
The length of 'verdicts' SHOULD BE STRICTLY EQUAL to that of claims.
You DON'T have to provide a reason if the answer is 'yes'.
ONLY provide a 'no' answer if the retrieval context DIRECTLY CONTRADICTS the claims. YOU SHOULD NEVER USE YOUR PRIOR KNOWLEDGE IN YOUR JUDGEMENT.
Claims made using vague, suggestive, speculative language such as 'may have', 'possibility due to', does NOT count as a contradiction.
Claims that is not backed up due to a lack of information/is not mentioned in the retrieval contexts MUST be answered 'idk', otherwise I WILL DIE.
If there are clear contradictions or any data or images that's not mentioned in the retrieval context, just provide 'no'.
