Commit 78a4b8e
posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
commit f90fff1 upstream.
If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().
If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.
Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.
This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens@google.com>
Fixes: 0bdd2ed ("sched: run_posix_cpu_timers: Don't check ->exit_state, use lock_task_sighand()")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>1 parent 0fee1b2 commit 78a4b8e
1 file changed
Lines changed: 9 additions & 0 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1119 | 1119 | | |
1120 | 1120 | | |
1121 | 1121 | | |
| 1122 | + | |
| 1123 | + | |
| 1124 | + | |
| 1125 | + | |
| 1126 | + | |
| 1127 | + | |
| 1128 | + | |
| 1129 | + | |
| 1130 | + | |
1122 | 1131 | | |
1123 | 1132 | | |
1124 | 1133 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments