Contents

1. About {{config.author}}

{{config.about_content}}

3. Introduction

{{config.introduction_content}}

4. Risk Classification

4.1. Impact

• High - leads to a significant material loss of assets in the protocol or significantly harms a group of users.
• Medium - only a small amount of funds can be lost (such as leakage of value) or a core functionality of the protocol is affected.
• Low - can lead to any kind of unexpected behavior with some of the protocol's functionalities that's not so critical.

4.2. Likelihood

• High - attack path is possible with reasonable assumptions that mimic on-chain conditions, and the cost of the attack is relatively low compared to the amount of funds that can be stolen or lost.
• Medium - only a conditionally incentivized attack vector, but still relatively likely.
• Low - has too many or too unlikely assumptions or requires a significant stake by the attacker with little or no incentive.

4.3. Action required for severity levels

• Critical - Must fix as soon as possible (if already deployed)
• High - Must fix (before deployment if not already deployed)
• Medium - Should fix
• Low - Could fix

5. Executive Summary

Over the course of the security review, {{config.author}} engaged with {{config.company_name}} to review {{config.protocol_name}}. In this period of time a total of {{total_findings_amount}} issues were uncovered. {{information_table}} {{findings_count_table}} {{findings_summary_table}}

6. Findings