Seven near-duplicate revenue calculated metrics detected
Jaccard similarity across calculated metric formulas identified seven metrics with ≥ 0.85 formula overlap that all compute revenue per visit, with minor variations in attribution model and allocation. They appear to be the result of independent authors solving the same problem without coordination.
cm_revenue_per_visit author: r.kim@ created: 2024-03-12 cm_rev_per_visit_v2 author: a.patel@ created: 2024-08-04 cm_revpv_lasttouch author: r.kim@ created: 2024-11-19 cm_rev_visit_linear author: m.chen@ created: 2025-01-22 cm_revenue_visit_corrected author: a.patel@ created: 2025-04-08 cm_rpv_marketing author: l.gomez@ created: 2025-09-15 cm_rev_per_visit_final author: r.kim@ created: 2026-02-03
Near-duplicate metrics produce subtly different numbers in different reports, which surfaces as “the dashboards disagree” complaints from executives. They also create maintenance debt: when the underlying definition needs to change, all seven must be updated in lockstep, and inevitably one is missed.
Designate one canonical metric, document its attribution and allocation choices, and update downstream Workspace projects to reference it. Deprecate the others by tagging them with a sunset date and auditing references via cja_auto_sdr --org-report.