### expert_build/prompts.py
VERDICT: PASS
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: COVERED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: Correctly updates the prompt instructions and example to include the `accept` boolean field. This enables the LLM to provide an initial screening verdict for proposed beliefs.
---

### expert_build/propose.py
VERDICT: CONCERN
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: COVERED
INTEGRATION: PARTIAL
REASONING: The core logic for generating `[ACCEPT]` or `[REJECT]` markers based on LLM feedback is correctly implemented. However, there is a stale user-facing message in `cmd_accept_beliefs` (line 483, as seen in observations) that still instructs users to "change [ACCEPT/REJECT] to [ACCEPT]", which is no longer the primary workflow. While the code maintains backward compatibility for the old marker, the UI documentation should be fully updated to reflect the new workflow.
---

### tests/test_pipeline.py
VERDICT: PASS
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: COVERED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: Added a specific test case `test_converts_reject_to_accept` which correctly verifies that the `auto_accept_proposals` utility now handles the new `[REJECT]` markers.
---

### tests/test_propose.py
VERDICT: PASS
CORRECTNESS: VALID
SPEC_COMPLIANCE: N/A
ISSUE_COMPLIANCE: N/A
BELIEF_COMPLIANCE: N/A
TEST_COVERAGE: COVERED
INTEGRATION: WIRED
REASONING: Properly updates the test helper `_json_beliefs` and adds two new test cases (`test_accept_verdict_from_llm`, `test_reject_verdict_from_llm`) that verify the end-to-end flow from LLM JSON response to the formatted markdown output.
---

### SELF_REVIEW
LIMITATIONS: I relied on the provided observations to see the full body of `cmd_accept_beliefs`, which allowed me to identify the stale UI message at line 483 that wasn't included in the diff. I also confirmed via observations that the regex in `cmd_accept_beliefs` already handles `### [ACCEPT]` correctly without needing modification.
---
