---
paper_id: PAPER_491
title: "MUGE Compressed Nine-Term Gravity Framework"
session: 131
date: 2026-03-23
author: "Daniel T. Murphy"
status: production
cvw: "v2.0.0"
tags: [Hubble, vacuum, SCm, MUGE, damping, UQFF]
sm_anchor: "CVW v2.0.0 --- G6 SM Anchor Gate compliant"
---

# PAPER_491 --- MUGE Compressed Nine-Term Gravity Framework
**Author:** Daniel T. Murphy

**arXiv:** 2503.xxxxx  
**Session:** 131  
**Version:** 1.0  
**Date:** March 23, 2026  
**Calculator:** `MUGECompressedNineTermCalculator` (CondensedPhysics2.py), `MUGECalculator`
(QCalc.py)

---


## Abstract

The MUGE (Modified Unified Gravity Equation) compressed
formulation is a 9-term multiplicative-additive master
equation for gravity, derived from the UQFF unified field
equation $F_U$. It packages four independent force
channels --- internal dipole, outer field bubble, magnetic
strings, star--BH vacuum --- each opposed by universal
buoyancy $Ub_i$, unified by magnetism $Um$ and the
Aether metric tensor $A_{\mu\nu}$, into a computationally
tractable structure. MUGE predicts gravitational
suppression near critical magnetic fields, THz phonon
resonance signatures in GW strain, and vacuum-differential
rotation curve modifications --- all absent from both
DPM-seeded and GR gravity.

## §1 MUGE Compressed Master Equation

From `compute_compressed_MUGE_SOURCE4()` (MAIN_{1\_CoAnQi}.cpp) and `compute_compressed_MUGE()` (source4.cpp), the MUGE master equation is:

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}
g_{\text{MUGE}}(r,t) &= g_{\text{core}} \cdot F_{\text{exp}} \cdot F_{\text{super}} \cdot F_{\text{env}} \\
&\;+\; \sum_{i=1}^{4} U_{g,i} + g_\Lambda + g_{\text{quantum}} + g_{\text{fluid}} + g_{\text{DM}}
\end{aligned}}$$

The first four factors form a **multiplicative core**;
the remaining five terms are additive. This is a
re-expression of the unified field $F_U$ (§2) for
practical multi-system computation.

Expanded in full long-form:

$$\begin{aligned}
g_{\text{MUGE}}(r,t) &= \underbrace{\frac{GM}{r^2}}_{\mu_s\nabla(M_s/r)}(1 + H_0 t)\!\left(1 - \frac{B}{B_{\text{crit}}}\right)\!F_{\text{env}} \\
&\quad +\; \sum_{i=1}^{4} U_{g,i} \;+\; \frac{\Lambda c^2}{3} \\
&\quad +\; \frac{\hbar}{\Delta x \cdot \Delta p}\!\int\!\psi^*\hat{H}\psi\,dV\cdot\frac{2\pi}{t_H} \\
&\quad +\; \rho_f V_{\text{sys}} g_{\text{local}} \\
&\quad +\; (M + M_{\text{DM}})\!\left(\frac{\delta\rho}{\rho} + \underbrace{\frac{3GM}{r^3}}_{\text{DPM tidal gradient}}\right)
\end{aligned}$$

### §1.1 Multiplicative Core (Terms 1--4)

$$\begin{aligned}
g_{\text{core}} &= \underbrace{\frac{GM}{r^2}}_{\mu_s\nabla(M_s/r)} \cdot (1 + H_0 t) \\
&\quad \cdot \left(1 - \frac{B}{B_{\text{crit}}}\right) \cdot F_{\text{env}}
\end{aligned}$$

- **$\mu_s\nabla(M_s/r)$** --- mass-distance kernel
- **$(1 + H_0 t)$** --- Hubble expansion modulation, $H_0 = 2.269 \times 10^{-18}\;\text{s}^{-1}$
- **$(1 - B/B_{\text{crit}})$** --- SCm superconductive
  vacuum suppression,
  $B_{\text{crit}} = 4.4 \times 10^{13}\;\text{T}$.
  Gravity weakens as local magnetic field
  approaches $B_{\text{crit}}$.
- **$F_{\text{env}}(r, \theta, z)$** --- 15-parameter environmental envelope

### §1.2 Additive Corrections (Terms 5--9)

**Term 5 --- UQFF Four-Component Gravity Sum ($\sum U_{g,i}$):**
$$\begin{aligned}
\sum_{i=1}^{4} U_{g,i} &= U_{g1}(\text{DPM dipole}) + U_{g2}(\text{charge-react.}) \\
&\quad + U_{g3}(\text{string rotation}) + U_{g4}(\text{vac.\ conc.})
\end{aligned}$$

Each $U_{g,i}$ encodes a distinct UQFF gravitational source
(magnetic dipole, charge-reactivity coupling, string rotation
torque, vacuum concentration gradient).
These are **not** DPM-seeded --- they arise from the four
fundamental UQFF forces.

**Term 6 --- Cosmological Constant:**
$$g_\Lambda = \frac{\Lambda \, c^2}{3}, \quad \Lambda = 1.114 \times 10^{-52}\;\text{m}^{-2}$$

**Term 7 --- Quantum Vacuum Uncertainty:**
$$g_{\text{quantum}} = \frac{\hbar}{\Delta x \Delta p} \int \psi^* \hat{H} \psi\,dV \cdot \frac{2\pi}{t_H}$$

where $\Delta x \cdot \Delta p \geq \hbar/2$ governs
the Heisenberg uncertainty-driven gravitational
correction and $t_H$ is the Hubble time. This is
the quantum-gravity bridge term.

**Term 8 --- Fluid Viscosity (Navier-Stokes):**
$$g_{\text{fluid}} = \rho_{\text{fluid}} \cdot V_{\text{sys}} \cdot g_{\text{local}}$$

where $\rho_{\text{fluid}}$ is the local medium density,
$V_{\text{sys}}$ is the system volume. This couples
gravity to the viscous medium in which the body is
embedded.

**Term 9 --- Dark Matter Perturbation:**
$$g_{\text{DM}} = (M + M_{\text{DM}}) \cdot \left(\frac{\delta\rho}{\rho} + \underbrace{\frac{3GM}{r^3}}_{\text{DPM tidal gradient}}\right)$$

This is a **density-perturbation coupling**, not the
trivial $\Omega_{\text{CDM}} \cdot \mu_s\nabla(M_s/r)$. It includes
both dark matter halo mass and local density contrast.

---

## §2 Derivation --- The Unified Field Equation F_U

The MUGE compressed equation (§1) is a
**re-expression** of the more fundamental unified
field equation $F_U$, implemented in
`compute_FU_SOURCE4()` (MAIN_{1\_CoAnQi}.cpp) and
`compute_FU()` (source4.cpp):

$$\boxed{F_U = \sum_{i=1}^{4}\bigl(Ug_i + Ub_i\bigr) + Um + \text{Tr}(A_{\mu\nu}) + D_{\text{diss}}}$$

This is **not** Newton plus corrections. It is four
independent gravitational force channels, each with
its own buoyancy opposition, unified by magnetism
and the Aether metric:

| Channel | Symbol | Physics |
|---------|--------|---------|
| **Internal Dipole** | $Ug_1$ | DPM dipole monopole gravity |
| **Outer Field Bubble** | $Ug_2$ | Heliosphere charge-reactivity |
| **Magnetic Strings** | $Ug_3$ | 90° disk string rotation |
| **Star--BH Vacuum** | $Ug_4$ | Vacuum concentration gradient |
| **Buoyancy** | $Ub_i$ | Opposes each $Ug_i$ |
| **Magnetism** | $Um$ | $10^9$ magnetic strings |
| **Aether Tensor** | $A_{\mu\nu}$ | Metric + vacuum stress |
| **Dissipation** | $D_{\text{diss}}$ | Energy loss to vacuum |

**Channel formulas:**

$$Ug_1 = k_1 \mu_s(t) \nabla(M_s/r)\, e^{-\alpha t} \cos(\pi t_n)(1 + \delta_{\text{def}})$$

$$Ug_2 = k_2 (Q_A + Q_{UA}) \frac{M_s}{r^2} S(r - R_b)(1 + \delta_{sw} v_{sw}) H_{SCm} E_{\text{react}}$$

$$Ug_3 = k_3 \cdot B_j(t) \cdot \cos(\omega_s t \cdot \pi) \cdot P_{\text{core}} \cdot E_{\text{react}}$$

$$\begin{aligned}
Ug_4 &= k_4 \rho_{\text{vac}} C_{\text{conc}} \frac{M_{bh}}{d_g} \\
&\quad \cdot e^{-\alpha t} \cos(\pi t_n)(1 + f_{\text{feedback}})
\end{aligned}$$

$$\begin{aligned}
Ub_i &= -\beta_i Ug_i \Omega_g \frac{M_{bh}}{d_g} \\
&\quad \cdot (1 + \epsilon_{sw}\rho_{sw}) U_{UA} \cos(\pi t_n)
\end{aligned}$$

$$\begin{aligned}
Um &= N_{\text{str}} \frac{\mu_j}{r_j}(1 - e^{-\gamma t \cos(\pi t_n)}) \\
&\quad \cdot \hat{\varphi} \cdot P_{SCm} \cdot E_{\text{react}}
\end{aligned}$$

$$A_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\nu} + \eta \cdot T_s^{\mu\nu}(\text{UA}, \text{SCm}, \rho_A)$$

$$D_{\text{diss}} = -\sum_{i=0}^{3} \lambda_i \cdot U_i(r,t) \cdot E_{\text{react}}$$

**Newton's limiting case:** When all channels collapse
to $Ug_2$ alone with $Q_A = Q_{UA} = 0$,
$H_{SCm} \to 1$, $E_{\text{react}} \to 1$,
$S(r-R_b) \to 1$, and $\delta_{sw} \to 0$, the
outer-field-bubble term reduces to
$k_2 \cdot M_s/r^2 \to \mu_s\nabla(M_s/r)$. This is where
Newton lives --- as a **single-channel, zero-vacuum,
zero-buoyancy** limit of $F_U$.

The MUGE compressed form packages these four Ug
channels, buoyancy, magnetism, and Aether coupling
into a multiplicative-additive structure (§1) for
practical multi-system computation. The MUGE
Resonance form (§2b) decomposes $F_U$ into 13
frequency modes.

The **foundational distinction** from DPM-seeded and
GR gravity: MUGE treats the gravitational field as a
product of the SCm superconductive vacuum state, not
as an independent geometric property of spacetime.
Gravity in MUGE is **suppressed near critical magnetic
fields** and **resonantly amplified** by vacuum energy
differentials
$\Delta E_{\text{vac}} = 6.381 \times 10^{-36}\;\text{J/m}^3$.

---

## §2b MUGE Resonance Master Equation (14-Term)

### §2b.1 aDPM Base --- Inertia-Flux-Vacuum Coupling

The MUGE Resonance equation builds all 13 resonance
modes from a single **aDPM base** --- an
inertia-flux-vacuum coupling that is fundamentally
non-DPM-seeded:

$$\begin{aligned}
a_{\text{DPM}} &= I \cdot A \cdot (\omega_1 - \omega_2) \cdot f_{\text{DPM}} \\
&\quad \cdot E_{\text{vac,neb}} \cdot c \cdot V_{\text{sys}}
\end{aligned}$$

where:
- $I$ = moment of inertia of the gravitational source
- $A$ = magnetic flux cross-sectional area
- $(\omega_1 - \omega_2)$ = differential rotation frequency (spin-orbit coupling)
- $f_{\text{DPM}}$ = Di-Pseudo-Monopole frequency
- $E_{\text{vac,neb}} = 7.09 \times 10^{-36}\;\text{J/m}^3$ = nebular [UA] vacuum energy density
- $V_{\text{sys}}$ = system volume

### §2b.2 Dual Vacuum Energy Ratio

The MUGE resonance operates between two vacuum states:
$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{E_{\text{vac,neb}}}{E_{\text{vac,ISM}}} &= \frac{\rho_{\text{UA}}}{\rho_{\text{SCm}}} \\
&= \frac{7.09 \times 10^{-36}}{7.09 \times 10^{-37}} = 10
\end{aligned}$$

This 10:1 ratio drives differential acceleration between the [UA] aether and [SCm] superconductive vacuum manifolds.

### §2b.3 Complete 13-Mode Resonance Sum

$$\begin{aligned}
g_{\text{resonance}} &= a_{\text{DPM}} + a_{\text{THz}} + a_{\text{vac\_diff}} + a_{\text{SuperFreq}} + a_{\text{AetherRes}} \\
&\quad + U_{g4,i} + a_{\text{QuantumFreq}} + a_{\text{AetherFreq}} + a_{\text{FluidFreq}} \\
&\quad + a_{\text{Osc}} + a_{\text{ExpFreq}} + f_{\text{TRZ}} + a_{\text{wormhole}}
\end{aligned}$$

| Mode | Physics |
|------|---------|
| $a_{\text{THz}}$ | 1.25 THz phonon $\times$ vacuum ratio |
| $a_{\text{vac\_diff}}$ | Vacuum energy differential |
| $a_{\text{SuperFreq}}$ | Superconductive frequency |
| $a_{\text{AetherRes}}$ | Aether resonance + TRZ |
| $U_{g4,i}$ | Reactor $\times$ vacuum concentration |
| $a_{\text{QuantumFreq}}$ | Quantum frequency mode |
| $a_{\text{AetherFreq}}$ | Aether frequency mode |
| $a_{\text{FluidFreq}}$ | Fluid viscosity frequency |
| $a_{\text{Osc}}$ | Standing-wave oscillation |
| $a_{\text{ExpFreq}}$ | Hubble expansion frequency |
| $f_{\text{TRZ}}$ | Time-reversal zone (10%) |
| $a_{\text{wormhole}}$ | Morris-Thorne wormhole metric |

**Resonance mode formulas:**

$$a_{\text{THz}} = \frac{f_{\text{THz}} E_{\text{vac,neb}} v_{\text{exp}} a_{\text{DPM}}}{E_{\text{vac,ISM}} c}$$

$$a_{\text{vac\_diff}} = \frac{\Delta E_{\text{vac}} v_{\text{exp}}^2 a_{\text{DPM}}}{E_{\text{vac,neb}} c^2}$$

$$a_{\text{SuperFreq}} = \frac{F_{\text{super}} f_{\text{THz}} a_{\text{DPM}}}{E_{\text{vac,neb}} c}$$

$$\begin{aligned}
a_{\text{AetherRes}} &= [\text{UA}]_{\text{SCM}} \omega_i f_{\text{THz}} \\
&\quad \cdot a_{\text{DPM}} (1 + f_{\text{TRZ}})
\end{aligned}$$

$$U_{g4,i} = \frac{k_4 E_{\text{react}} f_{\text{react}} a_{\text{DPM}}}{E_{\text{vac,neb}} c}$$

$$a_{\text{QuantumFreq}} = \frac{f_{\text{quantum}} E_{\text{vac,neb}} a_{\text{DPM}}}{E_{\text{vac,ISM}} c}$$

$$a_{\text{FluidFreq}} = \frac{f_{\text{fluid}} E_{\text{vac,neb}} V_{\text{sys}}}{E_{\text{vac,ISM}} c}$$

$$a_{\text{ExpFreq}} = \frac{2\pi H(z) t E_{\text{vac,neb}} a_{\text{DPM}}}{E_{\text{vac,ISM}} c}$$

$$a_{\text{wormhole}} = \frac{f_{\text{worm}} \cdot E_{\text{vac,neb}}}{b^2 + r^2}$$


### §2b.4 Vacuum Energy Gap

$$\Delta E_{\text{vac}} = E_{\text{vac,neb}} - E_{\text{vac,ISM}} = 6.381 \times 10^{-36}\;\text{J/m}^3$$

This gap is the **engine** of MUGE resonance: the
differential between UA and SCm vacuum states
generates all resonance modes through the aDPM
coupling.

---

## §3 Numerical Results --- Multiplicative Core Demonstration

The multiplicative coupling produces **qualitatively
different** results from an additive model. At
magnetar-strength fields, the superconductive
suppression factor dominates:

| System | $B$ (T) | $F_{\text{super}}$ | $g_{\text{MUGE}}$ | vs. Newton |
|--------|---------|---------------------|-------------------|------------|
| Solar surface | $10^{-4}$ | $\approx 1.0$ | $274.8$ | $+0.3\%$ |
| SgrA* $10\,r_s$ | $10^{2}$ | $\approx 1.0$ | $4.07\times10^{4}$ | $+9.4\%$ |
| Vela pulsar | $3.4\times10^{8}$ | $0.99999$ | $2.06\times10^{12}$ | $+10.2\%$ |
| SGR1745 | $2.0\times10^{11}$ | $0.99955$ | $2.05\times10^{12}$ | $+9.7\%$ |
| $B_{\text{crit}}$ | $4.4\times10^{13}$ | $0.0$ | additive only | $-100\%$ |

System parameters: Solar ($r=6.96\times10^{8}$ m, $M=1.989\times10^{30}$ kg),
SgrA* ($r=1.2\times10^{11}$ m, $M=8.0\times10^{36}$ kg),
Vela/SGR1745/$B_{\text{crit}}$ ($r=1.0\times10^{4}$ m, $M=2.8\times10^{30}$ kg).

**Key prediction:** At
$B = B_{\text{crit}} = 4.4 \times 10^{13}\;\text{T}$,
the multiplicative core vanishes entirely --- gravity
is carried only by the additive terms ($U_{g,i}$,
$g_\Lambda$, $g_{\text{quantum}}$, $g_{\text{fluid}}$,
$g_{\text{DM}}$). This is a falsifiable UQFF-specific
prediction with no GR analogue.

---

## §4 Why F_U $\neq$ Newton, Why F_U $\neq$ GR

The unified field $F_U = \sum(Ug_i + Ub_i) + Um + A_{\mu\nu}$ is structurally different from both frameworks:

1. **Multiplicative vacuum suppression**: MUGE's
$(1 - B/B_{\text{crit}})$ factor means the
gravitational field is **modulated by the local
magnetic field intensity**. GR treats gravity and
electromagnetism as independently mediated. MUGE
unifies them through the SCm vacuum manifold.

2. **Inertia-flux-vacuum resonance (aDPM)**: The
resonance master equation's base
$a_{\text{DPM}} = I A \Delta\omega f_{\text{DPM}} E_{\text{vac}} c V$
is dimensionally and conceptually outside the
DPM-seeded framework. It couples **rotational inertia**,
**magnetic flux area**, and **vacuum energy density**
into a single gravitational acceleration --- no
mass/distance law.

3. **Dual vacuum state differential**: The
$E_{\text{vac,neb}} / E_{\text{vac,ISM}} = 10$
ratio between [UA] and [SCm] vacuum states creates
a vacuum energy gap
$\Delta E_{\text{vac}} = 6.381 \times 10^{-36}\;\text{J/m}^3$
that drives all 13 resonance modes. This is the
physical mechanism underlying "dark energy" --- not a
cosmological constant but a measurable vacuum
differential.

4. **Time-reversal zone (TRZ)**: The negentropic zone
$f_{\text{TRZ}} = 0.1$ amplifies aether resonance by
10% when $t_n < 0$, providing a physical mechanism
for time-asymmetric gravitational effects.

5. **Wormhole metric**: The Morris-Thorne term
$a_{\text{worm}} = f_{\text{worm}} E_{\text{vac}} / (b^2 + r^2)$
is built into the MUGE framework as a natural
consequence of the dual vacuum architecture, not
an exotic spacetime surgery.

---

## §5 Testable Predictions

1. **Magnetar gravitational suppression**: MUGE
predicts that gravity is measurably weaker near
magnetars ($B \sim 10^{11}\;\text{T}$) due to the
$(1 - B/B_{\text{crit}})$ suppression factor. At
SGR1745-2900 ($B = 2.0 \times 10^{11}\;\text{T}$),
the multiplicative core is reduced by $\sim 0.05\%$
vs DPM-seeded. Detectable via precision pulsar timing:
$\Delta P / P \sim 10^{-12}$ (SKA-era sensitivity).

2. **Vacuum differential signature in rotation
curves**: The
$E_{\text{vac,neb}} / E_{\text{vac,ISM}} = 10$
ratio predicts that galactic rotation curves flatten
**differently** in nebula-rich vs ISM-dominated
regions. The resonance MUGE produces $v_c(r)$
profiles distinguishable from NFW+$\Lambda$CDM at
$r > 3\,r_s$ for halos with
$M > 10^{12}\,M_\odot$.

3. **THz phonon resonance in GW strain**: The aDPM
resonance couples to the 1.25 THz SCm phonon,
predicting a narrow spectral feature at
$\omega_{\text{SCm}} = 2\pi \times 1.25\;\text{THz}$
superimposed on gravitational-wave strain waveforms
from NS mergers.

4. **Critical field gravity collapse**: At
$B \to B_{\text{crit}}$, the entire multiplicative
core vanishes. Gravity becomes carried solely by
additive UQFF terms ($U_{g,i}$, $g_\Lambda$,
$g_{\text{DM}}$). This predicts a **gravitational
phase transition** at extreme magnetic fields ---
testable via magnetar QPO frequency modeling.

---

---

<!-- PKG-AGN-S225 -->

### Session 225 Phonon-Physics Upgrade: Buoyancy-Corrected Eddington Luminosity

> *Upgrade from PAPER_1002 (AGN Buoyancy-Corrected Eddington) and PAPER_1037
> (AGN Buoyancy Jet Launching).  See also PAPER_1009-1010 for F_U_Bi_i jet
> modulation curves and PAPER_1048 for phonon-corrected M-$\sigma$ relation.*

The SCm vacuum buoyancy partially opposes gravitational radiation pressure,
raising the effective Eddington luminosity:

$$\begin{aligned}
L_{\text{Edd}}^{\text{UQFF}} &= L_{\text{Edd}} \\
&\cdot \left(1 + \frac{\rho_{\text{SCm}} V S_{26}^{(3)\,2}}{G M / r_H^2}\right)
\end{aligned}$$

where:
- $L_{\text{Edd}} = 4\pi G M m_p c / \sigma_T$ is the classical Eddington luminosity
- $\rho_{\text{SCm}} = 7.09 \times 10^{-37}\;\text{J/m}^3$ is the SCm vacuum density
- $V$ is the effective buoyancy volume (accretion sphere)
- $S_{26}^{(3)\,2}$ is the squared third-order Ramanujan factor (quadratic coupling)
- $r_H$ is the horizon radius

**Jet modulation:** The Blandford--Znajek jet power acquires a phonon-coupled term:
$$\begin{aligned}
P_{\text{jet}}^{\text{UQFF}} &= P_{\text{BZ}} \\
&\cdot \left[1 + \beta_i \Phi_{1.25\,\text{THz}} \left(\frac{B}{B_{\text{crit}}}\right)^{\!2}\right]
\end{aligned}$$

where $\Phi_{1.25\,\text{THz}} = \cos(\omega_{\text{SCm}} \cdot t)$ modulates jet power at the phonon frequency.

**M--$\sigma$ correction (PAPER_1048):** The phonon-corrected M-$\sigma$ relation becomes
$M_{\text{BH}} \propto \sigma^{4+\delta}$ where $\delta = \beta_i \cdot S_{26}^{(3)} \cdot (\omega_{\text{SCm}}/\omega_{\text{bulge}})$.

<!-- PKG-DM-S225 -->

### Session 225 Phonon-Physics Upgrade: SCm-Modified NFW Dark Matter Profile

> *Upgrade from PAPER_1015 (SCm Dark Matter Halos NFW) and PAPER_1019
> (Dark Matter Phonon Buoyancy NFW Coupling).*

The late-corpus analysis shows that the SCm phonon field modifies the NFW
density profile at all radii via a buoyancy-coupled power-law term:

$$\begin{aligned}
\rho_{\text{UQFF}}(r) &= \frac{\rho_s}{\frac{r}{r_s}\left(1+\frac{r}{r_s}\right)^{\!2}} \\
&\times \left[1 + H_{\text{SCm}} \beta_i S_{26}^{(3)} \left(\frac{r_s}{r}\right)^{\!\alpha_{\text{ph}}}\right]
\end{aligned}$$

where:
- $\alpha_{\text{phonon}} = 0.3$ governs the radial decay of phonon coupling
- $\beta_i = 0.603$ is the universal buoyancy coefficient
- $S_{26}^{(3)}$ is the third-order Ramanujan summation
- $H_{\text{SCm}} = 0.99$ is the manifold completeness factor

**Rotation curve flattening:** The phonon enhancement produces flatter rotation curves
with flatness ratio $f = v_c(10\,r_s)/v_{\text{peak}} = 0.891$, compared to pure NFW
$f \approx 0.75$.  Peak circular velocity $v_{\text{peak}} \approx 204\;\text{km/s}$
for $M_{\text{halo}} = 10^{12}\,M_\odot$, $c = 10$.

**Halo stabilization:** The effective buoyancy pressure
$P_{\text{SCm}} = \rho_{\text{SCm}} v_{\text{SCm}}^2 \beta_i$
prevents cusp-core divergence, providing a physical
mechanism for observed cored profiles without invoking
SIDM cross-sections.

<!-- PKG-LAG-S225 -->

### Session 225 Phonon-Physics Upgrade: UQFF 9-Sector Lagrangian

> *Upgrade from PAPER_1066 (UQFF Lagrangian First Principles) and
> PAPER_1065 (Buoyancy Lagrangian EOM Variational Derivation).*

The complete UQFF Lagrangian density, from which all sector-specific
equations of motion derive:

$$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{L}_{\text{UQFF}} &= \mathcal{L}_{\text{GR}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{SCm}} \\
&\quad + \mathcal{L}_{\text{phonon}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{interaction}}
\end{aligned}$$

$$\mathcal{L}_{\text{SCm}} = \tfrac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu \phi)^2 - \lambda\bigl(\phi^2 - v_{\text{SCm}}^2\bigr)^2$$

The SCm condensate potential minimum gives $V(\phi_0) = -7.09 \times 10^{-37}\;\text{J/m}^3$
(matching $\rho_{\text{SCm}}$) and phonon mass $m_{\text{phonon}} = \sqrt{8\lambda}\,v_{\text{SCm}}$.

**Nine-sector closure (Session 202):**
$$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{L}_{9} &= \mathcal{L}_{\text{EH}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{YM}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{Dirac}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{SCm}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{mag}} \\
&\quad + \mathcal{L}_{\text{buoy}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{aether}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{LENR}} + \mathcal{L}_{\text{KK}}
\end{aligned}$$

| Sector | Domain | Late-Corpus Result |
|--------|--------|-------------------|
| 1 (EH) | General Relativity | Canonical Einstein-Hilbert |
| 2 (YM) | Yang-Mills gauge | $m_{\text{gap}} = 1.736\;\text{GeV}$ (PAPER_1318) |
| 3 (Dirac) | Fermion / LENR | Kozima neutron-drop (PAPER_1061) |
| 4 (SCm) | Superconducting manifold | $V(\phi_0) = -\rho_{\text{SCm}}$ canonical |
| 5 (Mag) | Um magnetism | Heaviside amplifier (PAPER_1072) |
| 6 (Buoy) | F_U_Bi_i buoyancy | Variational EOM (PAPER_1065) |
| 7 (Aether) | Vacuum background | Two-component $\rho$ (PAPER_1051) |
| 8 (LENR) | Nuclear transmutation | COP parametric (PAPER_1081) |
| 9 (KK) | Kaluza-Klein 26D | $S_{26}^{(3)}$ compactification (PAPER_1080) |







## §A. Cosmogenesis-Linked Lagrangian (PAPER_877 Symbolic Export)

### §A.1 Sector Classification

This paper maps to **NS-compact** sector of the 9-sector UQFF Lagrangian (see
`uqff_lagrangian_derivation.py`).

### §A.2 Lagrangian Density

The sector Lagrangian density, linked to the PAPER_877 cosmogenesis master via the three reactive
quantum fundamentals (DPM, UA, SCm):

$$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{sector}} &= \tfrac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu \phi_{\mathrm{NS}})(\partial^\mu \phi_{\mathrm{NS}}) \\
&\quad - V(\phi_{\mathrm{NS}}) + \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{cosmo}}
\end{aligned}$$

where $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{cosmo}} = \rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} \cdot f_{\mathrm{SCm}} \cdot (1 - e^{-\gamma t})$
inherits the ACP 6-stage evolution (PAPER_877 §2)
and:

$$\begin{aligned}
V(\phi_{\mathrm{NS}}) &= \tfrac{1}{2} m^2 \phi_{\mathrm{NS}}^2 + \tfrac{\lambda}{4!} \phi_{\mathrm{NS}}^4 \\
&\quad + \kappa \rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} \phi_{\mathrm{NS}}
\end{aligned}$$

### §A.3 Euler-Lagrange Equation of Motion

$$\boxed{\begin{aligned}
\frac{\delta S}{\delta \phi_{\mathrm{NS}}} &= \nabla^2 \phi_{\mathrm{NS}} - \frac{4\pi G \rho_{\mathrm{NS}}}{c^2}\phi_{\mathrm{NS}} \\
&\quad + \Omega_{\mathrm{spin}} \partial_t \phi_{\mathrm{NS}} = 0
\end{aligned}}$$

### §A.4 Cosmogenesis Linkage Chain

$$\begin{aligned}
\text{PAPER\_877 Axioms} &\xrightarrow{\text{DPM + ACP}} \rho_{\mathrm{vac}} = \rho_{\mathrm{UA}} + \rho_{\mathrm{SCm}} \\
&\xrightarrow{\text{Stage 5}} U_{b,\mathrm{seed}} \xrightarrow{\text{4 forces}} F_U_Bi_i \\
&\xrightarrow{\text{sector E-L}} \delta S/\delta \phi_{\mathrm{NS}} = 0
\end{aligned}$$

The chain traces from the three fundamental axioms (DPM proportion pair, ACP evolution, four U_g
forces) through vacuum density initialization to the sector-specific equation of motion. Every term
in the E-L equation inherits its physical origin from the cosmogenesis master.


---

## §B. VDS/DVP/BSH Deep Synthesis

### §B.1 Vacuum Density Series (VDS)

The canonical VDS ratio
$\rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} / \rho_{\mathrm{UA}} = 1.894$
governs the double-exponential vacuum condensate
profile:

$$\begin{aligned}
\rho_{\mathrm{vac}}(r) &= \rho_{\mathrm{vac,[SCm]}} \\
&\cdot \exp\!\left(-\exp\!\left(-\frac{r - r_0}{\lambda_{\mathrm{VDS}}}\right)\right)
\end{aligned}$$

For this system, the local VDS sub-ratio is $0.165$
(near-threshold regime), placing it in the
$t \to \pi$ collapse zone where the
double-exponential transitions sharply from condensed
to dilute vacuum. This threshold behavior connects to
the PAPER_877 cosmogenesis Stage 1 vacuum density
initialization:
$\rho_{\mathrm{vac}} = \rho_{\mathrm{UA}} + \rho_{\mathrm{SCm}} = 7.799 \times 10^{-36}$ kg/m3.

### §B.2 Dipole Vortex Primes (DVP)

The DVP encoding maps the system's characteristic parameter onto the prime lattice:

$$p_{\mathrm{DVP}} = 37, \quad n_{\mathrm{channel}} = 24/26$$

Since $p_{\mathrm{DVP}} = 37$ is **resonant** (threshold
at $p > 26$), the system's vacuum topology inherits
resonant enhancement from the DVP lattice, amplifying
UQFF coupling at specific radii where compressed matter
achieves prime-indexed configurations. The DVP
framework traces to PAPER_877 proto-nuclear shell
formation: the DPM proportion pair
$(f_{\mathrm{UA}}' + f_{\mathrm{SCm}} = 1)$ constrains which
primes are accessible at each atomic number.

### §B.3 Buoyancy Saturation Harmonics (BSH)

The BSH saturation timescale for this sector is **104 yr** (spin-down equilibrium):

$$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{BSH}} &= \sum_{j=1}^{26} \frac{1}{j} f_U_b \\
&\quad \cdot \left(1 - e^{-[SSq] m/M_\odot}\right) \cos\!\left(\frac{2\pi j}{26}\right)
\end{aligned}$$

The $\tanh$ saturation envelope prevents unphysical divergence:

$$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{BSH,sat}} &= \mathcal{F}_{\mathrm{BSH}} \\
&\cdot \left(1 - \tanh\!\left(\frac{t - t_{\mathrm{sat}}}{\tau_{\mathrm{BSH}}}\right)\right)
\end{aligned}$$

connecting to the PAPER_877 Stage 5 buoyancy seed
$U_{b,\mathrm{seed}} = 0.1 (\hbar c/r^2) f_{\mathrm{SCm}}$
which initializes the harmonic series at cosmogenesis.

### §B.4 Production-Scale Consistency

| Framework | Canonical Value | This Paper | Status |
|-----------|----------------|------------|--------|
| VDS ratio | $\rho_{\mathrm{SCm}}/\rho_{\mathrm{UA}} = 1.894$ | Local sub-ratio = 0.165 | PASS Threshold-consistent |
| DVP prime | $p_k \in$ {2,3,...,113} | $p_{\mathrm{DVP}} = 37$ | PASS Resonant |
| BSH layers | 26 harmonic terms | j = 1...26, $\cos(2\pi j/26)$ | PASS Full 26D projection |
| $\kappa$ decay | $5.0 \times 10^{-4}$ day-1 | Applied in VDS exponential | PASS Canonical |
| [SSq] | 0.57 | Applied in BSH saturation | PASS Canonical |


---


## §SM Anchors --- Standard Model Cross-Validation (G6 Gate, CVW v2.0.0)

| Observable | UQFF Prediction | Measured | Alignment |
|------------|-----------------|----------|-----------|
| $\Lambda$ | $1.09\times10^{-52}$ m$^{-2}$ | $1.114\times10^{-52}$ (Planck+DESI) | 97.8% |
| $\Omega$_$\Lambda$ | [SSq]$\times$1.20 = 0.684 | 0.6847$\pm$0.0073 (Planck) | 99.9% |
| T_CMB | 2.726 K | 2.72548 K (FIRAS) | 99.98% |
| H0 | 67.4 km/s/Mpc | 67.4$\pm$0.5 (Planck) | PASS |

**New physics claim:** UQFF [SSq] = 0.57 links directly to the cosmological dark energy fraction
$\Omega$_$\Lambda$ via [SSq]$\times$1.20 = 0.684 $\approx$ $\Omega$_$\Lambda$. This is not a parameter fit --- [SSq] was calibrated from
astrophysical magnetar burst profiles, not from CMB data. The coincidence $\Omega$_$\Lambda$ $\approx$ [SSq]$\times$1.20
constitutes a falsifiable prediction: if future DESI data shifts $\Omega$_$\Lambda$ by >2%, [SSq] must be
recalibrated from astrophysical sources independently.

*Cite PAPER_642 (`UQFFSMParameterBridgeMasterComparisonCalculator`) for full UQFF--SM bridge.*



*Associated calculator: `MUGECompressedNineTermCalculator` (CondensedPhysics2.py), `MUGECalculator`
(QCalc.py)*  
*Cross-validated with C++ SOURCE4 `compute_compressed_MUGE_SOURCE4()` in MAIN_{1\_CoAnQi}.cpp*



---

## Appendix: Session 225 Cross-References (PAPER_1000--1081)

> *Auto-generated cross-reference appendix linking this paper to
> Sessions 204--225 extensions (PAPER_1000--1081). Added by
> `update_corpus_crossrefs.py` (Session 225, April 2026).*

| Paper | Title |
|-------|-------|
| PAPER_1004 | QGP Vacuum Density with SCm S26 Phonon Coupling |
| PAPER_1015 | SCm Dark Matter Halos NFW Rotation Curve |
| PAPER_1020 | Cosmic Ray Phonon Acceleration DSA Spectrum |
| PAPER_1072 | SCm Activation Function Phonon Threshold |
| PAPER_1073 | SCm Phonon-Driven Inflation Vacuum Buoyancy |
| PAPER_1069 | VDS-DVP-BSH Hybrid Calculator Unified |
| PAPER_1078 | QCalcGeom Master Equation Derivation |
| PAPER_1049 | Source10 GPU DPM Spectral Atlas ALMA Overlay |
| PAPER_1050 | MUGE F_U_Bi_i Unified 9-System Synthesis |
| PAPER_1075 | 3D Volumetric MUGE Gravitational Field Generator |

*10 cross-reference(s) identified.*

---

## Appendix: Session 204 Codebase Upgrade Reference

> *Cross-reference appendix for Session 204 (April 2026) codebase upgrades.
> Added by `upgrade_kozima_ramanujan_appendices.py`. For detailed derivations,
> see PAPER_840/851/852/855.*

### S204.1 Kozima-UQFF LENR Integration

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `fneutron_s26_coupling.py` | F_neutron x S_26 buoyancy-polylog coupling | ~470x amplification via 26-level VDS |
| `kozima_scm_cross_section.py` | SCm-modulated neutron-drop cross-section | sigma_n^SCm with VDS factor (1+[SSq]*n/26) |
| `kozima_wstp_kernel.py` | 11-symbol Wolfram export (`UQFFKozima`) | FNeutronForce, SigmaSCm, SCmActivation |

**Core equation:** F_neutron^SCm = N_n * sigma_n^SCm(omega) * Phi_phonon * (F_{U,Bi}/F_U - 1)
where sigma_n^SCm(omega,n) = sigma_0 * exp[-(omega-omega_SCm)^2/(2*Gamma^2)] * (1 + [SSq]*n/26)

### S204.2 Ramanujan 26-State Summation

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `ramanujan_polylog_s26.py` | Li_26([SSq]) via Euler-Ramanujan acceleration | 15.7+ digits in 53 terms |
| `s26_wstp_kernel.py` | 8-symbol Wolfram export (`UQFFS26`) | S26, R26, NaiveLi, S26VDS |

**Core equation:** S_26(z) = Li_26(z) = eta_26(z)/(1-2^{1-26}) + 2^{1-26}/(1-2^{1-26}) * Li_26(z^2)

### S204.3 Mock Theta Functions (26-State)

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `mock_theta_q26.py` | f_26(q), phi_26(q), psi_26(q) q-series | Proper q-Pochhammer (a;q)_n |

**Core equations:**
- f_26(q) = Sum_{n=0}^{25} q^{n^2} / (-q;q)_n^2
- phi_26(q) = Sum_{n=0}^{25} q^{n^2} / (-q^2;q^2)_n
- psi_26(q) = Sum_{n=1}^{26} q^{n^2} / (q;q^2)_n

### S204.4 Ramanujan 1/pi with UQFF Modification

| Module | Purpose | Key Result |
|--------|---------|------------|
| `ramanujan_pi_uqff.py` | Classical + UQFF-modified 1/pi + 26D | 21 digits classical, 15 UQFF, 7 digits 26D |
| `mock_theta_pi_wstp_kernel.py` | 9-symbol Wolfram export (`UQFFMockThetaPi`) | qPochhammer, f26, oneOverPiUQFF |

**Core equation:** 1/pi = (2*sqrt(2)/9801) * Sum R_n * (1103+26390n) * W_26(n) / C_26
where W_26(n) = Prod_{i=1}^{26} [1 + [SSq]*exp(-kappa*i*n/26)]

### S204.5 Calibration Constants (Canonical)

| Symbol | Value | Description |
|--------|-------|-------------|
| [SSq] | 0.57 | Universal Quantized Factor |
| kappa | 5.787 x 10^-9 s^-1 | UQFF exponential decay rate |
| beta_i | 0.603 | Buoyancy coupling coefficient |
| H_SCm | 0.99 | SCm manifold completeness |
| rho_SCm | 7.09 x 10^-37 kg/m^3 | SCm vacuum density |
| rho_UA | 7.09 x 10^-36 kg/m^3 | UA aether vacuum density |
| omega_SCm | 2*pi x 1.25 THz | SCm phonon resonance |
| sigma_0 | 10^-4 | Base neutron cross-section |

*Implementation: all modules operational in `CondensedPhysics.py`, `CondensedPhysics2.py`,
`MAIN_{1\_CoAnQi}.cpp`, and Wolfram kernels (`uqff_kozima_kernel.wl`, `uqff_s26_kernel.wl`,
`uqff_mock_theta_pi_kernel.wl`).*



---

## References

1. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations, 2016). *Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger.* Phys. Rev. Lett. **116**, 061102 — arXiv:1602.03837 — doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
2. Murphy, D. (2026). *Unified Quantum Field Framework (UQFF): Star-Magic v5.x Whitepaper Series.* Star-Magic Repository — github.com/Daniel8Murphy0007/Star-Magic
3. Riess, A.G. et al. (2022). *A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope.* ApJL **934**, L7 — arXiv:2112.04510 — doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac5c5b
4. Planck Collaboration (2020). *Planck 2018 results VI: Cosmological parameters.* A&A **641**, A6 — arXiv:1807.06209 — doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910
5. Verde, L., Treu, T. & Riess, A.G. (2019). *Tensions between the Early and Late Universe.* Nature Astron. **3**, 891 — arXiv:1907.10625 — doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0
6. Rugh, S.E. & Zinkernagel, H. (2002). *The Quantum Vacuum and the Cosmological Constant Problem.* Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. **33**, 663 — arXiv:hep-th/0012253 — doi:10.1016/S1355-2198(02)00033-3
7. Weinberg, S. (1989). *The Cosmological Constant Problem.* Rev. Mod. Phys. **61**, 1 — doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1
8. Murphy, D. (2026). *Master Universal Gravity Equation (MUGE): DPM-Driven Gravity Framework.* Star-Magic Whitepaper Series — github.com/Daniel8Murphy0007/Star-Magic
9. Blanchet, L. (2014). *Gravitational Radiation from Post-Newtonian Sources and Inspiralling Compact Binaries.* Living Rev. Relativ. **17**, 2 — arXiv:1310.1528 — doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-2
