                              1 of 2 DOCUMENTS

            UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. JOHN DOE,
                           Defendant, Appellant.

                                 No. 08-1234

           UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

               555 F.3d 100; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12345

                        March 3, 2009, Argued
                        June 1, 2009, Decided

PRIOR HISTORY:  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District
of Massachusetts.

COUNSEL: Jane Roe, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Michael Sullivan,
United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellee.
Paul Smith, Federal Public Defender Office, for appellant.

JUDGES: Before TORRUELLA, LYNCH, and HOWARD, Circuit Judges. HOWARD, Circuit
Judge, dissenting.

OPINION BY: LYNCH

DISSENT BY: HOWARD

OPINION

 [*101]  LYNCH, Circuit Judge. John Doe was convicted of possession of a
firearm by a felon. He argues that the search of his car violated the Fourth
Amendment. We review the district court's legal conclusions de novo. See
United States v. Example, 400 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2005).

The district court erred in denying the motion to suppress. We reverse and
remand for further proceedings.

DISSENT

HOWARD, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I would affirm the conviction.

                              2 of 2 DOCUMENTS

      ACME CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,
                                Respondent.

                                 No. 07-5678

           UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

                     2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 54321

                      January 10, 2008, Submitted
                       February 2, 2008, Filed

NOTICE:  PLEASE REFER TO FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE RULE 32.1
GOVERNING THE CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS.

PRIOR HISTORY: Petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations
Board.

DISPOSITION: PETITION DENIED.

COUNSEL: Ann Lee for petitioner.
Bob Kim, National Labor Relations Board, for respondent.

JUDGES: Before: SCHROEDER, O'SCANNLAIN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

MEMORANDUM

Acme Corporation petitions for review of the Board's order finding an unfair
labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act. Substantial evidence
supports the Board's findings. The petition is denied.
