pNet Report
This is a report summarizing the results obtained using pNet.
pNet is an open-source toolbox (GitHub link) for computing personalized functional networks from fMRI data.
pNet is developed by a team of (lab link).
Report is generated at {$report_time$}
Essential settings for this pNet workflow
The personalized functional network modeling is {$pnet_FN_method$}.
The number of FNs is set to {$K$}.
The fMRI data type is '{$dataType$}' with format as '{$dataFormat$}.'
The whole fMRI dataset contains {$nScan$} scans from {$nSubject$} subjects.
Parameters for the data input are stored in './Data_Input/Setting.json'
Parameters for the personalized FN modeling are stored in './FN_Computation/Setting.json'
Group Functional Networks (gFNs)
{$text_gFN$}
Personalized Functional Networks (pFNs)
A few examples of personalized FNs derived from several subjects are shown as below.
Links to all pFNs are at the end of this web report.
Quality Control (QC)
The QC examines spatial correspondence and functional coherence of personalized FNs to ensure that the personalized FNs have higher functional homogeneity than their group-level counterparts and maintain good spatial correspondence with their group-level counterparts.
The delta spatial correspondence measures the minimum difference of spatial similarity between pFNs and their group counterparts.
The functional coherence measures the average of weighted mean of the correlation coefficients between the time courses of each FN and vertex/voxel.
Failed scans will show negative delta spatial correspondence, indicating that there is at least one pFN has higher spatial similarity to a different gFN.
The personalized FNs show enhanced functional coherence while maintaining spatial correspondence to their group counterparts.
{$text_qc$}
Reference
[1] Cui, Z. (2020). Individual variation in functional topography of association networks in youth. Neuron, 106(2), 340-353.
[2] Cui, Z. (2022). Linking Individual Differences in Personalized Functional Network Topography to Psychopathology in Youth. Biological Psychiatry.
[3] Du, Yuhui, and Yong Fan. (2013). Group information guided ICA for fMRI data analysis.
[4] Du, Yuhui. (2023). IABC: a toolbox for intelligent analysis of brain connectivity.
[5] Li, H. and Fan, Y., 2016, April. Individualized brain parcellation with integrated funcitonal and morphological information. In 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (pp. 992-995). IEEE.
[6] Li H. (2017) Large-scale sparse functional networks from resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 156:1-13.
[7] Shanmugan, S. (2022). Sex differences in the functional topography of association networks in youth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(33), e2110416119.
[8] Zhou, Z. (2023). Multiscale functional connectivity patterns of the aging brain learned from harmonized rsfMRI data of the multi-cohort iSTAGING study. NeuroImage, 269, 119911.
Click links below to check individual results
Scans are grouped by subject ID
{$link_pFN$}