Conpack E2E Eval Results

Generated: 1771997023s-since-epoch

Summary

No Ctx WORST
29.6%
confidence  |  p95: 15.9s  |  p97: 16.0s  |  p99: 16.1s  |  best: 11.5s
Know Only
76.6%
confidence  |  p95: 17.6s  |  p97: 17.7s  |  p99: 17.7s  |  best: 14.2s
CLI Search BEST
81.9%
confidence  |  p95: 59.9s  |  p97: 60.0s  |  p99: 60.0s  |  best: 58.6s
MCP+Tools
63.7%
confidence  |  p95: 23.3s  |  p97: 23.4s  |  p99: 23.4s  |  best: 13.8s

Comparison

MetricNo CtxKnow OnlyCLI SearchMCP+Tools
Avg Confidence29.6%76.6%81.9%63.7%
Pass Rate67%100%100%100%
Avg Time13.7s16.0s59.2s19.7s
Time P9515.9s17.6s59.9s23.3s
Time P9716.0s17.7s60.0s23.4s
Time P9916.1s17.7s60.0s23.4s
Best Time11.5s14.2s58.6s13.8s
Success Rate3/33/32/33/3
Timeouts0010
Errors0000

Coverage Matrix (Strategy × Vertical)

StrategyNo CtxKnow OnlyCLI SearchMCP+Tools
fts0% (0/1)100% (1/1)0% (0/1)100% (1/1)
vector100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)
cascade100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)

Seed Routing

SeedStrategyTarget Upstream
zephyr-query-protocolftselasticsearch-fts
conpackdb-ring-bufferftselasticsearch-fts
conpack-cluster-terraformftselasticsearch-fts
prismoid-cache-coherenceftselasticsearch-fts
vortex-ingestion-pipelinevectorqdrant-vector
helix-embedder-trainingvectorqdrant-vector
obsidian-vault-syncvectorqdrant-vector
crystalline-tensor-decompositionvectorqdrant-vector
nexara-meridian-consensuscascade(cascade — priority order)
auralis-service-meshcascade(cascade — priority order)
spectral-query-analyzercascade(cascade — priority order)
solaris-event-meshcascade(cascade — priority order)
12 seeds: 4 FTS, 4 vector, 4 cascade

Per-Strategy Recall

StrategyNo CtxKnow OnlyCLI SearchMCP+Tools
fts0% (0/1)100% (1/1)-100% (1/1)
vector100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)
cascade100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)100% (1/1)

Per-Query Confidence

QueryStrategyNo CtxKnow OnlyCLI SearchMCP+Tools
q-001What is the Zephyr Query Protocol and how does its three-phase handshake work?fts25%---
q-004How do you configure the Vortex ingestion pipeline stages and dead-letter handling?vector32%---
q-003Explain the Meridian consensus protocol used by Nexara and its temporal sharding approachcascade32%---
q-002How does ConpackDB implement ring-buffer sharding with BLAKE3 partition keys?fts-73%--
q-006How do you train custom embeddings with the Helix Embedder and export to ONNX?vector-89%--
q-005What traffic shaping policies does the Auralis service mesh support?cascade-68%--
q-007Describe the Prismoid cache coherence protocol and its gossip-based invalidationfts--TIMEOUT-
q-010Explain the Obsidian Vault Sync protocol modes and delta sync mechanism for knowledge filesvector--77%-
q-009How does the Spectral Query Analyzer optimize execution plans for multi-upstream searches?cascade--86%-
q-008What resources does the conpack-cluster Terraform module provision and what are the auto-scaling triggers?fts---50%
q-011How does the Crystalline engine perform Tucker decomposition on high-dimensional tensors?vector---77%
q-012Explain the Solaris Event Mesh causal ordering and topic partitioning approachcascade---64%

Query Details

q-001 — What is the Zephyr Query Protocol and how does its three-phase handshake work?
Expected: eval-001 — Zephyr Query Protocol v3.2 Specification
The Zephyr Query Protocol (ZQP) v3.2 introduces scatter-gather query routing with adaptive fan-out. ZQP uses a three-phase handshake: DISCOVER, NEGOTIATE, STREAM. The DISCOVER phase broadcasts topology probes to all registered shards using multicast group 239.17.42.0/24. NEGOTIATE selects optimal shards based on affinity scores computed via the Kessler-Huang ranking algorithm. STREAM delivers results using chunked transfer with backpressure signaling via ZQP-FlowControl headers. Configuration requires setting zqp.scatter_factor (default 3), zqp.negotiate_timeout_ms (default 150), and zqp.stream_window_size (default 64KB). The protocol supports both synchronous request-response and asynchronous push modes controlled by the zqp.mode parameter.
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
No Ctxeval-001NO0.25013.3s
title-partial:3/5tag:zephyrtag:query-protocolterm:queryterm:phaseterm:handshake
Agent Responses
No Ctx — recall 0%
I'm not aware of any protocol called the "Zephyr Query Protocol" or a specific "three-phase handshake" associated with it. This doesn't correspond to any widely recognized standard, RFC, or well-known system in my knowledge. There is a **Zephyr Notification Service** from MIT's Project Athena (a campus messaging/notification system), but it is not called the "Zephyr Query Protocol" and is not defined by a three-phase handshake. There's also the **Zephyr RTOS project** (now under the Linux Foundation), which has various networking capabilities, but no protocol by that specific name. If this term comes from a specific paper, course, proprietary system, or codebase you're working with, I'd be happy to help if you can point me to the source material. Otherwise, I don't want to fabricate details about something that may not exist.
q-004 — How do you configure the Vortex ingestion pipeline stages and dead-letter handling?
Expected: eval-004 — Vortex Ingestion Pipeline Configuration Guide
The Vortex ingestion pipeline processes streaming data through configurable stages: PARSE, ENRICH, VALIDATE, ROUTE. Each stage runs as an isolated actor with bounded mailboxes (vortex.stage.mailbox_size, default 4096). The PARSE stage supports JSON, Avro, Protobuf, and custom formats via pluggable deserializers registered in vortex.parsers[]. ENRICH applies transformation rules defined in vortex.enrichment_rules[], supporting field mapping, regex extraction, and lookup joins against reference tables. VALIDATE enforces schema contracts using Vortex Schema Language (VSL) files referenced by vortex.schema_path. ROUTE distributes validated records to downstream sinks based on content-based routing rules in vortex.routing_table[]. Dead-letter handling sends invalid records to the vortex.dlq_topic (default 'vortex-dlq'). Backpressure propagates upstream when any stage's mailbox exceeds 80% capacity.
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
No Ctxeval-004YES0.31916.1s
title-partial:4/5phrase:Dead-letter handlingtag:vortextag:ingestiontag:pipeline
Agent Responses
No Ctx — recall 100%
I don't have specific knowledge of a product or framework called "Vortex" with ingestion pipeline stages and dead-letter handling. This could refer to an internal/proprietary system, a niche open-source project, or something I don't have detailed documentation on. Let me check if there's anything relevant in the current working directory. <tool_call> <tool_name>Bash</tool_name> <parameters> <command>find /tmp/conpack-eval/verticals/no_context -type f | head -50</command> </parameters> </tool_call> <tool_call> <tool_name>Grep</tool_name> <parameters> <pattern>(?i)vortex</pattern> <path>/tmp/conpack-eval/verticals/no_context</path> <glob>*"</glob> </parameters> </tool_call> There's no relevant code or documentation in the working directory, and I don't have reliable, specific technical knowledge about a system called "Vortex" with ingestion pipeline stages and dead-letter handling. Rather than fabricate details, I want to be straightforward: **I don't have enough information to give you an accurate, specific answer about this system.** Here's how I can help if you provide more context: - **If this is a specific product/framework**: Share the documentation link, repo, or full product name (e.g., "Apache Vortex," "Vortex by CompanyX"), and I can reason about it or help you work with it. - **If this is in your codebase**: Point me to the relevant files or repo, and I can read the code and explain the configuration model. - **If this is a general architecture question**: I can discuss common patterns for configuring multi-stage ingestion pipelines with dead-letter queues (e.g., using Kafka DLQs, AWS SQS dead-letter queues, Azure Service Bus dead-lettering, etc.). Which of these applies to your situation?
q-003 — Explain the Meridian consensus protocol used by Nexara and its temporal sharding approach
Expected: eval-003 — Nexara Consensus: The Meridian Protocol
Nexara implements the Meridian consensus protocol, a Byzantine fault-tolerant algorithm designed for geo-distributed clusters. Meridian operates in three rounds: PROPOSE, CERTIFY, COMMIT. Unlike traditional BFT protocols, Meridian uses a rotating committee of 2f+1 validators selected via verifiable random functions (VRFs). The protocol achieves 50,000 TPS in WAN configurations with 100ms finality. Key parameters include meridian.committee_size (default 7), meridian.vrf_threshold (0.67), and meridian.proposal_timeout_ms (default 200). Meridian introduces the concept of 'temporal sharding' where consensus rounds are partitioned across time slots to reduce message complexity from O(n^2) to O(n*log(n)). The Nexara implementation uses the Ed25519 signature scheme for vote signing.
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
No Ctxeval-003YES0.31911.5s
title-partial:3/4tag:nexaratag:meridiantag:consensusterm:meridianterm:nexaraterm:temporalterm:sharding
Agent Responses
No Ctx — recall 100%
I don't have any information about a "Meridian consensus protocol," "Nexara," or its "temporal sharding approach." These terms don't correspond to any technology, protocol, or project that I'm aware of from my training data (up to May 2025). A few possibilities: 1. **These may be fictional or fabricated terms.** If this is a test to see whether I'll confabulate a plausible-sounding answer, I'd rather be straightforward: I don't know these things and I won't make something up. 2. **These could be very new or niche.** If this is a real project that emerged after my knowledge cutoff or is extremely obscure, I simply don't have data on it. 3. **These could be internal/proprietary terms.** If this relates to a private or internal project, I wouldn't have access to that information unless you provide documentation. If you have documentation, a whitepaper, or source code related to this protocol, I'm happy to read through it and give you a detailed technical explanation. Just point me to the relevant files.
q-002 — How does ConpackDB implement ring-buffer sharding with BLAKE3 partition keys?
Expected: eval-002 — ConpackDB Ring-Buffer Sharding Architecture
ConpackDB implements ring-buffer sharding using BLAKE3 partition keys for deterministic data distribution. Each shard is a fixed-size ring buffer (default 256MB) that overwrites oldest entries on capacity. The sharding algorithm computes shard_id = blake3(document_key) % num_shards. Hot shards are detected when write throughput exceeds the configurable threshold shard.hot_threshold_ops_sec (default 10000). Hot shard mitigation uses split-and-replicate: the hot shard is split into two sub-shards and the secondary is placed on a different node. The ring-buffer uses a cursor-based read model where consumers track their position via monotonic sequence numbers. ConpackDB's consistency model is eventual with a configurable convergence window of shard.convergence_ms (default 500).
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
Know Onlyeval-002YES0.72817.8s
title-partial:3/4phrase:BLAKE3 partitionphrase:ConpackDB implementsphrase:Each shardtag:conpackdbtag:ring-buffertag:shardingtag:blake3term:bufferterm:convergenceterm:implementsterm:nodeterm:shardingterm:writeterm:consumersterm:secondary
Agent Responses
Know Only — recall 100%
Here's how ConpackDB implements ring-buffer sharding with BLAKE3 partition keys: **Shard Assignment** The sharding algorithm is deterministic: `shard_id = blake3(document_key) % num_shards`. Each document key is hashed with BLAKE3, and the modulo of the number of shards determines which shard owns that key. **Ring-Buffer Structure** Each shard is a fixed-size ring buffer (default **256 MB**) that operates as a circular log — when capacity is reached, the oldest entries are overwritten. Consumers read using a **cursor-based model**, tracking their position via monotonic sequence numbers. **Hot Shard Mitigation** When a shard's write throughput exceeds `shard.hot_threshold_ops_sec` (default **10,000 ops/sec**), ConpackDB uses a **split-and-replicate** strategy: 1. The hot shard is split into two sub-shards. 2. The secondary sub-shard is placed on a different node to distribute load. **Consistency Model** ConpackDB uses **eventual consistency** with a configurable convergence window controlled by `shard.convergence_ms` (default **500 ms**). **Key configuration parameters:** | Parameter | Default | Purpose | |---|---|---| | Shard size | 256 MB | Ring-buffer capacity per shard | | `shard.hot_threshold_ops_sec` | 10,000 | Triggers hot-shard split | | `shard.convergence_ms` | 500 ms | Eventual consistency convergence window |
q-006 — How do you train custom embeddings with the Helix Embedder and export to ONNX?
Expected: eval-006 — Helix Embedder: Custom Model Training Workflow
The Helix Embedder produces domain-specific text embeddings using a fine-tuned transformer architecture. Training requires a corpus file in Helix Format (.hxf) containing tab-separated (anchor, positive, negative) triplets. The training pipeline is: helix train --corpus data.hxf --model-dim 384 --epochs 20 --lr 1e-5 --loss contrastive-margin --margin 0.3. Evaluation uses helix eval --model checkpoint.hx --benchmark internal-retrieval --metrics ndcg@10,mrr. The Helix runtime exports models as ONNX for inference, supporting batch sizes up to helix.inference.max_batch (default 32). Quantization reduces model size via helix quantize --bits 8 --calibration cal.hxf. The Helix index format uses product quantization (PQ) with helix.index.pq_segments (default 48) and helix.index.pq_bits (default 8) for compressed vector storage.
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
Know Onlyeval-006YES0.88716.1s
title-partial:4/6phrase:--benchmark internal-retrievalphrase:--calibration cal.hxfphrase:--corpus data.hxfphrase:--loss contrastive-marginphrase:--lr 1e-5tag:helixtag:embeddertag:trainingtag:onnxterm:--marginterm:ndcgterm:evalterm:formatterm:anchorterm:runtimeterm:size
Agent Responses
Know Only — recall 100%
Here's how to train custom embeddings with the Helix Embedder and export to ONNX: ## Corpus Preparation Your training data must be in **Helix Format (`.hxf`)** — a file of tab-separated `(anchor, positive, negative)` triplets. ## Training Run the training pipeline with: ```bash helix train \ --corpus data.hxf \ --model-dim 384 \ --epochs 20 \ --lr 1e-5 \ --loss contrastive-margin \ --margin 0.3 ``` Key parameters: - **`--model-dim 384`** — embedding dimensionality - **`--loss contrastive-margin`** with **`--margin 0.3`** — the contrastive margin loss function - **`--lr 1e-5`** — learning rate - **`--epochs 20`** — number of training epochs ## Evaluation Evaluate your trained checkpoint against a retrieval benchmark: ```bash helix eval \ --model checkpoint.hx \ --benchmark internal-retrieval \ --metrics ndcg@10,mrr ``` ## ONNX Export & Inference The Helix runtime **natively exports models as ONNX** for inference. It supports batch sizes up to `helix.inference.max_batch` (default **32**). ## Optional: Quantization To reduce model size, quantize to 8-bit with a calibration set: ```bash helix quantize --bits 8 --calibration cal.hxf ``` ## Indexing with Product Quantization For compressed vector storage, Helix uses **product quantization (PQ)** with two tunable parameters: | Config Key | Default | Description | |---|---|---| | `helix.index.pq_segments` | 48 | Number of PQ sub-vector segments | | `helix.index.pq_bits` | 8 | Bits per PQ code |
q-005 — What traffic shaping policies does the Auralis service mesh support?
Expected: eval-005 — Auralis Service Mesh: Traffic Shaping Policies
Auralis service mesh provides traffic shaping through declarative policies defined in AuralisPolicy CRDs. Traffic splitting uses weighted backends specified as auralis.backends[].weight (0-100, must sum to 100). Circuit breaking triggers when error_rate exceeds auralis.circuit.threshold (default 0.5) over auralis.circuit.window_sec (default 30). The mesh supports canary deployments via header-based routing: requests with X-Auralis-Canary: true are routed to canary backends. Rate limiting is per-service with auralis.ratelimit.rps (default 1000) and auralis.ratelimit.burst (default 50). Auralis uses sidecar proxies based on the Luminex engine, which processes L4/L7 traffic with sub-millisecond overhead. Mutual TLS is enforced by default between all mesh services using SPIFFE identities (spiffe://auralis.local/service/<name>).
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
Know Onlyeval-005YES0.68214.2s
title-partial:5/6phrase:Auralis servicephrase:Auralis usestag:auralistag:service-meshtag:traffic-shapingtag:luminexterm:localterm:policiesterm:header-basedterm:backendsterm:triggersterm:mutualterm:x-auralis-canaryterm:specifiedterm:nameterm:spiffe
Agent Responses
Know Only — recall 100%
The Auralis service mesh supports the following traffic shaping policies, all defined declaratively via **AuralisPolicy CRDs**: ### Traffic Splitting - Weighted backends specified as `auralis.backends[].weight` (values 0–100, must sum to 100). ### Circuit Breaking - Triggers when error rate exceeds `auralis.circuit.threshold` (default **0.5**) over `auralis.circuit.window_sec` (default **30** seconds). ### Canary Deployments - Header-based routing: requests carrying `X-Auralis-Canary: true` are routed to canary backends. ### Rate Limiting - Per-service rate limiting with: - `auralis.ratelimit.rps` — requests per second (default **1000**) - `auralis.ratelimit.burst` — burst allowance (default **50**) ### Mutual TLS - Enforced by default between all mesh services using **SPIFFE identities** (`spiffe://auralis.local/service/<name>`). Under the hood, Auralis uses sidecar proxies based on the **Luminex engine**, which processes L4/L7 traffic with sub-millisecond overhead.
q-007 — Describe the Prismoid cache coherence protocol and its gossip-based invalidation
Expected: eval-007 — Prismoid Cache Coherence Protocol
The Prismoid protocol maintains cache coherence across distributed proxy nodes using a gossip-based invalidation scheme. Each cache entry carries a vector clock (prismoid.vclock) that tracks the last-write timestamp per node. On cache miss, Prismoid performs a quorum read: it queries prismoid.quorum_size (default 3) peer nodes and returns the entry with the highest vector clock. Invalidation messages are propagated via anti-entropy gossip every prismoid.gossip_interval_ms (default 100). Conflict resolution uses last-writer-wins (LWW) with tie-breaking on node_id. The protocol supports two consistency modes: 'strong' (synchronous quorum writes) and 'eventual' (async gossip propagation). Memory overhead per entry is 24 bytes (8-byte vclock + 8-byte hash + 8-byte expiry). Prismoid integrates with conpack's CacheProxy via the PrismoidAdapter trait.
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
CLI Searcheval-007NO0.00060.0s
Agent Responses
CLI Search — TIMEOUT

No response captured

q-010 — Explain the Obsidian Vault Sync protocol modes and delta sync mechanism for knowledge files
Expected: eval-010 — Obsidian Vault Sync Protocol for Knowledge Files
The Obsidian Vault Sync protocol synchronizes knowledge files between conpack's local knowledge folder and a remote vault. Sync operates in three modes: obsidian.sync_mode = 'pull' (read-only from vault), 'push' (write local changes to vault), or 'bidirectional' (merge with conflict detection). File identity uses content-addressed hashing: obsidian.hash_algorithm (default 'blake3'). Delta sync transfers only changed blocks using rolling checksums with obsidian.block_size (default 4KB). Conflict resolution in bidirectional mode creates .conflict files with timestamps. The vault manifest (vault.json) tracks file metadata: path, hash, last_modified, size_bytes. Sync scheduling uses obsidian.sync_interval_sec (default 60) with jitter of ±10%. Authentication to remote vaults uses Ed25519 key pairs stored in obsidian.key_path (default '~/.conpack/vault_key').
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
CLI Searcheval-010YES0.77358.9s
title-partial:6/6phrase:Conflict resolutionphrase:Delta syncphrase:File identitytag:obsidiantag:vault-synctag:knowledgetag:delta-syncterm:manifestterm:detectionterm:timestampsterm:changesterm:syncterm:metadataterm:synchronizesterm:size_bytesterm:hashingterm:read-only
Agent Responses
CLI Search — recall 100%
Based on the documentation, here is a detailed explanation of the Obsidian Vault Sync protocol: ## Obsidian Vault Sync Protocol The Obsidian Vault Sync protocol synchronizes knowledge files between conpack's **local knowledge folder** and a **remote vault**. ### Three Sync Modes | Mode | Config | Behavior | |------|--------|----------| | **Pull** | `obsidian.sync_mode = 'pull'` | Read-only from the vault. Local changes are never pushed upstream. | | **Push** | `obsidian.sync_mode = 'push'` | Writes local changes to the vault. The local side is authoritative. | | **Bidirectional** | `obsidian.sync_mode = 'bidirectional'` | Full two-way merge with conflict detection. | ### Delta Sync Mechanism Rather than transferring entire files on every sync cycle, the protocol uses a **rolling-checksum, block-level delta sync**: - Files are divided into blocks of `obsidian.block_size` (default **4 KB**). - A rolling checksum is computed over each block. - On sync, only **changed blocks** are transferred, significantly reducing bandwidth for large knowledge files where edits are localized. File identity itself is established via **content-addressed hashing** using `obsidian.hash_algorithm` (default **BLAKE3**). This allows quick detection of whether a file has changed at all before engaging the more granular block-level comparison. ### Conflict Resolution In **bidirectional** mode, when both sides have modified the same file, the protocol creates **`.conflict` files** annotated with timestamps, allowing the user to manually resolve divergent edits. ### Vault Manifest A `vault.json` file tracks metadata for every synced file: - `path` — file location within the vault - `hash` — content-addressed hash - `last_modified` — modification timestamp - `size_bytes` — file size ### Sync Scheduling Sync runs on a configurable interval via `obsidian.sync_interval_sec` (default **60 seconds**), with a **±10% jitter** to avoid thundering-herd problems when multiple clients sync against the same vault. ### Authentication Vault access is authenticated using **Ed25519 key pairs** stored at `obsidian.key_path` (default `~/.conpack/vault_key`).
q-009 — How does the Spectral Query Analyzer optimize execution plans for multi-upstream searches?
Expected: eval-009 — Spectral Query Analyzer: Execution Plan Optimization
The Spectral Query Analyzer optimizes query execution plans for multi-upstream searches. It decomposes queries into sub-plans using cost-based optimization with the Spectral cost model. Cost factors include: upstream_latency_p99 (measured), result_cardinality (estimated via histogram sketches), and network_hop_count. The analyzer supports three plan strategies: spectral.strategy = 'parallel' (fan-out all upstreams simultaneously), 'sequential' (try upstreams in cost order, stop on threshold), or 'adaptive' (start parallel, switch to sequential after first result). Plan caching uses spectral.plan_cache_size (default 1000) with LRU eviction. The EXPLAIN command outputs the chosen plan: EXPLAIN QUERY 'search terms' shows estimated costs per upstream, chosen strategy, and predicted latency. Statistics are refreshed every spectral.stats_refresh_interval_sec (default 300).
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
CLI Searcheval-009YES0.86458.6s
title-partial:5/6phrase:Analyzer optimizesphrase:Cost factorsphrase:EXPLAIN QUERYphrase:Plan cachingtag:spectraltag:query-analyzertag:cost-basedtag:execution-planterm:upstream_latency_p99term:latencyterm:statisticsterm:measuredterm:cost-basedterm:adaptiveterm:evictionterm:fan-outterm:decomposesterm:stop
Agent Responses
CLI Search — recall 100%
Here's how the Spectral Query Analyzer optimizes execution plans for multi-upstream searches: ## Query Decomposition The Spectral Query Analyzer decomposes incoming queries into **sub-plans** using **cost-based optimization** driven by the Spectral cost model. Three cost factors are evaluated for each upstream: | Cost Factor | Source | |---|---| | `upstream_latency_p99` | Measured (live metrics) | | `result_cardinality` | Estimated via histogram sketches | | `network_hop_count` | Topology-derived | ## Plan Strategies The analyzer supports three execution strategies, configured via `spectral.strategy`: 1. **`parallel`** — Fan-out to all upstreams simultaneously. Best when latency matters more than resource usage. 2. **`sequential`** — Try upstreams in cost order, stopping once a result threshold is met. Conserves resources when a single upstream is likely sufficient. 3. **`adaptive`** — Starts in parallel mode, then switches to sequential after the first result arrives. Balances latency and efficiency. ## Plan Caching Computed plans are cached to avoid repeated optimization overhead: - Cache size controlled by `spectral.plan_cache_size` (default: **1000** entries) - Uses **LRU eviction** policy ## Introspection The `EXPLAIN` command exposes the optimizer's decisions: ``` EXPLAIN QUERY 'search terms' ``` This outputs the estimated cost per upstream, the chosen strategy, and the predicted latency. ## Statistics Refresh Cost model statistics (latency measurements, cardinality histograms) are refreshed every `spectral.stats_refresh_interval_sec` (default: **300 seconds** / 5 minutes), ensuring the optimizer adapts to changing upstream conditions over time.
q-008 — What resources does the conpack-cluster Terraform module provision and what are the auto-scaling triggers?
Expected: eval-008 — Terraform Module: ConpackCluster Deployment
The conpack-cluster Terraform module deploys a production-ready conpack proxy cluster on AWS. Resources provisioned: ALB (conpack_alb), ECS Fargate tasks (conpack_proxy, 3 replicas), ElastiCache Redis (conpack_cache), and CloudWatch alarms. Required variables: cluster_name, vpc_id, subnet_ids[], conpack_image, upstream_urls[]. Optional variables: proxy_cpu (default 1024), proxy_memory (default 2048), cache_node_type (default 'cache.r6g.large'), min_tasks (default 3), max_tasks (default 12). Auto-scaling triggers on CloudWatch metric ConpackProxyCacheHitRate: scales out when hit rate drops below 70% for 5 minutes, scales in when above 90% for 15 minutes. Health checks use /ready endpoint with 30-second interval. The module outputs: alb_dns_name, ecs_cluster_arn, redis_endpoint, cloudwatch_dashboard_url.
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
MCP+Toolseval-008YES0.50013.8s
phrase:30-second intervaltag:terraformtag:conpack-clustertag:awstag:ecs-fargateterm:requiredterm:production-readyterm:largeterm:conpack_imageterm:2048term:proxy_memoryterm:metricterm:proxyterm:alb_dns_nameterm:cache
Agent Responses
MCP+Tools — recall 100%
## conpack-cluster Terraform Module The `conpack-cluster` module deploys a **production-ready conpack proxy cluster on AWS**. Here's a breakdown: ### Resources Provisioned | Resource | Name / Details | |---|---| | **ALB** (Application Load Balancer) | `conpack_alb` | | **ECS Fargate Tasks** | `conpack_proxy` — 3 replicas by default | | **ElastiCache Redis** | `conpack_cache` | | **CloudWatch Alarms** | Monitoring alarms for the cluster | ### Auto-Scaling Triggers Scaling is driven by the CloudWatch metric **`ConpackProxyCacheHitRate`**: - **Scale out** — when the cache hit rate drops **below 70%** for **5 minutes** - **Scale in** — when the cache hit rate rises **above 90%** for **15 minutes** Task count ranges from `min_tasks` (default **3**) to `max_tasks` (default **12**). ### Required Variables - `cluster_name`, `vpc_id`, `subnet_ids[]`, `conpack_image`, `upstream_urls[]` ### Optional Variables (with defaults) | Variable | Default | |---|---| | `proxy_cpu` | `1024` | | `proxy_memory` | `2048` | | `cache_node_type` | `cache.r6g.large` | | `min_tasks` | `3` | | `max_tasks` | `12` | ### Health Checks Uses the `/ready` endpoint with a **30-second interval**. ### Module Outputs - `alb_dns_name` - `ecs_cluster_arn` - `redis_endpoint` - `cloudwatch_dashboard_url`
q-011 — How does the Crystalline engine perform Tucker decomposition on high-dimensional tensors?
Expected: eval-011 — Crystalline Tensor Decomposition Engine
The Crystalline Tensor Decomposition Engine performs high-dimensional tensor factorization using Higher-Order Singular Value Decomposition (HOSVD) and Tucker factorization. Crystalline operates on tensors up to rank 12 with configurable decomposition strategies: crystalline.strategy = 'hosvd' (exact, O(n^d) complexity), 'tucker' (approximate, iterative ALS with crystalline.max_iterations default 200), or 'hybrid' (HOSVD initialization + Tucker refinement). The engine uses tiled memory layouts with crystalline.tile_size (default 64) for cache-optimal traversal. Core decomposition produces factor matrices U_1..U_d and a core tensor G, stored in Crystalline Archive Format (.caf). Compression ratios of 50-200x are typical for sparse scientific datasets. Parallel decomposition distributes mode-n unfoldings across crystalline.worker_threads (default 8) using work-stealing schedulers. The crystalline.convergence_threshold (default 1e-6) controls Tucker iteration termination. Reconstruction error is measured via normalized Frobenius norm: ||T - T_approx||_F / ||T||_F.
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
MCP+Toolseval-011YES0.77321.7s
title:Crystalline Tensor Decomposition Enginephrase:Archive Formatphrase:Compression ratiosphrase:Crystalline Archivetag:crystallinetag:tensor-decompositiontag:hosvdtag:tuckerterm:layoutsterm:storedterm:reconstructionterm:convergence_thresholdterm:frobeniusterm:iterativeterm:producesterm:t_approx
Agent Responses
MCP+Tools — recall 100%
## Crystalline Engine: Tucker Decomposition on High-Dimensional Tensors The Crystalline Tensor Decomposition Engine supports tensors **up to rank 12** and offers three configurable decomposition strategies. Here's how Tucker decomposition specifically works: ### Decomposition Strategy Tucker decomposition is configured via `crystalline.strategy = 'tucker'` and uses **iterative Alternating Least Squares (ALS)**. The key parameters are: | Parameter | Default | Purpose | |---|---|---| | `crystalline.max_iterations` | 200 | Maximum ALS iterations | | `crystalline.convergence_threshold` | 1e-6 | Controls iteration termination | | `crystalline.tile_size` | 64 | Tile size for cache-optimal memory traversal | | `crystalline.worker_threads` | 8 | Parallel worker threads | ### Core Algorithm 1. **Factorization output** — The decomposition produces **factor matrices** U\_1 .. U\_d (one per mode) and a **core tensor G**. These are stored in Crystalline Archive Format (`.caf`). 2. **Parallelism** — Mode-n unfoldings are distributed across worker threads using a **work-stealing scheduler**, enabling efficient parallel computation of each factor matrix. 3. **Memory layout** — Crystalline uses **tiled memory layouts** (`tile_size` default 64) to ensure cache-optimal traversal of the tensor data, which is critical for performance on high-dimensional tensors. 4. **Convergence** — ALS iterations terminate when the change falls below `convergence_threshold` (default 1e-6) or `max_iterations` is reached. 5. **Reconstruction error** — Measured via the **normalized Frobenius norm**: `||T - T_approx||_F / ||T||_F`. ### Alternative Strategies Crystalline also supports two other modes: - **`hosvd`** — Exact Higher-Order SVD with O(n^d) complexity. - **`hybrid`** — Uses HOSVD for initialization, then refines with Tucker ALS. This often converges faster and to better local minima than random initialization. ### Compression Performance For sparse scientific datasets, Crystalline achieves **50–200x compression ratios** through Tucker decomposition, making it well-suited for large-scale scientific data.
q-012 — Explain the Solaris Event Mesh causal ordering and topic partitioning approach
Expected: eval-012 — Solaris Event Mesh: Distributed Event Routing
The Solaris Event Mesh provides distributed event routing with causal ordering guarantees across geo-distributed clusters. Solaris uses topic partitioning to divide event streams into independent partitions, each assigned to a partition leader via the Solaris Raft-based coordinator. Causal ordering is enforced using vector timestamps: each event carries a solaris.vclock that tracks producer-side causality. Events within the same causal chain are delivered in order; independent events may be reordered for throughput. Topic partitioning supports three strategies: solaris.partition_strategy = 'hash' (consistent hashing on event key), 'range' (ordered key ranges), or 'custom' (user-defined partition function). The mesh routes events through relay nodes organized in a spanning tree topology, minimizing cross-region traffic. Configuration includes solaris.max_partitions_per_topic (default 64), solaris.relay_buffer_size (default 8192), and solaris.delivery_timeout_ms (default 5000). Dead letter routing sends undeliverable events to solaris.dlq_topic with full causal metadata preserved. The Solaris SDK provides at-least-once delivery with optional idempotency keys via solaris.idempotency_window_sec (default 300).
VerticalDocMatchConfidenceTimeMatched Terms
MCP+Toolseval-012YES0.63723.5s
title-partial:6/6phrase:Causal orderingphrase:Dead lettertag:solaristag:event-meshtag:causal-orderingtag:topic-partitioningterm:eventsterm:relayterm:deliveryterm:topologyterm:timestampsterm:8192term:deadterm:vclock
Agent Responses
MCP+Tools — recall 100%
## Solaris Event Mesh: Causal Ordering & Topic Partitioning The Solaris Event Mesh is a distributed event routing system designed for **geo-distributed clusters**, combining causal ordering guarantees with flexible topic partitioning for high-throughput event delivery. ### Causal Ordering Solaris enforces causal ordering via **vector timestamps**. Every event carries a `solaris.vclock` field that tracks producer-side causality. The guarantees are: - **Events within the same causal chain** are always delivered in order. - **Causally independent events** may be reordered to maximize throughput. This is a deliberate trade-off — strict total ordering would be expensive across geo-distributed clusters, so Solaris only enforces ordering where a causal dependency actually exists. ### Topic Partitioning Event streams are divided into independent partitions, each assigned to a **partition leader** via the Solaris **Raft-based coordinator**. Three partitioning strategies are supported: | Strategy | Config Value | Description | |---|---|---| | **Hash** | `solaris.partition_strategy = 'hash'` | Consistent hashing on the event key | | **Range** | `solaris.partition_strategy = 'range'` | Ordered key ranges | | **Custom** | `solaris.partition_strategy = 'custom'` | User-defined partition function | The maximum number of partitions per topic is controlled by `solaris.max_partitions_per_topic` (default **64**). ### Network Topology & Routing Events are routed through **relay nodes** organized in a **spanning tree topology**, which minimizes cross-region traffic. Key relay configuration: - `solaris.relay_buffer_size` — default **8192** - `solaris.delivery_timeout_ms` — default **5000** ms ### Delivery Semantics & Error Handling - **At-least-once delivery** is the baseline guarantee, with optional idempotency support via `solaris.idempotency_window_sec` (default **300** seconds) for deduplication. - **Dead letter routing** — undeliverable events are sent to `solaris.dlq_topic` with full causal metadata (`vclock`) preserved, ensuring no causal context is lost during failure handling. ### Summary Solaris balances ordering correctness with throughput by scoping its ordering guarantee to causal chains (via vector clocks) rather than enforcing a global total order. Topic partitioning with Raft-coordinated leaders ensures each partition has clear ownership, while the spanning-tree relay topology keeps cross-region overhead low.