You are given a metric name, its score, and a traversal path through a conversational evaluation DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph).
This DAG reflects step-by-step reasoning over a dialogue to arrive at the final verdict.

Each step in the DAG represents a judgment based on parts of the conversation — including roles and the contents they spoke of.

Your task is to explain **why the score was assigned**, using the traversal steps to justify the reasoning.

Metric Name:
{{ name }}

Score:
{{ score }}

DAG Traversal:
{{ verbose_steps }}

**
IMPORTANT: Only return JSON with a 'reason' key.
Example:
{
  "reason": "The score is <metric_score_in_example> because the assistant repeatedly failed to clarify the user's ambiguous statements, as shown in the DAG traversal path."
}
**
JSON:
