Step Ledger
| Step | Name | Status | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Init template | Done | |
| 02 | Frame + Spec quality | Done | |
| 03 | Stories / rules / AC | Blocked | |
| 04 | Self-check | Todo |
Artifact Relationships
How artifacts in this session connect to each other
graph LR
business-analysis["Business Analysis"] --> user-flow["User Flow"]
business-analysis["Business Analysis"] --> prd["PRD"]
user-flow["User Flow"] --> prd["PRD"]
Business Analysis
Source: BUSINESS_ANALYSIS.md
Spec Quality Review
| Finding | Evidence | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Print count editable on all tabs | Only 現品票 has it | Fail |
| Upload size limit defined | Spec says 10MB | Pass |
| API timeout handling | Not specified | Unknown |
Problem Statement
Testers cannot efficiently review BA artifacts because they are written in markdown format that is not visual or accessible to non-technical stakeholders.
The current workflow requires testers to parse complex markdown tables and mermaid diagrams manually, leading to missed requirements and inconsistent test coverage.
User Flow Diagram
graph TD
A[BA writes markdown] --> B[Parser processes file]
B --> C[Renderer generates HTML]
C --> D[Tester reviews in browser]
D --> E{Feedback?}
E -->|Yes| A
E -->|No| F[Sign off]
User Flow
Source: USER_FLOW.md
Stakeholders
| Actor | Goal | Pain Point | Authority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business Analyst | Document requirements clearly | Testers don't read markdown | High |
| Tester | Review specs efficiently | Markdown not visual | Medium |
| Product Manager | Ensure quality delivery | Can't review technical docs | High |
Product Requirements
Source: PRD.md
Functional Requirements
Derived from Business Analysis and User Flow artifacts.
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR-001 | System shall parse markdown files | High | Done |
| FR-002 | System shall render HTML with design system | High | Done |
| FR-003 | System shall support mermaid diagrams | Medium | In Progress |
| FR-004 | System shall export to PDF | Low | Todo |