate a harassment restraining order (HRO).Shauna Marie Krupicka, Respondent, vs. Paul John Hassinger, Appellant. A15-1231, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-12312016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf130583Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishJarrod Dwayne Miller, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-795, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-28T10:21:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:26:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of a firearm by an ineligible person.Jarrod Dwayne Miller, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-795, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-7952016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf124117Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dean James Roehler, Appellant. A12-2135, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, ...2016-03-29T11:37:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T11:49:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013On remand from the Minnesota Supreme Court, which directed this court to reconsider our earlier decision in light of the supreme courts decisions in State v. Stavish, 868 N.W.2d 670 (Minn. 2015), and State v. Lindquist, 869 N.W.2d 863 (Minn. 2015).State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dean James Roehler, Appellant. A12-2135, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A12-21352016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A12- ... pdf149797Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishWashington County HRA, Respondent, vs. Kuohsiou Huang, Appellant. A15-879, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-29T17:22:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:43:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges eviction action.Washington County HRA, Respondent, vs. Kuohsiou Huang, Appellant. A15-879, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-8792016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf115853Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Pierre Dortch, Appellant. A15-623, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, ...2016-03-29T09:58:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T12:16:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Pierre Dortch, Appellant. A15-623, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-6232016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf162574Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jesse Andrew Faust, Appellant. A15-428, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-29T11:50:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T11:59:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges drug-related convictions.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jesse Andrew Faust, Appellant. A15-428, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-4282016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf110573Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Robert James Fallin, Appellant. A15-642, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, ...2016-03-29T10:59:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T12:18:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges drug-related convictions.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Robert James Fallin, Appellant. A15-642, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-6422016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf223111Apr 4,
2016 19:10:23 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Amy Daiker Werger, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Brett Michael Werger, Appellant. A15-1527, Court ...2016-03-29T16:39:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T14:08:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Child custody dispute.In re the Marriage of: Amy Daiker Werger, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Brett Michael Werger, Appellant. A15-1527, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-15272016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf187011Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishDeborah Meckola, as Trustee for the Heirs of Jordan Adams, Decedent, Respondent, vs. Thomas J. Rishavy, M.D., et al., ...2016-03-28T15:34:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T12:20:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Following a jury trial on respondents medical-malpractice wrongful-death claims, Appellants seek reversal of a money judgment against them and remand for a new trial.Deborah Meckola, as Trustee for the Heirs of Jordan Adams, Decedent, Respondent, vs. Thomas J. Rishavy, M.D., et al., Appellants. A15-693, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-6932016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf195546Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. JaJuan Anthony Reed, Sr., Appellant. A15-557, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4,...2016-03-28T15:43:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T12:10:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to felony domestic assault conviction.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. JaJuan Anthony Reed, Sr., Appellant. A15-557, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-5572016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf145247Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishRebecca J. Adams, et al., Plaintiffs, John Crudele, et al., Appellants, vs. James Koch, et al., Defendants, Steve ...2016-03-28T15:01:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:22:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Real estate investors challenge dismissal of claims and vacating default judgments.Rebecca J. Adams, et al., Plaintiffs, John Crudele, et al., Appellants, vs. James Koch, et al., Defendants, Steve Hyland, Respondent, Erik Ostigaard, Respondent, Greg Bohnsack, Respondent. A15-761, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-7612016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf28508Apr 4,
2016 19:10:22 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Aaron Arnold Lind-Pashina, Appellant. A15-1199, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-03-24T12:43:41+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-04T13:58:44+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-03-24T17:41:01+00:00Challenges the portion of his sentence requiring him to pay three fines and provide a DNA sample. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Aaron Arnold Lind-Pashina, Appellant. A15-1199, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-11992016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf181696Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishSteven Abrahamson, et al., Relators, vs. The St. Louis County School District, Independent School District No. 2142, et ...2016-03-29T16:48:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:56:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges that the St. Louis County School District violated campaign-finance reporting laws.Steven Abrahamson, et al., Relators, vs. The St. Louis County School District, Independent School District No. 2142, et al., Respondents, Office of Administrative Hearings, Respondent. A15-1024, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-10242016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf201684Apr 4,
2016 19:10:22 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jonathan Earl Brown, Appellant. A15-1484, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, ...2016-03-29T09:09:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T14:06:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jonathan Earl Brown, Appellant. A15-1484, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-14842016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf111415Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Mendoza, Appellant. A15-767, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-24T14:59:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:24:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Mendoza, Appellant. A15-767, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-7672016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf193671Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishFred E. Friedrichs, et al., Appellants, vs. Lake Washington Sanitary District, Respondent. A15-965, Court of Appeals ...2016-03-24T13:53:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:52:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant-property owners challenge a district court decision upholding a special assessment following annexation of the property into respondent sanitary-sewer district and construction of a sanitary sewer on the property.Fred E. Friedrichs, et al., Appellants, vs. Lake Washington Sanitary District, Respondent. A15-965, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-9652016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf265453Apr 4,
2016 19:10:22 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Christina Ann Burton, Appellant. A15-1347, ...2016-03-29T12:58:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T14:04:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter and child custody dispute.In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Christina Ann Burton, Appellant. A15-1347, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-13472016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf25498Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Pov Beng, Appellant. A15-709, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-03-29T11:47:00+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-04-04T13:12:22+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-03-29T16:46:28+00:00Appellant challenges the district courts denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea to violating an order for protection.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Pov Beng, Appellant. A15-709, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.A15-7092016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf112815Apr 4,
2016 19:10:12 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brittany Ann Vacko, Appellant. A15-822, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016.2016-03-29T10:03:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-04-04T13:32:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony theft by swindle. Remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brittany Ann Vacko, Appellant. A15-822, Court of Appeals Unpublished, April 4, 2016. A15-8222016-04-04T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf54750Mar 30,
2016 18:11:24 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Amanda Lyn Ruffing, f/k/a Amanda Lyn Koble, a Minnesota Attorney, ...2016-03-23T14:12:08+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-30T13:10:37+00:00Adobe Acrobat 11.0.14 Paper Capture Plug-inEffective March 26, 2016, respondent Amanda Lyn Ruffing is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Amanda Lyn Ruffing, f/k/a Amanda Lyn Koble, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0386825. A15-1243, Supreme Court Order, March 30, 2016.A15-12432016-03-30T00:00:00-0500 March 23, 2016 subject of professional responsibility. Failure to do so shall result in automatic re- suspension, as provided in Rule 18(e)(3), RLPR. Dated: ... pdf52412Mar 30,
2016 16:38:41 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Transfer to Disability-Inactive Status of Ralph F. Carter, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. ...2016-03-23T15:52:28+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-30T11:37:42+00:00Adobe Acrobat 11.0.14 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Ralph F. Carter is transferred to disability-inactive status effective as of the date of this order.In re Petition for Transfer to Disability-Inactive Status of Ralph F. Carter, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0134910. A16-435, Supreme Court Order, March 30, 2016. A16-4352016-03-30T00:00:00-0500 March 23, 2016 Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Respondent Ralph F. Carter is transferred to disability- ... pdf74141Mar 30,
2016 16:38:41 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Fong Eric Lee, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0387546. A16-228, ...2016-03-23T14:09:45+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-30T11:30:18+00:00Adobe Acrobat 11.0.14 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Fong Eric Lee is publicly reprimanded and placed on 2 years of probation.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Fong Eric Lee, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0387546. A16-228, Supreme Court Order, March 30, 2016. A16-2282016-03-30T00:00:00-0500 March 23, 2016 Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Respondent Fong Eric Lee is publicly reprimanded and ... pdf186078Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jermaine Sylvester Watkins, Appellant. A14-1772, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-21T11:22:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T10:58:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of aggravated robbery and kidnapping.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jermaine Sylvester Watkins, Appellant. A14-1772, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A14-17722016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf133967Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tyrese Thomas, Appellant. A15-468, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-18T11:53:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:15:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tyrese Thomas, Appellant. A15-468, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-4682016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123501Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tony Luke Fisher, Appellant. A15-614, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-22T14:05:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:30:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tony Luke Fisher, Appellant. A15-614, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-6142016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf241083Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishLeon Asle Baxter, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Debra Kay Baxter, Appellant. A15-601, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March ...2016-03-22T15:14:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:27:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts denial of motion to amend an order dividing pension benefits.Leon Asle Baxter, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Debra Kay Baxter, Appellant. A15-601, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-6012016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf105585Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Charles Kenneth Redding, Appellant. A15-1221, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March ...2016-03-22T09:50:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:23:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges district court imposing a sentence at the higher end of the sentencing-guidelines range because of his young age at the time of the offense and because he showed remorse for his actions..State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Charles Kenneth Redding, Appellant. A15-1221, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-12212016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf205199Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishCLino LLC, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Lino Lakes, Respondent. A15-762, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, ...2016-03-21T11:00:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T12:01:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges special assessment tax.CLino LLC, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Lino Lakes, Respondent. A15-762, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-7622016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf111562Mar 28,
2016 18:59:45 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Christopher Timothy Poorker, Appellant. A15-1346, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-16T12:28:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:31:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Christopher Timothy Poorker, Appellant. A15-1346, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-13462016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf142055Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Senen Guerrero, Appellant. A15-851, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-18T10:56:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:52:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Senen Guerrero, Appellant. A15-851, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-8512016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf106134Mar 28,
2016 18:59:45 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Charles Louis Gollop, Respondent. A15-1354, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, ...2016-03-17T09:59:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:43:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts order granting a stay of adjudication over appellants objection. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Charles Louis Gollop, Respondent. A15-1354, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-13542016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf179612Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishGreg Peterson, et al., Relators, vs. City of Richfield, Respondent, Richfield Police & Fire Civil Service Commission, ...2016-03-22T14:46:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:13:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenge respondent-commissions ratification of a detective-promotion eligible register, arguing that the commission failed to consider records of the candidates efficiency, character, conduct, and seniority as required by Minn. Stat. § 419.06(9) (2014).Greg Peterson, et al., Relators, vs. City of Richfield, Respondent, Richfield Police & Fire Civil Service Commission, Respondent. A15-1151, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-11512016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf130325Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Herbert Thornton, Jr., Appellant. A15-265,...2016-03-22T10:10:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:11:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts denial of motion to reopen the parties default dissolution judgment. Affirmed; motions to strike granted in part and denied in part and motion to preserve the record denied.In re the Marriage of: Dontrell Valerie Thornton, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Herbert Thornton, Jr., Appellant. A15-265, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-2652016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf132553Mar 28,
2016 19:52:16 GMTenglishIn re: The Frank John Rodriguez Sr. Trust. A15-1353, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-16T12:45:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T14:51:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the denial of his motion to vacate the judgment in a trust dispute.In re: The Frank John Rodriguez Sr. Trust. A15-1353, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-13532016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf116485Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishJoel Inskeep and Chelsea Inskeep and o/b/o L.I. and E.I., petitioners, Respondents, vs. Sheila Moore, Appellant, Harry ...2016-03-17T10:45:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:12:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenge the grant of a harassment restraining order.Joel Inskeep and Chelsea Inskeep and o/b/o L.I. and E.I., petitioners, Respondents, vs. Sheila Moore, Appellant, Harry Walk, Appellant. A15-450, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-4502016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf38967Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dragos Valentine Bogza, Appellant. A15-471, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-03-22T11:44:54+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-03-28T11:17:55+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-03-22T16:44:29+00:00Challenges to conviction of felony domestic assault. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dragos Valentine Bogza, Appellant. A15-471, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-4712016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf102636Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Christopher Desjarlais, Appellant. A15-592, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-22T10:22:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:20:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to district court erred by denying motion for a downward dispositional departure.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Christopher Desjarlais, Appellant. A15-592, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-5922016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf118821Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishIn the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A., petitioner, Respondent, vs. Adam ...2016-03-21T15:26:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:45:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges district court abused its discretion by issuing an order for protection (OFP) based on inadequate findings.In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A., petitioner, Respondent, vs. Adam Cain Anderson, Appellant. A15-757, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-7572016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf199982Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishGerald L. Rehbein, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Lino Lakes, Respondent. A15-923, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March ...2016-03-21T09:06:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T12:00:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges special assessment levied by respondent City of Lino Lakes.Gerald L. Rehbein, et al., Appellants, vs. City of Lino Lakes, Respondent. A15-923, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-9232016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf137856Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Arne Henry Mahlberg, Appellant. A15-745, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, ...2016-03-18T12:53:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T11:42:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Arne Henry Mahlberg, Appellant. A15-745, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-7452016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf66022Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishJames L. Mandel, Appellant, vs. Multiband Corporation, et al., Respondents. A15-1133, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-03-17T13:53:15+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-03-28T12:12:56+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-03-16T17:05:30+00:00Challenges grant of summary judgment.James L. Mandel, Appellant, vs. Multiband Corporation, et al., Respondents. A15-1133, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-11332016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf111689Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishNereus Montemayor, Appellant, vs. Sebright Products, Inc., d/b/a Bright Technologies, defendant and third party ...2016-03-17T14:37:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:15:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.Nereus Montemayor, Appellant, vs. Sebright Products, Inc., d/b/a Bright Technologies, defendant and third party plaintiff, Respondent, vs. VZ Hogs, LLP, Third Party Defendant. A15-1188, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-11882016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf142361Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sonny Ray Juday, Appellant. A15-1047, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-21T09:27:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T12:10:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sonny Ray Juday, Appellant. A15-1047, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-10472016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf169259Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishDavid Waterworth, Appellant, vs. Elaine Ekman, et al., Respondents. A15-1206, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, ...2016-03-22T13:33:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:17:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Property dispute.David Waterworth, Appellant, vs. Elaine Ekman, et al., Respondents. A15-1206, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-12062016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf106548Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishSemaj Williams, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1216, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-17T13:54:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:19:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Semaj Williams, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1216, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-12162016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf100489Mar 28,
2016 18:59:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Darren Clinton, Appellant. A15-1235, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-21T15:52:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:25:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges sentence, arguing there is no basis for the upward departure. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Darren Clinton, Appellant. A15-1235, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-12352016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf122713Mar 28,
2016 19:52:35 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. V. S. and A. M., Parents and In the Matter of the Welfare of the ...2016-03-22T16:24:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T14:50:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges district court order determining that her children need protection or services.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. V. S. and A. M., Parents and In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. V. S. and T. J., Parents. A15-1785, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-17852016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf120864Mar 28,
2016 18:59:46 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Stevan Andre Wilkins, Appellant. A15-1799, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, ...2016-03-18T11:17:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:54:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying his sentence-correction motion.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Stevan Andre Wilkins, Appellant. A15-1799, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-17992016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf192112Mar 28,
2016 18:59:46 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. S. A15-1697, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-18T08:50:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:45:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant Department of Human Services (DHS) challenges the district courts order directing it to expunge the juvenile-delinquency records of respondent P.J.S. because it was not served with the expungement petition. Reversed and remanded.In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. S. A15-1697, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-16972016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf103271Mar 28,
2016 18:59:46 GMTenglishIgnacio Olalde-Hernandez, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1841, Court of Appeals ...2016-03-17T15:19:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T13:56:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges the district courts denial of his motion for sentence correction.Ignacio Olalde-Hernandez, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1841, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-18412016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf172321Mar 28,
2016 19:52:04 GMTenglishJoyce Sammon, Respondent, vs. Kim Halvorson, Appellant. A15-1261, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016.2016-03-22T10:50:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-28T14:48:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges harassment restraining order.Joyce Sammon, Respondent, vs. Kim Halvorson, Appellant. A15-1261, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 28, 2016. A15-12612016-03-28T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf218760Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishAdelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator, vs. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., Respondents, and ...2016-03-22T15:15:14+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-23T11:46:44+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-in[Amended order.] IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relator's motion to accept new evidence is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on September 28, 2015 is affirmed without opinion.Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator, vs. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., Respondents, and Sanford Health, Intervenor. A15-1730, Supreme Court Order, March 23, 2016.A15-17302016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 March 22, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator, vs. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., Respondents, ... pdf270098Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishSprinkler Warehouse, Inc., Respondent, vs. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.com, et al., Appellants. A14-1121, ...2016-03-17T16:22:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-23T11:10:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A domain name constitutes intangible personal property within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 571.73, subd. 3(3) (2014) and is therefore subject to attachment by garnishment.Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc., Respondent, vs. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.com, et al., Appellants. A14-1121, Supreme Court, March 23, 2016.A14-11212016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1121 Court of Appeals Dietzen, J. Took no part, Hudson, Chutich, JJ. Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc., Respondent, vs. ... pdf126116Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishJason Lee Bolstad, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-564, Supreme Court, March 23, 2016.2016-03-23T09:26:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20102016-03-23T11:48:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2010The postconviction court did not abuse its discretion when it concluded that appellant's second petition for postconviction relief was untimely. The facts of this case do not warrant granting appellant a new trial in the interests of justice.Jason Lee Bolstad, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-564, Supreme Court, March 23, 2016.A15-5642016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0564 Kanabec County Anderson, J. Took no part, Chutich, J. Jason Lee Bolstad, Appellant, vs. Filed: March 23, ... pdf270787Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishJamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager, Appellant, vs. American Family Mutual Insurance Group, Respondent. A14-1189, Supreme ...2016-03-21T12:43:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-23T11:21:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The resolution of the primary uninsured motorist claim is not a condition precedent to the assertion of a claim for excess uninsured motorist benefits under the No-Fault Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2014). Claims for excess uninsured motorist benefits accrue on the date of the accident.Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager, Appellant, vs. American Family Mutual Insurance Group, Respondent. A14-1189, Supreme Court, March 23, 2016.A14-11892016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1189 Court of Appeals Dietzen, J. Concurring, Lillehaug, J. Took no part, Anderson, Chutich, JJ. Jamy Hegseth ... pdf317855Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against James Richard Mayer, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0312241. ...2016-03-16T13:02:04+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-23T11:15:04+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent James Richard Mayer is indefinitely suspended from the practice of lawIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against James Richard Mayer, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0312241. A15-1274, Supreme Court Order, March 23, 2016.A15-12742016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 March 16, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1274 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against James Richard Mayer, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf206401Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishAdelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator, vs. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., Respondents, and ...2016-03-21T14:14:22+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-23T11:43:48+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that relator's motion to accept new evidence is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on September 28, 2015 is affirmed without opinion.Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator, vs. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., Respondents, and Sanford Health, Intervenor. A15-1730, Supreme Court Order, March 23, 2016.A15-17302016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 March 21, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT Adelbys Tamayo Lopez, Relator, vs. JBS USA, LLC, and Zurich American Insurance Co./Sedgwick CMS, Inc., Respondents, ... pdf321183Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Sara Marie Grant Rojas, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0391827. ...2016-03-15T10:36:13+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-23T11:13:19+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Sara Marie Grant Rojas is suspended from the practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Sara Marie Grant Rojas, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0391827. A16-92, Supreme Court Order, March 23, 2016.A16-922016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 March 15, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A16-0092 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Sara Marie Grant Rojas, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf366675Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jaren Lee Johnson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0290427. ...2016-03-16T12:37:10+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-23T11:11:43+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Jaren Lee Johnson is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of 30 days.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jaren Lee Johnson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0290427. A16-240, Supreme Court Order, March 23, 2016.A16-2402016-03-23T00:00:00-0500 March 16, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A16-0240 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jaren Lee Johnson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf418662Mar 23,
2016 16:49:25 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard Lee Swanson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 173423.2016-03-21T11:43:11+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-23T11:26:42+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe motion of respondent Richard Lee Swanson for additional time in which to provide proof of his successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination is denied. Respondent's conditional reinstatement is revoked and he is indefinitely suspended, effective 10 days from the date of this order.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Richard Lee Swanson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 173423.2016-03-21T06:43:11-0500 March 21, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1589 In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Richard Lee Swanson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf174396Mar 22,
2016 14:05:22 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. S. A. M., Appellant. A15-950, Court of Appeals Published, March 21, 2016.2016-03-21T09:13:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-22T09:01:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A felony conviction later deemed a misdemeanor conviction by operation of Minn. Stat. § 609.13, subd. 1(2) (2014), is a felony conviction for purposes of the expungement statute. A petitioner is not entitled to expungement when the felony offense is not one of the statutorily enumerated offenses for which relief may be sought under Minn. Stat. § 609A.02, subd. 3(b) (2015).State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. S. A. M., Appellant. A15-950, Court of Appeals Published, March 21, 2016.A15-9502016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0950 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. S. A. M., Appellant. Filed March 21, 2016 Affirmed Reilly, Judge Olmsted ... pdf193058Mar 22,
2016 14:05:22 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Leona Rose deLottinville, Respondent. A15-1481, Court of Appeals Published, March 21,...2016-03-15T08:57:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-22T09:02:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013When police have probable cause to believe that the subject of a valid arrest warrant is present as a short-term social guest at another persons residence, police may enter that residence to effectuate the arrest pursuant to the warrant without violating the Fourth Amendment rights of the person named therein.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Leona Rose deLottinville, Respondent. A15-1481, Court of Appeals Published, March 21, 2016.A15-14812016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1481 State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Leona Rose deLottinville, Respondent. Filed March 21, 2016 Reversed and ... pdf176141Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Leroy Smith, Appellant. A15-570, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016.2016-03-14T14:59:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:26:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of first-degree driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan Leroy Smith, Appellant. A15-570, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-5702016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf121897Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jack Leonard Williams, Appellant. A15-427, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-15T15:04:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:02:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jack Leonard Williams, Appellant. A15-427, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-4272016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf159567Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Letrell Pierre Brewer, Appellant. A15-653, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-11T12:28:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:44:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of violating a domestic abuse no contact order (DANCO).State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Letrell Pierre Brewer, Appellant. A15-653, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-6532016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf143185Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Shawn Deangelo Jones, Appellant. A15-541, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-15T15:24:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:21:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aiding and abetting simple robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Shawn Deangelo Jones, Appellant. A15-541, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-5412016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf154220Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Shuly Marambo, Appellant. A15-784, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016.2016-03-11T13:30:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:48:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Shuly Marambo, Appellant. A15-784, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-7842016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf160047Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph Scott Welch, Appellant. A15-854, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-15T15:35:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:51:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of controlled substance charge. Reversed.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph Scott Welch, Appellant. A15-854, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016.A15-8542016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf172494Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishWillie James Patterson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-956, Court of Appeals ...2016-03-15T09:12:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:07:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Willie James Patterson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-956, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-9562016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf183956Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. William Martin Odette, Appellant. A15-944, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-15T15:42:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T12:01:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. William Martin Odette, Appellant. A15-944, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-9442016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf104973Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Petition of George K. Lovrien for an Order Determining Boundary Lines. A15-1135, Court of Appeals ...2016-03-15T11:02:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:09:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Boundary-line dispute.In the Matter of the Petition of George K. Lovrien for an Order Determining Boundary Lines. A15-1135, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-11352016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf116313Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. A15-1784, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-10T13:55:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:35:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges order that grants the responsible social services agency custody of her child for placement in an aftercare program to complete chemical-dependency treatment.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. A15-1784, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-17842016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf122318Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishJermaine Kershawn Perry, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1181, Court of Appeals ...2016-03-15T11:28:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:19:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Jermaine Kershawn Perry, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1181, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-11812016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf179674Mar 21,
2016 18:39:31 GMTenglishLawrence Leasing, Inc., d/b/a Lawrence Transportation Services, Respondent, vs. Northwoods Pallets, LLC, et al., ...2016-03-14T14:45:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T10:31:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellants argue that the district court abused its discretion in piercing the corporate veil and that the district courts factual findings are clearly erroneous. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Lawrence Leasing, Inc., d/b/a Lawrence Transportation Services, Respondent, vs. Northwoods Pallets, LLC, et al., Appellants. A15-360, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-3602016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf171132Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kurt Nathan Rud, Appellant. A15-344, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016.2016-03-11T09:15:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T10:25:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kurt Nathan Rud, Appellant. A15-344, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-3442016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf108557Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Bruce Everett Boyd, Appellant. A15-606, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-15T15:31:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:37:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of theft of a motor vehicle and theft. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Bruce Everett Boyd, Appellant. A15-606, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-6062016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf104408Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Todd Allen Turchin, Appellant. A15-677, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-15T15:50:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:46:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Todd Allen Turchin, Appellant. A15-677, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-6772016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf199699Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishBruce Township, Respondent, vs. Kevin Schmitz, Appellant, Nathan A. Baum, et al., Defendants. A15-1163, Court of ...2016-03-11T14:28:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:15:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges conditional-use-permit ordinance.Bruce Township, Respondent, vs. Kevin Schmitz, Appellant, Nathan A. Baum, et al., Defendants. A15-1163, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-11632016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf126017Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Paul Wilkins, Appellant. A15-1331, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, ...2016-03-09T11:58:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:22:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. James Paul Wilkins, Appellant. A15-1331, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-13312016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf118241Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishJohn Aydt, et al., Appellants, vs. Steven A. Hensel, et al., Respondents, City of St. Michael, Respondent. A15-1406, ...2016-03-15T14:49:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:26:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges granting discharging a notice of lis pendens de novo.John Aydt, et al., Appellants, vs. Steven A. Hensel, et al., Respondents, City of St. Michael, Respondent. A15-1406, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-14062016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107786Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishJames William Graham, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1457, Court of Appeals Unpublished,...2016-03-11T11:33:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:28:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.James William Graham, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1457, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-14572016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf104822Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishBereket Hagos, Appellant, Seniat Gebregios, Plaintiff, vs. Pond View of Woodbury Townhouse Association, et al., ...2016-03-15T09:55:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T13:30:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.Bereket Hagos, Appellant, Seniat Gebregios, Plaintiff, vs. Pond View of Woodbury Townhouse Association, et al., Respondents. A15-1779, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-17792016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf206754Mar 21,
2016 18:39:32 GMTenglishGreg Peterson, Appellant, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. City of Richfield, ...2016-03-09T15:02:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-21T11:55:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment. Reversed and remanded.Greg Peterson, Appellant, Souphanny Dean, Co-Appellant, Brian Rogge, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. City of Richfield, Minnesota, Respondent. A15-925, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 21, 2016. A15-9252016-03-21T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf192228Mar 16,
2016 15:16:28 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ishmael Roberts, Appellant. A14-2039, Supreme Court, March 16, 2016.2016-03-14T09:48:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-16T10:14:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The district court did not clearly err by finding that appellant failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that appellant did not know his acts were morally wrong at the time that he murdered two of his family members.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ishmael Roberts, Appellant. A14-2039, Supreme Court, March 16, 2016.A14-20392016-03-16T00:00:00-0500 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-2039 Hennepin County Anderson, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: March 16, ... pdf95512Mar 14,
2016 15:27:22 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: E. G. and K. G., Sr., Parents. A15-2091, Court of Appeals Published, ...2016-03-08T16:28:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T10:26:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013An intermediate dispositional order in a juvenile-protection proceeding is not appealable as a matter of right under Minn. R. Juv. Prot. P. 47.02, subd. 1. Appeal dismissed.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: E. G. and K. G., Sr., Parents. A15-2091, Court of Appeals Published, March 14, 2016.A15-20912016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-2091 In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: E. G. and K. G., Sr., Parents. Filed March 14, 2016 Appeal dismissed ... pdf146674Mar 14,
2016 20:31:50 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Philip Lee Carlson, Appellant. A15-190, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, ...2016-03-08T09:15:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T13:38:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony theft by swindle.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Philip Lee Carlson, Appellant. A15-190, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-1902016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf209764Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Christian Mccary Mayo, Appellant. A15-511, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, ...2016-03-07T15:50:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T14:47:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Christian Mccary Mayo, Appellant. A15-511, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-5112016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf134477Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, Appellant. A15-634, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March ...2016-03-07T11:26:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T14:54:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts denial of jail credit for time he spent under internal sanctions while committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen, Appellant. A15-634, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-6342016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf171370Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishEnoch Klingbeil, Appellant, vs. Krystal Lee Ramfjord, et al., Respondents. A15-1215, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-07T13:50:43+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:18:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment dismissing the motor-vehicle negligence action.Enoch Klingbeil, Appellant, vs. Krystal Lee Ramfjord, et al., Respondents. A15-1215, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-12152016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf236225Mar 14,
2016 20:31:52 GMTenglishTiffany Thompson, Relator, vs. Jefferson Partners LP, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...2016-03-07T14:46:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:19:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Tiffany Thompson, Relator, vs. Jefferson Partners LP, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1246, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-12462016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf174051Mar 14,
2016 20:31:52 GMTenglishLaurie Lea Oliveira, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1257, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-03-02T11:39:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:25:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Laurie Lea Oliveira, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1257, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-12572016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf207976Mar 14,
2016 20:31:50 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Deontray Vershon Tate, Appellant. A14-1339, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, ...2016-03-08T13:34:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T13:31:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges two first-degree-assault convictions and 309-month sentence.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Deontray Vershon Tate, Appellant. A14-1339, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A14-13392016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf267735Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Julie Ann Summers, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Jonathon Roger Summers, Appellant. A15-735, Court ...2016-03-08T14:54:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:09:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter.In re the Marriage of: Julie Ann Summers, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Jonathon Roger Summers, Appellant. A15-735, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-7352016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf168176Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jesse B. Bennett, Appellant. A15-414, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016.2016-03-08T13:00:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T14:33:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of a controlled substance. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jesse B. Bennett, Appellant. A15-414, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-4142016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf121303Mar 14,
2016 20:31:50 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Quentin Lee Davis, Appellant. A15-228, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016.2016-03-07T10:11:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T14:19:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Quentin Lee Davis, Appellant. A15-228, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-2282016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf148275Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mark Allan Misgen, Appellant. A15-656, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016.2016-03-08T17:13:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:00:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of first-degree arson and insurance fraud.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mark Allan Misgen, Appellant. A15-656, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-6562016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf152284Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishJohn Christian Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-894, Court of Appeals ...2016-03-08T09:41:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:12:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.John Christian Richmond, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-894, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-8942016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf114901Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Grant Leighton Johnson, Appellant. A15-913, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, ...2016-03-08T09:32:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:14:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of fifth-degree controlled substance crime.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Grant Leighton Johnson, Appellant. A15-913, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-9132016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf185422Mar 14,
2016 20:31:51 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. John F. Bonner, III, Appellant. A15-993, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, ...2016-03-08T15:48:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:15:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of theft by swindle.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. John F. Bonner, III, Appellant. A15-993, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-9932016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf162094Mar 14,
2016 20:31:52 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Glenn Kevin Hazley, Appellant. A15-1418, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, ...2016-03-02T11:49:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T15:29:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Glenn Kevin Hazley, Appellant. A15-1418, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-14182016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf157516Mar 14,
2016 20:31:50 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Virginia Marie Carlson, Appellant. A15-179, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, ...2016-03-08T09:23:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-14T13:36:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony theft by swindle.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Virginia Marie Carlson, Appellant. A15-179, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 14, 2016. A15-1792016-03-14T00:00:00-0500 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf348507Mar 9,
2016 16:55:21 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Alan F. Pendleton, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121538. ...2016-03-01T13:20:09+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-09T10:53:13+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Alan F. Pendleton is suspended from the practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Alan F. Pendleton, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121538. A15-1996, Supreme Court Order, March 9, 2016.A15-19962016-03-09T00:00:00-0600 March 1, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1996 In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Alan F. Pendleton, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf528139Mar 9,
2016 16:55:21 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Paul Joseph Bosman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0388865. ...2016-03-02T13:50:08+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-09T10:49:14+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Paul Joseph Bosman is suspended from the practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Paul Joseph Bosman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0388865. A15-1930, Supreme Court Order, March 9, 2016.A15-19302016-03-09T00:00:00-0600 March 2, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1930 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Paul Joseph Bosman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf365821Mar 9,
2016 16:55:21 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent (A14-0941), Appellant (A15-0300), vs. Byron David Smith, Appellant (A14-0941), ...2016-03-04T14:31:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-09T10:46:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The district court did not err in denying the defendants motion to dismiss the indictment based on five separate, individually alleged errors. The cumulative effect of the five alleged errors in the indictment process did not deprive the defendant of a fair grand-jury proceeding. The nonpublic proceeding to discuss the district courts ruling on a pretrial evidentiary issue did not violate the defendants Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. The district court did not violate the defendants constitutional right to present a complete defense by excluding four pieces of evidence. Because the prosecutor did not commit misconduct in closing argument, the district court did not err in failing to give a curative jury instruction. The district court erred when it determined that the defendants restitution affidavit was timely under Minn. Stat. § 611A.045, subd. 3(a) (2014). Affirmed in part and reversed in part.State of Minnesota, Respondent (A14-0941), Appellant (A15-0300), vs. Byron David Smith, Appellant (A14-0941), Respondent (A15-0300). A14-941, A15-300, Supreme Court, March 9, 2016.A14-9412016-03-09T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0941 A15-0300 Morrison County Lillehaug, J. Concurring, Stras, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. State of Minnesota, ... pdf295441Mar 7,
2016 16:05:31 GMTenglishAnita J. Howard, Respondent, vs. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D., et al., Appellants. A15-896, Court of Appeals Published, ...2016-03-02T10:01:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T10:03:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Under Minn. Stat. § 595.02, subd. 5 (2014), an informal discussion with a treating physician who has examined or cared for a party allows inquiry into any information or opinion the physician possesses, including opinions on the standard of care and causation relating to periods when the physician was not caring for the patient. Reversed.Anita J. Howard, Respondent, vs. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D., et al., Appellants. A15-896, Court of Appeals Published, March 7, 2016.A15-8962016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0896 Anita J. Howard, Respondent, vs. Shelly R. Svoboda, M.D., et al., Appellants. Filed March 7, 2016 Reversed ... pdf111401Mar 7,
2016 16:05:31 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Drljic, Appellant. A15-714, Court of Appeals Published, March 7, 2016.2016-02-25T10:05:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T10:04:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013For purposes of calculating felony criminal-history points for the crime of second-degree burglary, the burglary of three separate businesses in one building on one day does not constitute a single behavioral incident.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Drljic, Appellant. A15-714, Court of Appeals Published, March 7, 2016.A15-7142016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0714 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Daniel Drljic, Appellant. Filed March 7, 2016 Affirmed Connolly, Judge ... pdf186858Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Marshall Johnson, a/k/a Michael Tate, Appellant. A15-391, Court of Appeals ...2016-02-29T13:02:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:06:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Marshall Johnson, a/k/a Michael Tate, Appellant. A15-391, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-3912016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf135905Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Derrick Lee Riddle, Appellant. A15-522, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016.2016-02-29T14:34:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:09:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of and sentences for violating an order for protection (OFP) and terroristic threats. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Derrick Lee Riddle, Appellant. A15-522, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-5222016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf135872Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nicole Renaye Kroells, Appellant. A15-1026, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, ...2016-02-29T14:17:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:37:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to suppress evidence.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nicole Renaye Kroells, Appellant. A15-1026, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-10262016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf160481Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishOrin Vann, Relator, vs. Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC - Texas Roadhouse, Respondent, Department of Employment and ...2016-02-26T10:18:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:22:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Orin Vann, Relator, vs. Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC - Texas Roadhouse, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-994, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-9942016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf140484Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishIn re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray, Deceased. A15-1061, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, ...2016-03-01T17:31:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:49:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Judgment against an estate.In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray, Deceased. A15-1061, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-10612016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf121486Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishSarah Elizabeth LeBlanc, Appellant, vs. Alonzo Marell Lee, Respondent. A15-1006, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, ...2016-03-01T10:31:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:34:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of a harassment restraining order.Sarah Elizabeth LeBlanc, Appellant, vs. Alonzo Marell Lee, Respondent. A15-1006, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-10062016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf122076Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishMarcia H. Thurmer, Relator, vs. Attorney Edward R. Shaw, P.A., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic ...2016-02-26T10:25:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T13:04:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits. Reversed.Marcia H. Thurmer, Relator, vs. Attorney Edward R. Shaw, P.A., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1105, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-11052016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf136837Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Alan Michael Habiger, Appellant. A15-306, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, ...2016-03-01T17:09:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:00:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aggravated robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Alan Michael Habiger, Appellant. A15-306, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-3062016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf108224Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishCathie J. Pascavage, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Donald Mackay, Appellant. A15-1204, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-26T11:40:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T13:05:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges a harassment restraining order (HRO).Cathie J. Pascavage, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Donald Mackay, Appellant. A15-1204, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-12042016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf223568Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishNewman-Lakka Cancer Foundation, Appellant, vs. Christine E. Briggs, Respondent. A15-1217, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-29T14:24:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T13:16:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts dismissal of its defamation lawsuit.Newman-Lakka Cancer Foundation, Appellant, vs. Christine E. Briggs, Respondent. A15-1217, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-12172016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf170401Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Raymond Joseph Traylor, Appellant. A15-29, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, ...2016-02-29T11:43:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T10:58:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Raymond Joseph Traylor, Appellant. A15-29, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-292016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf126598Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Cheng Pao Vue, Appellant. A15-852, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016.2016-02-26T09:12:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:17:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of first-degree burglary and theft. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Cheng Pao Vue, Appellant. A15-852, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-8522016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf185203Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sherman Peak, Appellant. A15-355, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016.2016-03-01T12:53:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:05:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to suppress the evidence.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sherman Peak, Appellant. A15-355, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-3552016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf103230Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of: C.M.M., Child. A15-906, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016.2016-03-01T17:51:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:19:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) challenges the district courts order requiring it to seal its files related to respondent C.M.M.s juvenile delinquency records after C.M.M. improperly served her expungement petition to the wrong address and with the wrong hearing date. Reversed.In the Matter of the Welfare of: C.M.M., Child. A15-906, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-9062016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf241684Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Paul Patterson, Appellant. A15-604, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, ...2016-03-01T14:08:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:13:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of sale and possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Paul Patterson, Appellant. A15-604, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-6042016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf160060Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishBridget Colleen Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-1054, Court of ...2016-02-26T10:09:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:39:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts order sustaining the revocation of her drivers license.Bridget Colleen Johnson, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-1054, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-10542016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123072Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishBrandon Darnell Barnes, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1212, Court of Appeals ...2016-02-29T13:45:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T13:10:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Brandon Darnell Barnes, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1212, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-12122016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf195745Mar 7,
2016 19:24:01 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. A15-1539, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016.2016-03-01T11:26:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T13:20:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. J. S., Parent. A15-1539, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-15392016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf191315Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishIsanti Estates, LLC, Appellant, vs. McCarthy Well Company, Respondent, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough ...2016-03-01T14:24:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:15:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the summary-judgment dismissal of its conversion, negligence, and breach-of-contract claims, and the entry of summary judgment in favor of one of the respondents on its unjust-enrichment claim.Isanti Estates, LLC, Appellant, vs. McCarthy Well Company, Respondent, McCullough & Sons, Incorporated d/b/a McCullough & Sons Well Drilling, Inc., Respondent. A15-809, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-8092016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf98046Mar 7,
2016 19:24:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Max Dylan Loosen-Scholer, Appellant. A15-1095, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March ...2016-03-01T16:04:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T11:52:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Max Dylan Loosen-Scholer, Appellant. A15-1095, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-10952016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf121173Mar 7,
2016 19:24:01 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. R. H. and G. J. B., Parents. A15-1441, Court of Appeals Unpublished,...2016-03-01T10:51:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-07T13:19:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. R. H. and G. J. B., Parents. A15-1441, Court of Appeals Unpublished, March 7, 2016. A15-14412016-03-07T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf1596149Mar 2,
2016 17:05:17 GMTenglishORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE BOARD ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS. ADM10-8032, Supreme Court Administrative ...2016-02-24T13:33:21+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-02T11:03:55+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards are amended as shown in the attachment to this order.ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE BOARD ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS. ADM10-8032, Supreme Court Administrative Order, March 2, 2016.ADM10-80322016-03-02T00:00:00-0600 February 24, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT ADM10-8032 ORDER PROMULGATING AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE BOARD ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS Om:ciEOF API'B. ... pdf401721Mar 2,
2016 17:05:17 GMTenglishCraig Matthew Hohenwald, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-487, Supreme Court Order, March 2, 2016.2016-02-26T15:35:09+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-02T10:51:48+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inCorrection: The attached slip opinion, amended as stated above, shall be substituted for the opinion filed February 24, 2016.Craig Matthew Hohenwald, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-487, Supreme Court Order, March 2, 2016.A15-4872016-03-02T00:00:00-0600 February 26, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT AlS- 0487 Craig Matthew Hohenwald, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. ORDER Based upon all the ... pdf308185Mar 2,
2016 17:05:17 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Daniel L. M. Kennedy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0211321. ...2016-02-24T11:33:10+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-02T10:55:29+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Daniel L. M. Kennedy is publicly reprimanded.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Daniel L. M. Kennedy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0211321. A15-1698, Supreme Court Order, March 2, 2016.A15-16982016-03-02T00:00:00-0600 February 24, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1698 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Daniel L. M. Kennedy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf306954Mar 2,
2016 17:05:17 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jonathan C. Lewis, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0172017. ...2016-02-24T15:47:49+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-03-02T10:57:12+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Jonathan C. Lewis is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jonathan C. Lewis, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0172017. A15-999, Supreme Court Order, March 2, 2016.A15-9992016-03-02T00:00:00-0600 February 24, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0999 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jonathan C. Lewis, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf275972Mar 2,
2016 17:05:17 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Vidale Lee Whitson, Appellant, Vidale Lee Whitson, Appellant, vs. State of ...2016-02-29T10:11:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-02T10:47:43+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Without deciding whether the prosecutor committed misconduct by failing to adequately prepare a witness and eliciting inadmissible testimony, the alleged misconduct was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The postconviction court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants postconviction claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel without granting an evidentiary hearing. The State did not fail to disclose material exculpatory evidence to the defense. The postconviction court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellants claims that the police and prosecutors fabricated evidence without granting an evidentiary hearing. Omissions from the trial transcript that were later corrected and provided to appellant did not deny him the right to meaningful review of his conviction.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Vidale Lee Whitson, Appellant, Vidale Lee Whitson, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. C5-02-2108, A04-875, Supreme Court, March 2, 2016.C5-02-21082016-03-02T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C5-02-2108 A04-0875 St. Louis County Lillehaug, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: ... pdf186472Feb 29,
2016 16:11:53 GMTenglishFounders Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. James Yates, Respondent. A15-1174, Court of Appeals Published, February 29, ...2016-02-23T14:02:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T10:09:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Under the Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2014), an out-of-state insurer that is not licensed to write motor-vehicle-accident reparation and liability insurance in Minnesota is not obligated to provide basic economic-loss benefits to its insured who was injured in an accident in Minnesota. Reversed.Founders Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. James Yates, Respondent. A15-1174, Court of Appeals Published, February 29, 2016.A15-11742016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-1174 Founders Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. James Yates, Respondent. Filed February 29, 2016 Reversed Chutich, ... pdf98056Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishCapital One Bank USA, NA, Respondent, vs. Gbenga J. Ekinnola, Appellant. A15-485, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-23T09:49:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:25:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to vacate judgment.Capital One Bank USA, NA, Respondent, vs. Gbenga J. Ekinnola, Appellant. A15-485, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-4852016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf106143Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Emery Scott Whitt, Appellant. A15-465, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, ...2016-02-23T11:09:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:21:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Emery Scott Whitt, Appellant. A15-465, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-4652016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS ... pdf128550Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gonsalo Cosme-Garsia, Appellant. A15-470, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29,...2016-02-18T09:30:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:23:25+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gonsalo Cosme-Garsia, Appellant. A15-470, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-4702016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf99207Feb 29,
2016 21:17:31 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jeremia Joseph Loper, Appellant. A15-509, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29,...2016-02-17T13:48:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T15:16:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jeremia Joseph Loper, Appellant. A15-509, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-5092016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf110812Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Troy Adam Gocha, Appellant. A15-706. Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, ...2016-02-23T16:17:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:59:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Troy Adam Gocha, Appellant. A15-706. Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-7062016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf180826Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kevin Earl Westergaard, Appellant. A15-582, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-18T15:03:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:39:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kevin Earl Westergaard, Appellant. A15-582, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-5822016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf102298Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishKarl Arthur Keene, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-796, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-23T13:02:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T12:01:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Karl Arthur Keene, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-796, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-7962016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf174808Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Robert Dornsbach, Appellant. A15-590, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-23T14:35:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:55:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Matthew Robert Dornsbach, Appellant. A15-590, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-5902016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf104836Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Zaki Mohamed Sugule, Appellant. A15-826, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, ...2016-02-23T09:48:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T12:06:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a downward durational sentencing departure.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Zaki Mohamed Sugule, Appellant. A15-826, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-8262016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf168458Feb 29,
2016 21:11:15 GMTenglishHennepin County, Respondent, Mamie Jegbadai, Respondent, vs. Gbenga Akinnola, Appellant. A15-667, Court of Appeals ...2016-02-23T13:55:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T15:10:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Child support dispute.Hennepin County, Respondent, Mamie Jegbadai, Respondent, vs. Gbenga Akinnola, Appellant. A15-667, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-6672016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf113753Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Timothy Andrew Swan, Appellant. A15-832, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, ...2016-02-23T11:15:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T12:07:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Timothy Andrew Swan, Appellant. A15-832, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-8322016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107220Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Justin Glenn Joecks, Appellant. A15-1014, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29,...2016-02-23T09:32:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T12:13:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to suppress evidence.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Justin Glenn Joecks, Appellant. A15-1014, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-10142016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf165895Feb 29,
2016 19:47:52 GMTenglishEstate of Howard G. Boyd, Decedent. A15-1132, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016.2016-02-18T10:47:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T13:23:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Probate dispute. Reversed and remanded.Estate of Howard G. Boyd, Decedent. A15-1132, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-11322016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf169297Feb 29,
2016 19:47:52 GMTenglishLois St. Aubin, Appellant, vs. Caseys Retail Company d/b/a Caseys General Store, Respondent. A15-1306, Court of ...2016-02-18T15:16:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T13:32:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges summary judgment dismissal of slip and fall claim.Lois St. Aubin, Appellant, vs. Caseys Retail Company d/b/a Caseys General Store, Respondent. A15-1306, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-13062016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf115044Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishWillie J. Bridgeforth, III, Appellant, Susan J. Swanson, Plaintiff, vs. Smith Strum Investment Co. d/b/a Winnetka ...2016-02-24T09:20:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 20102016-02-29T13:18:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2010Challenges grant of summary judgment.Willie J. Bridgeforth, III, Appellant, Susan J. Swanson, Plaintiff, vs. Smith Strum Investment Co. d/b/a Winnetka Village Apartments, Respondent. A15-1091, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-10912016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf136315Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph Harvey Bellanger, Appellant. A15-150, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-19T09:48:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:03:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of kidnapping and false imprisonment.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joseph Harvey Bellanger, Appellant. A15-150, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-1502016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf142108Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Travis Joseph Petermeier, Appellant. A15-425, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-23T13:14:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:18:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Travis Joseph Petermeier, Appellant. A15-425, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-4252016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf161062Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Faith Annette Jenson, Appellant. A15-416, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29,...2016-02-22T15:35:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:15:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Faith Annette Jenson, Appellant. A15-416, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-4162016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf131559Feb 29,
2016 21:11:06 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric Christopher Bakke, Appellant. A15-504, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-23T17:01:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T15:09:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of a controlled substance. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eric Christopher Bakke, Appellant. A15-504, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-5042016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf26025Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Marcus Darrell Pederson, Appellant. A15-583, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-23T09:07:33+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-29T11:44:24+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-23T15:07:22+00:00Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Marcus Darrell Pederson, Appellant. A15-583, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-5832016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123814Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha, Appellant. ...2016-02-22T17:00:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T11:37:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter.In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha, Appellant. A15-563, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-5632016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf152927Feb 29,
2016 19:47:52 GMTenglishGail D. Robinson, Relator, vs. Analysts International Corporation, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic ...2016-02-18T11:14:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T13:25:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Gail D. Robinson, Relator, vs. Analysts International Corporation, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1200, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-12002016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf120143Feb 29,
2016 19:47:53 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr., Respondent. A15-1432, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-23T14:25:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T13:38:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013State of Minnesota challenges that the district court erred as a matter of law by suppressing all evidence discovered as a result of a canine sniff and subsequent search of vehicle. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr., Respondent. A15-1432, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-14322016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf127530Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Justin Lee Armstrong, Appellant. A15-912, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29,...2016-02-23T15:23:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T12:11:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to withdraw guilty plea. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Justin Lee Armstrong, Appellant. A15-912, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-9122016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf122422Feb 29,
2016 19:47:53 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. J. W. and M. A., Parents. A15-1531, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-22T15:47:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T13:45:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. J. W. and M. A., Parents. A15-1531, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-15312016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf169510Feb 29,
2016 19:47:52 GMTenglishFrancis Kiyimba, Relator, vs. Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1098, Court of Appeals ...2016-02-18T14:36:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T13:21:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Francis Kiyimba, Relator, vs. Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1098, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-10982016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf94010Feb 29,
2016 19:47:41 GMTenglishHeidi Jo Olson, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Mark Douglas Olson, Appellant. A15-900, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-22T14:26:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T12:09:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter.Heidi Jo Olson, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Mark Douglas Olson, Appellant. A15-900, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-9002016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf114934Feb 29,
2016 19:47:53 GMTenglishCraig L. Anderson, Successor Personal Representative and Sole Beneficiary of the Leslie R. Anderson and Donna Mae ...2016-02-18T10:08:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-29T13:40:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges the district courts determination that he is a frivolous litigant under Minn. R. Gen. Pract. 9.06.Craig L. Anderson, Successor Personal Representative and Sole Beneficiary of the Leslie R. Anderson and Donna Mae Anderson Revocable Living Trust, on behalf of: The Estate of Leslie R. Anderson, Appellant, vs. Hans Carlson, et al., Respondents, Joel Krekelberg, Respondent, Scott Vance, Respondent. A15-1443, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 29, 2016. A15-14432016-02-29T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf393585Feb 24,
2016 18:21:54 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Duane A. Kennedy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0055128. ...2016-02-19T14:08:57+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-24T12:10:59+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Duane A. Kennedy is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Duane A. Kennedy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0055128. A15-1390, Supreme Court Order, February 24, 2016.A15-13902016-02-24T00:00:00-0600 February 19, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1390 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Duane A. Kennedy, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf417267Feb 24,
2016 18:21:54 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Marc G. Kurzman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080. A14-1416, ...2016-02-18T09:53:31+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-24T12:21:17+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Marc G. Kurzman is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Marc G. Kurzman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 59080. A14-1416, Supreme Court Order, February 24, 2016.A14-14162016-02-24T00:00:00-0600 February 18, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1416 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Marc G. Kurzman, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf150755Feb 24,
2016 18:21:53 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. True Thao, Appellant. A14-1182, Supreme Court, February 24, 2016.2016-02-19T15:18:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-24T12:12:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The district court's allegedly erroneous admission of evidence under Minn. R. Evid. 404(b) was harmless because it did not significantly affect the verdict. The district court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted expert testimony on gangs. The district court's jury instruction on reasonable doubt was not an abuse of discretion. The appellant's pro se arguments lack merit.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. True Thao, Appellant. A14-1182, Supreme Court, February 24, 2016.A14-11822016-02-24T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1182 Ramsey County Stras, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: February 24, ... pdf265837Feb 22,
2016 17:54:45 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Crystol Kevan Caudullo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Michael Anthony Caudullo, Respondent. A15-314,...2016-02-12T12:51:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:17:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Child custody dispute. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In re the Marriage of: Crystol Kevan Caudullo, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Michael Anthony Caudullo, Respondent. A15-314, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-3142016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf163108Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Steven Tyrone Davis, Appellant. A15-523, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, ...2016-02-16T15:23:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:23:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony violation of a harassment restraining order.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Steven Tyrone Davis, Appellant. A15-523, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-5232016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf162529Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Antonio Lamonthe White, Appellant. A15-608, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-12T11:07:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:37:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Antonio Lamonthe White, Appellant. A15-608, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-6082016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf228911Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents. A15-451, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-17T09:52:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:19:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents. A15-451, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-4512016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf229209Feb 22,
2016 17:54:45 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Emem Ufot Udoh, Appellant. A14-2181, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, ...2016-02-11T12:42:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:06:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Emem Ufot Udoh, Appellant. A14-2181, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A14-21812016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf130081Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishLovell Nahmor Oates, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-788, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-16T10:29:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:39:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Lovell Nahmor Oates, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-788, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-7882016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf193310Feb 22,
2016 17:54:45 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Paula Jean Yackel, Appellant. A15-311, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, ...2016-02-16T13:01:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:12:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of driving while impaired and obstructing the legal process. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Paula Jean Yackel, Appellant. A15-311, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-3112016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf115940Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishWilliam Nichols, Respondent, vs. Soo Line Railroad d/b/a C. P. Railway, a corporation, Appellant. A15-1100, Court of ...2016-02-11T11:58:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:45:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges the district courts grant, in favor of respondent, of judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), which set aside a jury determination that respondent was contributorily negligent. Reversed and remanded.William Nichols, Respondent, vs. Soo Line Railroad d/b/a C. P. Railway, a corporation, Appellant. A15-1100, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-11002016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf303717Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishRandall Norman, et al., Respondents, vs. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company, Appellant. A15-983, Court of ...2016-02-16T15:55:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:42:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Stray electrical voltage claim.Randall Norman, et al., Respondents, vs. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company, Appellant. A15-983, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-9832016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf172474Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishAngela K. Schreader, Respondent, vs. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services, Appellant. ...2016-02-11T11:34:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:49:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant employer challenges the district courts imposition of a statutory penalty for unpaid wages under Minn. Stat. § 181.13(a) (2014). Reversed and remanded.Angela K. Schreader, Respondent, vs. DC & D Enterprises, LLC, d/b/a Above Summit Construction Services, Appellant. A15-1140, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-11402016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf97698Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lamont Bugg, Jr., Appellant. A15-1137, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, ...2016-02-12T09:31:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:48:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013After appellant was sentenced for failure to register as a predatory offender, the district court sua sponte amended his sentence to add a ten-year conditional- release term under Minn. Stat. § 243.166, subd. 5a (Supp. 2013). Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lamont Bugg, Jr., Appellant. A15-1137, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-11372016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf245184Feb 22,
2016 17:54:46 GMTenglishPeter Gerard Lonergan, Appellant, vs. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, Respondent. A15-1625, Court ...2016-02-11T10:24:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-22T11:53:55+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant challenges the judicial appeal panels order dismissing and denying his petition for discharge or provisional discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous person.Peter Gerard Lonergan, Appellant, vs. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, Respondent. A15-1625, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 22, 2016. A15-16252016-02-22T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf238418Feb 17,
2016 18:41:34 GMTenglishThomas Daniel Rhodes, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A13-560, A15-136, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.2016-02-16T11:20:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-17T12:10:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The postconviction court did not abuse its discretion by summarily denying appellant's third and fourth petitions for postconviction relief because the petitions are untimely under the postconviction statute of limitations.Thomas Daniel Rhodes, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A13-560, A15-136, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A13-5602016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-0560 A15-0136 Kandiyohi County Wright, J. Dissenting, Anderson and Lillehaug, JJ. Took no part, Hudson, J. Thomas ... pdf366097Feb 17,
2016 18:41:35 GMTenglishJennifer L. DeCook, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, vs. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and ...2016-02-16T12:38:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-17T12:18:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A summons and complaint that are defective because they are signed by an attorney who is not licensed to practice in Minnesota are not void and may, in the district court's discretion, be cured by amendment. Because the plaintiffs produced evidence of service and the defendants did not satisfy their burden to prove that service was not effective, the district court erred in granting the defendants' motion to dismiss for insufficient service.Jennifer L. DeCook, et al., Respondents/Cross-Appellants, vs. Olmsted Medical Center, Inc., Brenda J. Hanson, R.N., and Darlene M. Pratt, R.N., Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Kenneth M. Palmer, M.D., Jack F. Perrone, M.D., Kimberly McKeon, M.D., and Ashley Morrow, R.N., Cross-Respondents. A14-1180, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A14-11802016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1180 Court of Appeals Lillehaug, J. Concurring in part and dissenting in part, Dietzen, J., Gildea, C.J., and ... pdf201180Feb 17,
2016 18:41:35 GMTenglishWayzata Nissan, LLC, Appellant, vs. Nissan North America, Inc., Respondent, Stephen J. McDaniels, et al., Respondents. ...2016-02-12T09:52:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-17T12:21:21+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A challenge to the proposed relocation of a motor vehicle dealership under the Minnesota Motor Vehicle Sale and Distribution Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 80E.01-.17 (2014), is not rendered moot by the relocation and operation of the dealership. The notice requirement of Minn. Stat. § 80E.14, subd. 1, applies on the date that a manufacturer develops an intention to authorize the relocation of a motor vehicle dealership. The exception for the "relocation of an existing dealer" in Minn. Stat. § 80E.14, subd. 1, does not apply when the relocated dealership will be operated by a new dealer. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Wayzata Nissan, LLC, Appellant, vs. Nissan North America, Inc., Respondent, Stephen J. McDaniels, et al., Respondents. A14-1652, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A14-16522016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1652 Court of Appeals Wright, J. Wayzata Nissan, LLC, Appellant, vs. Filed: February 17, 2016 Office of Appellate ... pdf310842Feb 18,
2016 17:36:36 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Lee Myhre, Appellant. A14-670, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.2016-02-18T11:18:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-18T11:35:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant is not entitled to a new trial based on the district court's failure to fully comply with the provisions of Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 26.01, subdivision 4.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Lee Myhre, Appellant. A14-670, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A14-6702016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0670 Court of Appeals Anderson, J. Dissenting, Wright and Lillehaug, JJ. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. ... pdf434441Feb 17,
2016 18:41:35 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jorge Luis Sanchez, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0388556. ...2016-02-03T14:30:45+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-17T12:35:50+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Jorge Luis Sanchez is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Jorge Luis Sanchez, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0388556. A16-66, Supreme Court Order, February 17, 2016.A16-662016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 February 3, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT Al6-0066 In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Jorge Luis Sanchez, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf248852Feb 17,
2016 18:41:35 GMTenglishAli M. Shire, Respondent, vs. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and ...2016-02-15T15:42:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-17T12:34:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The voluntary-recreational-program exception to the workers' compensation statute, Minn. Stat. § 176.021, subd. 9 (2014), is not satisfied when the employees' choices are either to attend the program or risk forfeiting pay or benefits. The phrase "voluntary recreational program" in Minn. Stat. § 176.021, subd._9, plainly refers to a voluntary "program," not voluntary activities within a program.Ali M. Shire, Respondent, vs. Rosemount, Inc., Self-Insured/Berkley Risk Administrators Company, LLC, Relators, and Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., Crosstown Surgery Center, and Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, Intervenors. A15-856, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A15-8562016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0856 Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals Wright, J. Dissenting, Anderson, J. Ali M. Shire, Respondent, vs. ... pdf339543Feb 17,
2016 18:41:35 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Mitchell Alan Robinson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0281359. ...2016-02-03T14:37:57+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-17T12:37:43+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Mitchell Alan Robinson is publicly reprimanded.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Mitchell Alan Robinson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0281359. A15-1357, Supreme Court Order, February 17, 2016.A15-13572016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 February 3, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1357 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Mitchell Alan Robinson, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf291007Feb 18,
2016 17:42:45 GMTenglishCurtis G. and Stacy S. Marks, Respondents, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. A15-1145, Supreme Court, February 17, ...2016-02-18T10:18:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-18T11:42:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013When determining whether a taxpayer was a "resident" as defined in Minn. Stat. § 290.01, subd. 7(b) (2014), the Commissioner may aggregate all the days the taxpayer spent in Minnesota during the tax year, including the days spent in the state as a domiciliary. Reversed and remanded.Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks, Respondents, vs. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. A15-1145, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A15-11452016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1145 Tax Court Lillehaug, J. Dissenting, Stras, J., Gildea C.J., Anderson, J. Curtis G. and Stacy S. Marks, Respondents, ... pdf269787Feb 17,
2016 18:41:35 GMTenglishMelrose Gates, LLC, Respondent, vs. Chor Moua, et al., Appellants. A14-1131, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.2016-02-16T12:06:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-17T12:26:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013When a district court grants summary judgment dismissing an equitable claim on the ground that, as a matter of law, the requirements for equitable relief were not met, and the record shows that the facts were undisputed and the district court did not weigh equitable factors, an appellate court reviews the district court's decision de novo. Under the factors set forth in RAM Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohde, 820 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2012), the landlord can proceed on a subrogation claim for damage to the tenants own apartment, but not for damage to other property belonging to the landlord. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Melrose Gates, LLC, Respondent, vs. Chor Moua, et al., Appellants. A14-1131, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A14-11312016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1131 Court of Appeals Dietzen, J. Concurring in part and dissenting in part, Lillehaug, J., Gildea, C.J., Anderson, ... pdf214646Feb 18,
2016 17:39:20 GMTenglishJedidiah Dean Troxel, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1294, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.2016-02-16T12:16:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-18T11:38:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion to introduce alternative-perpetrator evidence. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's request for a jury instruction on the lesser-included offense of second-degree intentional murder. The presiding judge at appellant's trial was not disqualified for an appearance of partiality.Jedidiah Dean Troxel, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1294, Supreme Court, February 17, 2016.A15-12942016-02-17T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1294 Pennington County Wright, J. Dissenting, Lillehaug, J., Gildea, C.J., Anderson, J. Jedidiah Dean Troxel, ... pdf276354Feb 16,
2016 16:05:39 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn, Appellant. A15-7, Court of Appeals Published, ...2016-02-04T10:56:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T10:05:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A person may be convicted of first-degree assault based on the intentional infliction of great bodily harm if that person commits a volitional act in a hostile manner, even where the degree of force is as slight as a push, so long as that act is a substantial cause of the bodily harm.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn, Appellant. A15-7, Court of Appeals Published, February 16, 2016.A15-72016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0007 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Alie Christine Theodore Dorn, Appellant. Filed February 16, 2016 Affirmed ... pdf208473Feb 16,
2016 16:05:40 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, Appellant. A14-1981, Court of Appeals Published, ...2016-02-09T17:41:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T10:04:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 20131. Minnesota Statutes section 169.91, subdivision 1 (2012), does not require an arresting police officer to present a suspected impaired driver to a judge before the officer completes all administrative duties attendant to an impaired-driving arrest, including administering the implied-consent testing required by Minnesota Statutes section 169A.51 (2012). 2. A criminal defendant has no Sixth Amendment right to create a video recording of her trial.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, Appellant. A14-1981, Court of Appeals Published, February 16, 2016A14-19812016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-1981 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michelle MacDonald Shimota, Appellant. Filed February 16, 2016 Affirmed ... pdf1130847Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Vernon David Matter, Appellant. A15-449, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-09T10:28:01+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-16T11:10:52+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-09T16:27:48+00:00Challenges to convictions of possessing a controlled substance and possessing a short-barreled shotgun. Reversed.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Vernon David Matter, Appellant. A15-449, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-4492016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf106505Feb 16,
2016 20:24:38 GMTenglishEugene Lee Rushton, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-584, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-04T08:27:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T11:22:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion to correct life sentence under Minn. Stat. § 609.3455, subd. 4(a)(1) (2010), for first-degree criminal sexual conduct.Eugene Lee Rushton, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-584, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-5842016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf174559Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Demetrious Limel Parker, Appellant. A15-654, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-09T13:17:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T11:37:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Demetrious Limel Parker, Appellant. A15-654, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-6542016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf32814Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishAntonio Medina, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1067, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-09T09:56:12+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-16T13:35:32+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-09T15:55:59+00:00Challenges the district courts denial of motion to correct sentence.Antonio Medina, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1067, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-10672016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf159962Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishJay Thomas Nygard, petitioner, Appellant (A15-1276), Kendall Mae Nygard, petitioner, Appellant (A15-1277), vs. Dennis S....2016-02-09T13:13:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T13:52:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenge district court orders dismissing their petitions seeking ex parte harassment restraining orders (HRO) against a neighbor.Jay Thomas Nygard, petitioner, Appellant (A15-1276), Kendall Mae Nygard, petitioner, Appellant (A15-1277), vs. Dennis S. Walsh, Respondent. A15-1276, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-12762016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf135069Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson, Appellant. A15-1057, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-09T10:57:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T11:53:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aggravated robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Elliott Lamar-Seccer Pierson, Appellant. A15-1057, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-10572016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107946Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Albert Wood. A15-1428, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016.2016-02-09T13:50:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T14:00:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts judgment committing him as mentally ill and dangerous.In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: John Albert Wood. A15-1428, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-14282016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf216909Feb 16,
2016 20:24:38 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Marlow Shelton McDonald, Appellant. A15-268, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-09T11:39:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T11:07:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of controlled-substance, firearms-related, and fleeing-a-peace-officer-in-a-motor-vehicle convictions and his aggravated durational departure sentence.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Marlow Shelton McDonald, Appellant. A15-268, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-2682016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf36432Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. M. R. and T. P. D., Parents. A15-1307, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-08T10:56:10+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-16T13:56:43+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-08T16:42:44+00:00Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. M. R. and T. P. D., Parents. A15-1307, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-13072016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf186436Mar 9,
2016 19:35:00 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lisa Dorthea Moodie, Appellant. A15-537, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, ...2016-03-08T16:34:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-09T13:22:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while inder the influence due to prosecutor prejudicial misconduct. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lisa Dorthea Moodie, Appellant. A15-537, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-5372016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf191615Feb 16,
2016 20:24:38 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lorenzo Leontay Washington, Appellant. A15-31, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-09T10:02:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T11:03:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of aiding and abetting attempted second-degree murder and aiding and abetting second-degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Lorenzo Leontay Washington, Appellant. A15-31, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-312016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf67744Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishDenise C. Esler, Relator, vs. Community Veterinary Clinic, P.A., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-08T13:09:11+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-16T11:50:01+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-08T19:08:49+00:00Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Denise C. Esler, Relator, vs. Community Veterinary Clinic, P.A., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-798, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-7982016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf117049Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishCraig Allan Hargreaves, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1046, Court of Appeals ...2016-02-05T13:26:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T11:51:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Craig Allan Hargreaves, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1046, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-10462016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf174591Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. D., Parent. A15-1241, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, ...2016-02-09T13:48:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T13:37:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts adjudication of her child as in need of protection or services (CHIPS). Reversed.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. D., Parent. A15-1241, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-12412016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf109047Feb 16,
2016 20:24:39 GMTenglishKenneth H. Zimmermann, et al., Appellants, Gary C. Berndt, et al., Appellants, vs. Sauk River Watershed District, ...2016-02-05T14:20:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-16T11:41:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment. Reversed and remanded.Kenneth H. Zimmermann, et al., Appellants, Gary C. Berndt, et al., Appellants, vs. Sauk River Watershed District, Respondent. A15-782, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 16, 2016. A15-7822016-02-16T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf117520Feb 10,
2016 16:48:46 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Jimmy Dawayne Lester, Respondent. A14-431, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.2016-02-08T15:59:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-10T10:47:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The warrantless search of respondent's car was lawful under the automobile exception because there was probable cause to believe that the car contained a controlled substance.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Jimmy Dawayne Lester, Respondent. A14-431, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.A14-4312016-02-10T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0431 Court of Appeals Wright, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Filed: February ... pdf187518Feb 10,
2016 16:48:46 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Paul Roland Rambow, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0169389. ...2016-02-08T12:12:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-10T10:45:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Disbarment is the appropriate sanction for an attorney who misappropriated client funds; forged, or allowed his staff to forge, endorsements on clients' settlement checks and medical reimbursement checks; failed to maintain required trust account books and records; made false statements to the Director and to an ethics investigator; failed to cooperate during the disciplinary investigation; violated multiple court orders; improperly billed clients; failed to communicate adequately and act diligently on client matters; took unauthorized actions on behalf of former clients after the termination of representation; released confidential client information to third parties; engaged in a conflict of interest; and engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Paul Roland Rambow, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0169389. A14-804, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.A14-8042016-02-10T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0804 Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Paul Roland Rambow, a Minnesota ... pdf178298Feb 10,
2016 16:48:46 GMTenglishBrent R. Wilcox, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, vs. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Defendant/Respondent. A15-724,...2016-02-08T10:26:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-10T10:30:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013When a homeowner's insurance policy does not define the term "actual cash value," it is for the trier of fact to determine whether labor costs embedded in the cost of repairing or replacing damaged property are depreciable for the purpose of calculating the actual cash value of a covered loss. Certified question, as reformulated, answered in the affirmative.Brent R. Wilcox, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, vs. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Defendant/Respondent. A15-724, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.A15-7242016-02-10T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0724 Certified Question Wright, J. United States District Court, Took no part, Stras and Hudson, JJ. District ... pdf247215Feb 10,
2016 16:48:46 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Amanda Lea Peltier, Appellant. A14-1452, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.2016-02-05T10:17:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-10T10:47:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The instruction given to the jury describing the elements of first-degree child abuse murder, Minn. Stat. § 609.185(a)(5) (2014), including malicious punishment of a child as a type of child abuse, constituted plain error because the instruction failed to include the elements of malicious punishment of a child under Minn. Stat. § 609.377, subd. 1 (2014). The appellant, however, failed to establish that the erroneous jury instruction affected her substantial rights.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Amanda Lea Peltier, Appellant. A14-1452, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.A14-14522016-02-10T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1452 Pope County Dietzen, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: February 10, ... pdf219079Feb 10,
2016 16:48:46 GMTenglishKeith Richard Rossberg, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1205, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.2016-02-08T14:51:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-10T10:28:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The postconviction judge erred by ruling on appellant's motion to disqualify the postconviction judge for cause rather than referring the motion to the chief judge of the judicial district. The failure to refer appellant's disqualification motion to the chief judge was harmless in this case because the motion lacked merit. Because it is undisputed that appellant's postconviction petition was submitted to the court without factual support, the postconviction court did not abuse its discretion by denying both appellant's request for additional time to file an addendum to the petition and appellant's petition.Keith Richard Rossberg, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-1205, Supreme Court, February 10, 2016.A15-12052016-02-10T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1205 Wright County Wright, J. Keith Richard Rossberg, Appellant, vs. Filed: February 10, 2016 Office of Appellate ... pdf323456Mar 22,
2016 20:56:30 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rafael Alfonso Banks, Appellant. A15-279, Court of Appeals Published, February 8, ...2016-03-16T09:51:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-03-22T15:55:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Rule 30.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure, which permits the district court to dismiss a complaint if the prosecutor has unnecessarily delayed bringing the defendant to trial, applies to claims of pre-charge delay. To warrant dismissal under rule 30.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure on a claim of unnecessary pre-charge delay, a defendant must demonstrate that he has suffered prejudice by the delay.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rafael Alfonso Banks, Appellant. A15-279, Court of Appeals Published, February 8, 2016.A15-2792016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0279 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Rafael Alfonso Banks, Appellant. Filed February 8, 2016 Affirmed Chutich, ... pdf117758Feb 8,
2016 16:07:33 GMTenglishJennifer White, Relator, vs. University of Minnesota Physicians Corp., Respondent, Department of Employment and ...2016-01-29T12:44:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T10:07:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013When the evidence in the record strongly suggests that an unrepresented applicant for unemployment benefits was suffering from depression when she was terminated for alleged employment misconduct, the unemployment-law judge has a duty to assist the applicant in developing the record regarding whether the alleged misconduct was a consequence of the applicants mental illness or impairment. Reversed and remanded.Jennifer White, Relator, vs. University of Minnesota Physicians Corp., Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-892, Court of Appeals Published, February 8, 2016.A15-8922016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0892 Jennifer White, Relator, vs. University of Minnesota Physicians Corp., Respondent, Department of Employment ... pdf120250Feb 8,
2016 21:22:57 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Vernon D. Schires, Appellant. A15-276, Court of ...2016-02-01T14:20:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T12:08:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In re the Marriage of: Janelle M. Schires, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Vernon D. Schires, Appellant. A15-276, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-2762016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf202543Feb 8,
2016 21:22:56 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Nathan Francis Gregor, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor, Appellant. ...2016-02-02T12:25:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T11:56:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Custody dispute.In re the Marriage of: Nathan Francis Gregor, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor, Appellant. A14-1920, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A14-19202016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf26784Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jodi Lynette Lacy, Appellant. A15-348, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-01T11:55:38+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-08T12:26:17+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-01T17:55:28+00:00Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jodi Lynette Lacy, Appellant. A15-348, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-3482016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf131613Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishIn re the Estate of: Harold E. Farnes, a/k/a Harold Farnes and Harold Ellwood Farnes, Deceased. A15-673, Court of ...2016-02-01T14:04:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:14:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Probate dispute.In re the Estate of: Harold E. Farnes, a/k/a Harold Farnes and Harold Ellwood Farnes, Deceased. A15-673, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-6732016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf109368Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tuquan Lee Smith, Appellant. A15-472, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, ...2016-02-02T09:42:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T13:34:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of first-degree aggravated robbery.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Tuquan Lee Smith, Appellant. A15-472, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-4722016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf169119Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Donalonte Jamar Wade, Defendant, Midwest Bonding, LLC, Appellant. A15-754, Court of ...2016-01-29T09:42:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:25:03+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant bonding company argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying its petition to reinstate and discharge a forfeited bail bond.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Donalonte Jamar Wade, Defendant, Midwest Bonding, LLC, Appellant. A15-754, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-7542016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf28395Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ronnie Jo Johnson, Appellant. A15-803, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-01T11:03:26+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-08T14:41:10+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-01T17:03:19+00:00Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ronnie Jo Johnson, Appellant. A15-803, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-8032016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf103739Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishJohn Howard Bartz, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-759, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-02T15:02:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:30:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.John Howard Bartz, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-759, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-7592016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf130154Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Amy Christine Olmsted, f/k/a Amy Christine Zarbok, petitioner, Appellant, vs. William Scott ...2016-02-02T12:46:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:55:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Property dispute and dissolution of marriage matter.In re the Marriage of: Amy Christine Olmsted, f/k/a Amy Christine Zarbok, petitioner, Appellant, vs. William Scott Zarbok, Respondent. A15-973, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016.A15-9732016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf175585Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishLawrence Charles Nichols, Appellant, vs. Erin Lynn Cimbura, Respondent. A15-861, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-02T13:05:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:52:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.Lawrence Charles Nichols, Appellant, vs. Erin Lynn Cimbura, Respondent. A15-861, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-8612016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf99483Feb 8,
2016 21:23:08 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kari Lynn Swenstad, Appellant. A15-996, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, ...2016-02-02T09:34:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T15:04:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kari Lynn Swenstad, Appellant. A15-996, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-9962016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf105162Feb 8,
2016 21:23:08 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Doua Chang, Appellant. A15-1281, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016.2016-02-02T09:40:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T15:13:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Doua Chang, Appellant. A15-1281, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-12812016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf115994Feb 8,
2016 21:22:57 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kenneth Edgar Staeheli, Appellant. A15-250, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-01-29T09:36:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T12:06:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree burglary. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Kenneth Edgar Staeheli, Appellant. A15-250, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-2502016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf356074Feb 8,
2016 21:22:57 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Reynaldo Morales, Appellant. A15-101, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, ...2016-02-02T12:21:13+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T12:03:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Reynaldo Morales, Appellant. A15-101, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-1012016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf96512Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gerald Ira Evans, Appellant. A15-572, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, ...2016-02-02T13:55:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:08:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gerald Ira Evans, Appellant. A15-572, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-5722016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf174143Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Bruce Monson, Appellant. A15-407, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, ...2016-02-02T09:44:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T13:33:20+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Joshua Bruce Monson, Appellant. A15-407, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-4072016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf37055Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Frederick Alusine Huballa, Appellant. A15-737, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-02T09:59:15+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-08T14:23:08+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-02T15:59:00+00:00Challenges possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Frederick Alusine Huballa, Appellant. A15-737, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-7372016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf34054Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Timothy Charles Dempze, Appellant. A15-492, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-02-02T09:14:14+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-08T13:37:25+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-02T15:13:54+00:00Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Timothy Charles Dempze, Appellant. A15-492, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-4922016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf201023Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishHeather Kirchner, Relator, vs. County of Nobles, Respondent. A15-794, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016.2016-02-02T11:50:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:35:05+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Certiorari appeal. Remanded.Heather Kirchner, Relator, vs. County of Nobles, Respondent. A15-794, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-7942016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf184562Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishWilliam D. Raffield, Appellant, Janice M. Raffield, Appellant, vs. Stephen K. Hursh, et al., Respondents, Wayne L. ...2016-02-02T12:05:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:48:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.William D. Raffield, Appellant, Janice M. Raffield, Appellant, vs. Stephen K. Hursh, et al., Respondents, Wayne L. Knoll, et al., Respondents. A15-828, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-8282016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf176018Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Terri Ann Demarrias, Defendant, Midwest Bonding, LLC, Appellant. A14-756, Court of ...2016-01-29T09:50:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T14:27:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant bonding company argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying its petition to reinstate and discharge a forfeited bail bond.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Terri Ann Demarrias, Defendant, Midwest Bonding, LLC, Appellant. A14-756, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A14-7562016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf114279Feb 8,
2016 21:23:08 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eugene Thomas Powells, Appellant. A15-1025, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-01-28T09:39:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T15:09:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Eugene Thomas Powells, Appellant. A15-1025, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-10252016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf103002Feb 8,
2016 21:23:08 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Patrick Alvin Gunnink, Appellant. A15-1042, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-02-02T09:29:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T15:12:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Patrick Alvin Gunnink, Appellant. A15-1042, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-10422016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf158820Feb 8,
2016 21:23:07 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Sandra Winer, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Edward L. Winer, Respondent. A15-339, Court of Appeals ...2016-02-02T12:01:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-08T12:23:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Spousal maintenance dispute. Affirmed in part, and reversed in part.In re the Marriage of: Sandra Winer, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Edward L. Winer, Respondent. A15-339, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 8, 2016. A15-3392016-02-08T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf329653Feb 3,
2016 17:38:21 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy J. Oliver, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121393. ...2016-01-27T11:06:10+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-03T10:39:39+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Timothy J. Oliver is temporarily suspended from the practice of law.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy J. Oliver, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121393. A15-1285, Supreme Court Order, February 3, 2016.A15-12852016-02-03T00:00:00-0600 January 27, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1285 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy J . Oliver, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf186391Feb 3,
2016 17:38:21 GMTenglishKelly Dennis, Respondent, vs. The Salvation Army and Chesterfield Services, Inc., Relators, and HealthEast Physician ...2016-01-28T12:22:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-03T10:55:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Because relators did not timely serve a cost bond upon the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals as required by Minn. Stat. § 176.471, subd. 3 (2014), the writ of certiorari is discharged and the appeal is dismissed.Kelly Dennis, Respondent, vs. The Salvation Army and Chesterfield Services, Inc., Relators, and HealthEast Physician Services, HealthEast St. Johns Hospital, High Pointe Surgery Center, Minnesota Department of Human Services/BRS, St. Croix Orthopaedics, and Nurse Anesthesia Services, P.A., Intervenors. A15-715, Supreme Court, February 3, 2016.A15-7152016-02-03T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0715 Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals Lillehaug, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. Kelly Dennis, Respondent, ... pdf274796Feb 3,
2016 17:38:21 GMTenglishJoan Van Riper, Employee-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, vs. Interstate Packaging, Inc. Employer-Relator/Cross-Appeal ...2016-01-27T12:14:09+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-03T10:51:30+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on June 26, 2015 is affirmed without opinion.Joan Van Riper, Employee-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, vs. Interstate Packaging, Inc. Employer-Relator/Cross-Appeal Respondent, and Cincinnati Insurance Company, Insurer-Relator/Cross-Appeal Respondent, and Mason City Clinic, Mason City Surgery Center, Mayo Clinic, Minnesota Department of Employment Economic Development, Spectrum Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, and, UNUM Life Insurance Company, Intervenors. A15-1156, Supreme Court Order, February 3, 2016.A15-11562016-02-03T00:00:00-0600 January 27, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT Joan Van Riper, vs. Employee-Respondent/ Cross-Appellant, Interstate Packaging, Inc. and Employer-Relator/ ... pdf35050Feb 3,
2016 17:38:21 GMTenglishRobert Marlyn Taylor, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-398, Supreme Court, February 3, 2016.MSC2016-02-01T09:00:49+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-03T10:53:11+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-02-01T15:00:23+00:00The postconviction court did not abuse its discretion when it summarily denied the appellant's second petition for postconviction relief, which was not timely filed with the postconviction court.Robert Marlyn Taylor, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-398, Supreme Court, February 3, 2016.A15-3982016-02-03T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-0398 Hennepin County Stras, J. Robert Marlyn Taylor, Appellant, vs. Filed: February 3, 2016 Office of Appellate ... pdf260875Feb 3,
2016 17:38:21 GMTenglishLeanda Muhonen, Relator, vs. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Respondents, Suburban ...2016-01-27T14:45:53+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-03T10:42:09+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inThe decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on July 1, 2015 is affirmed without opinion.Leanda Muhonen, Relator, vs. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Respondents, Suburban Radiologic Consultants, UCare, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, and Medical Advanced Pain Specialists, Intervenors. A15-1239, Supreme Court Order, February 3, 2016.A15-12392016-02-03T00:00:00-0600 January 27, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT AlS-1239 Leanda Muhonen, Relator, vs. New Horizon Academy and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Respondents, ... pdf437605Feb 3,
2016 17:38:21 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kent E. Nyberg, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0080159. A15-1632,...2016-01-27T14:06:15+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-02-03T10:45:08+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Kent E. Nyberg is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kent E. Nyberg, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0080159. A15-1632, Supreme Court Order, February 3, 2016.A15-16322016-02-03T00:00:00-0600 January 27, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1632 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Kent E. Nyberg, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf166246Feb 1,
2016 16:09:07 GMTenglishAmanda Jean Lunzer, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-456, Court of Appeals Published, ...2016-01-26T16:39:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T10:03:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A stay of adjudication entered pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 152.18, subd. 1 (2006),1 is not a conviction for purposes of seeking postconviction relief.Amanda Jean Lunzer, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-456, Court of Appeals Published, February 1, 2016A15-4562016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0456 Amanda Jean Lunzer, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Filed February 1, 2016 Affirmed ... pdf244380Feb 1,
2016 16:09:07 GMTenglishLandmark Community Bank, N.A., Respondent, vs. John D. Klingelhutz, et al., Appellants. A15-980. Court of Appeals ...2016-01-25T09:38:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T10:04:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Real property securing a guaranty mortgage is an asset under the Minnesota Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act when, at the time of transfer, there was no claim of default upon the underlying principal or the guaranty mortgage and the property had value. Minn. Stat. §§ 513.41-.51 (2014 & Supp. 2015).Landmark Community Bank, N.A., Respondent, vs. John D. Klingelhutz, et al., Appellants. A15-980. Court of Appeals Published, February 1, 2016. A15-9802016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0980 Landmark Community Bank, N.A., Respondent, vs. John D. Klingelhutz, et al., Appellants. Filed February 1, 2016 ... pdf232785Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Anne Marie Hinrichs, Appellant. A14-1895, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...2016-01-26T13:10:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T10:54:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of felony neglect of a child, and malicious punishment of a child.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Anne Marie Hinrichs, Appellant. A14-1895, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016.A14-18952016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf111956Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Landon Darrick Robinson, Appellant. A15-280, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-01-20T14:24:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:30:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Landon Darrick Robinson, Appellant. A15-280, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-2802016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf201946Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dashaunta Dmar Gomez, Appellant. A15-128, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...2016-01-27T09:27:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:04:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of second-degree murder and possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Dashaunta Dmar Gomez, Appellant. A15-128, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016.A15-1282016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf252776Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishFirst American Title Insurance Company, Respondent, vs. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, et ...2016-01-22T08:53:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T12:00:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges default judgment and attorneys-fees judgment.First American Title Insurance Company, Respondent, vs. National Title Resources Corp., dba Northwest Title Agency, et al., Co-Appellants, Wayne Holstad, Appellant. A15-664, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-6642016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf41148Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishIn the Matter of all Licenses Held by Pet Motortech, Inc., d/b/a Pet Auto Repair, for the premises at 44 Acker Street ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-01-25T09:36:54+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-01T11:47:40+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-01-25T15:35:36+00:00Challenges respondent-citys suspension of its business licenses.In the Matter of all Licenses Held by Pet Motortech, Inc., d/b/a Pet Auto Repair, for the premises at 44 Acker Street in St. Paul, Minnesota. A15-405, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-4052016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf170627Feb 1,
2016 21:20:06 GMTenglishIn the Matter of Kayvon Behnam, D. C., License No. 3644. A15-721, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016.2016-01-26T15:27:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T12:07:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to suspension of chiropractic license.In the Matter of Kayvon Behnam, D. C., License No. 3644. A15-721, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-7212016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf187171Feb 1,
2016 21:20:16 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Robert Reiland, et al., ...2016-01-27T10:15:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:09:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts grant of a condemnation petition for the taking of property by respondent State of Minnesota. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Robert Reiland, et al., Respondents Below, Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P., successor in interest to Magellan Pipeline Company, LLC and to Williams Pipe Line Company and to Williams Brothers Pipe Line Company, Appellant. A15-893, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-8932016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf114653Feb 1,
2016 21:20:06 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Warren Fred Nelson, Appellant. A15-765, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...2016-01-26T13:40:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:03:34+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to possession of controlled substance charge.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Warren Fred Nelson, Appellant. A15-765, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-7652016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf135821Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Luis Daniel Ruiz-Oliva, Appellant. A14-1241, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-01-26T16:49:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T10:43:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of third-degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Luis Daniel Ruiz-Oliva, Appellant. A14-1241, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A14-12412016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf205108Feb 1,
2016 21:20:16 GMTenglishMichael N. Palm, Sr., Appellant, vs. Calhoun Realty Company, Respondent. A15-895, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-26T16:06:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:11:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment dismissal of breach of contract claim.Michael N. Palm, Sr., Appellant, vs. Calhoun Realty Company, Respondent. A15-895, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-8952016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf111248Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishKnawon Antony Conda, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-74, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-25T15:37:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:02:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Knawon Antony Conda, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-74, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016.A15-742016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf208304Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Michael Rindahl, Jr., Appellant. A14-1736, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-26T12:45:48+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T10:49:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of malicious punishment of a child resulting in great bodily harm.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. David Michael Rindahl, Jr., Appellant. A14-1736, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A14-17362016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf109920Feb 1,
2016 21:20:17 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Antonio Freeman, Respondent. A15-1451, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...2016-01-26T10:43:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:45:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant State of Minnesota argues that the district court abused its discretion by sentencing respondent to a downward dispositional departure.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Antonio Freeman, Respondent. A15-1451, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-14512016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf37173Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Faron Wayne Ruel, Appellant. A15-152, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-01-25T13:14:25+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-01T11:15:41+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-01-25T19:14:03+00:00Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Faron Wayne Ruel, Appellant. A15-152, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-1522016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf151794Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. William James Holisky, II, Appellant. A15-153, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-21T14:42:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:25:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of felony domestic assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. William James Holisky, II, Appellant. A15-153, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-1532016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf110927Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Luis Fernando Escobar-Chilel, Appellant. A15-321, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-21T14:17:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:34:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Luis Fernando Escobar-Chilel, Appellant. A15-321, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-3212016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf116739Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nicholas Taylor Rod, Appellant. A15-372, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...2016-01-26T09:16:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:45:08+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of causing demonstrable bodily harm to a public safety dog.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nicholas Taylor Rod, Appellant. A15-372, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-3722016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf35854Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brandon Christopher Seals, Appellant. A15-581, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-01-25T10:47:12+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-02-01T11:49:55+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-01-25T16:46:55+00:00Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Brandon Christopher Seals, Appellant. A15-581, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-5812016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf172792Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sabrina Beth OBrien, Appellant. A15-596, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...2016-01-26T13:35:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:51:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of gross-misdemeanor malicious punishment of a child and misdemeanor domestic assault-harm.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Sabrina Beth OBrien, Appellant. A15-596, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-5962016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf127847Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishCarleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich, petitioner, Respondent, vs. John Marvin Theno, Appellant. A15-637, ...2016-01-25T15:01:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:56:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter.Carleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich, petitioner, Respondent, vs. John Marvin Theno, Appellant. A15-637, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-6372016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf190186Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Carol Lee DCosta, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Joseph Francis DCosta, Appellant. A15-655, Court ...2016-01-26T09:57:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:57:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Dissolution of marriage matter.In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee DCosta, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Joseph Francis DCosta, Appellant. A15-655, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-6552016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf101912Feb 1,
2016 21:20:06 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Shawn Timothy Zitzloff, Appellant. A15-676, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-01-21T13:35:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T12:03:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Shawn Timothy Zitzloff, Appellant. A15-676, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-6762016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf194007Feb 1,
2016 21:20:06 GMTenglishArrow Southampton, LLC, Respondent, vs. Jeremiah Akinnola, Appellant. A15-731, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1,...2016-01-26T13:06:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:02:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to housing court judgment ordering eviction.Arrow Southampton, LLC, Respondent, vs. Jeremiah Akinnola, Appellant. A15-731, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-7312016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf170890Feb 1,
2016 21:20:16 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Christopher Gary Zurek, Appellant. A15-816, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-01-26T15:17:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:05:50+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of refusal to submit to a chemical test.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Christopher Gary Zurek, Appellant. A15-816, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-8162016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf177970Feb 1,
2016 21:20:17 GMTenglishU. S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2012 SC Title Trust, Respondent, vs. Thomas J. ...2016-01-27T09:15:36+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:35:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenge the district courts denial of motion to stay eviction proceedings pending resolution of a related loss-mitigation action in federal court. Reversed and remanded.U. S. Bank National Association as Legal Title Trustee for Truman 2012 SC Title Trust, Respondent, vs. Thomas J. Litterer, Appellant, Mary Litterer, Appellant. A15-988, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-9882016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf183170Feb 1,
2016 21:20:17 GMTenglishLoria Quade, Relator, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...2016-01-26T13:23:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:37:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Relator challenges a determination by an unemployment law judge (ULJ) that she is ineligible for unemployment benefits because she quit her employment to care for her ailing mother. Reversed and remanded.Loria Quade, Relator, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-1049, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-10492016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf113906Feb 1,
2016 21:20:16 GMTenglishJoseph Molesky, et al., Respondents, vs. John L. Trebesch, et al., Defendants, Sheila P. Sabas, et al., Appellants. ...2016-01-26T11:37:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:07:47+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of default judgment.Joseph Molesky, et al., Respondents, vs. John L. Trebesch, et al., Defendants, Sheila P. Sabas, et al., Appellants. A15-889, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-8892016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf175653Feb 1,
2016 21:20:17 GMTenglishKristina Jean Powers, Appellant, vs. Superintendent James Freihammer, in his official capacity, et al., Respondents. ...2016-01-26T10:23:11+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:14:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges dismissal of data-practices claim.Kristina Jean Powers, Appellant, vs. Superintendent James Freihammer, in his official capacity, et al., Respondents. A15-911, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-9112016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107505Feb 1,
2016 21:20:17 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jesus Ivan Torres-Lopez, a/k/a Jesus Ivan Lopez-Torres, Appellant. A15-929, Court ...2016-01-21T14:36:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:21:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Revocation of probation.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jesus Ivan Torres-Lopez, a/k/a Jesus Ivan Lopez-Torres, Appellant. A15-929, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-9292016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf173430Feb 1,
2016 21:20:05 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Donovan Krauss, Appellant. A15-331, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February ...2016-01-25T15:53:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T11:42:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges possession of firearm by an ineligible person.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Donovan Krauss, Appellant. A15-331, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-3312016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf166492Feb 1,
2016 21:20:17 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. S., E. B. and H. J., Parents. A15-1293, Court of Appeals ...2016-01-21T14:28:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T13:42:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Termination of parental rights matter.In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. S., E. B. and H. J., Parents. A15-1293, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-12932016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf117117Feb 1,
2016 21:42:25 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gatwech Yiek Thach, Appellant. A15-177, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, ...2016-01-26T12:12:26+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-01T15:40:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second-degree test refusal. Reversed.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Gatwech Yiek Thach, Appellant. A15-177, Court of Appeals Unpublished, February 1, 2016. A15-1772016-02-01T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf130319Feb 3,
2016 17:38:21 GMTenglishORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 27, 20162016-02-03T10:34:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-03T10:36:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 27, 20162016-01-27T00:00:00-0600 ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW Filed – January 27, 2016 (Petitioner indicated in Italic Type) 1. State of Minnesota vs. Benjamin Paul Adams – A14-1891 – Denied ... pdf370362Jan 27,
2016 17:35:08 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy J. Oliver, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121393. ...2016-01-25T14:34:46+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-01-27T11:21:55+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent Timothy J. Oliver is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective as of the date of this order, pending final resolution of this matter.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy J. Oliver, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121393. A15-1285, Supreme Court Order, January 27, 2016.A15-12852016-01-27T00:00:00-0600 January 25, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1285 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Timothy J. Oliver, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf348181Jan 27,
2016 17:35:09 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Disciplinary Action against John Nwabuwane Akwuba, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0280446. ...2016-01-25T14:39:26+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-01-27T11:20:11+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inRespondent John Nwabuwane Akwuba is conditionally reinstated to the practice of law in the State of Minnesota.In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against John Nwabuwane Akwuba, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0280446. A15-1316, Supreme Court Order, January 27, 2016.A15-13162016-01-27T00:00:00-0600 January 25, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A15-1316 In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against John Nwabuwane Akwuba, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf201241Feb 4,
2016 19:28:01 GMTenglishTerry Boyd, Respondent, vs. BNSF Railway Company, Appellant. A14-277, Supreme Court, January 27, 2016.2016-02-04T13:15:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-04T13:25:43+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013When determining whether the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (2012), preempts a state law in a state court proceeding, a court must apply the substantive-procedural test of FELA precedent. Because the taxation of double costs pursuant to Minn. R. Civ. P. 68.03(b)(2) is substantive and not authorized by federal law, it is preempted by FELA. Accordingly, Minn. R. Civ. P. 68.03(b)(2) does not apply in state court FELA proceedings. Reversed and remanded.Terry Boyd, Respondent, vs. BNSF Railway Company, Appellant. A14-277, Supreme Court, January 27, 2016.A14-2772016-01-27T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-0277 Court of Appeals Wright, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. Terry Boyd, Respondent, vs. Filed: January 27, 2016 ... pdf127466Jan 25,
2016 16:43:44 GMTenglishWillie Edd Reynolds, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A14-906, Court of Appeals Published, ...2016-01-19T17:54:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T10:37:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013A motion to correct a sentence under rule 27.03, subdivision 9, is a proper mechanism for a convicted person to challenge the district courts decision to amend his sentence sua sponte by adding a statutorily required conditional-release term. Reversed and remanded.Willie Edd Reynolds, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A14-906, Court of Appeals Published, January 25, 2016.A14-9062016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14-0906 Willie Edd Reynolds, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. Filed January 25, 2016 Reversed ... pdf212751Jan 25,
2016 16:43:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Robin Lyne Hensel, Appellant. A15-5, Court of Appeals Published, January 25, 2016.2016-01-14T09:59:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T10:11:27+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Minn. Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(2) (2012), is not void for vagueness or facially overbroad in violation of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Robin Lyne Hensel, Appellant. A15-5, Court of Appeals Published, January 25, 2016.A15-52016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0005 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Robin Lyne Hensel, Appellant. Filed January 25, 2016 Affirmed Larkin, Judge ... pdf42724Jan 25,
2016 16:43:44 GMTenglishMeleyco Partnership No. 2, Appellant, vs. City of West St. Paul, Respondent. A15-775, Court of Appeals Published, ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-01-19T10:12:55+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-01-25T10:12:13+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-01-19T16:12:47+00:00For a nonconforming use to lose its legal status, the discontinuance of the nonconforming use must be attributable, at least in part, to the property owner. Reversed.Meleyco Partnership No. 2, Appellant, vs. City of West St. Paul, Respondent. A15-775, Court of Appeals Published, January 25, 2016.A15-7752016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0775 Meleyco Partnership No. 2, Appellant, vs. City of West St. Paul, Respondent. Filed January 25, 2016 Reversed ... pdf263640Jan 25,
2016 16:43:44 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent (A15-0984), Appellant (A15-0998) vs. Chao Moua, Appellant (A15-0984), Respondent ...2016-01-14T10:03:58+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T10:14:23+00:00Microsoft® Word 20131. The minimum restitution provision of the identity-theft statute, Minn. Stat. § 609.527 (2012), does not violate a defendants right to procedural due process. 2. An individual experiences loss or harm as a result of identity theft when the individual either suffers economic loss or the theft involves the individuals name and private identifying information. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.State of Minnesota, Respondent (A15-0984), Appellant (A15-0998) vs. Chao Moua, Appellant (A15-0984), Respondent (A15-0998). A15-984, A15-998, Court of Appeals Published, January 25, 2016.A15-9842016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0984 A15-0998 State of Minnesota, Respondent (A15-0984), Appellant (A15-0998) vs. Chao Moua, Appellant (A15-0984), ... pdf114114Jan 25,
2016 21:42:09 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Scott Joseph Mirkovich, Appellant. A15-249, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January ...2016-01-19T15:14:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T11:36:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of second degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Scott Joseph Mirkovich, Appellant. A15-249, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-2492016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf293691Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishCSM Equities, LLC, Appellant, vs. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership, et al., Respondents. A15-455, Court ...2016-01-15T11:56:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T13:09:35+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.CSM Equities, LLC, Appellant, vs. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership, et al., Respondents. A15-455, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-4552016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf168831Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of: L. R. O. A15-652, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016.2016-01-19T16:54:04+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T13:30:24+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges administrative-law judges summary disposition without hearing. Reversed and remanded.In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of: L. R. O. A15-652, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-6522016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf120206Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishMark Sharockman, Appellant, vs. LifeSpan of Minnesota, Inc., Respondent. A15-864, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January ...2016-01-19T14:22:52+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:10:57+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment.Mark Sharockman, Appellant, vs. LifeSpan of Minnesota, Inc., Respondent. A15-864, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-8642016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf211060Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishIn re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation. A15-858, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016.2016-01-20T09:53:37+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:08:38+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges dismissal of class-action suit. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In re Medtronic, Inc. Shareholder Litigation. A15-858, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-8582016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf162848Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishIn re the Matter of: Jodi Kris Engen, et al., on behalf of themselves and their grandchildren, J. R. B., J. A. B., and ...2016-01-19T10:19:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:17:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Grandparent visitation time restored.In re the Matter of: Jodi Kris Engen, et al., on behalf of themselves and their grandchildren, J. R. B., J. A. B., and J. E. P., petitioners, Respondents, vs. Ashlee Jo Belisle, Appellant. A15-866, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-8662016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf171477Jan 25,
2016 21:42:19 GMTenglishYer Vue, Relator, vs. Surdyks Flights Inc. Surdyks Flights Wine Market and Bar, Respondent, Department of ...2016-01-15T13:07:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:22:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Yer Vue, Relator, vs. Surdyks Flights Inc. Surdyks Flights Wine Market and Bar, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-932, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-9322016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf226051Jan 25,
2016 21:42:19 GMTenglishRobert Kagel, Respondent, vs. Christian Brackey, et al., Appellants, Kagel Acquisition Company, LLC, Defendant. A15-934,...2016-01-15T09:12:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:26:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges district court's forced buy out order. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Robert Kagel, Respondent, vs. Christian Brackey, et al., Appellants, Kagel Acquisition Company, LLC, Defendant. A15-934, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-9342016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf142018Jan 25,
2016 21:42:09 GMTenglishIn re the Marriage of: Melissa Louise Constantini, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Brent John Constantini, Respondent. ...2016-01-15T14:39:02+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T10:55:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Parenting time dispute. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In re the Marriage of: Melissa Louise Constantini, petitioner, Appellant, vs. Brent John Constantini, Respondent. A15-58, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-582016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf189296Jan 25,
2016 21:42:19 GMTenglishShannon Fogarty, Appellant, vs. Ciao Bella, Respondent. A15-1030, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016.2016-01-19T09:22:22+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:28:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of motion for relief from the judgment under Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02. Reversed.Shannon Fogarty, Appellant, vs. Ciao Bella, Respondent. A15-1030, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-10302016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf252310Jan 25,
2016 21:42:19 GMTenglishRichard J. Hartfiel, Appellant, vs. Raymond Wilburn Allison, Respondent, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Respondent, ...2016-01-19T15:00:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:30:31+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment dismissal. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.Richard J. Hartfiel, Appellant, vs. Raymond Wilburn Allison, Respondent, T. J. Potter Trucking, Inc., Respondent, Westfield Insurance Company, intervenor, Respondent. A15-1149, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-11492016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf100672Jan 25,
2016 21:42:09 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Yatarrie Lee Brown, Appellant. A15-108, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, ...2016-01-19T12:47:12+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T10:57:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of criminal sexual conduct and sentencing.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Yatarrie Lee Brown, Appellant. A15-108, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-1082016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf123238Jan 25,
2016 21:42:09 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Cartrell Ismail Smith, Appellant. A15-3, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, ...2016-01-15T13:21:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T10:52:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of aiding and abetting second degree murder.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Cartrell Ismail Smith, Appellant. A15-3, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-32016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf109363Jan 25,
2016 21:42:19 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Jonathon Michael Honeycutt, Respondent. A15-1456, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-19T15:39:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:36:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013State challenges the district courts dispositional departure from the presumptive prison sentence for respondents conviction of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Reversed and remanded.State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Jonathon Michael Honeycutt, Respondent. A15-1456, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-14562016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf108045Jan 25,
2016 21:42:09 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Stevie Birdie Daniels, Appellant. A15-121, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25,...2016-01-19T17:32:32+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T11:14:59+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of credit card fraud. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Stevie Birdie Daniels, Appellant. A15-121, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-1212016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf230507Jan 25,
2016 21:42:09 GMTenglishRandy Lee Torgeson, petitioner, Appellant, vs Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-195, Court of Appeals ...2016-01-14T11:29:06+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T11:26:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges revocation of driver's license.Randy Lee Torgeson, petitioner, Appellant, vs Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent. A15-195, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-1952016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf158857Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Thomas Eugene Sirois, Appellant. A15-328, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, ...2016-01-19T15:45:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T12:10:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of second and third degree assault.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Thomas Eugene Sirois, Appellant. A15-328, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-3282016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf263645Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishIn the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Patricia Annette Wallace, Protected Person. A15-440, Court of Appeals ...2016-01-19T12:10:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T13:07:45+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disallowed fees and expenses filed by guardian and conservator. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.In the Matter of the Conservatorship of: Patricia Annette Wallace, Protected Person. A15-440, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-4402016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf101150Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Scott Andrew Syversrud, Appellant. A15-560, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January ...2016-01-15T12:11:40+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T13:12:07+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of driving while impaired.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Scott Andrew Syversrud, Appellant. A15-560, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-5602016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf107698Feb 19,
2016 14:00:21 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Archester Rodgers, Jr., Appellant. A15-289, A15-290, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-02-04T14:47:49+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-02-19T07:58:42+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Appellant claims that the district court abused its discretion by applying an incorrect criminal history score. Reversed and remanded for resentencing.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Archester Rodgers, Jr., Appellant. A15-289, A15-290, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016.A15-2892016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf106762Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishLucille OQuinn, Relator, vs. Noodles & Company (Corp.), Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...2016-01-19T12:22:29+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T13:23:44+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges disqualification from receiving unemployment benefits.Lucille OQuinn, Relator, vs. Noodles & Company (Corp.), Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent. A15-609, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-6092016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf112155Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishKim Marie Robberstad, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-385, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-15T09:42:17+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T12:12:54+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Kim Marie Robberstad, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-385, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-3852016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf149629Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishWilson Newongeby Kpahn, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-723, Court of Appeals ...2016-01-15T10:15:51+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T13:34:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief.Wilson Newongeby Kpahn, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-723, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-7232016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf171022Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishAnchor Bank, N. A., Appellant, vs. Matthew L. Gulbransen, Respondent. A15-741, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25,...2016-01-19T15:45:30+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T13:41:10+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges grant of summary judgment dismissal of its claim for breach of a non-solicitation and confidentiality agreement. Reversed and remanded.Anchor Bank, N. A., Appellant, vs. Matthew L. Gulbransen, Respondent. A15-741, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-7412016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf247683Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishSeagate Technology, LLC, Appellant, vs. Western Digital Corporation, et al., Respondents, Sining Mao, Respondent. ...2016-01-15T09:01:16+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:06:28+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges the district courts denial of its request for an award of post-arbitration-award interest. Reversed and remanded.Seagate Technology, LLC, Appellant, vs. Western Digital Corporation, et al., Respondents, Sining Mao, Respondent. A15-760, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-7602016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf33860Jan 25,
2016 21:42:10 GMTenglishJohn W. Conzemius, et al., Respondents, vs. David J. Finnegan, et al., Appellants. A15-727, Court of Appeals ...Minnesota Judicial Branch2016-01-19T09:53:13+00:00Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word2016-01-25T13:39:01+00:00Adobe PDF Library 11.02016-01-19T15:52:51+00:00Property dispute.John W. Conzemius, et al., Respondents, vs. David J. Finnegan, et al., Appellants. A15-727, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-7272016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf101733Jan 25,
2016 21:42:19 GMTenglishIn re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Luke Stephen Klammer, Appellant. A15-922, Court ...2016-01-19T15:09:15+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:20:39+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges Order for Protection. Reversed and remanded.In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Luke Stephen Klammer, Appellant. A15-922, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-9222016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf190451Jan 25,
2016 21:42:19 GMTenglishChristopher R. Coker, Respondent (A15-1439, A15-1445), Appellant (A15-1606), vs. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of ...2016-01-15T11:19:01+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-25T14:32:19+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges provisional discharge from the Minnesota Sex Offender Program.Christopher R. Coker, Respondent (A15-1439, A15-1445), Appellant (A15-1606), vs. Emily Johnson Piper, Commissioner of Human Services, Appellant (A15-1439), Respondent (A15-1606), Hennepin County, Appellant (A15-1445). A15-1439, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 25, 2016. A15-14452016-01-25T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf161886Jan 23,
2016 04:17:38 GMTenglishYvette Ford, Respondent, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Appellant. A13-1072, Supreme Court, January 20, 2016.2016-01-15T11:08:46+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-20T12:32:53+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013The statute of limitations for the cause of action created by subdivision 1(1) of the Minnesota Whistleblower Act (MWA), Minn. Stat. § 181.932 (2012), which prohibits employment discrimination based on a good-faith report of a violation of law, is the 6-year limitations period in Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(2) (2014), because the cause of action is statutory and has no counterpart at common law.Yvette Ford, Respondent, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Appellant. A13-1072, Supreme Court, January 20, 2016.A13-10722016-01-20T00:00:00-0600 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A13-1072 Court of Appeals Lillehaug, J. Took no part, Hudson, J. Yvette Ford, Respondent, vs. Filed: January 20, ... pdf414282Jan 23,
2016 04:17:38 GMTenglishIn re Petition for Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Bruce A. Kunz, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. ...2016-01-12T15:43:21+00:00Canon DR-M140 TWAIN2016-01-20T12:33:04+00:00Adobe Acrobat 10.1.16 Paper Capture Plug-inPetitioner Bruce A. Kunz is reinstated to the practice of law.In re Petition for Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Bruce A. Kunz, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0225289. A15-178, Supreme Court Order, January 20, 2016.A15-1782016-01-20T00:00:00-0600 January 12, 2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT In re Petition for Reinstatement to the Practice of Law of Bruce A. Kunz, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration ... pdf133436Jan 27,
2016 17:35:09 GMTenglishORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 19, 2016.2016-01-27T11:09:33+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-27T11:10:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 19, 2016.2016-01-19T00:00:00-0600 ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW Filed – January 19, 2016 (Petitioner indicated in Italic Type) 1. In the Matter of the Welfare of: K.T. , Child. – A15-0381 – ... pdf130144Jan 23,
2016 04:15:33 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Anthony London Foresta, Appellant. A14-2146, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January ...2016-01-08T12:36:00+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-19T10:46:18+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Anthony London Foresta, Appellant. A14-2146, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 19, 2016. A14-21462016-01-19T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14- ... pdf203820Jan 23,
2016 04:15:33 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Richard William Reynolds, Jr., Appellant. A15-241, Court of Appeals Unpublished, ...2016-01-12T09:48:56+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-19T11:48:09+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to conviction of failure to register a new primary address as a predatory offender. Reversed.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Richard William Reynolds, Jr., Appellant. A15-241, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 19, 2016. A15-2412016-01-19T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf97606Jan 23,
2016 04:15:33 GMTenglishState of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Yia Her, Appellant. A15-119, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 19, 2016.2016-01-07T11:33:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-19T10:51:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges to convictions of fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle causing death and fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle causing great bodily harm.State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Yia Her, Appellant. A15-119, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 19, 2016. A15-1192016-01-19T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ... pdf161732Jan 23,
2016 04:15:33 GMTenglishJaime Marquez Guevara, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-295, Court of Appeals Unpublished,...2016-01-11T09:57:14+00:00Microsoft® Word 20132016-01-19T11:52:41+00:00Microsoft® Word 2013Challenges denial of petition for postconviction relief. Reversed and remanded.Jaime Marquez Guevara, petitioner, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15-295, Court of Appeals Unpublished, January 19, 2016. A15-2952016-01-19T00:00:00-0600 This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15- ...
0-500|0
500-500|0
500-500|0
Court of Appeals Unpublished, AprilCourt of Appeals Unpublished, JanuaryCourt of Appeals Unpublished, May 9, 2016Court of Appeals Unpublished, MarchCourt of Appeals Unpublished, FebruarySupreme CourtAppellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent. A15Court of Appeals Unpublished, May 2, 2016Court of Appeals PublishedAppellant, vs. Commissioner of Public Safety, Respondent