Requirement and testability review
Reviews a Jira or Linear ticket before implementation or QA begins, exposing ambiguity, contradiction, hidden dependencies, missing acceptance criteria, and untestable expectations.
A complete repository of detailed QA workflow specifications covering planning, execution, defects, release decisions, platform testing, automation, communication, and continuous improvement.
Every skill includes a full self-contained HTML overview, a platform-neutral SKILL.md, examples, and a structured report template. Shared policies and JSON schemas prevent each skill from inventing its own safety and evidence rules.
4 production-oriented QA workflow specifications.
Reviews a Jira or Linear ticket before implementation or QA begins, exposing ambiguity, contradiction, hidden dependencies, missing acceptance criteria, and untestable expectations.
Creates a reviewable test plan from approved requirements, implementation context, and known risk, with explicit scope, required scenarios, evidence, data, and exit criteria.
Determines the smallest defensible regression set for a change by combining code impact, architecture, risk, historical failures, platform exposure, and operational behaviour.
Builds and maintains a defensible compatibility matrix across browsers, operating systems, devices, firmware, resolutions, roles, regions, and feature states.
8 production-oriented QA workflow specifications.
Turns a ticket and its implementation into a version-bound, evidence-backed QA run with explicit approvals, deterministic release rules, regression protection, publication, and cleanup.
Runs a time-boxed exploratory session with a clear charter, controlled data, evidence, notes, coverage map, findings, and follow-up recommendations.
Runs a short, version-bound health check across the most critical user and system paths to decide whether deeper testing or rollout should continue.
Validates authentication and authorisation across roles, tenants, ownership states, endpoints, operations, cached sessions, and direct-object access.
Plans and executes API validation across contracts, authentication, authorisation, data integrity, errors, pagination, rate limits, idempotency, concurrency, and compatibility.
Investigates connectivity failures across interfaces, DNS, proxy, TLS, firewall, redirects, private-network rules, endpoints, and application behaviour while protecting network and customer secrets.
Validates startup, cached operation, interruption, reboot, clock changes, queued work, reconnection, synchronization, and long-offline limitations with explicit observation duration.
Validates media startup, decoding, layout, looping, transitions, audio, synchronization, interruption, recovery, long-running stability, and platform-specific rendering.
5 production-oriented QA workflow specifications.
Converts an observed problem into a precise, reproducible, environment-bound defect report without overstating cause, severity, or scope.
Reviews an incoming issue and determines what it most likely represents, how severe it is, who should own it, what evidence is missing, and what action should happen next.
Determines whether a reported defect is fully fixed in the intended build and whether related behaviour remains safe across the agreed regression scope.
Transforms a support case into a privacy-safe, controlled reproduction plan that compares customer conditions with known-good conditions and returns a clear confidence-based outcome.
Diagnoses inconsistent test results by separating product nondeterminism, automation defects, shared data, timing, infrastructure, environment, order, and concurrency effects.
3 production-oriented QA workflow specifications.
Combines ticket-level results, open defects, platform coverage, rollout safeguards, monitoring, rollback readiness, and accepted risk into one auditable release recommendation.
Evaluates each rollout stage using version adoption, product health, device state, support signals, cohort comparison, and predefined rollback thresholds.
Provides a controlled QA workstream during an incident: reproducing impact, validating mitigations, comparing affected and healthy states, and preserving evidence without disrupting response ownership.
2 production-oriented QA workflow specifications.
Audits an automated test suite for correctness, reliability, isolation, maintainability, coverage value, security, runtime cost, and false-confidence patterns.
Audits existing manual test cases for correctness, clarity, traceability, duplication, maintainability, execution value, automation suitability, and obsolete assumptions.
3 production-oriented QA workflow specifications.
Produces a concise daily or stand-up update from verified work records without inventing progress, hiding blockers, or exposing restricted detail.
Creates a precise handoff so another tester or team can continue from the correct build, state, evidence, and next action without repeating work or losing uncertainty.
Reviews a completed release, incident, project, or testing cycle to identify escaped-risk patterns, process failures, effective controls, and owned preventive actions.
The documentation is intentionally detailed enough for review, but no agent should be granted production access merely because a skill file describes safe behaviour.