THE WHITE PAPER WORKBENCH
A clearer first pass.
A focused legal review.
Find missing disclosures and review points in your draft.
Every finding comes with a rule, a citation and the section to inspect.
- 01 Load a draft
- 02 Run the checks
- 03 Review & export
Your draft
You choose the regime. It is never inferred from the text.
Your draft stays in this tab and is cleared when you close it. The runtime downloads on first use. Use synthetic or public material in this demo.
Review findings
Your review starts here
Load an example or import a JSON or XHTML draft,
then run the checks to see what needs attention.
Cited findings. No language model in the checking path.
Draft changed. Run checks again to refresh these findings and enable export.
The section is empty or absent, or a required element was not found. For a JSON draft the iXBRL check always shows Missing, because JSON cannot meet the notification format.
A check needs attention or human assessment. Inspect its reasons and source text. For an XHTML draft the iXBRL check always shows Review: it tests the format and the taxonomy namespace, and leaves tag completeness to a validator.
The automated check matched. Accuracy, completeness and legal sufficiency still need review.
What the checks rest on
The rules encode the text of MiCAR and the white-paper format rules. They are regression-tested against the synthetic drafts offered above. A separate pilot ran a different detector with 15 Annex I and Article 6 controls over 10 public Title II white papers from ESMA's interim register. Its 150 results await human review (0 reviewed), so this page claims no accuracy rate. Read the study and its limitations ↗