# Watermarking landscape (research 2026-05-24)

> Relocated verbatim from `CLAUDE.md` on 2026-06-11 to keep the always-loaded
> context small. Long single-line entries were reformatted into paragraphs;
> no content was changed or summarized.

Who embeds what, and whether it is locally detectable (so we know which gaps are fillable). See `identify.py` for what we read.
- **Locally detectable (open decoder, no key/API):** Stable Diffusion / SDXL / FLUX via `imwatermark` DWT-DCT (now covered by `invisible_watermark.py`). FLUX uses the same library (`black-forest-labs/flux2` `src/flux2/watermark.py`, 48-bit `0b001010101111111010000111100111001111010100101110`); SDXL is the diffusers `WATERMARK_MESSAGE` (`0b101100111110110010010000011110111011000110011110`). **Caveat: the `imwatermark` dwtDct decode is carrier-fragile on a broad class of real images, NOT just re-encode-fragile, and it is a POSITIVE-ONLY signal.** A clean encode->decode round-trip (no re-encode at all) recovers 48/48 bits on some carriers (random noise, chatgpt-1.png 48/48, firefly-1.png 45/48) but FAILS on many others — verified 2026-06-19 that a *known-embedded* watermark only round-trips 28-39/48 (below the safe `_MATCH_48` = 44 gate, random baseline ~24) on the FLUX fox sample (28), doubao-1.png (39), a 1024² minimalist-flat FLUX image (28), AND a **clean synthetic bright-flat fill with NO watermark at all (28)**. The failure does NOT track texture (firefly lapvar ~11 passes; the flat FLUX lapvar ~56 fails); it correlates with a degenerate decode where the raw bits read **all-ones (48/48 ones)** — which a clean synthetic image reproduces, so **all-ones is a CARRIER ARTIFACT, NOT a watermark signal** (a double-embed test also showed a pre-existing embed does not corrupt a second embed — no interference). Net: trust a `detect_invisible_watermark` hit, but treat a `None`/no-match as **inconclusive** whenever a positive-control embed on the same carrier does not first recover >=44/48. The 44 gate is a deliberate precision choice (lowering it would admit false positives).

  **Root cause and external confirmation (deep-research 2026-06-19, adversarially verified).** This is the SCHEME's ceiling, not our usage — there is no better decoder to adopt. The imwatermark maintainers state verbatim (both the ShieldMnt and Stability-AI READMEs) that the algorithm "cannot guarantee to decode the original watermarks 100% accurately even though we don't apply any attack." Independent measurement (WMAdapter, arXiv:2406.08337 Table 2) puts dwtDct at only **~0.79 bit accuracy on CLEAN images (~38/48 bits — already below our 44 gate)**, collapsing to ~0.50 (chance) under crop/JPEG. Two code-verified + locally-reproduced mechanisms drive the content-dependent failures: (1) the decoder reads each bit as the **highest-magnitude DCT coefficient per block**, so any content coefficient exceeding the encoded target flips the bit; (2) the default embed is in the **YUV chroma channel, which 8-bit-clamps on white/bright pixels** (a +36 chroma delta survives a white-fill round-trip as only +4, ~89% loss) — this is the mechanism behind the bright-flat / minimalist failures and the all-ones degenerate decode. No maintained fork or detector decodes this scheme reliably: the WAVES benchmark (arXiv:2401.08573) relegates DWT-DCT to supplementary appendix G.5 and targets Stable Signature / Tree-Ring / StegaStamp instead; learned encoder/decoder schemes reach ~0.98-0.99 clean but are a DIFFERENT watermark class (not what SDXL/FLUX stamp). `dwtDctSvd` does not help (SDXL embeds `dwtDct`; dwtDctSvd cannot decode it, and its clean accuracy ~0.72 is lower). **Authoritative conclusion: the open DWT-DCT mark cannot be turned from positive-only into a reliable real-world detector; keep it positive-only and rely on C2PA.** (Refuted along the way: that the library is unmaintained, and that it is robust to JPEG but only fails on geometric attacks — both did not survive verification.)

  Consequence for the FLUX hosted-output question (BFL Playground, FLUX.2 [pro] + FLUX.1 [dev], 2026-06-19): all samples carry the signed C2PA manifest (issuer "Black Forest Labs"); the open DWT-DCT decode returned `None`, but every available FLUX carrier (textured fox AND a minimalist-flat generation) failed the positive control (28/48), so the detector is blind on them and **whether BFL hosted output embeds the open pixel watermark is UNRESOLVED** (an earlier note here wrongly asserted it absent — overstated; a later note blamed "high texture" — also wrong, flat carriers fail too). What IS established: C2PA is the reliable FLUX identifier; the `_BITS_48` pattern is correct (round-trips on chatgpt/firefly/random). Resolving the hosted question needs a hosted FLUX carrier that first passes a >=44/48 positive control, which neither a textured nor a flat prompt produced — low priority (the open mark is only a stripped-metadata fallback).
- **C2PA / IPTC (covered by the issuer/marker scan):** OpenAI, Google, Adobe Firefly, Microsoft (Designer + **Bing Image Creator** — collected 2026-05-24; Bing now runs Microsoft's own **MAI-Image** model, signs C2PA as "Microsoft", NOT OpenAI/DALL-E), **Stability AI** (collected from Brand Studio / DreamStudio successor; signs C2PA as "Stability AI Ltd", no SynthID, no imwatermark on its current Stable Image model — issuer added to `C2PA_ISSUERS`), and **Canva** (Magic Media signs C2PA as "Canva" + `trainedAlgorithmicMedia` with a generic `c2pa-rs` claim generator, no SynthID — issuer `b"Canva"` → "Canva (Magic Media)"; found on real production traffic 2026-06-19, which **disproved the earlier assumption** that Canva downloads are re-encoded exports that always strip C2PA). Still unsampled: Getty, Shutterstock. Midjourney embeds NO C2PA and no invisible watermark (our `mj-*` sample carried only the IPTC tag).

**Samsung Galaxy AI** (Generative Edit / Sketch to Image / Portrait Studio on Galaxy S23 FE / S24 / S25, One UI 7+) signs C2PA as "Samsung Galaxy" with the standard `trainedAlgorithmicMedia` source type AND a proprietary `genAIType` marker; verified on real signed files 2026-05-29 (the standard scan catches the source type; `genAIType` additionally catches a Galaxy S24 file that omits it). It ALSO burns a **visible** localized wordmark into the pixels — a sparkle + "generated with AI" string in the bottom-LEFT corner (issue #37; the Italian "✦ Contenuti generati dall'AI" variant is calibrated) — removed by `samsung_engine.py` / `visible --mark samsung` (reverse-alpha, see the engine bullet); detection feeds `identify` as the medium `visible_samsung` signal. The string is locale-specific, so each locale needs its own captured alpha template.

**ASUS Gallery** also signs edited photos as C2PA (`com.asus.gallery`) but with no AI source type — a signer, not an AI marker.

**Black Forest Labs (FLUX)** API output signs C2PA: `claim_generator_info "Black Forest Labs API"` + a `c2pa.ai_generated_content` assertion + `trainedAlgorithmicMedia` (issuer `b"Black Forest Labs"` added to `C2PA_ISSUERS`, platform "Black Forest Labs (FLUX)").

**ByteDance Volcano Engine (Volcengine)** — the cloud behind Doubao / Jimeng — signs its AI image output with a cert from `certificate_center@volcengine.com` + `trainedAlgorithmicMedia` (issuer `b"volcengine"` → "ByteDance (Volcano Engine)", platform "ByteDance (Doubao / Jimeng / Volcano Engine)"); note this is the C2PA-signed surface, distinct from the XMP/PNG TC260 `AIGC` label Doubao also uses. All three verified on real signed files 2026-05-29. ByteDance's **international brand (BytePlus / Seedream / Seededit)** signs the SAME content as **"Byteplus Pte. Ltd."** — the bare `volcengine` needle missed it, so real BytePlus output was mis-attributed to "Adobe Firefly" (an incidental "Adobe XMP" toolkit string in the file's XMP, picked up by the fallback byte-scan once the clean manifest issuer matched nothing). Added issuer `b"Byteplus"` → org "BytePlus (ByteDance)" (platform resolves to the shared "ByteDance (Doubao / Jimeng / Volcano Engine)" label via the common `ByteDance` needle) so the clean manifest issuer attributes it directly; found on real production traffic 2026-06-19. ByteDance's consumer app **Dreamina** (the international Jimeng brand) signs as **"Bytedance Pte. Ltd."** with a `Dreamina/x.y` claim generator but, unlike the Volcano Engine surface, ships **NO `trainedAlgorithmicMedia`** — the generator name is the only AI signal, and the active manifest is frequently a plain `c2pa-tool` transcode with the real `Dreamina` token on an ingredient manifest. Added issuer `b"Dreamina"` → org "ByteDance (Dreamina)" with **`asserts_ai=True`** (see `constants.py`): the caBX / store-JSON byte-scan sees the token across all manifests, and the identity-AI flag lifts the AI verdict without a source-type. Mined from the retained corpus 2026-07 (7 files read `unknown` before, all now ByteDance). Registering the **issuer** `b"Bytedance Pte"` was deliberately AVOIDED — that same Singapore entity also signs non-AI CapCut edits (`CapCut/x.y` generator, `c2pa.created`, no AI marker), which must stay unattributed per the editor-vs-generator line; keying on the `Dreamina` generator token is precise.
- **EXIF/XMP/PNG-text generator tag (caught by `exif_generator`):** **Ideogram** writes EXIF `Make="Ideogram AI"` (collected 2026-05-24 — no C2PA, no SynthID, no imwatermark; the Make tag is the only signal). Three more mined from the retained corpus 2026-06-22, all no-C2PA generator stamps that previously read as no-signal: **NovelAI** (anime SD) writes its stamp in PNG `tEXt` chunks `Software="NovelAI"` / `Source="NovelAI Diffusion V4.5 <hash>"` / `Title="NovelAI generated image"` — so `exif_generator` now reads PNG text chunks (`Software`/`Source`/`Title`/`Description`), not just EXIF/XMP; **Reve** (reve.com) writes EXIF `Software` / XMP `CreatorTool` = `reve.com` (token is the full `reve.com`, not bare `reve`, to avoid false-firing on "forever"/"reverie"); **Aphrodite AI** writes EXIF `Make`/`Software` = `Aphrodite AI`.
- **xAI / Grok — its own EXIF signature scheme, NOT C2PA (DETECTED by `metadata.xai_signature`, built 2026-05-26).**

Grok JPEG downloads (Aurora model) carry **no C2PA, no XMP, no SynthID, no IPTC** — only EXIF `Artist` = a UUID and EXIF `ImageDescription` = `Signature: <base64>` (a crypto signature, unverifiable locally without xAI's public key). This empirically kills the earlier unverified "xAI signs C2PA as xAI" lead — xAI is not even a C2PA member. `exif_generator` misses it (neither field holds an `AI_GENERATOR_TOKENS` token), so a dedicated detector `xai_signature(path)` matches the pair (`ImageDescription ~ ^Signature: [A-Za-z0-9+/=]{64,}` AND UUID `Artist`); wired into `has_ai_metadata`, `get_ai_metadata` (key `xai_signature`), and `identify` (signal `xai_signature`, platform "xAI (Grok / Aurora)").

**Format confirmed stable across n=3 genuine generations:** exactly three EXIF tags (`Artist`, `ExifOffset`, `ImageDescription`), `Signature:` prefix constant, base64 payload 300-1004 chars. Two capture facts: (a) the `Artist` UUID **equals the public image id** in the asset URL (`https://imagine-public.x.ai/imagine-public/images/<uuid>.jpg`), so it is NOT a private per-user secret — only the `Signature` blob is; (b) the Grok web-UI image is a re-encoded **WebP with no signature** — the EXIF survives only in the *original* JPEG (download button or that public tokenless URL), which is why screenshots / re-encodes are metadata-stripped. A real fixture `data/samples/grok-1.jpg` plus **synthetic** JPEG fixtures (fake UUID + fake `Signature:` blob) cover the detector; never add a real Grok image carrying private content (the repo is public).

**Stripped on removal too:** `remove_ai_metadata` now calls `_scrub_ai_exif` on the JPEG EXIF, which deletes the xAI Signature+UUID-Artist pair **and** any `Software`/`Make`/`Artist`/`ImageDescription` tag holding an `AI_GENERATOR_TOKENS` token (so Ideogram's `Make="Ideogram AI"` is scrubbed too), while keeping genuine camera/editor EXIF. The shared `_is_xai_signature_pair` helper (module-level compiled regexes) is the single source of truth for the pattern, used by both `xai_signature` and `_scrub_ai_exif`. (AVIF/HEIF/JXL still strip only C2PA boxes via `isobmff`, not EXIF — unchanged.)
- **China TC260 AIGC label (caught by `AIGC_MARKERS` / `metadata.aigc_label`, surfaced by `identify` as the `aigc` signal):** China-served generators embed an XMP `<TC260:AIGC>{"Label":"1","ContentProducer":...}` block — China's mandatory AI-content labeling (TC260 namespace `tc260.org.cn/ns/AIGC`).

**Doubao** (ByteDance) uses it (verified on the real #13 sample 2026-05-25; `ContentProducer` `001191110102MACQD9K64010000`, no C2PA/SynthID/imwatermark — the XMP block is the only signal; GitHub attachment upload did NOT strip it). The same standard is mandatory for Jimeng/Kling/Qwen/Ernie etc., so the one marker covers the whole China-AIGC-labeled ecosystem. `aigc_label` reads **four serializations** through a shared `_parse` helper: the HTML-entity-encoded XMP `TC260:AIGC` block in **either RDF form** — the nested element `<TC260:AIGC>{...}</TC260:AIGC>` (Doubao) or the attribute `TC260:AIGC="{...}"` (**PicWish**, `ContentProducer="picwish"`, verified on the corpus 2026-05-30) — via a container-agnostic raw-byte scan (any JSON object accepted), a raw-JSON PNG `AIGC` tEXt chunk (Doubao also writes the label this way, no namespaced marker at all — confirmed on the corpus 2026-05-28, `ContentProducer="doubao"`), a bare raw-JSON `{"AIGC":{...}}` object embedded in **JPEG EXIF (UserComment)** by some China-served generators, brace-matched from the scan head with `json.JSONDecoder().raw_decode` (no namespaced marker, no PNG chunk — confirmed on the corpus 2026-05-30, `ContentProducer="001191440300708461136T1308L"`), **and** a bare `AIGC{...}` blob (the label glued straight to its JSON, no `"AIGC":` key wrapper) embedded in a **JPEG APP segment near the JFIF header** — confirmed on the corpus 2026-06-10 (`ContentProducer="00119144030008867405X210002"`; 3 files read `unknown` before this form was added). The two raw-JSON forms are scanned in one loop (`'"AIGC"'` then `AIGC{`) that **falls through on a non-TC260 / undecodable hit instead of returning** — a quoted `"AIGC"` can appear later in an XMP packet while the real label is a bare `AIGC{...}` earlier in the file, so an unconditional early return on the quoted form would shadow the bare form (the exact bug behind the 06-10 misses). All three generic forms (the PNG chunk, the bare `{"AIGC":...}` object, and the bare `AIGC{...}` blob) are gated on at least one TC260 field (`_TC260_FIELDS`) so a generic `AIGC` key cannot false-positive; the namespaced XMP element is unambiguous and needs no gate. `_TC260_FIELDS` covers **two schemas**: the producer-side one (`Label` / `ContentProducer` / `ProduceID` / `ContentPropagator` / `PropagateID`, Doubao and most China gens) and the **service-provider** one (`ServiceProvider` / `ServiceUser`, plus generic `Time` / `ContentId` which are NOT gated on) — **Tencent Cloud's** AIGC variant (`ServiceProvider` = `腾讯云`), embedded in **EXIF `ImageDescription`**, mined from the retained corpus 2026-07 (11 files read `unknown` before — the block was found by the raw-JSON scan but rejected because none of its fields were in the producer-only gate; removal already stripped it since it lives in EXIF). In `identify`, `aigc` fires on the parsed label **or** the `AIGC_MARKERS` byte scan (the latter preserves the laundering-tell case where the JSON payload is truncated).
- **HuggingFace-hosted job (caught by `metadata.huggingface_job`, surfaced by `identify` as the `hf_job` signal, MEDIUM confidence):** HuggingFace Jobs / Spaces stamp generated PNGs with an `hf-job-id` tEXt chunk holding the job UUID (3 on the corpus 2026-05-28, no other signal). It marks the *hosting job*, not a model — most commonly diffusion output — so it lifts an Unknown verdict to a tentative AI via `hf_only` (parallel to the visible sparkle) but never overrides a hard metadata signal; `_HF_JOB_CAVEAT` states the limit (job, not model; not proof of AI pixels). Stripped on removal (the PNG save whitelist keeps only `STANDARD_METADATA_KEYS`, so `hf-job-id` and the `AIGC` chunk are both dropped). The exact writer is not authoritatively documented (HF Jobs are generic GPU jobs), hence medium not high.
- **No detectable signal on download (correctly reported `unknown`):** **Recraft** (PNG export is a re-encoded design export — strips everything), **Krea hosting FLUX 2** (no imwatermark despite FLUX — the host omits the encoder, same as Stability's hosted SDXL), and Midjourney (embeds nothing). Lesson: the imwatermark detector only fires on *pristine* output from a pipeline that runs the encoder (diffusers default, official BFL), not from re-hosts (Krea/Stability) or re-encoded exports (Recraft/Canva).
- **Invisible but NOT locally detectable (proprietary, API/oracle only — same wall as SynthID):** Amazon Titan Image Generator + Nova Canvas (Bedrock `DetectGeneratedContent` API), Kakao (new SynthID image adopter, May 2026), NVIDIA Cosmos (SynthID video). No local detector possible; treat like SynthID.
- **C2PA 2.4 "Durable Content Credentials" (April 2026; verified against the spec) raise the bar for metadata stripping.** 2.4 defines soft bindings (an invisible watermark or a content fingerprint) plus a server-side manifest repository and a new `c2pa.repository-receipt` assertion. Per the spec: "if a C2PA manifest is removed from an asset, but a copy of that manifest remains in a provenance store elsewhere, the manifest and asset may be matched using available soft bindings." So our local `metadata --remove` deletes the *embedded* manifest, but a fingerprint/watermark soft binding can still re-link the image to its manifest in a repository server-side. Stripping the file is becoming necessary-but-not-sufficient against durable provenance. (Our parsers target the stable embedded-manifest format documented in C2PA 2.1 §11; that format is unchanged in 2.4 -- the new pieces are repository/soft-binding infra, not the on-file box layout, so no parser change is implied.) Spec: https://spec.c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/2.4/specs/C2PA_Specification.html We now READ the soft-binding `alg` (`C2PA_SOFT_BINDINGS` / `soft_binding_vendors_in`) to name the forensic-watermark vendor, and locally DECODE the one open scheme, Adobe TrustMark (`trustmark_detector`); the rest (Digimarc/Imatag/Steg.AI/...) stay name-only (proprietary decoders).
- **Built 2026-05-26 (this batch):** soft-binding `alg` vendor detection; IPTC Photo Metadata 2025.1 AI-disclosure fields (`AISystemUsed` etc.); **video C2PA metadata** detect + strip for MP4/MOV/M4V (free — `isobmff.py` is format-agnostic, MP4 is ISOBMFF); Adobe TrustMark open decoder. NOT done (out of cheap reach, per the feasibility review): visible video-logo removal (needs a video frame pipeline) and audio (SynthID/ElevenLabs/Resemble/Suno all oracle-only or unmarked).

**Box detection window — now handled (v0.6.8):** detection no longer relies on a fixed first-MB read. `metadata.scan_head(path, size)` reads the first `size` bytes and, for ISOBMFF, appends the payloads of late provenance boxes found by `isobmff.scan_c2pa_region` (a file-seeking top-level box walker that skips past `mdat` by size without reading it), so a C2PA/AIGC/IPTC manifest placed AFTER a large `mdat` in a streaming/non-faststart MP4 is now caught. Every C2PA/marker byte scan (`has_ai_metadata`, `aigc_label`, `iptc_ai_system`, `synthid_source`, `exif_generator` XMP, `get_ai_metadata` soft-binding, and `identify`) goes through `scan_head`; it is behavior-neutral for non-ISOBMFF inputs (exactly `f.read(size)`).

**Meta-box XMP removal — now handled (v0.6.9):** an AI-label XMP packet stored as a meta-box `mime` item (HEIF/AVIF; out of reach of the top-level box stripper) is blanked in place by `isobmff.blank_ai_xmp_packets` — it locates the packet by its `<?xpacket begin … end?>` delimiters and, if it carries an AI marker (`_AI_LABEL_MARKERS`), overwrites it with spaces of the SAME length, so box sizes / `iloc` offsets stay valid and the coded image is untouched (selective: plain non-AI XMP is left alone, mirroring the top-level uuid logic). Wired into `remove_ai_metadata`'s ISOBMFF branch after `strip_c2pa_boxes`. The remaining gap is an `Exif` meta-box *item* (rare; the AI labels are XMP) — still needs `iinf`/`iloc` surgery or exiftool.
- **Regulatory driver (context, not a code change):** AI-content labeling mandates are expanding, which pushes more generators toward exactly the C2PA + watermark signals we read. The full per-jurisdiction table lives in README "## Legal" -- keep it there, not duplicated here. Newly added + primary-source verified 2026-05-26: **EU AI Act Article 50** machine-readable marking applicable **2026-08-02** (verified against the article text); **South Korea AI Framework Act Art. 31(3)** in force since **22 January 2026** (verified via Kim & Chang + FPF/Korea Times; Enforcement Decree accepts an invisible-watermark label); **California AB 853** (amends the CA AI Transparency Act) latent-disclosure duty operative **2026-08-02**, requiring a disclosure "permanent or extraordinarily difficult to remove" (verified against the leginfo bill text -- this is the exact disclosure our tool strips); **India IT Amendment Rules 2026** in force **2026-02-20** (verified via Chambers), which prominently-label + permanent-provenance-id all synthetic media AND **expressly prohibit removing/suppressing the label or metadata** -- the first major all-content removal ban outside China.

**Removal liability (README "## Legal" disclaimer):** the tool is lawful general-purpose software; liability sits with the remover and is intent-gated -- downstream acts (fraud/deception/IP), plus US DMCA 17 USC 1202 (removing copyright-management info to conceal infringement), plus the removal-as-such bans in China + India. When extending the README table, verify each date/article against the statute/bill text before committing, not against search summaries.

## Visible AI-generation marks + detection methods (deep-research 2026-07-10, adversarially verified)

**Google Gemini visible "sparkle" -- tier-dependent, and spec-undocumented by Google.** Google primary sources (the Nano Banana Pro blog and the gemini.google image-generation page, both WebFetch-verified) confirm Gemini images carry BOTH the invisible SynthID (on ALL Google-AI media) AND a visible sparkle, but the visible mark is **tier-gated**: applied for FREE and Google AI **Pro** users, and **REMOVED** for Google AI **Ultra** subscribers, inside **Google AI Studio**, and on **API / dev** output. So a Google-C2PA image with NO visible sparkle is expected (Ultra / API), not evidence it is clean -- this reinforces the `identify` "no visible mark != clean" rule. The ONLY official verifier is the SynthID flow (upload to the Gemini app, ask if it is AI-generated), which reads the INVISIBLE mark; there is **no official visible-sparkle detector**, and Google publishes **no** glyph geometry / size / opacity / color / locale / placement spec. So our capture-based sparkle template is the only source of truth and cannot be validated against a vendor spec -- keep reverse-engineering from real captures (do not expect a published spec).

**The faint-visible-mark precision/recall wall is fundamental, not a heuristic artifact.** The visible-watermark-detection literature has moved to LEARNED segmentation / object-detection (WDNet WACV'21 arXiv:2012.07616; SLBR ACM MM'21, open code+weights; the PRCV'18 large-scale detector; Su et al. survey 2025), but three verified findings bound what a learned detector actually buys: (1) a claim that a confidence threshold "cleanly separates" true from false matches even with a learned CNN front-end was **REFUTED** in verification (arXiv:1705.08593) -- the precision/recall wall persists even with learned features. (2) Learned detectors need a LARGE, pattern-diverse labeled dataset trained on synthetic composites (PRCV'18: 60k images / 80 watermark classes; CLWD: 60k / 160 marks), and off-distribution degradation is a documented real axis (models trained on limited-pattern LVW transfer worse; diversity of training patterns drives generalization). (3) Inference is cheap (WDNet ~8 ms at 256x256) -- the cost is the data pipeline, not runtime. Net: a learned detector shifts the frontier but does NOT remove the wall; for a SINGLE mark the cheapest next step is a small patch classifier (real-sparkle vs false-positive) on top of the existing NCC localizer, not a full segmentation model. SLBR is a ready baseline. The current NCC + false-positive gate (core-ring brightness margin + gradient-NCC crispness + white-core saturation) is a sound operating point, and the residual miss is the information-theoretic wall the literature confirms.

**Visible-mark landscape beyond the registry.** Meta stamps a visible "Imagined with AI" mark (bottom-LEFT, a small symbol) on its OWN Meta AI / "Imagine" output; for third-party images it relies on C2PA / IPTC, not a visible mark. Samsung Galaxy AI additionally uses a **four-star icon** variant in a corner alongside the localized text wordmark `samsung_engine` calibrates (only the Italian text variant is covered) -- the icon is a distinct, uncovered variant. Every source agrees visible + metadata marks are trivially removable (crop / screenshot, ~2 s), which is the tool's premise.

**Regulatory driver -- China GB 45438-2025 is the strongest VISIBLE-mark mandate.** The CAC / TC260 "Measures for Labeling AI-Generated Synthesized Content" (issued March 2025, **effective 2025-09-01**, technical standard **GB 45438-2025**, building on the TC260 Aug-2023 practice guide) MANDATE a **visible** label for AI images -- a visible textual mark whose height must be **>= 5% of the image's shortest side** -- plus the metadata (implicit) label. So every major Chinese platform now ships visible "AI生成"-style text marks (we cover Doubao / Jimeng; expect more CJK-text marks under this driver). By contrast EU AI Act Article 50 mandates only the MACHINE-READABLE mark (enforceable 2026-08-02, grace to 2026-12-02); a visible label is proposed and modality-specific (visible for images) but is NOT a hard "fixed icon" mandate -- a claim that Art 50 requires a clearly-visible fixed icon for images was refuted in verification. Primary-source dates verified against the article/standard text, not search summaries.
