You're working on the Waffle agent {%- if agent %} `{{ agent }}`{%- endif %} in this repo. A previous session was analysed for inefficiency by Waffle's hub. Your job: read the analysis below and propose concrete code-level changes.

# Context

- session_id: {{ session_analysis.session_id }}
{%- if agent %}
- agent: {{ agent }}
{%- endif %}
- actual: {{ session_analysis.turns }} turns, ${{ '%.4f' % session_analysis.cost_actual_usd if session_analysis.cost_actual_usd is not none else '?' }}
{%- if cf %}
- counterfactual: {{ cf.get('turns', '?') }} turns, ${{ '%.4f' % cf.get('cost_usd') if cf.get('cost_usd') is not none else '?' }} (savings: ${{ '%.4f' % session_analysis.savings_potential_usd if session_analysis.savings_potential_usd is not none else '?' }})
{%- endif %}
{%- if session_analysis.model %}
- model used in the session: {{ session_analysis.model }}
{%- endif %}

# What happened

{{ a.get('chronology') or '(no chronology returned)' }}

{% if a.get('counterfactual_summary') -%}
# What should have happened

{{ a.get('counterfactual_summary') }}

{% endif -%}
# Improvement suggestions

{% for s in suggestions -%}
{{ loop.index }}. [{{ s.get('estimated_impact', '?') | upper }} · {{ s.get('category', '?') }}] {{ s.get('title') or '(untitled)' }}
   {{ s.get('description') or '' }}

{% endfor -%}

# Your task

For each suggestion above:

1. Decide if it applies to this codebase (skip ones that don't, or that conflict with each other or with the agent's intent).
2. Locate the file(s) to change.
3. Propose a concrete diff — or apply it directly if you're confident.

Start with the highest-impact ones. Push back on suggestions that disagree with the agent's actual purpose (e.g. "remove Bash" if the agent legitimately needs it). When you're done, print a short summary: what you applied, what you skipped, and why.