Contributing

Edge corrections are the highest-value contribution

Spotted a wrong edge? A RELATES_TO that should be REQUIRES? A missing concept in Riva or Isaac?

The graph gets more useful with every fix. Open an issue or PR at github.com/Yarmoluk/ckg-nvidia-ai.

Review format

When submitting an edge correction, include:

• Concept: the node label (exact)
• Domain: the domain slug
• Current edge: Source --EDGE_TYPE--> Target
• Proposed edge: Source --EDGE_TYPE--> Target
• Source: NVIDIA docs URL or reference that supports the change
• Confidence: high / null / low

What counts as a correction

• A RELATES_TO that is actually a hard prerequisite (REQUIRES)
• A REQUIRES edge that is optional (ENABLES)
• A missing node that is documented in NVIDIA's official docs
• A node label that doesn't match NVIDIA's canonical naming
• A confidence state that is too high given the evidence

What doesn't need a PR

• Typos in labels → open an issue
• Missing domains entirely → open an issue with the domain name and docs URL
• Questions about edge semantics → open a discussion

See CONTRIBUTING.md in the repo for the full format.