{{ data.metrics.uncertainty_score | format_number(3) }}
{{ data.metrics.avg_coverage | format_percentage(2) }}
{{ data.metrics.avg_width | format_number(4) }}
{{ data.metrics.num_alphas }}
Interpretation: {% if data.metrics.uncertainty_score >= 0.8 %} Excellent uncertainty quantification! The prediction intervals provide reliable coverage with narrow widths. {% elif data.metrics.uncertainty_score >= 0.6 %} Good uncertainty quantification. Prediction intervals are reasonably reliable. {% else %} Low uncertainty quantification. Prediction intervals may not be reliable. Intervals may be too narrow or coverage too low. {% endif %}
At the lowest alpha level (highest confidence), the coverage achieved was {{ data.crqr_results[0].actual_coverage | format_percentage(2) }}, compared to an expected {{ data.crqr_results[0].expected_coverage | format_percentage(2) }}.
{% endif %}| Alpha | Expected Coverage | Actual Coverage | Coverage Gap | Mean Width | Min Width | Max Width |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ result.alpha | format_number(3) }} | {{ result.expected_coverage | format_percentage(2) }} | {{ result.actual_coverage | format_percentage(2) }} | {{ ((result.actual_coverage - (1 - result.alpha)) | abs) | format_percentage(2) }} | {{ result.mean_width | format_number(4) }} | {{ result.min_width | format_number(4) if result.min_width else 'N/A' }} | {{ result.max_width | format_number(4) if result.max_width else 'N/A' }} |
No CRQR results available.
{% endif %}| {{ key | format_metric_name }} | {{ value }} |
|---|