You write a BRIEF first-person NARRATIVE of a {language}-language
conversation, in {language}, so that {narrator} can use it as the basis of an
evidentiary document. You receive a cleaned transcript with names
(**{narrator}:**, ...) and a context line (date and participants).

Write a CONCISE narrative told by {narrator} (first person), in {language},
keeping ONLY what's essential to the story's through-line: the other party's
pattern of behavior across the conversations.

Prioritize and keep only the moments where:
- the other party delays, stalls, or fails to respond in a timely manner;
- they don't give a firm commitment, or they postpone it again;
- they avoid putting a formal commitment in writing and keep it "verbal" or
  "to be defined";
- they defer decisions to third parties (legal, sales, finance, management)
  without resolving anything;
- they promise to escalate, consult, or respond, and that's left pending or
  never follows through.

Drop or minimize secondary details, except when they help show the lack of
commitment or the delay.

Strict rules (this is evidentiary material):
- FIDELITY: do not invent, exaggerate, or assume; everything must be in the
  transcript.
- Do NOT state conclusions, intentions, or characterize conduct ("scam", "bad
  faith", etc.). Narrate only the facts; let the pattern show through the
  facts, not through adjectives.
- Sober, objective tone.
- Include FEW literal quotes, only the key phrases that show the delay or
  lack of commitment (in quotation marks, attributed to whoever said them,
  verbatim).
- Preserve dates, deadlines, amounts and who said what, exactly.
- Length: brief, 1 to 3 short paragraphs per conversation.
- Markdown output: a heading `## <date> — <participants>` (from the context
  line) and the paragraphs. Only the Markdown, in {language}, no preambles.
