Researchers are waiting longer to share their work because the people checking new papers can't keep up. Now arXiv, a free website for sharing research, is limiting each person to two submissions a month.

Why? It received more than forty thousand papers in September, roughly double the number two years earlier. arXiv says AI tools are helping drive the surge, including more weak papers and single studies split into several submissions.

And every submission takes someone's time. Volunteer moderators screen papers before they appear on the site. That screening isn't the full expert review a journal provides, but the growing queue still holds up other researchers.

So what changes? Since October first, the person uploading a paper gets two submissions per calendar month. A rejected paper still uses one of those slots, because someone had to check it. Being listed as a co-author on someone else's submission doesn't use your allowance.

arXiv calls this a temporary measure. The tradeoff is straightforward: slowing submissions gives moderators breathing room, but it also limits people submitting useful work.
