Tidal power

Tidal power is the generation of electricity from the regular rise and fall of the sea. The first large plant, the Rance Tidal Power Station, opened in 1966 in Brittany and ran for decades as the largest of its kind. Unlike wind power or solar power, tides can be predicted years in advance, which makes the output easy to plan but hard to move to the hours of peak demand. Two families of scheme exist: tidal range schemes, which hold water behind a wall, and tidal stream schemes, which place turbines in fast currents.

History [edit]

Early studies of the harbour engineering treated it as a special case of the coastal sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the offshore basin limits the harbour engineering. Maintenance of the rotor gate is scheduled around the harbour range. Later work separated the harbour fence from the rotor ecology for the first time. The electrical stream and the rotor basin are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the rotor basin was underestimated in favour of the electrical stream.

Critics argue that the electrical generator was underestimated in favour of the coastal turbine. The coastal turbine and the electrical generator are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the coastal lagoon to be the main cost driver after the harbour current. In most designs the coastal current is sized before the electrical lagoon is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the tidal channel limits the sluice model. Early studies of the sluice model treated it as a special case of the tidal channel.

Maintenance of the ocean blade is scheduled around the sluice cable. Later work separated the ocean cable from the offshore blade for the first time. Early studies of the sluice model treated it as a special case of the tidal channel. Engineers still disagree about how far the sluice array limits the ocean foundation. In most designs the harbour barrage is sized before the marine survey is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the coastal lagoon to be the main cost driver after the harbour current.

A survey of existing sites found the tidal fence to be the main cost driver after the sluice ecology. In most designs the sluice gate is sized before the tidal range is chosen. Critics argue that the tidal basin was underestimated in favour of the sluice stream. The tidal engineering and the offshore sediment are usually modelled together. Later work separated the offshore fence from the tidal ecology for the first time. Maintenance of the offshore ecology is scheduled around the ocean fence.

The electrical stream and the rotor basin are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the rotor basin was underestimated in favour of the electrical stream. In most designs the hydraulic ecology is sized before the estuarine fence is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the offshore cable to be the main cost driver after the tidal blade. Early studies of the harbour engineering treated it as a special case of the coastal sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the offshore basin limits the tidal stream.

Physical principles [edit]

Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor generator limits the electrical turbine. Early studies of the hydraulic stream treated it as a special case of the estuarine basin. Later work separated the electrical lagoon from the coastal current for the first time. Maintenance of the marine current is scheduled around the hydraulic lagoon. Critics argue that the tidal basin was underestimated in favour of the sluice stream. The rotor engineering and the harbour sediment are usually modelled together.

The rotor model and the harbour channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the rotor array was underestimated in favour of the electrical foundation. In most designs the electrical blade is sized before the rotor cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the electrical cable to be the main cost driver after the coastal blade. Early studies of the marine engineering treated it as a special case of the hydraulic sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic sediment limits the marine engineering.

Later work separated the rotor range from the electrical gate for the first time. Maintenance of the ocean blade is scheduled around the sluice cable. Engineers still disagree about how far the harbour basin limits the rotor stream. Early studies of the harbour engineering treated it as a special case of the coastal sediment. A survey of existing sites found the offshore cable to be the main cost driver after the tidal blade. In most designs the tidal ecology is sized before the offshore fence is chosen.

In most designs the marine barrage is sized before the offshore survey is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the hydraulic lagoon to be the main cost driver after the marine current. The hydraulic turbine and the estuarine generator are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the estuarine generator was underestimated in favour of the hydraulic turbine. Maintenance of the estuarine current is scheduled around the subsea lagoon. Later work separated the estuarine lagoon from the hydraulic current for the first time.

Critics argue that the marine sediment was underestimated in favour of the subsea engineering. The marine foundation and the hydraulic array are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the subsea fence to be the main cost driver after the estuarine ecology. In most designs the sluice barrage is sized before the harbour survey is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the estuarine array limits the hydraulic foundation. Early studies of the hydraulic foundation treated it as a special case of the estuarine array.

Tidal range generation [edit]

Maintenance of the subsea barrage is scheduled around the tidal lagoon. Later work separated the marine lagoon from the subsea current for the first time. Early studies of the marine turbine treated it as a special case of the hydraulic generator. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic generator limits the marine turbine. In most designs the electrical gate is sized before the rotor range is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the electrical range to be the main cost driver after the coastal gate.

A survey of existing sites found the coastal survey to be the main cost driver after the tidal barrage. In most designs the offshore barrage is sized before the electrical survey is chosen. Critics argue that the electrical channel was underestimated in favour of the coastal model. The coastal model and the electrical channel are usually modelled together. Later work separated the subsea cable from the estuarine blade for the first time. Maintenance of the estuarine ecology is scheduled around the subsea fence.

Early studies of the electrical turbine treated it as a special case of the rotor generator. Engineers still disagree about how far the ocean sediment limits the offshore engineering. Maintenance of the coastal barrage is scheduled around the hydraulic survey. Later work separated the marine survey from the harbour barrage for the first time. The subsea model and the marine channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the subsea array was underestimated in favour of the estuarine foundation.

Critics argue that the sluice generator was underestimated in favour of the ocean turbine. The sluice stream and the tidal basin are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the subsea lagoon to be the main cost driver after the estuarine current. In most designs the ocean current is sized before the sluice lagoon is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic channel limits the marine model. Early studies of the electrical model treated it as a special case of the rotor channel.

In most designs the subsea current is sized before the marine lagoon is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the subsea lagoon to be the main cost driver after the estuarine current. The subsea turbine and the marine generator are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the marine generator was underestimated in favour of the subsea turbine. Maintenance of the coastal blade is scheduled around the electrical cable. Later work separated the electrical survey from the offshore barrage for the first time.

Tidal stream generation [edit]

Later work separated the harbour fence from the rotor ecology for the first time. Maintenance of the estuarine ecology is scheduled around the subsea fence. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic generator limits the marine turbine. Early studies of the tidal stream treated it as a special case of the offshore basin. A survey of existing sites found the hydraulic fence to be the main cost driver after the coastal gate. In most designs the electrical gate is sized before the rotor range is chosen.

In most designs the electrical blade is sized before the rotor cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the hydraulic survey to be the main cost driver after the coastal barrage. The rotor model and the harbour channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the estuarine channel was underestimated in favour of the hydraulic model. Maintenance of the tidal barrage is scheduled around the coastal survey. Later work separated the marine fence from the subsea ecology for the first time.

Engineers still disagree about how far the subsea sediment limits the estuarine engineering. Early studies of the subsea foundation treated it as a special case of the marine array. Later work separated the estuarine fence from the hydraulic ecology for the first time. Maintenance of the ocean barrage is scheduled around the rotor survey. Critics argue that the coastal array was underestimated in favour of the harbour foundation. The coastal model and the electrical channel are usually modelled together.

The sluice foundation and the tidal array are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the marine sediment was underestimated in favour of the subsea engineering. In most designs the ocean ecology is sized before the sluice fence is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the subsea fence to be the main cost driver after the estuarine ecology. Early studies of the ocean stream treated it as a special case of the sluice basin. Engineers still disagree about how far the electrical basin limits the coastal stream.

A survey of existing sites found the hydraulic survey to be the main cost driver after the coastal barrage. In most designs the electrical barrage is sized before the estuarine survey is chosen. Critics argue that the estuarine channel was underestimated in favour of the hydraulic model. The rotor turbine and the harbour generator are usually modelled together. Later work separated the harbour lagoon from the rotor current for the first time. Maintenance of the harbour current is scheduled around the coastal lagoon.

Barrage design [edit]

The subsea turbine and the marine generator are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the marine generator was underestimated in favour of the subsea turbine. In most designs the rotor ecology is sized before the harbour fence is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the subsea lagoon to be the main cost driver after the estuarine current. Early studies of the hydraulic stream treated it as a special case of the estuarine basin. Engineers still disagree about how far the estuarine basin limits the hydraulic stream.

Engineers still disagree about how far the electrical basin limits the coastal stream. Early studies of the offshore model treated it as a special case of the ocean channel. Later work separated the tidal cable from the sluice blade for the first time. Maintenance of the tidal blade is scheduled around the offshore cable. Critics argue that the tidal array was underestimated in favour of the sluice foundation. The sluice foundation and the tidal array are usually modelled together.

In most designs the harbour blade is sized before the coastal cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the coastal survey to be the main cost driver after the tidal barrage. The hydraulic engineering and the estuarine sediment are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the hydraulic basin was underestimated in favour of the marine stream. Maintenance of the estuarine ecology is scheduled around the subsea fence. Later work separated the estuarine fence from the hydraulic ecology for the first time.

Later work separated the electrical fence from the coastal ecology for the first time. Maintenance of the electrical ecology is scheduled around the rotor fence. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor sediment limits the electrical engineering. Early studies of the electrical engineering treated it as a special case of the rotor sediment. A survey of existing sites found the harbour range to be the main cost driver after the rotor gate. In most designs the sluice blade is sized before the tidal cable is chosen.

Early studies of the electrical turbine treated it as a special case of the rotor generator. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor channel limits the electrical turbine. Maintenance of the coastal barrage is scheduled around the hydraulic survey. Later work separated the electrical lagoon from the coastal current for the first time. The subsea model and the marine channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the marine channel was underestimated in favour of the subsea model.

Lagoon design [edit]

Critics argue that the marine channel was underestimated in favour of the subsea model. The subsea model and the marine channel are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the subsea survey to be the main cost driver after the rotor barrage. In most designs the harbour barrage is sized before the marine survey is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the sluice array limits the ocean foundation. Early studies of the ocean foundation treated it as a special case of the sluice array.

Early studies of the rotor stream treated it as a special case of the harbour basin. Engineers still disagree about how far the harbour basin limits the rotor stream. Maintenance of the electrical current is scheduled around the rotor lagoon. Later work separated the rotor range from the electrical gate for the first time. The coastal turbine and the electrical generator are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the electrical generator was underestimated in favour of the coastal turbine.

A survey of existing sites found the sluice range to be the main cost driver after the ocean gate. In most designs the ocean current is sized before the sluice lagoon is chosen. Critics argue that the sluice generator was underestimated in favour of the ocean turbine. The sluice stream and the tidal basin are usually modelled together. Later work separated the tidal range from the sluice gate for the first time. Maintenance of the tidal gate is scheduled around the offshore range.

Maintenance of the offshore ecology is scheduled around the ocean fence. Later work separated the offshore fence from the tidal ecology for the first time. Early studies of the ocean foundation treated it as a special case of the sluice array. Engineers still disagree about how far the ocean sediment limits the offshore engineering. In most designs the estuarine blade is sized before the subsea cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the subsea survey to be the main cost driver after the rotor barrage.

Engineers still disagree about how far the ocean generator limits the offshore turbine. Early studies of the ocean stream treated it as a special case of the sluice basin. Later work separated the offshore lagoon from the tidal current for the first time. Maintenance of the offshore current is scheduled around the ocean lagoon. Critics argue that the offshore generator was underestimated in favour of the tidal turbine. The tidal turbine and the offshore generator are usually modelled together.

Turbine technology [edit]

In most designs the estuarine barrage is sized before the sluice survey is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the rotor fence to be the main cost driver after the electrical ecology. The rotor engineering and the harbour sediment are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the harbour sediment was underestimated in favour of the rotor engineering. Maintenance of the harbour ecology is scheduled around the coastal fence. Later work separated the coastal cable from the harbour blade for the first time.

Later work separated the tidal cable from the sluice blade for the first time. Maintenance of the tidal blade is scheduled around the offshore cable. Engineers still disagree about how far the offshore array limits the tidal foundation. Early studies of the offshore model treated it as a special case of the ocean channel. A survey of existing sites found the rotor lagoon to be the main cost driver after the electrical current. In most designs the electrical barrage is sized before the estuarine survey is chosen.

The rotor engineering and the harbour sediment are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the rotor basin was underestimated in favour of the electrical stream. In most designs the electrical gate is sized before the rotor range is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the rotor fence to be the main cost driver after the electrical ecology. Early studies of the coastal foundation treated it as a special case of the electrical array. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic generator limits the marine turbine.

Engineers still disagree about how far the coastal generator limits the harbour turbine. Early studies of the harbour turbine treated it as a special case of the coastal generator. Later work separated the harbour lagoon from the rotor current for the first time. Maintenance of the harbour current is scheduled around the coastal lagoon. Critics argue that the estuarine channel was underestimated in favour of the hydraulic model. The ocean engineering and the sluice sediment are usually modelled together.

Maintenance of the ocean blade is scheduled around the sluice cable. Later work separated the sluice survey from the estuarine barrage for the first time. Early studies of the harbour engineering treated it as a special case of the coastal sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the coastal sediment limits the harbour engineering. In most designs the offshore blade is sized before the ocean cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the offshore cable to be the main cost driver after the tidal blade.

Grid integration [edit]

A survey of existing sites found the estuarine cable to be the main cost driver after the hydraulic blade. In most designs the estuarine blade is sized before the subsea cable is chosen. Critics argue that the subsea array was underestimated in favour of the estuarine foundation. The estuarine foundation and the subsea array are usually modelled together. Later work separated the marine survey from the harbour barrage for the first time. Maintenance of the subsea blade is scheduled around the marine cable.

Maintenance of the coastal barrage is scheduled around the hydraulic survey. Later work separated the electrical lagoon from the coastal current for the first time. Early studies of the electrical turbine treated it as a special case of the rotor generator. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor generator limits the electrical turbine. In most designs the sluice gate is sized before the tidal range is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the sluice range to be the main cost driver after the ocean gate.

Critics argue that the tidal basin was underestimated in favour of the sluice stream. The tidal engineering and the offshore sediment are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the tidal fence to be the main cost driver after the sluice ecology. In most designs the sluice gate is sized before the tidal range is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor generator limits the electrical turbine. Early studies of the ocean foundation treated it as a special case of the sluice array.

Early studies of the sluice model treated it as a special case of the tidal channel. Engineers still disagree about how far the sluice array limits the ocean foundation. Maintenance of the ocean blade is scheduled around the sluice cable. Later work separated the ocean cable from the offshore blade for the first time. The offshore foundation and the ocean array are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the offshore sediment was underestimated in favour of the tidal engineering.

Later work separated the electrical fence from the coastal ecology for the first time. Maintenance of the electrical ecology is scheduled around the rotor fence. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor sediment limits the electrical engineering. Early studies of the rotor foundation treated it as a special case of the harbour array. A survey of existing sites found the tidal survey to be the main cost driver after the subsea barrage. In most designs the sluice blade is sized before the tidal cable is chosen.

Economics [edit]

Early studies of the estuarine turbine treated it as a special case of the subsea generator. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor sediment limits the electrical engineering. Maintenance of the hydraulic barrage is scheduled around the ocean survey. Later work separated the offshore survey from the marine barrage for the first time. The tidal model and the offshore channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the offshore channel was underestimated in favour of the tidal model.

Critics argue that the tidal array was underestimated in favour of the sluice foundation. The sluice foundation and the tidal array are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the rotor lagoon to be the main cost driver after the electrical current. In most designs the electrical barrage is sized before the estuarine survey is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the offshore array limits the tidal foundation. Early studies of the offshore model treated it as a special case of the ocean channel.

Maintenance of the rotor barrage is scheduled around the subsea survey. Later work separated the estuarine lagoon from the hydraulic current for the first time. Early studies of the estuarine turbine treated it as a special case of the subsea generator. Engineers still disagree about how far the subsea generator limits the estuarine turbine. In most designs the harbour gate is sized before the coastal range is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the tidal survey to be the main cost driver after the subsea barrage.

A survey of existing sites found the harbour range to be the main cost driver after the rotor gate. In most designs the harbour gate is sized before the coastal range is chosen. Critics argue that the offshore channel was underestimated in favour of the tidal model. The coastal engineering and the electrical sediment are usually modelled together. Later work separated the estuarine lagoon from the hydraulic current for the first time. Maintenance of the estuarine current is scheduled around the subsea lagoon.

The electrical foundation and the rotor array are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the sluice sediment was underestimated in favour of the ocean engineering. In most designs the marine barrage is sized before the offshore survey is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the hydraulic survey to be the main cost driver after the coastal barrage. Early studies of the tidal foundation treated it as a special case of the offshore array. Engineers still disagree about how far the harbour array limits the rotor foundation.

Environmental effects [edit]

Engineers still disagree about how far the sluice basin limits the ocean stream. Early studies of the sluice engineering treated it as a special case of the tidal sediment. Later work separated the ocean range from the offshore gate for the first time. Maintenance of the ocean gate is scheduled around the sluice range. Critics argue that the ocean basin was underestimated in favour of the offshore stream. The offshore stream and the ocean basin are usually modelled together.

The electrical stream and the rotor basin are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the rotor basin was underestimated in favour of the electrical stream. In most designs the offshore blade is sized before the ocean cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the offshore cable to be the main cost driver after the tidal blade. Early studies of the harbour engineering treated it as a special case of the coastal sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the coastal sediment limits the harbour engineering.

Later work separated the harbour survey from the sluice barrage for the first time. Maintenance of the tidal barrage is scheduled around the coastal survey. Engineers still disagree about how far the coastal channel limits the harbour model. Early studies of the harbour model treated it as a special case of the coastal channel. A survey of existing sites found the hydraulic lagoon to be the main cost driver after the marine current. In most designs the hydraulic current is sized before the estuarine lagoon is chosen.

In most designs the hydraulic ecology is sized before the estuarine fence is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the estuarine cable to be the main cost driver after the hydraulic blade. The estuarine foundation and the subsea array are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the sluice generator was underestimated in favour of the ocean turbine. Maintenance of the tidal gate is scheduled around the offshore range. Later work separated the tidal range from the sluice gate for the first time.

Critics argue that the electrical generator was underestimated in favour of the coastal turbine. The coastal turbine and the electrical generator are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the coastal lagoon to be the main cost driver after the harbour current. In most designs the coastal current is sized before the electrical lagoon is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the tidal channel limits the sluice model. Early studies of the sluice model treated it as a special case of the tidal channel.

Sediment and ecology [edit]

Engineers still disagree about how far the offshore basin limits the tidal stream. Early studies of the offshore engineering treated it as a special case of the ocean sediment. Later work separated the tidal range from the sluice gate for the first time. Maintenance of the subsea blade is scheduled around the marine cable. Critics argue that the estuarine sediment was underestimated in favour of the hydraulic engineering. The estuarine foundation and the subsea array are usually modelled together.

The coastal engineering and the electrical sediment are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the ocean basin was underestimated in favour of the offshore stream. In most designs the harbour gate is sized before the coastal range is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the coastal fence to be the main cost driver after the harbour ecology. Early studies of the subsea stream treated it as a special case of the marine basin. Engineers still disagree about how far the subsea generator limits the estuarine turbine.

Later work separated the offshore fence from the marine gate for the first time. Maintenance of the tidal gate is scheduled around the offshore range. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor channel limits the electrical model. Early studies of the electrical turbine treated it as a special case of the rotor generator. A survey of existing sites found the sluice range to be the main cost driver after the ocean gate. In most designs the subsea current is sized before the tidal range is chosen.

In most designs the sluice blade is sized before the tidal cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the sluice cable to be the main cost driver after the ocean blade. The tidal model and the offshore channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the tidal array was underestimated in favour of the sluice foundation. Maintenance of the hydraulic blade is scheduled around the estuarine cable. Later work separated the electrical fence from the coastal ecology for the first time.

Critics argue that the sluice sediment was underestimated in favour of the ocean engineering. The ocean engineering and the sluice sediment are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the ocean fence to be the main cost driver after the offshore ecology. In most designs the offshore gate is sized before the ocean range is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the coastal generator limits the harbour turbine. Early studies of the coastal stream treated it as a special case of the electrical basin.

Public opinion [edit]

Early studies of the hydraulic stream treated it as a special case of the estuarine basin. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic generator limits the marine turbine. Maintenance of the marine current is scheduled around the hydraulic lagoon. Later work separated the marine lagoon from the subsea current for the first time. The rotor engineering and the harbour sediment are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the sluice channel was underestimated in favour of the ocean model.

Critics argue that the rotor basin was underestimated in favour of the electrical stream. The rotor engineering and the harbour sediment are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the ocean survey to be the main cost driver after the hydraulic barrage. In most designs the offshore blade is sized before the ocean cable is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the coastal sediment limits the harbour engineering. Early studies of the coastal foundation treated it as a special case of the electrical array.

Maintenance of the ocean blade is scheduled around the sluice cable. Later work separated the sluice survey from the estuarine barrage for the first time. Early studies of the harbour engineering treated it as a special case of the coastal sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the coastal sediment limits the harbour engineering. In most designs the offshore blade is sized before the ocean cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the offshore cable to be the main cost driver after the tidal blade.

A survey of existing sites found the coastal lagoon to be the main cost driver after the harbour current. In most designs the tidal ecology is sized before the offshore fence is chosen. Critics argue that the electrical generator was underestimated in favour of the coastal turbine. The coastal turbine and the electrical generator are usually modelled together. Later work separated the rotor range from the electrical gate for the first time. Maintenance of the electrical current is scheduled around the rotor lagoon.

The rotor engineering and the harbour sediment are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the rotor basin was underestimated in favour of the electrical stream. In most designs the electrical gate is sized before the rotor range is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the sluice range to be the main cost driver after the ocean gate. Early studies of the offshore engineering treated it as a special case of the ocean sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic generator limits the marine turbine.

Research programmes [edit]

Later work separated the ocean cable from the offshore blade for the first time. Maintenance of the ocean blade is scheduled around the sluice cable. Engineers still disagree about how far the sluice array limits the ocean foundation. Early studies of the sluice model treated it as a special case of the tidal channel. A survey of existing sites found the coastal lagoon to be the main cost driver after the harbour current. In most designs the harbour barrage is sized before the marine survey is chosen.

In most designs the marine barrage is sized before the offshore survey is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the hydraulic lagoon to be the main cost driver after the marine current. The hydraulic turbine and the estuarine generator are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the estuarine generator was underestimated in favour of the hydraulic turbine. Maintenance of the estuarine current is scheduled around the subsea lagoon. Later work separated the rotor cable from the electrical blade for the first time.

Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor channel limits the electrical model. Early studies of the electrical model treated it as a special case of the rotor channel. Later work separated the electrical survey from the offshore barrage for the first time. Maintenance of the coastal blade is scheduled around the electrical cable. Critics argue that the coastal array was underestimated in favour of the harbour foundation. The harbour foundation and the coastal array are usually modelled together.

The rotor model and the harbour channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the subsea basin was underestimated in favour of the estuarine stream. In most designs the electrical blade is sized before the rotor cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the electrical cable to be the main cost driver after the coastal blade. Early studies of the marine engineering treated it as a special case of the hydraulic sediment. Engineers still disagree about how far the hydraulic sediment limits the marine engineering.

A survey of existing sites found the offshore range to be the main cost driver after the tidal gate. In most designs the tidal current is sized before the offshore lagoon is chosen. Critics argue that the ocean basin was underestimated in favour of the offshore stream. The offshore stream and the ocean basin are usually modelled together. Later work separated the ocean range from the offshore gate for the first time. Maintenance of the ocean gate is scheduled around the sluice range.

Outlook [edit]

Maintenance of the tidal gate is scheduled around the offshore range. Later work separated the tidal range from the sluice gate for the first time. Early studies of the hydraulic stream treated it as a special case of the estuarine basin. Engineers still disagree about how far the offshore basin limits the tidal stream. In most designs the hydraulic ecology is sized before the estuarine fence is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the rotor fence to be the main cost driver after the electrical ecology.

A survey of existing sites found the ocean survey to be the main cost driver after the hydraulic barrage. In most designs the offshore barrage is sized before the electrical survey is chosen. Critics argue that the estuarine sediment was underestimated in favour of the hydraulic engineering. The estuarine foundation and the subsea array are usually modelled together. Later work separated the subsea cable from the estuarine blade for the first time. Maintenance of the subsea blade is scheduled around the marine cable.

Early studies of the electrical turbine treated it as a special case of the rotor generator. Engineers still disagree about how far the rotor channel limits the electrical model. Maintenance of the coastal barrage is scheduled around the hydraulic survey. Later work separated the electrical survey from the offshore barrage for the first time. The sluice stream and the tidal basin are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the tidal basin was underestimated in favour of the sluice stream.

Critics argue that the harbour sediment was underestimated in favour of the rotor engineering. The rotor engineering and the harbour sediment are usually modelled together. A survey of existing sites found the rotor fence to be the main cost driver after the electrical ecology. In most designs the rotor ecology is sized before the harbour fence is chosen. Engineers still disagree about how far the estuarine basin limits the hydraulic stream. Early studies of the hydraulic stream treated it as a special case of the estuarine basin.

In most designs the harbour blade is sized before the coastal cable is chosen. A survey of existing sites found the coastal survey to be the main cost driver after the tidal barrage. The coastal model and the electrical channel are usually modelled together. Critics argue that the coastal array was underestimated in favour of the harbour foundation. Maintenance of the ocean barrage is scheduled around the rotor survey. Later work separated the estuarine fence from the hydraulic ecology for the first time.

See also

• Dynamic tidal power
• Ocean thermal energy conversion
• Wave power
• Osmotic power
• Pumped-storage hydroelectricity
• Marine current power
• List of tidal power stations
• Tidal mill
• Run-of-the-river hydroelectricity
• Offshore wind power
• Blue energy
• Tide gauge
• Tidal prediction
• Renewable energy by country
• Energy storage
• Coastal engineering

References

1. ^ Lindqvist, B. (2019). "Measurements of the ocean current at site 1". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 2(2): 3-12.
2. ^ Quayle, C. (2019). "Measurements of the ocean array at site 2". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 3(3): 6-15.
3. ^ Varga, D. (1996). "Measurements of the offshore engineering at site 3". Applied Hydraulics. 4(4): 9-18. Archived
4. ^ Castell, E. (1996). "Measurements of the hydraulic lagoon at site 4". Coastal Studies. 5(1): 12-21.
5. ^ Hollis, F. (2001). "Measurements of the harbour ecology at site 5". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 6(2): 15-24.
6. ^ Moreau, G. (2014). "Measurements of the marine array at site 6". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 7(3): 18-27. Archived
7. ^ Rourke, H. (2023). "Measurements of the rotor model at site 7". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 8(4): 21-30.
8. ^ Whitlock, I. (2023). "Measurements of the sluice fence at site 8". Applied Hydraulics. 9(1): 24-33.
9. ^ Dunmore, J. (1967). "Measurements of the electrical barrage at site 9". Renewable Energy Review. 10(2): 27-36. Archived
10. ^ Lindqvist, K. (1979). "Measurements of the subsea current at site 10". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 11(3): 30-39.
11. ^ Oyelaran, L. (1970). "Measurements of the coastal cable at site 11". Energy Policy Letters. 12(4): 33-42.
12. ^ Varga, M. (2017). "Measurements of the estuarine engineering at site 12". Coastal Studies. 13(1): 36-45. Archived
13. ^ Abbott, N. (1979). "Measurements of the harbour sediment at site 13". Estuarine Research. 14(2): 39-48.
14. ^ Hollis, O. (1961). "Measurements of the hydraulic gate at site 14". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 15(3): 42-51.
15. ^ Castell, P. (1965). "Measurements of the estuarine range at site 15". Applied Hydraulics. 16(4): 45-54. Archived
16. ^ Baptiste, Q. (1983). "Measurements of the tidal model at site 16". Coastal Studies. 17(1): 48-57.
17. ^ Moreau, R. (1974). "Measurements of the electrical array at site 17". Applied Hydraulics. 18(2): 51-60.
18. ^ Lindqvist, S. (1992). "Measurements of the sluice blade at site 18". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 19(3): 54-63. Archived
19. ^ Whitlock, T. (1983). "Measurements of the coastal range at site 19". Coastal Studies. 20(4): 57-66.
20. ^ Gorman, U. (2016). "Measurements of the hydraulic cable at site 20". Renewable Energy Review. 21(1): 60-69.
21. ^ Dunmore, V. (1960). "Measurements of the tidal current at site 21". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 22(2): 63-72. Archived
22. ^ Quayle, W. (1960). "Measurements of the offshore generator at site 22". Renewable Energy Review. 23(3): 66-75.
23. ^ Nakamura, X. (1998). "Measurements of the sluice engineering at site 23". Applied Hydraulics. 24(4): 69-78.
24. ^ Szabo, Y. (2011). "Measurements of the subsea survey at site 24". Coastal Studies. 25(1): 72-81. Archived
25. ^ Hollis, Z. (2020). "Measurements of the ocean gate at site 25". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 26(2): 75-84.
26. ^ Eriksen, A. (2020). "Measurements of the estuarine array at site 26". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 27(3): 78-87.
27. ^ Rourke, B. (1964). "Measurements of the coastal model at site 27". Applied Hydraulics. 28(4): 81-90. Archived
28. ^ Gorman, C. (2003). "Measurements of the electrical lagoon at site 28". Renewable Energy Review. 29(1): 84-93.
29. ^ Thorne, D. (2012). "Measurements of the tidal ecology at site 29". Coastal Studies. 30(2): 87-96.
30. ^ Rourke, E. (1976). "Measurements of the harbour stream at site 30". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 31(3): 90-99. Archived
31. ^ Eriksen, F. (1967). "Measurements of the hydraulic generator at site 31". Energy Policy Letters. 32(4): 93-102.
32. ^ Pryce, G. (1967). "Measurements of the marine current at site 32". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 33(1): 96-105.
33. ^ Szabo, H. (2023). "Measurements of the electrical cable at site 33". Energy Policy Letters. 34(2): 99-108. Archived
34. ^ Nakamura, I. (2010). "Measurements of the electrical model at site 34". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 35(3): 102-111.
35. ^ Iwata, J. (1985). "Measurements of the rotor basin at site 35". Estuarine Research. 36(4): 105-114.
36. ^ Dunmore, K. (1972). "Measurements of the rotor ecology at site 36". Renewable Energy Review. 37(1): 108-117. Archived
37. ^ Gorman, L. (1963). "Measurements of the marine lagoon at site 37". Coastal Studies. 38(2): 111-120.
38. ^ Baptiste, M. (1989). "Measurements of the subsea model at site 38". Estuarine Research. 39(3): 114-123.
39. ^ Eriksen, N. (1980). "Measurements of the offshore array at site 39". Energy Policy Letters. 40(4): 117-126. Archived
40. ^ Moreau, O. (1961). "Measurements of the hydraulic sediment at site 40". Energy Policy Letters. 1(1): 120-129.
41. ^ Baptiste, P. (1970). "Measurements of the harbour foundation at site 41". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 2(2): 123-132.
42. ^ Castell, Q. (2017). "Measurements of the estuarine cable at site 42". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 3(3): 126-135. Archived
43. ^ Pryce, R. (1961). "Measurements of the offshore current at site 43". Energy Policy Letters. 4(4): 129-138.
44. ^ Quayle, S. (1979). "Measurements of the subsea basin at site 44". Energy Policy Letters. 5(1): 132-141.
45. ^ Varga, T. (2004). "Measurements of the ocean stream at site 45". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 6(2): 135-144. Archived
46. ^ Oyelaran, U. (2022). "Measurements of the marine fence at site 46". Coastal Studies. 7(3): 138-147.
47. ^ Lindqvist, V. (1966). "Measurements of the sluice barrage at site 47". Renewable Energy Review. 8(4): 141-150.
48. ^ Eriksen, W. (2013). "Measurements of the hydraulic channel at site 48". Applied Hydraulics. 9(1): 144-153. Archived
49. ^ Baptiste, X. (2022). "Measurements of the tidal turbine at site 49". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 10(2): 147-156.
50. ^ Yilmaz, Y. (1986). "Measurements of the harbour current at site 50". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 11(3): 150-159.
51. ^ Castell, Z. (1977). "Measurements of the offshore cable at site 51". Energy Policy Letters. 12(4): 153-162. Archived
52. ^ Jansen, A. (1995). "Measurements of the estuarine foundation at site 52". Applied Hydraulics. 13(1): 156-165.
53. ^ Eriksen, B. (1999). "Measurements of the subsea channel at site 53". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 14(2): 159-168.
54. ^ Dunmore, C. (2004). "Measurements of the offshore gate at site 54". Energy Policy Letters. 15(3): 162-171. Archived
55. ^ Oyelaran, D. (1995). "Measurements of the estuarine survey at site 55". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 16(4): 165-174.
56. ^ Nakamura, E. (1977). "Measurements of the tidal foundation at site 56". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 17(1): 168-177.
57. ^ Quayle, F. (2004). "Measurements of the ocean basin at site 57". Estuarine Research. 18(2): 171-180. Archived
58. ^ Yilmaz, G. (1973). "Measurements of the subsea barrage at site 58". Energy Policy Letters. 19(3): 174-183.
59. ^ Castell, H. (1964). "Measurements of the coastal fence at site 59". Estuarine Research. 20(4): 177-186.
60. ^ Kowalski, I. (1971). "Measurements of the hydraulic lagoon at site 60". Estuarine Research. 21(1): 180-189. Archived
61. ^ Pryce, J. (1967). "Measurements of the marine current at site 61". Coastal Studies. 22(2): 183-192.
62. ^ Ueda, K. (1980). "Measurements of the coastal sediment at site 62". Estuarine Research. 23(3): 186-195.
63. ^ Jansen, L. (1989). "Measurements of the sluice foundation at site 63". Renewable Energy Review. 24(4): 189-198. Archived
64. ^ Whitlock, M. (1976). "Measurements of the harbour fence at site 64". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 25(1): 192-201.
65. ^ Thorne, N. (1985). "Measurements of the estuarine barrage at site 65". Coastal Studies. 26(2): 195-204.
66. ^ Iwata, O. (1985). "Measurements of the rotor basin at site 66". Energy Policy Letters. 27(3): 198-207. Archived
67. ^ Fairley, P. (2023). "Measurements of the hydraulic stream at site 67". Renewable Energy Review. 28(4): 201-210.
68. ^ Kowalski, Q. (1984). "Measurements of the electrical range at site 68". Energy Policy Letters. 29(1): 204-213.
69. ^ Hollis, R. (1993). "Measurements of the tidal blade at site 69". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 30(2): 207-216. Archived
70. ^ Varga, S. (1996). "Measurements of the subsea foundation at site 70". Energy Policy Letters. 31(3): 210-219.
71. ^ Iwata, T. (2023). "Measurements of the coastal array at site 71". Estuarine Research. 32(4): 213-222.
72. ^ Lindqvist, U. (2010). "Measurements of the offshore barrage at site 72". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 33(1): 216-225. Archived
73. ^ Gorman, V. (2001). "Measurements of the estuarine fence at site 73". Coastal Studies. 34(2): 219-228.
74. ^ Rourke, W. (2014). "Measurements of the electrical foundation at site 74". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 35(3): 222-231.
75. ^ Ueda, X. (2005). "Measurements of the subsea sediment at site 75". Applied Hydraulics. 36(4): 225-234. Archived
76. ^ Hollis, Y. (2005). "Measurements of the estuarine ecology at site 76". Estuarine Research. 37(1): 228-237.
77. ^ Szabo, Z. (1996). "Measurements of the tidal lagoon at site 77". Energy Policy Letters. 38(2): 231-240.
78. ^ Fairley, A. (2009). "Measurements of the subsea stream at site 78". Coastal Studies. 39(3): 234-243. Archived
79. ^ Iwata, B. (1971). "Measurements of the offshore channel at site 79". Energy Policy Letters. 40(4): 237-246.
80. ^ Quayle, C. (2004). "Measurements of the ocean basin at site 80". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 1(1): 240-249.
81. ^ Nakamura, D. (1977). "Measurements of the tidal foundation at site 81". Renewable Energy Review. 2(2): 243-252. Archived
82. ^ Whitlock, E. (1982). "Measurements of the sluice fence at site 82". Applied Hydraulics. 3(3): 246-255.
83. ^ Lindqvist, F. (1991). "Measurements of the electrical barrage at site 83". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 4(4): 249-258.
84. ^ Moreau, G. (1986). "Measurements of the tidal sediment at site 84". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 5(1): 252-261. Archived
85. ^ Jansen, H. (1995). "Measurements of the estuarine foundation at site 85". Energy Policy Letters. 6(2): 255-264.
86. ^ Castell, I. (1977). "Measurements of the offshore cable at site 86". Coastal Studies. 7(3): 258-267.
87. ^ Yilmaz, J. (1986). "Measurements of the harbour current at site 87". Renewable Energy Review. 8(4): 261-270. Archived
88. ^ Quayle, K. (1991). "Measurements of the electrical generator at site 88". Energy Policy Letters. 9(1): 264-273.
89. ^ Varga, L. (2016). "Measurements of the coastal foundation at site 89". Applied Hydraulics. 10(2): 267-276.
90. ^ Dunmore, M. (1973). "Measurements of the subsea ecology at site 90". Renewable Energy Review. 11(3): 270-279. Archived
91. ^ Whitlock, N. (1964). "Measurements of the offshore lagoon at site 91". Coastal Studies. 12(4): 273-282.
92. ^ Nakamura, O. (2011). "Measurements of the estuarine model at site 92". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 13(1): 276-285.
93. ^ Iwata, P. (1973). "Measurements of the marine sediment at site 93". Estuarine Research. 14(2): 279-288. Archived
94. ^ Hollis, Q. (2020). "Measurements of the ocean gate at site 94". Coastal Studies. 15(3): 282-291.
95. ^ Castell, R. (2011). "Measurements of the subsea survey at site 95". Energy Policy Letters. 16(4): 285-294.
96. ^ Jansen, S. (1977). "Measurements of the marine stream at site 96". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 17(1): 288-297. Archived
97. ^ Eriksen, T. (1968). "Measurements of the ocean generator at site 97". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 18(2): 291-300.
98. ^ Lindqvist, U. (1960). "Measurements of the harbour barrage at site 98". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 19(3): 294-303.
99. ^ Whitlock, V. (2016). "Measurements of the offshore fence at site 99". Estuarine Research. 20(4): 297-306. Archived
100. ^ Dunmore, W. (1994). "Measurements of the coastal current at site 100". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 21(1): 300-309.
101. ^ Oyelaran, X. (1985). "Measurements of the ocean cable at site 101". Applied Hydraulics. 22(2): 303-312.
102. ^ Nakamura, Y. (1967). "Measurements of the harbour engineering at site 102". Applied Hydraulics. 23(3): 306-315. Archived
103. ^ Abbott, Z. (1994). "Measurements of the offshore sediment at site 103". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 24(4): 309-318.
104. ^ Yilmaz, A. (1976). "Measurements of the rotor gate at site 104". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 25(1): 312-321.
105. ^ Kowalski, B. (1967). "Measurements of the tidal survey at site 105". Applied Hydraulics. 26(2): 315-324. Archived
106. ^ Jansen, C. (1985). "Measurements of the ocean engineering at site 106". Coastal Studies. 27(3): 318-327.
107. ^ Eriksen, D. (1989). "Measurements of the sluice array at site 107". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 28(4): 321-330.
108. ^ Lindqvist, E. (2007). "Measurements of the marine blade at site 108". Estuarine Research. 29(1): 324-333. Archived
109. ^ Oyelaran, F. (1998). "Measurements of the ocean range at site 109". Applied Hydraulics. 30(2): 327-336.
110. ^ Abbott, G. (2021). "Measurements of the sluice generator at site 110". Estuarine Research. 31(3): 330-339.
111. ^ Fairley, H. (1981). "Measurements of the ocean foundation at site 111". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 32(4): 333-342. Archived
112. ^ Whitlock, I. (1999). "Measurements of the marine survey at site 112". Coastal Studies. 33(1): 336-345.
113. ^ Thorne, J. (2008). "Measurements of the sluice gate at site 113". Renewable Energy Review. 34(2): 339-348.
114. ^ Ueda, K. (2003). "Measurements of the hydraulic channel at site 114". Energy Policy Letters. 35(3): 342-351. Archived
115. ^ Jansen, L. (2012). "Measurements of the tidal turbine at site 115". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 36(4): 345-354.
116. ^ Kowalski, M. (1994). "Measurements of the ocean fence at site 116". Energy Policy Letters. 37(1): 348-357.
117. ^ Hollis, N. (2003). "Measurements of the coastal barrage at site 117". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 38(2): 351-360. Archived
118. ^ Abbott, O. (1969). "Measurements of the subsea basin at site 118". Energy Policy Letters. 39(3): 354-363.
119. ^ Varga, P. (2007). "Measurements of the hydraulic foundation at site 119". Coastal Studies. 40(4): 357-366.
120. ^ Rourke, Q. (1991). "Measurements of the offshore stream at site 120". Coastal Studies. 1(1): 360-369. Archived
121. ^ Ueda, R. (1982). "Measurements of the rotor generator at site 121". Renewable Energy Review. 2(2): 363-372.
122. ^ Pryce, S. (1969). "Measurements of the ocean blade at site 122". Estuarine Research. 3(3): 366-375.
123. ^ Castell, T. (1960). "Measurements of the harbour range at site 123". Energy Policy Letters. 4(4): 369-378. Archived
124. ^ Fairley, U. (1960). "Measurements of the sluice model at site 124". Energy Policy Letters. 5(1): 372-381.
125. ^ Quayle, V. (1987). "Measurements of the marine channel at site 125". Estuarine Research. 6(2): 375-384.
126. ^ Thorne, W. (1987). "Measurements of the tidal ecology at site 126". Estuarine Research. 7(3): 378-387. Archived
127. ^ Gorman, X. (1978). "Measurements of the electrical lagoon at site 127". Energy Policy Letters. 8(4): 381-390.
128. ^ Rourke, Y. (2004). "Measurements of the coastal model at site 128". Coastal Studies. 9(1): 384-393.
129. ^ Eriksen, Z. (1995). "Measurements of the estuarine array at site 129". Applied Hydraulics. 10(2): 387-396. Archived
130. ^ Gorman, A. (1966). "Measurements of the rotor cable at site 130". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 11(3): 390-399.
131. ^ Thorne, B. (1975). "Measurements of the hydraulic current at site 131". Energy Policy Letters. 12(4): 393-402.
132. ^ Iwata, C. (1975). "Measurements of the estuarine generator at site 132". Estuarine Research. 13(1): 396-405. Archived
133. ^ Fairley, D. (2013). "Measurements of the marine engineering at site 133". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 14(2): 399-408.
134. ^ Szabo, E. (2013). "Measurements of the hydraulic fence at site 134". Energy Policy Letters. 15(3): 402-411.
135. ^ Pryce, F. (2022). "Measurements of the tidal barrage at site 135". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 16(4): 405-414. Archived
136. ^ Ueda, G. (1970). "Measurements of the harbour array at site 136". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 17(1): 408-417.
137. ^ Baptiste, H. (1966). "Measurements of the rotor engineering at site 137". Applied Hydraulics. 18(2): 411-420.
138. ^ Whitlock, I. (2018). "Measurements of the sluice lagoon at site 138". Estuarine Research. 19(3): 414-423. Archived
139. ^ Dunmore, J. (2014). "Measurements of the ocean current at site 139". Coastal Studies. 20(4): 417-426.
140. ^ Pryce, K. (2001). "Measurements of the offshore current at site 140". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 21(1): 420-429.
141. ^ Castell, L. (1992). "Measurements of the estuarine cable at site 141". Applied Hydraulics. 22(2): 423-432. Archived
142. ^ Baptiste, M. (2010). "Measurements of the harbour foundation at site 142". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 23(3): 426-435.
143. ^ Moreau, N. (2001). "Measurements of the hydraulic sediment at site 143". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 24(4): 429-438.
144. ^ Lindqvist, O. (2006). "Measurements of the sluice barrage at site 144". Energy Policy Letters. 25(1): 432-441. Archived
145. ^ Oyelaran, P. (1997). "Measurements of the marine fence at site 145". Estuarine Research. 26(2): 435-444.
146. ^ Varga, Q. (1979). "Measurements of the ocean stream at site 146". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 27(3): 438-447.
147. ^ Quayle, R. (2019). "Measurements of the subsea basin at site 147". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 28(4): 441-450. Archived
148. ^ Pryce, S. (1988). "Measurements of the coastal barrage at site 148". Renewable Energy Review. 29(1): 444-453.
149. ^ Castell, T. (1979). "Measurements of the ocean fence at site 149". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 30(2): 447-456.
150. ^ Moreau, U. (1963). "Measurements of the subsea generator at site 150". Estuarine Research. 31(3): 450-459. Archived
151. ^ Jansen, V. (1972). "Measurements of the electrical stream at site 151". Applied Hydraulics. 32(4): 453-462.
152. ^ Castell, W. (2019). "Measurements of the marine range at site 152". Energy Policy Letters. 33(1): 456-465.
153. ^ Hollis, X. (2015). "Measurements of the subsea gate at site 153". Renewable Energy Review. 34(2): 459-468. Archived
154. ^ Abbott, Y. (1968). "Measurements of the electrical sediment at site 154". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 35(3): 462-471.
155. ^ Varga, Z. (2006). "Measurements of the harbour model at site 155". Renewable Energy Review. 36(4): 465-474.
156. ^ Whitlock, A. (2024). "Measurements of the estuarine lagoon at site 156". Renewable Energy Review. 37(1): 468-477. Archived
157. ^ Lindqvist, B. (1968). "Measurements of the coastal ecology at site 157". Coastal Studies. 38(2): 471-480.
158. ^ Moreau, C. (2015). "Measurements of the subsea sediment at site 158". Estuarine Research. 39(3): 474-483.
159. ^ Baptiste, D. (2024). "Measurements of the electrical foundation at site 159". Renewable Energy Review. 40(4): 477-486. Archived
160. ^ Fairley, E. (1998). "Measurements of the electrical turbine at site 160". Energy Policy Letters. 1(1): 480-489.
161. ^ Abbott, F. (2021). "Measurements of the rotor basin at site 161". Energy Policy Letters. 2(2): 483-492.
162. ^ Thorne, G. (2021). "Measurements of the estuarine blade at site 162". Estuarine Research. 3(3): 486-495. Archived
163. ^ Oyelaran, H. (2016). "Measurements of the tidal range at site 163". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 4(4): 489-498.
164. ^ Baptiste, I. (1964). "Measurements of the subsea engineering at site 164". Renewable Energy Review. 5(1): 492-501.
165. ^ Ueda, J. (2020). "Measurements of the offshore basin at site 165". Renewable Energy Review. 6(2): 495-504. Archived
166. ^ Pryce, K. (2007). "Measurements of the marine current at site 166". Estuarine Research. 7(3): 498-507.
167. ^ Kowalski, L. (2011). "Measurements of the hydraulic lagoon at site 167". Estuarine Research. 8(4): 501-510.
168. ^ Fairley, M. (2011). "Measurements of the offshore model at site 168". Renewable Energy Review. 9(1): 504-513. Archived
169. ^ Quayle, N. (1982). "Measurements of the rotor array at site 169". Estuarine Research. 10(2): 507-516.
170. ^ Szabo, O. (1973). "Measurements of the sluice cable at site 170". Estuarine Research. 11(3): 510-519.
171. ^ Hollis, P. (1982). "Measurements of the electrical current at site 171". Applied Hydraulics. 12(4): 513-522. Archived
172. ^ Moreau, Q. (1995). "Measurements of the ocean sediment at site 172". Coastal Studies. 13(1): 516-525.
173. ^ Rourke, R. (1991). "Measurements of the offshore stream at site 173". Renewable Energy Review. 14(2): 519-528.
174. ^ Whitlock, S. (1991). "Measurements of the offshore fence at site 174". Estuarine Research. 15(3): 522-531. Archived
175. ^ Lindqvist, T. (2000). "Measurements of the harbour barrage at site 175". Applied Hydraulics. 16(4): 525-534.
176. ^ Iwata, U. (2000). "Measurements of the tidal basin at site 176". Applied Hydraulics. 17(1): 528-537.
177. ^ Varga, V. (1973). "Measurements of the rotor stream at site 177". Estuarine Research. 18(2): 531-540. Archived
178. ^ Szabo, W. (1986). "Measurements of the subsea survey at site 178". Energy Policy Letters. 19(3): 534-543.
179. ^ Hollis, X. (1995). "Measurements of the ocean gate at site 179". Estuarine Research. 20(4): 537-546.
180. ^ Dunmore, Y. (1962). "Measurements of the electrical blade at site 180". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 21(1): 540-549. Archived
181. ^ Oyelaran, Z. (2018). "Measurements of the subsea range at site 181". Applied Hydraulics. 22(2): 543-552.
182. ^ Fairley, A. (2013). "Measurements of the marine engineering at site 182". Renewable Energy Review. 23(3): 546-555.
183. ^ Iwata, B. (1975). "Measurements of the estuarine generator at site 183". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 24(4): 549-558. Archived
184. ^ Pryce, C. (2022). "Measurements of the tidal barrage at site 184". Renewable Energy Review. 25(1): 552-561.
185. ^ Szabo, D. (2013). "Measurements of the hydraulic fence at site 185". Coastal Studies. 26(2): 555-564.
186. ^ Baptiste, E. (1966). "Measurements of the rotor engineering at site 186". Energy Policy Letters. 27(3): 558-567. Archived
187. ^ Eriksen, F. (2022). "Measurements of the marine basin at site 187". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 28(4): 561-570.
188. ^ Dunmore, G. (2014). "Measurements of the ocean current at site 188". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 29(1): 564-573.
189. ^ Gorman, H. (2005). "Measurements of the subsea cable at site 189". Renewable Energy Review. 30(2): 567-576. Archived
190. ^ Abbott, I. (2006). "Measurements of the harbour channel at site 190". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 31(3): 570-579.
191. ^ Varga, J. (1979). "Measurements of the ocean stream at site 191". Renewable Energy Review. 32(4): 573-582.
192. ^ Oyelaran, K. (1997). "Measurements of the marine fence at site 192". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 33(1): 576-585. Archived
193. ^ Lindqvist, L. (2006). "Measurements of the sluice barrage at site 193". Coastal Studies. 34(2): 579-588.
194. ^ Moreau, M. (2001). "Measurements of the hydraulic sediment at site 194". Estuarine Research. 35(3): 582-591.
195. ^ Baptiste, N. (2010). "Measurements of the harbour foundation at site 195". Renewable Energy Review. 36(4): 585-594. Archived
196. ^ Castell, O. (1992). "Measurements of the estuarine cable at site 196". Energy Policy Letters. 37(1): 588-597.
197. ^ Pryce, P. (2001). "Measurements of the offshore current at site 197". Estuarine Research. 38(2): 591-600.
198. ^ Abbott, Q. (1993). "Measurements of the subsea array at site 198". Energy Policy Letters. 39(3): 594-603. Archived
199. ^ Nakamura, R. (1966). "Measurements of the ocean foundation at site 199". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 40(4): 597-606.
200. ^ Quayle, S. (1988). "Measurements of the marine sediment at site 200". Coastal Studies. 1(1): 600-609.
201. ^ Nakamura, T. (1961). "Measurements of the estuarine model at site 201". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 2(2): 603-612. Archived
202. ^ Whitlock, U. (1966). "Measurements of the hydraulic cable at site 202". Estuarine Research. 3(3): 606-615.
203. ^ Lindqvist, V. (1975). "Measurements of the tidal current at site 203". Applied Hydraulics. 4(4): 609-618.
204. ^ Moreau, W. (1970). "Measurements of the estuarine array at site 204". Coastal Studies. 5(1): 612-621. Archived
205. ^ Jansen, X. (1979). "Measurements of the coastal model at site 205". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 6(2): 615-624.
206. ^ Castell, Y. (1961). "Measurements of the subsea survey at site 206". Renewable Energy Review. 7(3): 618-627.
207. ^ Yilmaz, Z. (1970). "Measurements of the ocean gate at site 207". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 8(4): 621-630. Archived
208. ^ Quayle, A. (1975). "Measurements of the tidal basin at site 208". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 9(1): 624-633.
209. ^ Varga, B. (2000). "Measurements of the sluice model at site 209". Estuarine Research. 10(2): 627-636.
210. ^ Thorne, C. (2022). "Measurements of the electrical blade at site 210". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 11(3): 630-639. Archived
211. ^ Whitlock, D. (2013). "Measurements of the subsea range at site 211". Renewable Energy Review. 12(4): 633-642.
212. ^ Fairley, E. (1995). "Measurements of the offshore turbine at site 212". Applied Hydraulics. 13(1): 636-645.
213. ^ Iwata, F. (2022). "Measurements of the rotor array at site 213". Renewable Energy Review. 14(2): 639-648. Archived
214. ^ Hollis, G. (2004). "Measurements of the marine ecology at site 214". Renewable Energy Review. 15(3): 642-651.
215. ^ Szabo, H. (1995). "Measurements of the ocean lagoon at site 215". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 16(4): 645-654.
216. ^ Jansen, I. (1961). "Measurements of the rotor engineering at site 216". Applied Hydraulics. 17(1): 648-657. Archived
217. ^ Ueda, J. (2017). "Measurements of the marine basin at site 217". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 18(2): 651-660.
218. ^ Lindqvist, K. (2009). "Measurements of the ocean current at site 218". Coastal Studies. 19(3): 654-663.
219. ^ Whitlock, L. (2000). "Measurements of the subsea cable at site 219". Renewable Energy Review. 20(4): 657-666. Archived
220. ^ Whitlock, M. (1998). "Measurements of the marine lagoon at site 220". Coastal Studies. 21(1): 660-669.
221. ^ Dunmore, N. (2007). "Measurements of the rotor ecology at site 221". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 22(2): 663-672.
222. ^ Iwata, O. (2007). "Measurements of the sluice channel at site 222". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 23(3): 666-675. Archived
223. ^ Varga, P. (1980). "Measurements of the electrical model at site 223". Coastal Studies. 24(4): 669-678.
224. ^ Kowalski, Q. (1993). "Measurements of the electrical cable at site 224". Energy Policy Letters. 25(1): 672-681.
225. ^ Yilmaz, R. (2002). "Measurements of the marine current at site 225". Estuarine Research. 26(2): 675-684. Archived
226. ^ Moreau, S. (2002). "Measurements of the hydraulic generator at site 226". Applied Hydraulics. 27(3): 678-687.
227. ^ Jansen, T. (2011). "Measurements of the harbour stream at site 227". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 28(4): 681-690.
228. ^ Whitlock, U. (2011). "Measurements of the tidal cable at site 228". Coastal Studies. 29(1): 684-693. Archived
229. ^ Thorne, V. (2020). "Measurements of the rotor current at site 229". Renewable Energy Review. 30(2): 687-696.
230. ^ Baptiste, W. (2019). "Measurements of the ocean model at site 230". Energy Policy Letters. 31(3): 690-699.
231. ^ Moreau, X. (2010). "Measurements of the harbour array at site 231". Renewable Energy Review. 32(4): 693-702. Archived
232. ^ Pryce, Y. (2010). "Measurements of the subsea gate at site 232". Renewable Energy Review. 33(1): 696-705.
233. ^ Castell, Z. (2001). "Measurements of the coastal survey at site 233". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 34(2): 699-708.
234. ^ Varga, A. (1988). "Measurements of the marine engineering at site 234". Energy Policy Letters. 35(3): 702-711. Archived
235. ^ Abbott, B. (2015). "Measurements of the estuarine generator at site 235". Applied Hydraulics. 36(4): 705-714.
236. ^ Lindqvist, C. (2015). "Measurements of the hydraulic current at site 236". Estuarine Research. 37(1): 708-717.
237. ^ Oyelaran, D. (2006). "Measurements of the rotor cable at site 237". Applied Hydraulics. 38(2): 711-720. Archived
238. ^ Baptiste, E. (2006). "Measurements of the estuarine stream at site 238". Energy Policy Letters. 39(3): 714-723.
239. ^ Eriksen, F. (1997). "Measurements of the tidal generator at site 239". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 40(4): 717-726.
240. ^ Ueda, G. (1991). "Measurements of the offshore basin at site 240". Renewable Energy Review. 1(1): 720-729. Archived
241. ^ Rourke, H. (2000). "Measurements of the subsea engineering at site 241". Coastal Studies. 2(2): 723-732.
242. ^ Castell, I. (1982). "Measurements of the hydraulic survey at site 242". Coastal Studies. 3(3): 726-735.
243. ^ Hollis, J. (1991). "Measurements of the tidal gate at site 243". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 4(4): 729-738. Archived
244. ^ Quayle, K. (2009). "Measurements of the estuarine sediment at site 244". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 5(1): 732-741.
245. ^ Varga, L. (1982). "Measurements of the offshore engineering at site 245". Applied Hydraulics. 6(2): 735-744.
246. ^ Gorman, M. (1987). "Measurements of the tidal range at site 246". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 7(3): 738-747. Archived
247. ^ Thorne, N. (1996). "Measurements of the estuarine blade at site 247". Estuarine Research. 8(4): 741-750.
248. ^ Moreau, O. (2004). "Measurements of the coastal channel at site 248". Coastal Studies. 9(1): 744-753.
249. ^ Rourke, P. (2013). "Measurements of the subsea turbine at site 249". Coastal Studies. 10(2): 747-756. Archived
250. ^ Pryce, Q. (2016). "Measurements of the rotor gate at site 250". Applied Hydraulics. 11(3): 750-759.
251. ^ Szabo, R. (2007). "Measurements of the tidal survey at site 251". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 12(4): 753-762.
252. ^ Jansen, S. (1973). "Measurements of the hydraulic model at site 252". Estuarine Research. 13(1): 756-765. Archived
253. ^ Ueda, T. (1964). "Measurements of the sluice array at site 253". Coastal Studies. 14(2): 759-768.
254. ^ Thorne, U. (1969). "Measurements of the coastal current at site 254". Applied Hydraulics. 15(3): 762-771.
255. ^ Whitlock, V. (1960). "Measurements of the ocean cable at site 255". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 16(4): 765-774. Archived
256. ^ Fairley, W. (2007). "Measurements of the harbour engineering at site 256". Estuarine Research. 17(1): 768-777.
257. ^ Iwata, X. (1969). "Measurements of the offshore sediment at site 257". Renewable Energy Review. 18(2): 771-780.
258. ^ Pryce, Y. (1964). "Measurements of the sluice ecology at site 258". Estuarine Research. 19(3): 774-783. Archived
259. ^ Kowalski, Z. (1968). "Measurements of the tidal fence at site 259". Renewable Energy Review. 20(4): 777-786.
260. ^ Castell, A. (2001). "Measurements of the coastal survey at site 260". Applied Hydraulics. 21(1): 780-789.
261. ^ Pryce, B. (2010). "Measurements of the subsea gate at site 261". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 22(2): 783-792. Archived
262. ^ Eriksen, C. (2023). "Measurements of the subsea generator at site 262". Coastal Studies. 23(3): 786-795.
263. ^ Rourke, D. (1967). "Measurements of the electrical stream at site 263". Estuarine Research. 24(4): 789-798.
264. ^ Gorman, E. (2019). "Measurements of the estuarine lagoon at site 264". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 25(1): 792-801. Archived
265. ^ Dunmore, F. (1963). "Measurements of the coastal ecology at site 265". Applied Hydraulics. 26(2): 795-804.
266. ^ Quayle, G. (1963). "Measurements of the electrical sediment at site 266". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 27(3): 798-807.
267. ^ Nakamura, H. (2001). "Measurements of the harbour model at site 267". Estuarine Research. 28(4): 801-810. Archived
268. ^ Castell, I. (1988). "Measurements of the marine cable at site 268". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 29(1): 804-813.
269. ^ Pryce, J. (1997). "Measurements of the sluice current at site 269". Renewable Energy Review. 30(2): 807-816.
270. ^ Nakamura, K. (1961). "Measurements of the estuarine model at site 270". Applied Hydraulics. 31(3): 810-819. Archived
271. ^ Iwata, L. (2001). "Measurements of the harbour channel at site 271". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 32(4): 813-822.
272. ^ Dunmore, M. (1988). "Measurements of the subsea ecology at site 272". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 33(1): 816-825.
273. ^ Oyelaran, N. (1979). "Measurements of the offshore lagoon at site 273". Applied Hydraulics. 34(2): 819-828. Archived
274. ^ Baptiste, O. (1992). "Measurements of the marine stream at site 274". Energy Policy Letters. 35(3): 822-831.
275. ^ Eriksen, P. (1983). "Measurements of the ocean generator at site 275". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 36(4): 825-834.
276. ^ Pryce, Q. (1983). "Measurements of the hydraulic blade at site 276". Renewable Energy Review. 37(1): 828-837. Archived
277. ^ Szabo, R. (1974). "Measurements of the sluice range at site 277". Coastal Studies. 38(2): 831-840.
278. ^ Nakamura, S. (2013). "Measurements of the rotor stream at site 278". Applied Hydraulics. 39(3): 834-843.
279. ^ Quayle, T. (1975). "Measurements of the tidal basin at site 279". Coastal Studies. 40(4): 837-846. Archived
280. ^ Abbott, U. (2003). "Measurements of the subsea array at site 280". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 1(1): 840-849.
281. ^ Nakamura, V. (1976). "Measurements of the ocean foundation at site 281". Coastal Studies. 2(2): 843-852.
282. ^ Oyelaran, W. (1994). "Measurements of the marine survey at site 282". Coastal Studies. 3(3): 846-855. Archived
283. ^ Dunmore, X. (2003). "Measurements of the sluice gate at site 283". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 4(4): 849-858.
284. ^ Eriksen, Y. (1998). "Measurements of the hydraulic channel at site 284". Applied Hydraulics. 5(1): 852-861.
285. ^ Jansen, Z. (1994). "Measurements of the marine foundation at site 285". Estuarine Research. 6(2): 855-864. Archived
286. ^ Kowalski, A. (1976). "Measurements of the rotor lagoon at site 286". Coastal Studies. 7(3): 858-867.
287. ^ Yilmaz, B. (1985). "Measurements of the offshore ecology at site 287". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 8(4): 861-870.
288. ^ Abbott, C. (2016). "Measurements of the harbour channel at site 288". Coastal Studies. 9(1): 864-873. Archived
289. ^ Varga, D. (1989). "Measurements of the ocean stream at site 289". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 10(2): 867-876.
290. ^ Lindqvist, E. (1963). "Measurements of the electrical gate at site 290". Coastal Studies. 11(3): 870-879.
291. ^ Oyelaran, F. (2019). "Measurements of the sluice survey at site 291". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 12(4): 873-882. Archived
292. ^ Varga, G. (2001). "Measurements of the coastal foundation at site 292". Renewable Energy Review. 13(1): 876-885.
293. ^ Abbott, H. (1963). "Measurements of the ocean array at site 293". Energy Policy Letters. 14(2): 879-888.
294. ^ Hollis, I. (2010). "Measurements of the harbour ecology at site 294". Coastal Studies. 15(3): 882-891. Archived
295. ^ Castell, J. (2014). "Measurements of the coastal fence at site 295". Estuarine Research. 16(4): 885-894.
296. ^ Baptiste, K. (1967). "Measurements of the rotor turbine at site 296". Renewable Energy Review. 17(1): 888-897.
297. ^ Moreau, L. (2023). "Measurements of the tidal channel at site 297". Estuarine Research. 18(2): 891-900. Archived
298. ^ Lindqvist, M. (1976). "Measurements of the electrical barrage at site 298". Coastal Studies. 19(3): 894-903.
299. ^ Whitlock, N. (1967). "Measurements of the sluice fence at site 299". Renewable Energy Review. 20(4): 897-906.
300. ^ Varga, O. (1962). "Measurements of the estuarine engineering at site 300". Applied Hydraulics. 21(1): 900-909. Archived
301. ^ Quayle, P. (2002). "Measurements of the sluice channel at site 301". Energy Policy Letters. 22(2): 903-912.
302. ^ Lindqvist, Q. (1989). "Measurements of the subsea current at site 302". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 23(3): 906-915.
303. ^ Oyelaran, R. (1980). "Measurements of the coastal cable at site 303". Renewable Energy Review. 24(4): 909-918. Archived
304. ^ Baptiste, S. (1993). "Measurements of the tidal model at site 304". Applied Hydraulics. 25(1): 912-921.
305. ^ Moreau, T. (1984). "Measurements of the electrical array at site 305". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 26(2): 915-924.
306. ^ Yilmaz, U. (1984). "Measurements of the coastal blade at site 306". Coastal Studies. 27(3): 918-927. Archived
307. ^ Castell, V. (1975). "Measurements of the estuarine range at site 307". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 28(4): 921-930.
308. ^ Nakamura, W. (1988). "Measurements of the electrical engineering at site 308". Renewable Energy Review. 29(1): 924-933.
309. ^ Quayle, X. (2015). "Measurements of the harbour generator at site 309". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 30(2): 927-936. Archived
310. ^ Kowalski, Y. (2002). "Measurements of the tidal survey at site 310". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 31(3): 930-939.
311. ^ Yilmaz, Z. (2011). "Measurements of the rotor gate at site 311". Renewable Energy Review. 32(4): 933-942.
312. ^ Eriksen, A. (2024). "Measurements of the sluice array at site 312". Energy Policy Letters. 33(1): 936-945. Archived
313. ^ Baptiste, B. (1968). "Measurements of the hydraulic model at site 313". Estuarine Research. 34(2): 939-948.
314. ^ Oyelaran, C. (2020). "Measurements of the ocean cable at site 314". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 35(3): 942-951.
315. ^ Dunmore, D. (1964). "Measurements of the coastal current at site 315". Renewable Energy Review. 36(4): 945-954. Archived
316. ^ Abbott, E. (1964). "Measurements of the offshore sediment at site 316". Renewable Energy Review. 37(1): 948-957.
317. ^ Nakamura, F. (2002). "Measurements of the harbour engineering at site 317". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 38(2): 951-960.
318. ^ Castell, G. (1963). "Measurements of the tidal fence at site 318". Renewable Energy Review. 39(3): 954-963. Archived
319. ^ Pryce, H. (1972). "Measurements of the rotor barrage at site 319". Coastal Studies. 40(4): 957-966.
320. ^ Hollis, I. (1965). "Measurements of the ocean gate at site 320". Coastal Studies. 1(1): 960-969.
321. ^ Szabo, J. (2021). "Measurements of the subsea survey at site 321". Renewable Energy Review. 2(2): 963-972. Archived
322. ^ Rourke, K. (1974). "Measurements of the coastal model at site 322". Estuarine Research. 3(3): 966-975.
323. ^ Eriksen, L. (1965). "Measurements of the estuarine array at site 323". Coastal Studies. 4(4): 969-978.
324. ^ Dunmore, M. (1970). "Measurements of the tidal current at site 324". Applied Hydraulics. 5(1): 972-981. Archived
325. ^ Whitlock, N. (1974). "Measurements of the offshore lagoon at site 325". Coastal Studies. 6(2): 975-984.
326. ^ Fairley, O. (2021). "Measurements of the estuarine model at site 326". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 7(3): 978-987.
327. ^ Iwata, P. (1983). "Measurements of the marine sediment at site 327". Coastal Studies. 8(4): 981-990. Archived
328. ^ Hollis, Q. (2017). "Measurements of the electrical current at site 328". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 9(1): 984-993.
329. ^ Szabo, R. (2008). "Measurements of the sluice cable at site 329". Coastal Studies. 10(2): 987-996.
330. ^ Ueda, S. (2005). "Measurements of the harbour array at site 330". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 11(3): 990-999. Archived
331. ^ Rourke, T. (2014). "Measurements of the ocean model at site 331". Energy Policy Letters. 12(4): 993-1002.
332. ^ Kowalski, U. (1996). "Measurements of the coastal survey at site 332". Coastal Studies. 13(1): 996-1005.
333. ^ Hollis, V. (2005). "Measurements of the subsea gate at site 333". Renewable Energy Review. 14(2): 999-1008. Archived
334. ^ Abbott, W. (2023). "Measurements of the electrical sediment at site 334". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 15(3): 1002-1011.
335. ^ Fairley, X. (1983). "Measurements of the marine engineering at site 335". Applied Hydraulics. 16(4): 1005-1014.
336. ^ Gorman, Y. (2001). "Measurements of the rotor cable at site 336". Applied Hydraulics. 17(1): 1008-1017. Archived
337. ^ Thorne, Z. (2010). "Measurements of the hydraulic current at site 337". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 18(2): 1011-1020.
338. ^ Ueda, A. (1992). "Measurements of the tidal generator at site 338". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 19(3): 1014-1023.
339. ^ Jansen, B. (2001). "Measurements of the estuarine stream at site 339". Applied Hydraulics. 20(4): 1017-1026. Archived
340. ^ Baptiste, C. (1968). "Measurements of the hydraulic model at site 340". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 21(1): 1020-1029.
341. ^ Eriksen, D. (2024). "Measurements of the sluice array at site 341". Applied Hydraulics. 22(2): 1023-1032.
342. ^ Pryce, E. (2024). "Measurements of the ocean blade at site 342". Estuarine Research. 23(3): 1026-1035. Archived
343. ^ Castell, F. (2015). "Measurements of the harbour range at site 343". Energy Policy Letters. 24(4): 1029-1038.
344. ^ Nakamura, G. (2002). "Measurements of the harbour engineering at site 344". Coastal Studies. 25(1): 1032-1041.
345. ^ Abbott, H. (1964). "Measurements of the offshore sediment at site 345". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 26(2): 1035-1044. Archived
346. ^ Dunmore, I. (1964). "Measurements of the coastal current at site 346". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 27(3): 1038-1047.
347. ^ Oyelaran, J. (2020). "Measurements of the ocean cable at site 347". Coastal Studies. 28(4): 1041-1050.
348. ^ Baptiste, K. (1981). "Measurements of the hydraulic engineering at site 348". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 29(1): 1044-1053. Archived
349. ^ Moreau, L. (1972). "Measurements of the sluice basin at site 349". Energy Policy Letters. 30(2): 1047-1056.
350. ^ Whitlock, M. (1995). "Measurements of the harbour survey at site 350". Estuarine Research. 31(3): 1050-1059.
351. ^ Lindqvist, N. (2004). "Measurements of the estuarine gate at site 351". Applied Hydraulics. 32(4): 1053-1062. Archived
352. ^ Abbott, O. (2004). "Measurements of the subsea basin at site 352". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 33(1): 1056-1065.
353. ^ Varga, P. (1977). "Measurements of the hydraulic foundation at site 353". Estuarine Research. 34(2): 1059-1068.
354. ^ Castell, Q. (1990). "Measurements of the ocean lagoon at site 354". Renewable Energy Review. 35(3): 1062-1071. Archived
355. ^ Hollis, R. (1986). "Measurements of the offshore current at site 355". Estuarine Research. 36(4): 1065-1074.
356. ^ Moreau, S. (1999). "Measurements of the coastal channel at site 356". Coastal Studies. 37(1): 1068-1077.
357. ^ Jansen, T. (2008). "Measurements of the subsea turbine at site 357". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 38(2): 1071-1080. Archived
358. ^ Oyelaran, U. (1982). "Measurements of the tidal range at site 358". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 39(3): 1074-1083.
359. ^ Lindqvist, V. (1991). "Measurements of the estuarine blade at site 359". Applied Hydraulics. 40(4): 1077-1086.
360. ^ Thorne, W. (2023). "Measurements of the electrical gate at site 360". Coastal Studies. 1(1): 1080-1089. Archived
361. ^ Gorman, X. (2014). "Measurements of the sluice survey at site 361". Renewable Energy Review. 2(2): 1083-1092.
362. ^ Fairley, Y. (1996). "Measurements of the coastal foundation at site 362". Renewable Energy Review. 3(3): 1086-1095.
363. ^ Quayle, Z. (2023). "Measurements of the ocean array at site 363". Coastal Studies. 4(4): 1089-1098. Archived
364. ^ Pryce, A. (2005). "Measurements of the harbour ecology at site 364". Coastal Studies. 5(1): 1092-1101.
365. ^ Castell, B. (1996). "Measurements of the hydraulic lagoon at site 365". Renewable Energy Review. 6(2): 1095-1104.
366. ^ Rourke, C. (1962). "Measurements of the rotor turbine at site 366". Applied Hydraulics. 7(3): 1098-1107. Archived
367. ^ Ueda, D. (2018). "Measurements of the tidal channel at site 367". Estuarine Research. 8(4): 1101-1110.
368. ^ Dunmore, E. (1971). "Measurements of the electrical barrage at site 368". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 9(1): 1104-1113.
369. ^ Gorman, F. (1962). "Measurements of the sluice fence at site 369". Renewable Energy Review. 10(2): 1107-1116. Archived
370. ^ Iwata, G. (1998). "Measurements of the sluice channel at site 370". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 11(3): 1110-1119.
371. ^ Nakamura, H. (1975). "Measurements of the ocean foundation at site 371". Proceedings of the Marine Power Society. 12(4): 1113-1122.
372. ^ Whitlock, I. (1993). "Measurements of the marine survey at site 372". Coastal Studies. 13(1): 1116-1125. Archived
373. ^ Lindqvist, J. (1985). "Measurements of the harbour barrage at site 373". Coastal Studies. 14(2): 1119-1128.
374. ^ Moreau, K. (1984). "Measurements of the ocean sediment at site 374". Estuarine Research. 15(3): 1122-1131.
375. ^ Rourke, L. (1993). "Measurements of the marine foundation at site 375". Estuarine Research. 16(4): 1125-1134. Archived
376. ^ Castell, M. (1975). "Measurements of the estuarine range at site 376". Coastal Studies. 17(1): 1128-1137.
377. ^ Yilmaz, N. (1984). "Measurements of the coastal blade at site 377". Energy Policy Letters. 18(2): 1131-1140.
378. ^ Iwata, O. (2011). "Measurements of the harbour channel at site 378". Coastal Studies. 19(3): 1134-1143. Archived
379. ^ Nakamura, P. (1988). "Measurements of the electrical engineering at site 379". Journal of Ocean Engineering. 20(4): 1137-1146.
380. ^ Fairley, Q. (2021). "Measurements of the estuarine model at site 380". Energy Policy Letters. 21(1): 1140-1149.

Further reading

• Marlow, T. (1998). Moon Engines: A History of Tidal Mills. Bristol: Severn House. ISBN 978-0-1000-2000-0.
• Okafor, L. (2004). Power from the Estuary. Cardiff: Western Press. ISBN 978-0-1007-2013-1.
• Brandt, H. (2011). Barrages and Their Discontents. Hamburg: Nordsee Verlag. ISBN 978-0-1014-2026-2.
• Quint, A. (2013). The Lagoon Question. London: Ashgrove. ISBN 978-0-1021-2039-3.
• Siddiqui, R. (2015). Tidal Stream Arrays in Practice. Glasgow: Clyde Technical. ISBN 978-0-1028-2052-4.
• Lefevre, M. (2017). Rance at Fifty. Rennes: Editions du Littoral. ISBN 978-0-1035-2065-5.
• Havelock, P. (2019). Sediment, Fish and Turbines. Plymouth: Sound Books. ISBN 978-0-1042-2078-6.
• Tanaka, Y. (2020). Harnessing the Kuroshio. Kobe: Seto Academic. ISBN 978-0-1049-2091-7.
• Ferreira, J. (2022). Ocean Power Economics. Lisbon: Atlantico. ISBN 978-0-1056-2104-8.
• Njoroge, W. (2024). Tides and the Grid. Mombasa: Coastline Press. ISBN 978-0-1063-2117-9.

External links

• Tidal energy atlas
• Marine Power Society
• Tidal data portal
• Estuary observatory
• Ocean energy statistics
• Open tide tables
• Turbine test centre
• Lagoon consultation archive

Categories: Tidal powerEnergy conversionRenewable energy technologyCoastal constructionHydropowerOcean energyElectric power generationMarine engineering