illumination op• 資料種類:無 → table(僅由參數決定的運算子 —— 不接受影像或資料輸入)
• 呼叫:import illumdesign; illumdesign.illumination_design(surface='glossy', defect='topographic', slope_deg=10.0, part_size_mm=50.0, camera_height_mm=300.0)(或 opsoptics.get("illumination_design"))
針對某個「表面 / 缺陷」組合給標準照明族排序(`table`)。
> 以下的詳細說明為原文 —— 摘要與標題已翻譯。
Candidates: low-angle ring (dark field, elevation 20°), high-angle ring
(bright field, 70°), the elevation that :func:lighting_sweep finds best,
dome, coaxial and (for `defect="edge"`) backlight. Each is scored by the
simulated Michelson contrast of the stated defect — `topographic`: a
smooth facet of *slope_deg* (a dent wall, a bump); `scatter`: a rough
patch (chipped edge, pit, fine scratch); `pigment`: an albedo patch at
half the surround; `edge`: a silhouette — **multiplied by the uniformity
of the background radiance the camera sees** across the part (min/max over
the centre and the four edge midpoints). That second factor is what
separates a robust choice from a fragile one: coaxial light on a glossy
part gives a huge negative contrast exactly on axis (the glare) and almost
none a few millimetres away, so its background uniformity is poor and it
ranks below a dark field whose background is uniformly dark. Irradiance
uniformity is reported too. The result lists the candidates best first
with their numbers, the `recommended family, and rule_of_thumb` — the textbook
choice (a smooth facet → coaxial bright field on a glossy finish, else the
ring elevation that mirrors it into the camera; scatter → dark field; pigment →
dome; edge → backlight) so a disagreement between simulation and rule is
visible rather than hidden. Two things the numbers say that folklore does
not: a *smooth* 10° facet does not light up in dark field (it mirrors
the low light away from the camera) — the "dark field shows scratches"
rule is about their rough flanks, the `scatter` class here; and for that
class a large coaxial (bright-field) source often scores *higher* than
dark field because the rough patch appears dark on a uniform glare with
contrast near 1 (the wafer / glass inspection practice). The model does
not score sensor saturation or the glare's dependence on part flatness,
which is why the dark-field rule survives on the shop floor; the table
shows both so the choice is made with the numbers.
optics 的每個運算子都先檢驗輸入再計算(不讓任何東西無聲通過):
• 單位寫進參數名 —— _mm / _um / _deg / _mrad。把 mm 和 µm 弄混不會當掉,而是給出「看似合理卻是錯的答案」,所以用命名來防。這裡絕不從數值大小去猜單位。
• **字串一律 ValueError** —— float('50') 會成功,於是未解析的設定值會被當成長度混進來(實測:thin_lens('50', '200') 曾回傳看似合理的 66.667 mm)。bool 也按 True == 1 的隱式提升拒絕。
• **complex / masked array 一律 ValueError(僅接受實數槽位;拒絕無聲丟棄虛部或剝掉遮罩)。所有輸入中的 NaN/Inf 一律 ValueError**。
• 逐項點名拒絕除零及其近親:焦距 0、曲率半徑 0、折射率 <= 0、全不透明光闌(全為 0,正規化變成 0/0)、總和 <= 0 的 PSF、S0 = 0 的 Stokes 向量、物體位於前焦點(像在無窮遠)。
• 只有兩個運算子會回傳非有限值,而且都寫進了契約:depth_of_field 在超焦距以外回傳 far_mm = inf(這正是超焦距的定義),gaussian_beam 在束腰處回傳 wavefront_radius_mm = inf(平面波前的曲率半徑)。兩者都同時回傳一個有限的夥伴(far_is_infinite / curvature_per_mm)。**除此之外的無聲 NaN/Inf 都在內部檢出並 ValueError** ——「float64 溢位了」和「答案是無窮大」是兩種不同的主張,不能拿後者的臉去交付前者。
• 尺寸上限:生成網格受 optics.MAX_GRID(4096)限制,傳入的場/PSF/光闌受 optics.MAX_FIELD_ELEMENTS(2^24),ABCD 元件序列受 optics.MAX_SYSTEM_ELEMENTS(1024),Zernike 受 MAX_ZERNIKE_TERMS(512)/ MAX_ZERNIKE_ORDER(40)/ MAX_ZERNIKE_BASIS(2^25)。以 fail-closed 堵住「小參數引發巨大內部配置」的路徑(實測:n_max=40 × 4096² 需要 108 GB)。
• 物理上不可能的狀態同樣拒絕:偏振度 > 1 的 Stokes 向量、負穿透率、負強度、n-|m| 為奇數等非法 Zernike 指標。
• mv_illumination_practice — 照明の実務知識 — 波長・偏光・点灯方式・外光・安全
• 範例資料目錄(下載 URL / 授權) —— 2-D 用 skimage.data(BSD/公有領域)加合成圖,3-D 給出真實資料源(Stanford/PDS 等)的下載 URL。
• 運算子來歷與參考文獻 —— 該運算子族所依據的研究/方法出處。
• 演算法的正典(作者・年份)與用途見上面的族使用指南。
• illumination_design_demo — py -3.11 examples/illumination_design_demo.py
table 作為輸入)abcd_matrix · wavefront_stats · paraxial_trace · seidel_coefficients · spot_stats · tolerance_analysis · wavefront_from_opd · spot_diagram
illumination)light_source · irradiance_map · illumination_uniformity · defect_contrast · lighting_sweep
*Provenance: illumdesign.py — OPTICS 運算子登記表。本條目由 tools/opdocs.py md 自動產生(請勿手動編輯)。*
© 2026 Kazufumi Furuse — Fullseye operator documentation. Licensed under Apache-2.0.