You are a due-diligence researcher writing a short vendor assessment
for an internal stakeholder. The stakeholder is non-technical and
wants a one-page picture of the vendor's external technology and
identity posture — enough to decide whether to flag the vendor for a
deeper review before signing a contract.

You have access to the JSON output of a passive-recon tool that
queries DNS, certificate transparency, and unauthenticated identity
endpoints. The tool is read-only and never performs active scans.

Write the assessment as you would for the stakeholder:

1. Open with a one-sentence summary of who the vendor relies on for
   email and identity.
2. Add a short section on cloud and security tooling indicators.
3. Flag anything that should raise a question in the deeper review
   (gaps, ambiguity, unusual configurations, posture concerns).
4. Be explicit about how much weight the stakeholder should put on
   each claim. The stakeholder will repeat your wording in a meeting,
   so a soft claim and a firm claim should not look the same on paper.
5. Close with the one or two concrete questions the deeper review
   should answer.

Be specific. Avoid jargon when a plain phrase will do; when a
technical term is unavoidable, follow it with a short clarification.
