Metadata-Version: 2.4
Name: rustcam
Version: 0.0.4
Classifier: Development Status :: 4 - Beta
Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License
Classifier: Operating System :: Microsoft :: Windows
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.9
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.10
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.11
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.12
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3.13
Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: Implementation :: CPython
Classifier: Programming Language :: Rust
Classifier: Topic :: Multimedia :: Graphics :: Capture :: Screen Capture
Requires-Dist: numpy>=1.21
Summary: Rust-backed Windows DXGI Desktop Duplication API screen capture for Python.
Keywords: screen-capture,dda,dxgi,windows,directx,screenshot,bettercam
Author: zen-ham
License: MIT
Requires-Python: >=3.9
Description-Content-Type: text/markdown; charset=UTF-8; variant=GFM
Project-URL: Homepage, https://github.com/zen-ham/rustcam
Project-URL: Issues, https://github.com/zen-ham/rustcam/issues
Project-URL: Repository, https://github.com/zen-ham/rustcam

`rustcam`
===

[![PyPI](https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/rustcam?logo=pypi&color=blue)](https://pypi.org/project/rustcam/) [![Downloads](https://static.pepy.tech/badge/rustcam)](https://pypi.org/project/rustcam/) [![GitHub](https://img.shields.io/badge/GitHub-rustcam-blue?logo=github)](https://github.com/zen-ham/rustcam) [![stars](https://img.shields.io/github/stars/zen-ham/rustcam?style=social)](https://github.com/zen-ham/rustcam)

Fast DXGI Desktop Duplication screen capture for Windows, in Rust.

I made this because every "fast" screen capture package on PyPI runs its hot loop in Python. `bettercam` is a fork of `dxcam`, `dxcam` calls `AcquireNextFrame` through `comtypes` on every frame under the GIL, and the GDI-based ones (`mss`, `PIL.ImageGrab`) aren't even using DDA. They all top out around 130-140 fps on a 180 Hz monitor for the same reason: per-frame Python overhead misses compositor ticks. rustcam runs the whole `AcquireNextFrame` -> `CopyResource` -> `Map` -> memcpy cycle in native Rust with the GIL released, so it actually rides the refresh rate.

```py
import rustcam

cap = rustcam.Capturer(output=0, cursor=True)
frame = cap.grab()        # numpy ndarray (H, W, 4) BGRA, or None on timeout
```

Prebuilt Windows wheels for Python 3.9 through 3.13 (a single abi3 wheel that covers them all). `pip install rustcam` never compiles anything.

Install
---

```
pip install rustcam
```

Windows only. DDA is the `IDXGIOutputDuplication` interface, which is Win8+. There is no Linux or macOS equivalent. If you need cross-platform capture, look at `mss` (slower, GDI-based).

Performance
---

![benchmark](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zen-ham/rustcam/master/docs/benchmark.png)

`benches/flip_demo_bench.py` runs each library against two stimuli, on a 1920x1080 / 180 Hz monitor backed by a GTX 1660 Ti:

- **`flip_demo`** is a native Rust D3D11 app from the zentape project. It presents a flip-model swapchain with a unique full-screen colour every refresh, so the source emits ~180 unique fps and any honest capturer should be able to read at panel rate. This is the *controlled* benchmark.
- **`mover.py`** is a borderless PyQt window that orbits across the screen continuously. This is the *realistic* benchmark, what users actually capture, dragging a window around or recording a moving UI.

The metric is **unique frames per second**, measured by md5-hashing a sparse sample of each returned frame and counting distinct hashes. Container fps lies; a library can return the same buffer over and over and look fast. Unique fps cant be faked.

| capturer | flip_demo (valid fps) | mover.py (valid fps) | mover.py (% changed) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **rustcam grab(cursor=False)** | ~180 | **~177** | **99 %** |
| rustcam grab(cursor=True) | ~165 | 47 | 91 % |
| rustcam start/get_latest_frame | ~170 | ~170 (in steady state) | 100 % |
| rustcam grab_gpu (sustained) | ~180 | ~180 | 100 % |
| bettercam | ~180 | ~60 | 99 % |
| dxcam | ~170 | ~55 | 62 % |
| mss | ~5 | ~43 | 24 % |

The metric is **valid fps**, ie how many non-None grabs the lib delivers per second. A library that polls fast but returns the same buffer is honest about it: the `%changed` column on mover.py shows how often consecutive returned frames actually differ. Numbers vary 10-15% run-to-run with normal desktop load; this is a representative run.

On the controlled flip-model source (`flip_demo` is a tiny native Rust D3D11 app that presents a unique full-screen colour every refresh), rustcam, bettercam and dxcam all ride the 180 Hz panel rate. DDA is the bottleneck, not the library.

The moment the stimulus is realistic content (`mover.py` is a borderless PyQt window that orbits across the screen), the story flips:

- **rustcam delivers ~177 valid fps**, 99% of consecutive frames are different
- bettercam delivers ~60, dxcam ~55, mss ~43

Thats roughly a 3x gap on the kind of content people actually capture. bettercam still claims "180 fps fastest in the world" in its banner; the flip_demo number agrees, but on real desktop composition the Python per-frame proxy + GIL overhead eats two thirds of the refreshes.

The `cursor=True` cell on mover.py is currently 47 fps. The GDI cursor compositing path (`DrawIconEx` on the GDI-compatible BGRA texture) syncs with the GPU every frame, and that sync costs more when the desktop is also recomposing under it. Use `cursor=False` for the fastest hot path; turn cursor on when you actually need it composited.

Why this is faster
---

Every existing PyPI screen-cap library does the DDA loop FROM PYTHON. They acquire each frame through `comtypes` proxies, allocate a numpy array per call, do format conversion through `cv2.cvtColor` (bettercam pulls OpenCV in just for that), and hold the GIL the whole time. The native rate the OS can give you (one frame per compositor tick) gets eaten by all of that.

rustcam does the entire `AcquireNextFrame` -> `CopyResource` -> `Map` -> RowPitch-aware memcpy in a single Rust function call, releases the GIL around it, and reuses the same BGRA + staging textures across calls. Format conversion (BGR / RGB / RGBA / grayscale) is a tight scalar Rust loop that LLVM auto-vectorizes, no OpenCV dependency. Theres nothing clever, its just doing the same DXGI calls bettercam does without the per-frame Python overhead.

Additions vs bettercam:
- proper cursor compositing via `IDXGISurface1::GetDC` + `DrawIconEx(DI_NORMAL)`, which handles the inverting I-beam over text correctly (DrawIconEx does mask + XOR blending natively)
- a `region` argument that crops on the way out of the staging-texture map (no extra alloc)
- five output formats (`bgra`/`bgr`/`rgba`/`rgb`/`gray`) with no `cv2` dependency
- a paced CFR `frames(fps=N)` iterator that yields `(ndarray, slot_wallclock_ts)` for video recording, slot-clock pacing in native Rust, no Python-side timer drift
- a `start()/stop()/get_latest_frame()` background-thread mode (bettercam-parity API), Rust capture loop, mailbox, blocking pull
- `grab_gpu()` returns a `GpuTexture` wrapping a shared NT handle around a BGRA D3D11 texture, zero CPU readback, downstream code (CUDA, Vulkan, custom D3D11) can open the handle on its own device
- a context manager so `with rustcam.Capturer(...) as cap:` releases COM state on exit
- structured exceptions (`AccessLost`, `DeviceError`, `DuplicationError`, `CaptureTimeout`, `CaptureError`) carrying the underlying HRESULT

API
---

```py
import rustcam

cap = rustcam.Capturer(
    output=0,            # IDXGIOutput index, 0 = primary on single-GPU systems
    cursor=True,         # composite the OS cursor into each captured frame
    region=None,         # persistent (l, t, r, b) crop; None = full output
    device=0,            # IDXGIAdapter index, 0 = first adapter
)

# state
cap.width, cap.height            # output resolution
cap.region                       # current persistent region (full if None)
cap.output_idx, cap.device_idx
cap.cursor, cap.format, cap.rotation
cap.is_capturing                 # True between start() and stop(), or during frames() iteration

# one-shot capture
frame = cap.grab(
    timeout_ms=1000,                  # wait up to this long; 0 = poll
    fmt="bgra",                       # bgra / bgr / rgba / rgb / gray
    region=None,                      # per-call crop, doesn't mutate cap.region
)
# returns numpy ndarray (H, W, C) uint8, or None on DXGI_ERROR_WAIT_TIMEOUT

# background capture (bettercam-parity)
cap.start(target_fps=60, video_mode=True)
frame = cap.get_latest_frame(timeout_ms=500)   # blocks until new frame; raises CaptureTimeout on deadline
cap.stop()

# paced CFR stream — yields (ndarray, slot_wallclock_seconds), exact 1/fps spacing
for frame, ts in cap.frames(fps=60, fmt="bgr"):
    encoder.write(frame, pts=ts)
    if ts > 10.0:
        break

# zero-copy GPU handle (consumer opens with OpenSharedResource1 on its own D3D11 device)
tex = cap.grab_gpu(timeout_ms=200)
if tex is not None:
    print(tex.width, tex.height, hex(tex.shared_handle), tex.luid)
    tex.close()    # release the duplicated NT handle

# context manager
with rustcam.Capturer(output=0) as cap:
    frame = cap.grab()

# module helpers
rustcam.list_outputs()               # list of dicts (one per output across all adapters)
rustcam.device_info()                # bettercam-style multi-line string
rustcam.output_info()                # same
```

Exceptions (all subclasses of `rustcam.CaptureError`):

- `CaptureError` - base; catches every DXGI-origin failure
- `DeviceError` - device removed / reset
- `DuplicationError` - DuplicateOutput failed (often: another process already capturing this output)
- `AccessLost` - exclusive fullscreen took over the display; rustcam retries duplication once internally
- `CaptureTimeout` - raised by the streaming APIs (`get_latest_frame`, `frames`) when their deadline expires; `grab()` returns None on timeout instead

Each carries a `.hresult` attribute with the raw HRESULT when relevant.

Compatibility notes
---

A `Capturer` is bound to the OS thread that created it. Use one per thread. The Rust extension is `#[pyclass(unsendable)]`, so passing a Capturer between threads raises a `RuntimeError`.

`grab()`, `start()`, `frames()`, and `grab_gpu()` are mutually exclusive while a long-running operation is active. While the Capturer is in background mode (`start()`) or iterating frames, calling `grab()` or `grab_gpu()` raises `RuntimeError`. Call `stop()` (or close the `frames()` iterator) first.

The first DDA frame after construction is sometimes black. rustcam discards two warmup frames internally so the first user-visible `grab()` returns real content.

DDA cant see HDCP-protected content (Netflix, Disney+, etc) - that's the DRM working as designed, and you get a black texture. UWP apps with the protected-content flag set behave the same way. There is no way around this without going through different APIs (WGC + ContentDeliveryManager) which are out of scope here.

`grab_gpu()` returns a shared NT handle. The consumer opens it on its own D3D11 device via `OpenSharedResource1`. v0.0.3 ships without a strict keyed-mutex protocol on the shared texture; the consumer should copy the texture into its own resource before issuing GPU work that depends on the content. A future release will add an opt-in strict mode.

Future work
---

- Optional strict keyed-mutex mode for `grab_gpu()` so a single-writer single-reader pipeline can rely on producer/consumer ordering.
- WGC (Windows.Graphics.Capture) backend as a fallback for per-window capture and HDR sources where DDA can't help.
- 10-bit / HDR backbuffer support.
- ARM64 Windows wheels.

License
---

MIT. See `LICENSE`.

