controllable_elements_matrix:
  description: "Review controllable element mappings and support-status claims for judgment-based accuracy."
  match:
    include:
      - "controllable-elements.md"
  review:
    strategy: individual
    instructions: |
      Review doc/controllable-elements.md for judgment-based mapping accuracy.
      This rule provides judgment-based review coverage for OFTR-007.1,
      OFTR-007.2, and OFTR-007.3 concerns that cannot be validated
      deterministically by the controllable_elements_matrix DeepSchema.

      Deterministic facts such as table shape, one row per defined term, allowed
      status values, and status definition presence are handled by the
      controllable_elements_matrix DeepSchema. Do not duplicate those exact
      checks here.

      Check the following judgment-based concerns:
      1. Pi mechanism descriptions accurately reflect pi terminology and native
         behavior.
      2. Non-pi mappings are clearly framed as roadmap/experimental unless a
         supported adapter exists.
      3. Support status claims do not overstate tested Outfitter behavior.
      4. Defined controllable elements are meaningful product-boundary concepts,
         not implementation-only details.

      Output Format:
      - PASS: Mappings and support-status claims are accurate and appropriately qualified.
      - FAIL: Issues found. List each inaccurate or overstated mapping/status claim with a line reference.
