### Table 1 (Paying to know)

*Table 1 Descriptive and omnibus inferential statistics, across original studies and replications. Paying to know Choice under risk N Choice Win Loss Uncertain Inferential ES [95% CI] N Choice Win Loss Uncertain Inferential ES [95% CI] Statistics Statistics Tversky & Shafir, 1992, / / / / / / / 98 Ac...*

| Table 1 Descriptive and Tversky & Shafir, original (within- subject) Tversky & Shafir, original (between- | omnibus inferential statistics, across original studies and Paying to know N Choice Win Loss 1992, / / / / / / / / / / 1992, 199 Buy (%) 36 38 21 (54%) (57%) |
| --- | --- |
| subject) |  |
|  | Not buy 11 8 4 (%) (16%) (12%) Pay $5 20 21 41 (%) (30%) (31%) |
| Tversky & Shafir, | 1992, / / / / / |
| modified gambles |  |
| (between-subject) |  |
|  | / / / / / |
| Kühberger et al., | 2001, / / / / / |
| exp. 1 (between- |  |
| subject) | / / / / / |
| Kühberger et al., | 2001, / / / / / |
| exp. 2 (between- |  |
| subject) | / / / / / |
| Kühberger et al., | 2001, / / / / / |
| exp. 3 (within- |  |
| subject) | / / / / / |
| Kühberger et al., | 2001, / / / / / |
| exp. 4 (between- |  |
| subject) | / / / / / |
| Lambdin & Burdsal, | 2007 / / / / / |
| (within-subject) | / / / / / |
| Present work (within- | 445 Buy (%) 256 127 99 |
| subject) | (58%) (29%) |

### Table 1 (Choice under risk)

*Table 1 Descriptive and omnibus inferential statistics, across original studies and replications. Paying to know Choice under risk N Choice Win Loss Uncertain Inferential ES [95% CI] N Choice Win Loss Uncertain Inferential ES [95% CI] Statistics Statistics Tversky & Shafir, 1992, / / / / / / / 98 Ac...*

| I. Ziano replications. Choice under risk et al. Inferential ES [95% CI] N Choice Win Loss Uncertain Inferential ES [95% CI] Statistics Statistics / / 98 Accept 68 58 35 (34%) (%) (69%) (59%) / / Reject 30 40 63 (66%) (%) (31%) (41%) χ2 (4) =19.02, Cramer’s V = 213 Accept 49 40 χ2 (2) =13.89, Cramer’s V p <.001 0.218 [0.137, (%) (69%)1 (57%)1 p <.001 =0.255 |
| --- |
| 0.317] [0.144, |
| 0.394] |
| Reject 22 31 |
| (%) (31%)1 (43%)1 |
| / / 171 Accept 42 39 43 χ2 (2) =0.76, Cramer’s V |
| (%) (73%)1 (69%)1 (75%)1 p =.68 =0.067 |
| [(cid:0) 0.108, |
| 0.218] |
| / / Reject 15 18 14 |
| (%) (27%)1 (31%)1 (25%)1 |
| / / 177 Accept … … |
| (%) (60%)2 (47%)2 (47%)2 |
| / / Reject … … |
| (%) (40%)2 (53%)2 (53%)2 |
| / / 184 Accept … … |
| (%) (83%)2 (70%)2 (62%)2 |
| / / Reject … … |
| (%) (17%)2 (30%)2 (38%)2 |
| / / 35 Accept 28 13 15 … … |
| (%) (80%)1 (37%)1 (43%)1 |
| JournalofEconomicPsychology83(2021)102350 |
| / / Reject 7 22 20 … … |
| (%) (20%)1 (63%)1 (57%)1 |
| / / 97 Accept … … |
| (%) (68%)2 (32%)2 (38%)2 |
| / / Reject … … |
| (%) (32%)2 (68%)2 (62%)2 |
| / / 55 Accept 35 26 21 (38%) … … |
| (%) (64%) (47%) |
| / / Reject 20 31 34 … … |
| (%) (36%) (53%) (62%) |
| † 445 Accept 164 187 165 † |
| (%) (37%) (42%) (37%) |
| (continued on next page) |