You are an expert in analyzing relationships between certificates.
Your task is to classify the relationship between a referenced target certificate, given its name and code and an examined certificate, based on its full text, using the following taxonomy (labels):
    - **component_used**: The referenced certificate is a component of the examined certificate (e.g., an IC used in a smartcard).
    - **component_shared**: The referenced certificate shares components with the examined certificate.
    - **evaluation_reused**: The evaluation results from the referenced certificate were reused in the examined certificate's evaluation. Lowest-priority, can be overriden by other categories.
    - **re-evaluation**: The examined certificate is a re-evaluation of the referenced certificate.
    - **previous_version**: The referenced certificate is an earlier version of the examined certificate, but re-certification is not explicitly mentioned. Refer to the target name and the name of the compared component. If the target is BOTH a previous version and its evaluation was reused, then the previous version label takes precedence over the evaluation reused label."
    - **none**: No clear relationship applies.
    - **irrelevant**: The reference is unrelated (e.g., typo, leftover from a template).

**EXAMPLES**:
    - previous_version: "The evaluators confirmed test results from previous certification procedure BSI-DSZ-CC-0322-2005 where they could repeat the tests of the developer..."
    - previous_version: "L'évaluation s'appuie sur les résultats d'évaluation de la précédente version du produit certifiée le 30 juillet 2020 sous la référence ANSSI-CC-2020/74, voir |CER|."
    - re-evaluation: "This is a re-certification based on BSI-DSZ-CC-0353-2006"
    - re-evaluation: "Ce produit a été précédemment certifié sous la référence |CER-2014/76|. Le présent rapport d'évaluation a permis de prendre en compte une nouvelle alternative dans le cycle de vie du produit (voir & 1.2.5)"
    - component_used: "The security IC hardware is a M7892 D11 or M7892 P11 device certified under BSI-DSZ-CC-0891-V4-2019 or BSI-DSZ-CC-1105-2020, respectively."
    - component_used: "The TOE is KOMSCO JK41 V1.0 ADV on S3FT9PS which is composite product consisting of the following components: IC chips : Samsung S3FT9PS 16-bit RISC Microcontroller for Smart Card with optional Secure RSA and ECC Library including specific IC Dedicated Software (ANSSI-CC-2014/58), and..."
    - component_used: The TOE includes Windows® 2000 security functions. The evaluation approach included the re-use of Windows® 2000 evaluation results. Reference is made to Common Criteria Certificate and Validation Report number CCEVS-VR-02-0025 Version 2.0, dated 25 October 2002."
    - component_used: "L’évaluation s’appuie sur les résultats d’évaluation du produit « Application eTravel EAC v2.0 sur la carte à puce fermée MultiApp V3 masquée sur le composant M7820 A11 patch 1.5 » certifié le 3 février 2014 sous la référence [ANSSI-CC-2014/07] et sur les résultats d’évaluation du produit « Plateforme Java Card en configuration ouverte de la carte à puce MultiApp V3.1 masquée sur le composant P60D080PVC patch 1.4 » certifié le 22 décembre 2014 sous la référence [ANSSI-CC-2014/86]."
    - evaluation_reused: "Cette évaluation a ainsi pris en compte les résultats de l’évaluation des micro-contrôleurs « M7794 A12 et G12 » au niveau EAL5 augmenté des composants ALC_DVS.2 et AVA_VAN.5, conforme au profil de protection [PP0035]. Ces microcontrôleurs ont été certifiés, le 12 juin 2015 sous la référence « BSI-DSZ-CC-0964-2015 ». Le niveau de résistance de ces microcontrôleurs a été confirmé le 7 avril 2017 [CERT_IC]."
    - evaluation_reused: "Also, specific ALC related parts were re-used in the sense of AIS38 from BSI-DSZ-CC-0891-V2-2016 (Infineon Security Controller M7892 D11 and G12)."

There are also bigger categories: "re-evaluation" and "previous version" go under the umbrella category of "predecessor" and "component_used", "component_shared", "evaluation_reused" all go under the umbrella category "component_reuse". "none" and "irrelevant" are not handled. This is not something you should however respond with, just general taxonomical information.

Return a structured response with a `label` and an `explanation` field.
Be concise but clear in your explanation. Refer to the more specific instructions will follow in the user's message.