{% extends "base.html" %} {% block content %} {% if alert_err %}
| {{ "Seller" if taking_side == "buy" else "Buyer" }} | {{ order.maker_lapse_addr }} |
| Price | {{ fmt_price(order.price_stroops_per_lapse) }} XLM per LAPSE |
| Available | {{ fmt_lapse_dp(remaining, 4) }} |
| Smallest fill | {{ fmt_lapse_dp(order.min_fill, 4) }} |
| Track record |
{% if trust.abandoned_count %}
{{ fmt_score(trust.score) }} - took a payment and has not reciprocated
As of the last check, a payment they owed on a past trade still
has not arrived. That is re-checked against the chain every time
their standing is looked at, not assumed forever: if it turns
out they were simply offline and it eventually shows up, this
clears on its own. Until then you can still deal with them, but
the steps will be as small as this node allows.
{% else %}
{{ fmt_score(trust.score) }}
{%- if trust.completed_count %}
({{ trust.completed_count }} completed trade{{ '' if trust.completed_count == 1 else 's' }})
{%- endif %}
{% if trust.completed_count %}
Their address has been on the chain a while and holds a balance,
which is what makes that record worth something: a fresh address
with no funds counts for nothing here however long its history
claims to be.
{% elif trust.score > 0 %}
No completed trades yet, but their address's age and balance
already give it some standing on their own - what it would
forfeit by walking away, not a track record.
{% else %}
No history with this node, and their address's age and/or
balance do not yet clear the floor this score is built from
(see the Trades page for how yours compares). Normal for a
new market; it only means the trade is delivered in smaller
pieces.
{% endif %}
For comparison, your own standing is currently
{{ fmt_score(my_standing.score) }}.
{% endif %}
{% if trust.network_completed_count or trust.network_abandoned_count %}
{% if trust.network_abandoned_count %}
Other traders have independently reported {{ trust.network_abandoned_count }}
non-reciprocation{{ '' if trust.network_abandoned_count == 1 else 's' }} against
this address that this node checked and confirmed on chain itself.
{% endif %}
{% if trust.network_completed_count %}
{{ trust.network_completed_count }} of the completed trade{{ '' if trust.network_completed_count == 1 else 's' }}
above {{ 'was' if trust.network_completed_count == 1 else 'were' }} reported by other
traders, not this node, and independently re-checked against the chain before counting.
{% endif %}
{% endif %}
|
The seller's Stellar address has no account behind it yet, so a plain payment cannot reach it; your first step creates the account instead, which needs at least {{ account_min_xlm }} XLM regardless of what that step was scheduled for. This only ever happens once, on the very first payment to them, and costs at most the gap between the scheduled amount and that minimum.
This seller's own open sell orders, added together, currently ask for more LAPSE than their own address actually holds. That does not put anything you send at risk (a fill this maker cannot actually fund is refused before you pay, not after), but a request against this order may simply come back declined.
Filling all of this would mean putting more at stake in a single step than either side's own trust of the other currently allows. The most this trade will do at the moment is {{ fmt_lapse_dp(max_safe_lapse, 4) }}.
You can take that much now. There is no setting to raise this by hand: it is computed from both addresses' own trading history, not chosen by either side, so trading with them successfully is what raises it.