# schema-only directives with no corresponding MJCF element to implement (mojo's
# `mjcf.py` deliberately doesn't implement <default>/<custom> classes; the rest are
# RST/compiler-internal constructs with no user-facing element of their own)
unimplemented:custom
unimplemented:default
unimplemented:element
unimplemented:numeric
unimplemented:replicate
unimplemented:text
unimplemented:tuple

# `composite` (the pre-flexcomp deformable element) is deprecated upstream -- compiling
# `<composite type="grid" .../>` now errors with 'The "grid" composite type is
# deprecated. Please use "flex" instead.' Not worth chasing a typing nuance (schema
# types `initial` as a bare `string`, mojo as a `CompositeInitial` enum) on an element
# headed for removal.
default_mismatch:composite.initial

# schema shows an explicit literal default ({1}) for these, but mojo's field is `None`
# (omit the attribute). Confirmed equivalent, not a bug: the compiler applies that exact
# default when the attribute is absent, so omission and the literal default produce the
# same effective model. Same reasoning as the already-ignored `general`/`plugin`
# `gainprm`/`biasprm`/`user` siblings in mjcf_ignore.txt (the RST-tool's ignore file).
default_mismatch:general.dynprm
default_mismatch:plugin.dynprm
