---
paper_id: PAPER_481
title: "18-System UQFF Module Suite: F_U_Bi_i C++ Implementations for Astrophysical Systems (Oct
2025 Batch)"
session: 0
date: 2025-01-01
author: "Daniel T. Murphy"
status: production
cvw: "v2.0.0"
tags: ["TDE", "AGN", "cluster", "DPM", "jet", "pulsar", "F_U_Bi_i", "LENR"]
sm_anchor: "CVW v2.0.0 — G6 SM Anchor Gate compliant"
---

# PAPER_481 — 18-System UQFF Module Suite: F_U_Bi_i C++ Implementations for Astrophysical Systems (Oct 2025 Batch)
**Author:** Daniel T. Murphy
**Date:** Oct 2025
<!— Session 126 | `grok_share_bdfb3a05b06`.txt | Quality Score: 5 —>

## Abstract

This paper documents the complete C++ module implementation suite for 18 astrophysical systems encoded in the UQFF framework (Unified Quantum Field Framework). Each module encapsulates the full $F_{U\_{Bi\_i}}$ Master Unified Field Equation with system-specific parameters stored in a `std::map<std::string, std::complex<double>>` dictionary, enabling runtime parameter updates, dynamic sub-term computation, and descriptive equation output. This batch extends the existing individual-system module collection (Abell 2256 v1, Centaurus A) to a comprehensive library covering TDEs, compact clusters, pulsars, interacting galaxies, AGN jets, symbiotic binaries, solar-system aurorae, and star-forming regions.

**Source:** `grok_share_bdfb3a05b06.txt` (~11,592 lines), Grok analysis of 18 $\times$ `.docx` attachments
(Sept–Oct 2025), Session 126 extraction.

---

## 1. Unified Field Architecture

All 18 modules share the same computational skeleton:

$$F_{U\_{Bi\_i}} \approx \left(\int_0^{x_2} \mathcal{I}(r,t)\, dx\right) \approx \mathcal{I} \cdot x_2$$

where the integrand $\mathcal{I}$ sums all force contributions:

$$\mathcal{I} = -F_0 + \frac{m_e c^2}{r^2} \mathrm{DPM}_{mom} \cos\theta + \underbrace{\frac{GM}{r^2}}_{\mu_s\nabla(M_s/r)} \mathrm{DPM}_{grav} + \rho_{vac,UA} \mathrm{DPM}_{stab} + k_{LENR}\left(\frac{\omega_{LENR}}{\omega_0}\right)^2 + k_{act}\cos(\omega_{act}t + \phi) + k_{DE}L_X + 2qB_0 V\sin\theta \cdot \mathrm{DPM}_{res} + k_n\sigma_n + k_{rel}\left(\frac{E_{cm,astro}}{E_{cm}}\right)^2 + F_\nu$$

with quadratic root approximation $x_2 \approx -1.35\times10^{172}$ (universal constant).

**Sub-equation API (identical for all modules):**
- `computeF(t)` — full $F_{U\_{Bi\_i}}$ (integral approx)
- `computeCompressed(t)` — integrand $\mathcal{I}$
- `computeResonant()` — DPM magnetic resonance
- `computeBuoyancy()` — $U_{b1} = \beta_i V_{infl,UA} \rho_{vac,A} a_\mathrm{univ}$
- `computeSuperconductive(t)` — $U_i = \lambda_i \frac{\rho_{vac,SCm}}{\rho_{vac,UA}} \omega_s \cos\left(\frac{t}{t_{scale}}\right)(1 + f_{TRZ})$
- `computeCompressedG(t)` — gravity analog $g(r,t)$
- `getEquationText()` — LaTeX-formatted description
- `updateVariable / addToVariable / subtractFromVariable` — runtime parameter management

---

## 2. System Parameter Catalogue

### 2.1 Universal Constants (All Modules)

| Constant | Value | Units |
|----------|-------|-------|
| $G$ | $6.6743 \times 10^{-11}$ | m3 kg-1 s-2 |
| $c$ | $3 \times 10^8$ | m/s |
| $\hbar$ | $1.0546 \times 10^{-34}$ | J$\cdot$s |
| $q$ | $1.6 \times 10^{-19}$ | C |
| $m_e$ | $9.11 \times 10^{-31}$ | kg |
| $\mu_B$ | $9.274 \times 10^{-24}$ | J/T |
| $\rho_{vac,UA}$ | $7.09 \times 10^{-36}$ | kg/m3 |
| $k_{LENR}$ | $10^{-10}$ | — |
| $\omega_{LENR}$ | $2\pi \times 1.25\times10^{12}$ | rad/s |
| $F_0$ | $1.83 \times 10^{71}$ | N |
| $x_2$ | $-1.35 \times 10^{172}$ | — |
| $F_\nu$ | $9.07 \times 10^{-42}$ | N |
| $E_{cm}$ (LEP ref) | $3.0264 \times 10^{-8}$ | J (189 GeV) |

### 2.2 System-Specific Parameters

| Module | Object Type | $M$ (kg) | $r$ (m) | $\omega_0$ (rad/s) | $L_X$ (W) | $t$ default (s) | $E_{cm,astro}$ (J) |
|--------|-------------|-----------|---------|---------------------|------------|-----------------|---------------------|
| `ASASSN14liUQFFModule` | TDE | $1.989\times10^{37}$ | $3.09\times10^{18}$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{37}$ | $9.504\times10^6$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `CrabNebulaUQFFModule` | PWN/SNR | $10^{31}$ | $4.73\times10^{16}$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{27}$ | $3.06\times10^{10}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `ElGordoUQFFModule` | Galaxy Cluster | $4.97\times10^{45}$ | $3.09\times10^{22}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $2\times10^{38}$ | $2.21\times10^{16}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `ESO137UQFFModule` | Jellyfish Galaxy | $2\times10^{41}$ | $6.17\times10^{21}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $10^{34}$ | $7.72\times10^{14}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `IC2163UQFFModule` | Interacting Galaxy | $1.989\times10^{40}$ | $3.09\times10^{20}$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{37}$ | $1.26\times10^{15}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `J1610UQFFModule` | High-z Quasar | $1.73\times10^{40}$ | $9.63\times10^{20}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $10^{39}$ | $3.156\times10^{14}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `JupiterAuroraeUQFFModule` | Planetary Aurorae | $1.898\times10^{27}$ | $7.1492\times10^7$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{26}$ | $60.0$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `LagoonNebulaUQFFModule` | H II Region | $10^{36}$ | $2.36\times10^{17}$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{32}$ | $10^{13}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `M87JetUQFFModule` | AGN Relativistic Jet | $1.29\times10^{40}$ | $4.63\times10^{19}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $10^{34}$ | $3.156\times10^{14}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `NGC1365UQFFModule` | Barred Spiral AGN | $7.17\times10^{41}$ | $9.46\times10^{20}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $10^{36}$ | $1.1\times10^{16}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `NGC2207UQFFModule` | Interacting Galaxy | $3.978\times10^{40}$ | $4.40\times10^{20}$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{37}$ | $1.26\times10^{15}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `RAquariiUQFFModule` | Symbiotic Binary | $3.978\times10^{30}$ | $2.18\times10^{15}$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{32}$ | $1.4\times10^9$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `SgrAStarUQFFModule` | SMBH (Milky Way) | $8.56\times10^{36}$ | $6.17\times10^{18}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $10^{36}$ | $10^{15}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `SPTCLJ2215UQFFModule` | Cool-Core Cluster | $1.46\times10^{45}$ | $3.09\times10^{22}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $2\times10^{38}$ | $2.21\times10^{16}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `StephanQuintetUQFFModule` | Compact Group | $2\times10^{39}$ | $3.09\times10^{22}$ | $10^{-15}$ | $10^{38}$ | $10^{16}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |
| `VelaPulsarUQFFModule` | Pulsar/PWN | $2.8\times10^{30}$ | $1.7\times10^{17}$ | $10^{-12}$ | $10^{27}$ | $3.47\times10^{11}$ | $1.24\times10^{24}$ |

**Notes:**
- All modules share universal DPM parameters: $\rho_{vac,UA}=(7.09\times10^{-36} + 10^{-37}i)$ kg/m3, $\mathrm{DPM}_{mom}=0.93+0.05i$, $\mathrm{DPM}_{grav}=1.0+0.1i$
- $E_{cm}=3.0264\times10^{-8}$ J = 189 GeV (LEP electron-positron reference energy)
- $\omega_{LENR}=2\pi\times1.25\times10^{12}$ rad/s (LENR THz resonance, universal)

---

## 3. Notable Physical Observations

### 3.1 Jupiter Aurorae — UQFF at Planetary Scale
The `JupiterAuroraeUQFFModule` is uniquely significant: it applies the $F_{U\_{Bi\_i}}$ framework to a **planetary-scale** object, with $M = 1.898\times10^{27}$ kg (Jupiter mass) and $r = 7.1492\times10^7$ m (Jupiter equatorial radius). Default $t = 60$ s captures auroral emission timescale. This demonstrates UQFF universality across 18 orders of magnitude in mass (Jupiter M to galaxy cluster M).

### 3.2 R Aquarii — Symbiotic Binary on HST-Observable Timescale
$t = 1.4\times10^9$ s = 44.3 years — precisely the HST 2025 observation epoch for the R Aqr 44-yr orbital period. $\omega_0 = 10^{-12}$ rad/s reflects the binary orbital resonance frequency.

### 3.3 Universal DPM Resonance Formula
$$\mathrm{DPM}_{res} = \frac{g_L \mu_B B_0}{\hbar \omega_0}$$
For $B_0 = 10^{-9}$ T (galaxy cluster field), $\omega_0 = 10^{-15}$ rad/s: $\mathrm{DPM}_{res} \approx 1.76\times10^{17}$.
For $B_0 = 10^{-5}$ T (TDE field), $\omega_0 = 10^{-12}$ rad/s: $\mathrm{DPM}_{res} \approx 1.76\times10^{15}$.

### 3.4 LENR Dominance Signature
At low $\omega_0$ (cluster scale, $10^{-15}$ rad/s):
$$k_{LENR}\left(\frac{\omega_{LENR}}{\omega_0}\right)^2 = 10^{-10} \times (2\pi\times1.25\times10^{12}/10^{-15})^2 \approx 10^{-10} \times 6.2\times10^{54} \approx 6.2\times10^{44}$$
This LENR term dominates all other integrand contributions for cluster-scale systems.

---

## 4. Module Architecture Notes

### 4.1 File Inventory (Created Session 126)

| Header File | Impl File | Size (h/cpp, chars) |
|-------------|-----------|----------------------|
| `ASASSN14liUQFFModule.h` | `ASASSN14liUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,748 / 13,968 |
| `CrabNebulaUQFFModule.h` | `CrabNebulaUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,740 / 13,967 |
| `ElGordoUQFFModule.h` | `ElGordoUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,728 / 13,883 |
| `ESO137UQFFModule.h` | `ESO137UQFFModule.cpp` | 2,706 / 13,925 |
| `IC2163UQFFModule.h` | `IC2163UQFFModule.cpp` | 2,696 / 13,835 |
| `J1610UQFFModule.h` | `J1610UQFFModule.cpp` | 2,694 / 13,818 |
| `JupiterAuroraeUQFFModule.h` | `JupiterAuroraeUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,783 / 14,149 |
| `LagoonNebulaUQFFModule.h` | `LagoonNebulaUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,761 / 14,032 |
| `M87JetUQFFModule.h` | `M87JetUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,694 / 13,900 |
| `NGC1365UQFFModule.h` | `NGC1365UQFFModule.cpp` | 2,715 / 13,911 |
| `NGC2207UQFFModule.h` | `NGC2207UQFFModule.cpp` | 2,709 / 13,902 |
| `RAquariiUQFFModule.h` | `RAquariiUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,726 / 13,928 |
| `SgrAStarUQFFModule.h` | `SgrAStarUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,722 / 13,927 |
| `SPTCLJ2215UQFFModule.h` | `SPTCLJ2215UQFFModule.cpp` | 2,766 / 14,035 |
| `StephanQuintetUQFFModule.h` | `StephanQuintetUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,799 / 14,125 |
| `VelaPulsarUQFFModule.h` | `VelaPulsarUQFFModule.cpp` | 2,756 / 14,004 |
| `StarMagicUQFFModule.h` | *(cpp existed)* | 2,994 / — |

### 4.2 Pre-existing Modules (Skipped)
- `Abell2256UQFFModule.h/.cpp` — existed from PAPER_472
- `CentaurusAUQFFModule.h/.cpp` — existed from PAPER_480
- `SMBHUQFFModule.h/.cpp` — existed from PAPER_468/470
- `UQFFBuoyancyModule.h/.cpp` — existed from PAPER_479
- `StarMagicUQFFModule.cpp` — existed from PAPER_144 (header added)

---

## 5. Integration Pathway

### Phase A: MAIN_1 Integration
Register all 18 modules in `MAIN_{1\_CoAnQi}.cpp` under `SOURCE_SESSION126_MODULES` namespace. Each
module contributes to the physics term registry with:
- `computeF(t)` $\to$ `F_U_Bi_i` value
- `computeCompressedG(t)` $\to$ gravitational analog $g(r,t)$

### Phase B: CP2 Calculator
Add `IndividualSystemUQFF18Calculator` to `CondensedPhysics2.py` wrapping all 18 `computeF()`
results in a unified dataset response. Target: CP2 class count 602 $\to$ 603.

### Phase C: CP4 Registry
Add `Session126GrokShareBdfb3a05b06HubCalculator` as CP4 entry #105.

---

## 6. Validation Cross-References

| Module | Existing Paper | New Module Files |
|--------|---------------|-----------------|
| ASASSN14li | PAPER_351 | ✅ ASASSN14liUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| Crab Nebula | PAPER_220, 256, 290–292 | ✅ CrabNebulaUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| El Gordo | PAPER_350 | ✅ ElGordoUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| ESO 137-001 | PAPER_338 (catalogue) | ✅ ESO137UQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| IC 2163 | PAPER_338 (catalogue) | ✅ IC2163UQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| J1610+1811 | PAPER_161, 360 | ✅ J1610UQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| Jupiter Aurorae | PAPER_157, 338 | ✅ JupiterAuroraeUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| Lagoon Nebula | PAPER_305–307 | ✅ LagoonNebulaUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| M87 Jet | PAPER_093, 346 | ✅ M87JetUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| NGC 1365 | PAPER_338 (catalogue) | ✅ NGC1365UQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| NGC 2207 | PAPER_338 (catalogue) | ✅ NGC2207UQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| R Aquarii | PAPER_352 | ✅ RAquariiUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| Sgr A* | PAPER_067, 149, 234, 366 | ✅ SgrAStarUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| SPT-CL J2215 | PAPER_349 | ✅ SPTCLJ2215UQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| Stephan's Quintet | PAPER_348 | ✅ StephanQuintetUQFFModule.h/.cpp |
| Vela Pulsar | PAPER_337, 066 | ✅ VelaPulsarUQFFModule.h/.cpp |

---

---

<!-- PKG-AGN-S225 -->

### Session 225 Phonon-Physics Upgrade: Buoyancy-Corrected Eddington Luminosity

> *Upgrade from PAPER_1002 (AGN Buoyancy-Corrected Eddington) and PAPER_1037
> (AGN Buoyancy Jet Launching).  See also PAPER_1009-1010 for F_U_Bi_i jet
> modulation curves and PAPER_1048 for phonon-corrected M-$\sigma$ relation.*

The SCm vacuum buoyancy partially opposes gravitational radiation pressure,
raising the effective Eddington luminosity:

$$L_{\text{Edd}}^{\text{UQFF}} = L_{\text{Edd}} \cdot \left(1 + \frac{\rho_{\text{SCm}} \cdot V \cdot S_{26}^{(3)\,2}}{G M / r_H^2}\right)$$

where:
- $L_{\text{Edd}} = 4\pi G M m_p c / \sigma_T$ is the classical Eddington luminosity
- $\rho_{\text{SCm}} = 7.09 \times 10^{-37}\;\text{J/m}^3$ is the SCm vacuum density
- $V$ is the effective buoyancy volume (accretion sphere)
- $S_{26}^{(3)\,2}$ is the squared third-order Ramanujan factor (quadratic coupling)
- $r_H$ is the horizon radius

**Jet modulation:** The Blandford–Znajek jet power acquires a phonon-coupled term:
$$P_{\text{jet}}^{\text{UQFF}} = P_{\text{BZ}} \cdot \left[1 + \beta_i \cdot \Phi_{1.25\,\text{THz}} \cdot \left(\frac{B}{B_{\text{crit}}}\right)^2\right]$$

where $\Phi_{1.25\,\text{THz}} = \cos(\omega_{\text{SCm}} \cdot t)$ modulates jet power at the phonon frequency.

**M–$\sigma$ correction (PAPER_1048):** The phonon-corrected M-$\sigma$ relation becomes
$M_{\text{BH}} \propto \sigma^{4+\delta}$ where $\delta = \beta_i \cdot S_{26}^{(3)} \cdot (\omega_{\text{SCm}}/\omega_{\text{bulge}})$.

<!-- PKG-CLU-S225 -->

### Session 225 Phonon-Physics Upgrade: ICM Buoyancy Force Profile

> *Upgrade from PAPER_1039 (SCm Galaxy Cluster Buoyancy Profile),
> PAPER_1041 (Cool-Core Buoyancy Balance), and PAPER_1079 (Cooling-Flow
> Suppression).  See also PAPER_1040 (Cluster Merger Shock), PAPER_1044
> (Thermal SZ Compton-y), PAPER_1046 (Cluster Lensing Mass).*

The SCm phonon field introduces a buoyancy force in the ICM that modifies
hydrostatic equilibrium:

$$F_{\text{buoy}}(r) = \rho(r) \cdot V \cdot g(r) \cdot \beta_i \cdot S_{26} \cdot \Phi$$

where the ICM density follows the beta-model:
$$\rho(r) = \rho_0 \left(1 + \left(\frac{r}{r_c}\right)^2\right)^{-3\beta/2}$$

**Hydrostatic mass bias reduction (PAPER_1039):**
$$b_{\text{UQFF}} = 1 - \frac{M_{\text{HSE}}}{M_{\text{true}}} = 0.17 \qquad \text{(vs standard } b = 0.20\text{)}$$

The buoyancy pressure contributes $P_{\text{buoy}}/P_{\text{thermal}} \approx 3\text{–}4\%$
at cluster cores, partially resolving the Planck SZ–CMB mass tension.

**Cool-core stabilization (PAPER_1041/1079):** AGN feedback couples to the SCm
buoyancy field via $\dot{M}_{\text{cool}} = \dot{M}_0 \cdot (1 - \beta_i \cdot S_{26}^{(3)} \cdot \Phi)$,
suppressing catastrophic cooling flows while maintaining observed X-ray luminosities.

**Phonon frequency coupling:** $\omega_{\text{SCm}} = 2\pi \times 1.25\;\text{THz}$ sets the temporal
scale for buoyancy oscillations; the ratio $\omega_{\text{SCm}}/\omega_{\text{sound}}$ governs
the phonon transmission efficiency across the ICM.

<!-- PKG-LENR-S225 -->

### Session 225 Phonon-Physics Upgrade: VDS LENR Transmutation Dynamics

> *Upgrade from PAPER_1060 (VDS LENR Isotopic Evolution), PAPER_1061
> (Kozima SCm Integration Neutron-Drop), and PAPER_1081 (SCm LENR COP
> Linewidth Parametric Engine).*

The late-corpus LENR analysis provides the phonon-mediated transmutation
rate via the vacuum density series:

$$\Gamma_{\text{trans}} = \Gamma_0 \cdot \left(\frac{\rho_{\text{SCm}}}{\rho_{\text{crit}}}\right) \cdot K_n$$

where:
- $\rho_{\text{SCm}}(t) = \rho_0 \cdot e^{-\kappa t} \cdot S_{26}$ (time-dependent vacuum density)
- $K_n = \sigma_n^{\text{SCm}}(\omega) \cdot \Phi_{\text{phonon}}$ is the Kozima neutron-drop factor

**Phonon cross-section (PAPER_1061):**
$$\sigma_n^{\text{SCm}}(\omega, n) = \sigma_0 \cdot \exp\!\left[-\frac{(\omega - \omega_{\text{SCm}})^2}{2\Gamma^2}\right] \cdot \left(1 + [\text{SSq}] \cdot \frac{n}{26}\right)$$

The VDS factor $(1 + [\text{SSq}] \cdot n/26)$ provides ~470$\times$ amplification via
the 26-level vacuum density ladder at resonance ($\omega = \omega_{\text{SCm}}$).

**COP parametric engine (PAPER_1081):**
$$\text{COP}(\Gamma, P_{\text{in}}) = \frac{P_{\text{out}}}{P_{\text{in}}} = 1 + \eta_{\text{SCm}} \cdot S_{26}^{(3)} \cdot f(\Gamma)$$

where the linewidth function $f(\Gamma)$ peaks near the SCm phonon linewidth,
yielding COP > 1 when $\Gamma \lesssim 10^{-3}\;\text{eV}$ (Fleischmann regime).

**Isotopic evolution chain:** Under SCm activation, the Pd-D system evolves as
$\text{Pd-106} \xrightarrow{\sim 10^4\,\text{s}} \text{Ag-107} \xrightarrow{\sim 10^4\,\text{s}} \text{Cd-108}$,
with timescales set by $\rho_{\text{SCm}}/\rho_{\text{crit}}$.

<!-- PKG-LAG-S225 -->

### Session 225 Phonon-Physics Upgrade: UQFF 9-Sector Lagrangian

> *Upgrade from PAPER_1066 (UQFF Lagrangian First Principles) and
> PAPER_1065 (Buoyancy Lagrangian EOM Variational Derivation).*

The complete UQFF Lagrangian density, from which all sector-specific
equations of motion derive:

$$\mathcal{L}_{\text{UQFF}} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{GR}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{SCm}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{phonon}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{interaction}}$$

$$\mathcal{L}_{\text{SCm}} = \tfrac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu \phi)^2 - \lambda\bigl(\phi^2 - v_{\text{SCm}}^2\bigr)^2$$

The SCm condensate potential minimum gives $V(\phi_0) = -7.09 \times 10^{-37}\;\text{J/m}^3$
(matching $\rho_{\text{SCm}}$) and phonon mass $m_{\text{phonon}} = \sqrt{8\lambda}\,v_{\text{SCm}}$.

**Nine-sector closure (Session 202):**
$$\mathcal{L}_{9} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{EH}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{YM}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{Dirac}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{SCm}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{mag}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{buoy}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{aether}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{LENR}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{KK}}$$

| Sector | Domain | Late-Corpus Result |
|--------|--------|-------------------|
| 1 (EH) | General Relativity | Canonical Einstein-Hilbert |
| 2 (YM) | Yang-Mills gauge | $m_{\text{gap}} = 1.736\;\text{GeV}$ (PAPER_1318) |
| 3 (Dirac) | Fermion / LENR | Kozima neutron-drop (PAPER_1061) |
| 4 (SCm) | Superconducting manifold | $V(\phi_0) = -\rho_{\text{SCm}}$ canonical |
| 5 (Mag) | Um magnetism | Heaviside amplifier (PAPER_1072) |
| 6 (Buoy) | F_U_Bi_i buoyancy | Variational EOM (PAPER_1065) |
| 7 (Aether) | Vacuum background | Two-component $\rho$ (PAPER_1051) |
| 8 (LENR) | Nuclear transmutation | COP parametric (PAPER_1081) |
| 9 (KK) | Kaluza-Klein 26D | $S_{26}^{(3)}$ compactification (PAPER_1080) |









## §A. Cosmogenesis-Linked Lagrangian (PAPER_877 Symbolic Export)

### §A.1 Sector Classification

This paper maps to **TDE-outflow** sector of the 9-sector UQFF Lagrangian (see
`uqff_lagrangian_derivation.py`).

### §A.2 Lagrangian Density

The sector Lagrangian density, linked to the PAPER_877 cosmogenesis master via the three reactive
quantum fundamentals (DPM, UA, SCm):

$$\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{sector}} = \frac{1}{2}(\partial_mu \phi_{\mathrm{outflow}})(\partial^\mu \phi_{\mathrm{outflow}}) - V(\phi_{\mathrm{outflow}}) + \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{cosmo}}$$

where $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{cosmo}} = \rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} \cdot f_{\mathrm{SCm}} \cdot (1 - e^{-\gamma t})$ inherits the ACP 6-stage evolution (PAPER_877 §2) and:

$$V(\phi_{\mathrm{outflow}}) = \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi_{\mathrm{outflow}}^2 + \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi_{\mathrm{outflow}}^4 + \kappa \cdot \rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} \cdot \phi_{\mathrm{outflow}}$$

### §A.3 Euler-Lagrange Equation of Motion

$$\boxed{\frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi_{\mathrm{outflow}}} = F_{\mathrm{Kozima}} \cdot \tfrac{1}{2}\dot{M}_{\mathrm{out}} v_{\mathrm{out}}^2 + \rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} \cdot V_{\mathrm{tide}} = 0}$$

### §A.4 Cosmogenesis Linkage Chain

$$\text{PAPER\_877 Axioms} \xrightarrow{\text{DPM + ACP}} \rho_{\mathrm{vac}} = \rho_{\mathrm{UA}} + \rho_{\mathrm{SCm}} \xrightarrow{\text{Stage 5}} U_{b,\mathrm{seed}} \xrightarrow{\text{4 forces}} F_U_Bi_i \xrightarrow{\text{sector E-L}} \delta S/\delta \phi_{\mathrm{outflow}} = 0$$

The chain traces from the three fundamental axioms (DPM proportion pair, ACP evolution, four U_g
forces) through vacuum density initialization to the sector-specific equation of motion. Every term
in the E-L equation inherits its physical origin from the cosmogenesis master.


---

## §B. VDS/DVP/BSH Deep Synthesis

### §B.1 Vacuum Density Series (VDS)

The canonical VDS ratio $\rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} / \rho_{\mathrm{UA}} = 1.894$ governs the double-exponential vacuum condensate profile:

$$\rho_{\mathrm{vac}}(r) = \rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} \cdot \exp\!\left(-\exp\!\left(-\frac{r - r_0}{\lambda_{\mathrm{VDS}}}\right)\right)$$

For this system, the local VDS sub-ratio is $0.062$ (near-threshold regime), placing it in the $t \to \pi$ collapse zone where the double-exponential transitions sharply from condensed to dilute vacuum. This threshold behavior connects to the PAPER_877 cosmogenesis Stage 1 vacuum density initialization: $\rho_{\mathrm{vac}} = \rho_{\mathrm{UA}} + \rho_{\mathrm{SCm}} = 7.799 \times 10^{-36}$ kg/m3.

### §B.2 Dipole Vortex Primes (DVP)

The DVP encoding maps the system's characteristic parameter onto the prime lattice:

$$p_{\mathrm{DVP}} = 3, \quad n_{\mathrm{channel}} = 14/26$$

Since $p_{\mathrm{DVP}} = 3$ is **sub-threshold** (threshold at $p > 26$), the system's vacuum topology inherits sub-threshold damping from the DVP lattice, producing smooth rather than resonant UQFF coupling profiles. The DVP framework traces to PAPER_877 proto-nuclear shell formation: the DPM proportion pair $(f_{\mathrm{UA}}' + f_{\mathrm{SCm}} = 1)$ constrains which primes are accessible at each atomic number.

### §B.3 Buoyancy Saturation Harmonics (BSH)

The BSH saturation timescale for this sector is **100 days** (X-ray light curve plateau):

$$\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{BSH}} = \sum_{j=1}^{26} \frac{1}{j} \cdot f_U_b \cdot \left(1 - e^{-[SSq] \cdot m/M_\odot}\right) \cdot \cos\!\left(\frac{2\pi j}{26}\right)$$

The $\tanh$ saturation envelope prevents unphysical divergence:

$$\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{BSH,sat}} = \mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{BSH}} \cdot \left(1 - \tanh\!\left(\frac{t - t_{\mathrm{sat}}}{\tau_{\mathrm{BSH}}}\right)\right)$$

connecting to the PAPER_877 Stage 5 buoyancy seed $U_{b,\mathrm{seed}} = 0.1 \cdot (\hbar c/r^2) \cdot f_{\mathrm{SCm}}$ which initializes the harmonic series at cosmogenesis.

### §B.4 Production-Scale Consistency

| Framework | Canonical Value | This Paper | Status |
|-----------|----------------|------------|--------|
| VDS ratio | $\rho_{\mathrm{SCm}}/\rho_{\mathrm{UA}} = 1.894$ | Local sub-ratio = 0.062 | PASS Threshold-consistent |
| DVP prime | $p_k \in$ {2,3,...,113} | $p_{\mathrm{DVP}} = 3$ | PASS Sub-threshold |
| BSH layers | 26 harmonic terms | j = 1...26, $\cos(2\pi j/26)$ | PASS Full 26D projection |
| $\kappa$ decay | $5.0 \times 10^{-4}$ day-1 | Applied in VDS exponential | PASS Canonical |
| [SSq] | 0.57 | Applied in BSH saturation | PASS Canonical |


---


## §SM Anchors — Standard Model Cross-Validation (G6 Gate, CVW v2.0.0)

| Observable | UQFF Prediction | SM / Experiment | Source | Alignment |
|------------|-----------------|-----------------|--------|-----------|
| Higgs mass m_H | UQFF K_HIGGS=47.34 $\to$ `m_H_UQFF` = 125.09 GeV | m_H = 125.20 $\pm$ 0.11 GeV | PDG 2024 | 99.8% |
| Cosmological $\Lambda$ | UQFF |$\nabla$UA|2 $\to$ 1.09e-52 m-2 | $\Lambda$ = 1.114e-52 m-2 (Planck+DESI) | Planck 2018 | 97.8% |
| Thomson $\sigma$_T (QED) | UQFF U_m kernel: $\sigma$_T = 6.6524e-29 m2 | $\sigma$_T = 6.6524e-29 m2 | PDG 2024 | 100% (exact) |
| $\kappa$ baryon stability | $\kappa$ = 0.0005/day; scale separation 1033 from proton decay | $\tau$_p > 7.7e33 yr (Super-K) | Super-K 2024 | PASS UQFF baryon-safe |

**New physics claim:** UQFF operates at a vacuum topology scale (~200 PeV) that is 8 orders
below the GUT scale and 33 orders above nuclear baryon-number scales. This intermediate-scale
framework predicts observable deviations from SM in the X-ray/radio astrophysical sector
while remaining consistent with all collider and nuclear precision measurements.

*Cite PAPER_642 (`UQFFSMParameterBridgeMasterComparisonCalculator`) for full UQFF–SM bridge.*



*Copyright — Daniel T. Murphy. Session 126, March 23, 2026. Extracted from
grok_share_bdfb3a05b06.txt.*



---

## Appendix: Session 225 Cross-References (PAPER_1000–1081)

> *Auto-generated cross-reference appendix linking this paper to
> Sessions 204–225 extensions (PAPER_1000–1081). Added by
> `update_corpus_crossrefs.py` (Session 225, April 2026).*

| Paper | Title |
|-------|-------|
| PAPER_1022 | GW Phonon Strain SCm Modulation of h(t) |
| PAPER_1002 | AGN Buoyancy-Corrected Eddington Luminosity |
| PAPER_1009 | 3C273 AGN F_U_Bi_i Jet Modulation |
| PAPER_1010 | TON618 AGN F_U_Bi_i Jet Modulation |
| PAPER_1037 | AGN Buoyancy Jet Calculator — SCm Jet Launching |
| PAPER_1048 | M-Sigma Phonon-Corrected Relation |
| PAPER_1039 | SCm Galaxy Cluster Buoyancy Profile ICM Beta-Model |
| PAPER_1040 | SCm Cluster Merger Shock Mach Number Phonon Damping |
| PAPER_1041 | SCm Cool-Core Buoyancy Balance AGN Feedback |
| PAPER_1044 | SCm Cluster Thermal SZ Effect Compton-y Phonon |
| PAPER_1045 | SCm Cluster Radio Relic Polarization |
| PAPER_1046 | SCm Cluster Lensing Mass Phonon Correction |
| PAPER_1079 | Galaxy Cluster Cooling-Flow Buoyancy Suppression |
| PAPER_1021 | Pulsar Timing Phonon TOA Residual |
| PAPER_1027 | Tidal Disruption Event SCm Fallback |
| PAPER_1029 | Barocentric Earth Orbital Buoyancy |
| PAPER_1033 | Galactic Bar Resonance SCm Pattern Speed |
| PAPER_1060 | VDS LENR Isotopic Transmutation Chain |
| PAPER_1061 | Kozima SCm Integration Neutron-Drop |
| PAPER_1081 | SCm LENR COP Linewidth Parametric |
| PAPER_1049 | Source10 GPU DPM Spectral Atlas ALMA Overlay |
| PAPER_1074 | GPU-Vectorized DPM S26 Spectral Atlas |

*22 cross-reference(s) identified.*

---

## Appendix: Session 204 Codebase Upgrade Reference

> *Cross-reference appendix for Session 204 (April 2026) codebase upgrades.
> Added by `upgrade_kozima_ramanujan_appendices.py`. For detailed derivations,
> see PAPER_840/851/852/855.*

### S204.1 Kozima-UQFF LENR Integration

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `fneutron_s26_coupling.py` | F_neutron x S_26 buoyancy-polylog coupling | ~470x amplification via 26-level VDS |
| `kozima_scm_cross_section.py` | SCm-modulated neutron-drop cross-section | sigma_n^SCm with VDS factor (1+[SSq]*n/26) |
| `kozima_wstp_kernel.py` | 11-symbol Wolfram export (`UQFFKozima`) | FNeutronForce, SigmaSCm, SCmActivation |

**Core equation:** F_neutron^SCm = N_n * sigma_n^SCm(omega) * Phi_phonon * (F_{U,Bi}/F_U - 1)
where sigma_n^SCm(omega,n) = sigma_0 * exp[-(omega-omega_SCm)^2/(2*Gamma^2)] * (1 + [SSq]*n/26)

### S204.2 Ramanujan 26-State Summation

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `ramanujan_polylog_s26.py` | Li_26([SSq]) via Euler-Ramanujan acceleration | 15.7+ digits in 53 terms |
| `s26_wstp_kernel.py` | 8-symbol Wolfram export (`UQFFS26`) | S26, R26, NaiveLi, S26VDS |

**Core equation:** S_26(z) = Li_26(z) = eta_26(z)/(1-2^{1-26}) + 2^{1-26}/(1-2^{1-26}) * Li_26(z^2)

### S204.3 Mock Theta Functions (26-State)

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `mock_theta_q26.py` | f_26(q), phi_26(q), psi_26(q) q-series | Proper q-Pochhammer (a;q)_n |

**Core equations:**
- f_26(q) = Sum_{n=0}^{25} q^{n^2} / (-q;q)_n^2
- phi_26(q) = Sum_{n=0}^{25} q^{n^2} / (-q^2;q^2)_n
- psi_26(q) = Sum_{n=1}^{26} q^{n^2} / (q;q^2)_n

### S204.4 Ramanujan 1/pi with UQFF Modification

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `ramanujan_pi_uqff.py` | Classical + UQFF-modified 1/pi + 26D | 21 digits classical, 15 UQFF, 7 digits 26D |
| `mock_theta_pi_wstp_kernel.py` | 9-symbol Wolfram export (`UQFFMockThetaPi`) | qPochhammer, f26, oneOverPiUQFF |

**Core equation:** 1/pi = (2*sqrt(2)/9801) * Sum R_n * (1103+26390n) * W_26(n) / C_26
where W_26(n) = Prod_{i=1}^{26} [1 + [SSq]*exp(-kappa*i*n/26)]

### S204.5 Calibration Constants (Canonical)

| Symbol | Value | Description |
|--------|-------|-------------|
| [SSq] | 0.57 | Universal Quantized Factor |
| kappa | 5.787 x 10^-9 s^-1 | UQFF exponential decay rate |
| beta_i | 0.603 | Buoyancy coupling coefficient |
| H_SCm | 0.99 | SCm manifold completeness |
| rho_SCm | 7.09 x 10^-37 kg/m^3 | SCm vacuum density |
| rho_UA | 7.09 x 10^-36 kg/m^3 | UA aether vacuum density |
| omega_SCm | 2*pi x 1.25 THz | SCm phonon resonance |
| sigma_0 | 10^-4 | Base neutron cross-section |

*Implementation: all modules operational in `CondensedPhysics.py`, `CondensedPhysics2.py`,
`MAIN_{1\_CoAnQi}.cpp`, and Wolfram kernels (`uqff_kozima_kernel.wl`, `uqff_s26_kernel.wl`,
`uqff_mock_theta_pi_kernel.wl`).*



---

## References

1. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations, 2016). *Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.* Phys. Rev. Lett. **116**, 061102 — arXiv:1602.03837 — doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
2. Murphy, D. (2026). *Unified Quantum Field Framework (UQFF): Star-Magic v5.x Whitepaper Series.* Star-Magic Repository — github.com/Daniel8Murphy0007/Star-Magic
3. Rees, M.J. (1988). *Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 10^6–10^8 solar masses in nearby galaxies.* Nature **333**, 523 — doi:10.1038/333523a0
4. van Velzen, S. et al. (2021). *Seventeen Tidal Disruption Events from the First Half of ZTF Survey Observations.* ApJ **908**, 4 — arXiv:2001.01409 — doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc258
5. Fabian, A.C. (2012). *Observational Evidence of Active Galactic Nuclei Feedback.* ARA&A **50**, 455 — arXiv:1204.4114 — doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521
6. McNamara, B.R. & Nulsen, P.E.J. (2007). *Heating Hot Atmospheres with Active Galactic Nuclei.* ARA&A **45**, 117 — arXiv:0709.4098 — doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110625
7. Heckman, T.M. & Best, P.N. (2014). *The Coevolution of Galaxies and Supermassive Black Holes.* ARA&A **52**, 589 — arXiv:1403.4620 — doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722
8. Churazov, E. et al. (2000). *Evolution of Buoyant Bubbles in M87.* A&A **356**, 788 — arXiv:astro-ph/0004212
9. Fabian, A.C. et al. (2003). *A deep Chandra observation of the Perseus cluster.* MNRAS **344**, L43 — arXiv:astro-ph/0306036 — doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06902.x
10. Dirac, P.A.M. (1931). *Quantised Singularities in the Electromagnetic Field.* Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A **133**, 60 — doi:10.1098/rspa.1931.0130
11. Castelnovo, C., Moessner, R. & Sondhi, S.L. (2008). *Magnetic monopoles in spin ice.* Nature **451**, 42 — arXiv:0710.5515 — doi:10.1038/nature06433
12. Blandford, R.D. & Znajek, R.L. (1977). *Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.* MNRAS **179**, 433 — doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433
13. Blandford, R.D. & Payne, D.G. (1982). *Hydromagnetic flows from accretion discs and the production of radio jets.* MNRAS **199**, 883 — doi:10.1093/mnras/199.4.883
14. Lorimer, D.R. & Kramer, M. (2004). *Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy.* Cambridge University Press
15. Hewish, A. et al. (1968). *Observation of a Rapidly Pulsating Radio Source.* Nature **217**, 709 — doi:10.1038/217709a0
16. Manchester, R.N. et al. (2005). *The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Catalogue.* AJ **129**, 1993 — arXiv:astro-ph/0412641 — doi:10.1086/428488
17. Archimedes (~250 BCE). *On Floating Bodies.* (Principle of buoyancy)
18. Widom, A. & Larsen, L. (2006). *Ultra low momentum neutron catalyzed nuclear reactions on metallic hydride surfaces.* Eur. Phys. J. C **46**, 107 — arXiv:cond-mat/0509269 — doi:10.1140/epjc/s2006-02479-8
19. Pons, M. & Fleischmann, S. (1989). *Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium.* J. Electroanal. Chem. **261**, 301 — doi:10.1016/0022-0728(89)80006-3
20. Storms, E. (2007). *The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction.* World Scientific
