Results

The budget of {{ budget }} GBP was allocated across {{ rounds|length }} projects:

{{ election_name}} had a total of {{ total_votes }} voters participating.
Between these voters there was a total of {{ budget }} GBP available, of which {{ spent }} GBP was spent.
In total, there were {{ number_of_elected_projects }} projects elected, and {{ number_of_unelected_projects }} projects not elected.
{# The elected projects were:
{% for p in projects %} {{ projects[p]["name"] }}, {% endfor %} #}

The projects and their descriptions are as follows:
{% for p in projects %} {{ projects[p]["name"] }}: {{ projects[p]["description"] }}
{% endfor %}

{% set voter_budget = (budget | int) / (total_votes | int) %} Each of the voters had a budget of {{ '%0.2f' % voter_budget | float }} GBP to allocate to the projects.
The projects were elected using the Method of Equal Shares, where the total budget is virtually divided equally among the voters.
The following web-page outlines the process of the election and the step by step process of how each project was chosen.

Round	ID	Project Name	Cost	Number of Votes	Effective Support	Chart
›{{ loop.index }}	{{ round.id }}	{{ projects[round.id]["name"] }}	{{ round.cost }}	{{ round.totalvotes }}	{{ round.effective_vote_count[round.id] \| int }}	↓ {{ round.cost }} {# Project {candidate.name} ({display_short_string(candidate.id)}): {display_int(int(paid))} zł. " #} ↑ {{ round.initial_voter_funding \| int}}
Round Analysis: Click Me! Description: {{ projects[round.id]["description"] }} Categories: {% for category in projects[round.id]["categories"] %} {{ category }} {% endfor %} Other Details: Why was this project selected? {% if round.initial_voter_funding != round.final_voter_funding %} This project was accepted because its cost ({{ round.cost }} GBP) was less than or equal to the combined funds of its supporters at round {{ loop.index }} - {{ '%0.2f' % round.final_voter_funding \| float }} GBP. (sentence about its initial funding value) (sentence about how it lost some of its inital funding value) (conclusion sentence talking about the final funding value and comparing it to the cost?) {% else %} This project was accepted because its cost ({{ round.cost }} GBP) was less than or equal to the combined funds of its supporters ({{ '%0.2f' % round.final_voter_funding \| float }} GBP), and no funding for this project was lost in the previous rounds. {% endif %} Funding spent in previous rounds. {% if round.initial_voter_funding != round.final_voter_funding %} From the initial total funding, {{ (round.initial_voter_funding - round.final_voter_funding) \| int }} GBP was spent on previously selected projects. The funding was spent on: {% for r in round.funding_lost_per_round %} Project {{ rounds[r].id }} - {{ projects[rounds[r].id]["name"] }}: {{ round.funding_lost_per_round[r] \| int }} GBP {% endfor %} {% else %} None of the initial total funding was spent on previously selected projects. {% endif %}
›	{{ rejected.id }}	{{ projects[rejected.id]["name"] }}	{{ rejected.cost }}	{{ rejected.totalvotes }}	{{ round.effective_vote_count[rejected.id] \| int }}	↓ {{ rejected.cost }} ↑ {{ rejected.initial_voter_funding \| int}}
Description: {{ projects[rejected.id]["description"] }} Categories: {% for category in projects[rejected.id]["categories"] %} {{ category }} {% endfor %} Other Details: Why was this project not selected? {% if rejected.initial_voter_funding >= rejected.cost %} Project initially had funding to be accepted but lost too much funding in previous rounds. (mention the important projects that made it lose funding to go below the required cost) (mention that these important projects had a higher effective vote count, meaning they were selected earlier than this project) (mention by current round that project cost is greater than combined funds of supporters, making it unaffordable) {% else %} This project was rejected because its cost ({{ rejected.cost }} GBP) was greater than the combined funds of its supporters ({{ '%0.2f' % rejected.initial_voter_funding \| float }} GBP), even before any funding was lost. {% endif %} Funding spent in previous rounds. {% if rejected.initial_voter_funding != rejected.final_voter_funding %} From the initial total funding, {{ (rejected.initial_voter_funding - rejected.final_voter_funding) \| int }} GBP was spent on previously selected projects. The funding was spent on: {% for r in rejected.funding_lost_per_round %} Project {{ rounds[r].id }} - {{ projects[rounds[r].id]["name"] }}: {{ rejected.funding_lost_per_round[r] \| int }} GBP {% endfor %} {% else %} None of the initial total funding was spent on previously selected projects. {% endif %}

Round

Project Name

Cost

Number of Votes

Effective Support

Chart

›{{ loop.index }}

↓ {{ round.cost }}

Project {candidate.name} ({display_short_string(candidate.id)}): {display_int(int(paid))} zł.

" #}

↑ {{ round.initial_voter_funding | int}}

Round Analysis: Click Me!
Description: {{ projects[round.id]["description"] }}
Categories:
{% for category in projects[round.id]["categories"] %} {{ category }}
{% endfor %} Other Details:

Why was this project selected?

{% if round.initial_voter_funding != round.final_voter_funding %} This project was accepted because its cost ({{ round.cost }} GBP) was less than or equal to the combined funds of its supporters at round {{ loop.index }} - {{ '%0.2f' % round.final_voter_funding | float }} GBP.
(sentence about its initial funding value)
(sentence about how it lost some of its inital funding value)
(conclusion sentence talking about the final funding value and comparing it to the cost?)
{% else %} This project was accepted because its cost ({{ round.cost }} GBP) was less than or equal to the combined funds of its supporters ({{ '%0.2f' % round.final_voter_funding | float }} GBP), and no funding for this project was lost in the previous rounds. {% endif %}

Funding spent in previous rounds.

{% if round.initial_voter_funding != round.final_voter_funding %} From the initial total funding, {{ (round.initial_voter_funding - round.final_voter_funding) | int }} GBP was spent on previously selected projects.
The funding was spent on:

Project {{ rounds[r].id }} - {{ projects[rounds[r].id]["name"] }}: {{ round.funding_lost_per_round[r] | int }} GBP

{% else %} None of the initial total funding was spent on previously selected projects. {% endif %}

›

↓ {{ rejected.cost }}

↑ {{ rejected.initial_voter_funding | int}}

Description: {{ projects[rejected.id]["description"] }}
Categories:
{% for category in projects[rejected.id]["categories"] %} {{ category }}
{% endfor %} Other Details:

Why was this project not selected?

{% if rejected.initial_voter_funding >= rejected.cost %} Project initially had funding to be accepted but lost too much funding in previous rounds.
(mention the important projects that made it lose funding to go below the required cost)
(mention that these important projects had a higher effective vote count, meaning they were selected earlier than this project)
(mention by current round that project cost is greater than combined funds of supporters, making it unaffordable) {% else %} This project was rejected because its cost ({{ rejected.cost }} GBP) was greater than the combined funds of its supporters ({{ '%0.2f' % rejected.initial_voter_funding | float }} GBP), even before any funding was lost. {% endif %}

Funding spent in previous rounds.

{% if rejected.initial_voter_funding != rejected.final_voter_funding %} From the initial total funding, {{ (rejected.initial_voter_funding - rejected.final_voter_funding) | int }} GBP was spent on previously selected projects.
The funding was spent on:

Project {{ rounds[r].id }} - {{ projects[rounds[r].id]["name"] }}: {{ rejected.funding_lost_per_round[r] | int }} GBP

{% else %} None of the initial total funding was spent on previously selected projects. {% endif %}

{{ election_name }}

Results

Why was this project selected?

Funding spent in previous rounds.

Why was this project not selected?

Funding spent in previous rounds.