# Quality Evaluation

**Timestamp**: 2026-03-13T15:50:53
**Reference**: data/refine_examples/coset_codes/reference_review.md
**Model**: gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview
**Mode**: single

## Overall Score: 3.00/6.0

## Dimensions

| Dimension | Score | Reasoning |
|-----------|-------|-----------|
| coverage | 3.0/6 | The generated review identifies some valid issues (such as the typo in Table III regarding D8/RE8), but it includes several major hallucinations that detract from its overall coverage of the actual paper's flaws. |
| specificity | 1.5/6 | The review fabricates multiple quotes to create fake errors. For example, it alters the paper's Table I to show '\phi^5' instead of the actual '\phi^3' for H32 and H24, and it inserts an undefined 'r\'' into the text of Lemma 6 that does not exist in the original paper. |
| depth | 2.5/6 | While the review attempts deep technical engagement (e.g., checking lattice dimensions and exponents), much of this analysis is wasted on fabricated text, rendering the technical critiques invalid. |
| format | 5.0/6 | The generated review perfectly adheres to the requested format, including the Overall Feedback section and Detailed Comments with numbered entries containing Quote and Feedback sections. |

## Strengths

- Successfully catches a real typographical error in Table III (the duplicate D8/RE8 rows with contradictory parameters).
- Follows the requested structural format flawlessly.

## Weaknesses

- Fabricates quotes from the paper's tables (altering exponents) to invent mathematical errors that do not exist in the source text.
- Alters the text of Lemma 6 to introduce a fake variable ('r\'') just to critique it.
- Critiques the complex dimension of H16 based on a misunderstanding of the relationship between n, real dimensions, and complex dimensions.
